AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Official Samsung UNxxES8000 Owner's Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official Samsung UNxxES8000 Owner's Thread - Page 378

post #11311 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnoch View Post

Ha wow, you were quick. It would have been fine I guess in general if Sharpness wasn't 50 and DC on High. I am finding some slight differences though, like my Color setting is back to a normal looking setting yet looks the same as when I had it higher before the reset. Very interesting. I'll report back later or tomorrow with the slight changes. Well I'll say right now, the only adjustments to Standard I had to make was Color to 48 instead of 51 and I could get Contrast to 96, instead of 94, before it negatively effected things.

I happened to be responding to something and saw your post on how you were doing the reset, so I was watching to see what you thought. I thought sharpness was set to 20 or 22 now? I can't remember, but before the update I remember the sharpness being set at 50 by default. Also, I think now the Eco sensor has a not so great affect anymore compared to before the update. I would say that its nice that Samsung has calibrated the default settings closer to what they should be at compared to before, right? I mean, all you had to change was the color, sharpness and color space, and that was only by a few points correct? Did you do Movie mode as well? I still have your old settings in so don't remember how the defaults were after the reset.

when I did the THX app calibration, I think I had to keep contrast down to 75-78 because of the Dynamic contrast being on medium. But, I was able to calibrate it with my Dynamic contrast on medium and not get that over saturated look. So long as I set my color space on auto and color temp on standard, with color on 48-49 it came out really good with no crushing. I really think that other users of the 8000 should really tweak to their liking and use your settings as a start off point and only tweak if need to as you said, because my settings on my 65" are not the same as my 60". Different panels and lighting conditions really affect it, so this is why I never use someone else's exact settings unless i tried a few other tweaks of my own eyes first. I never want to feel like I'm missing out on something. Especially something I just spent so much money on.. Being OCD doesn't help either smile.gif

I wonder what Kevin Millers opinion would be

Sorry for the misspells.. I'm a little buzzed right now biggrin.gif
Edited by Anthony5362 - 2/1/13 at 9:10pm
post #11312 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnoch View Post

Ha wow, you were quick. It would have been fine I guess in general if Sharpness wasn't 50 and DC on High. I am finding some slight differences though, like my Color setting is back to a normal looking setting yet looks the same as when I had it higher before the reset. Very interesting. I'll report back later or tomorrow with the slight changes. Well I'll say right now, the only adjustments to Standard I had to make was Color to 48 instead of 51 and I could get Contrast to 96, instead of 94, before it negatively effected things.

Disregard some of what I say though until I finish....
post #11313 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony5362 View Post

I happened to be responding to something and saw your post on how you were doing the reset, so I was watching to see what you thought. I thought sharpness was set to 20 or 22 now? I can't remember, but before the update I remember the sharpness being set at 50 by default. Also, I think now the Eco sensor has a not so great affect anymore compared to before the update. I would say that its nice that Samsung has calibrated the default settings closer to what they should be at compared to before, right? I mean, all you had to change was the color, sharpness and color space, and that was only by a few points correct? Did you do Movie mode as well? I still have your old settings in so don't remember how the defaults were after the reset.

when I did the THX app calibration, I think I had to keep contrast down to 75-78 because of the Dynamic contrast being on medium. But, I was able to calibrate it with my Dynamic contrast on medium and not get that over saturated look. So long as I set my color space on auto and color temp on standard, with color on 48-49 it came out really good with no crushing. I really think that other users of the 8000 should really tweak to their liking and use your settings as a start off point and only tweak if need to as you said, because my settings on my 65" are not the same as my 60". Different panels and lighting conditions really affect it, so this is why I never use someone else's exact settings unless i tried a few other tweaks of my own eyes first. I never want to feel like I'm missing out on something. Especially something I just spent so much money on.. Being OCD doesn't help either smile.gif

I wonder what Kevin Millers opinion would be

Sorry for the misspells.. I'm a little buzzed right now biggrin.gif

The default is Standard with a Sharpness of 50, but if you change it to Movie, the Sharpness default is 20. You probably saw that and it stuck with you.

Eh, I wouldn't say people should start with mine really. If you're not going to hire someone, you really need to just find what works for your eyes and are happy with. That's why I tried so many first and suggest doing the same. Mine works for me and I can tell it's close to being right because I'm around monitors like that all day, but one, it's not perfect like a true calibration and two, people might not want to see it that way. Try a bunch and see what works for you then tweak from there. I tried Eagles and although he is right that most of the tests come out good, it's not even close to professional stuff, mostly because of his color temp and color being turned down, but he wants to see it that way and I think that's totally valid and fine and other people would probably be happy with it too. And your color temp is Standard, so your's may be too cool as well but a lot of people like that. Nothing wrong with being happy with your eyes and I know a lot of people feel a properly calibrated monitor is too warm. You're exactly right too that they aren't all the same, even panel to panel and room to room. And yeah OCD and a drink in your hand might not help haha. Nah, drinking water now here actually.

Resetting my TV did make me change some things in both modes. I'll double check it tomorrow and post the revisions based on a reset.
post #11314 of 15284
I've decided to buy a meter to really calibrate this thing. I honestly don't want to spend as much for the i1D3 with Chromapure or CalMAN, so I was looking at the Spyder 4 Elite, which apparently doesn't require purchasing software like the other I mentioned. I haven't done a whole lot of research, but want to do this quick. Anybody have any suggestions?
post #11315 of 15284
That's interesting. I didn't know that the 65 & the 60 have different panels. I assumed that the series had the same internal hardware and software. Pauls had matched prices. They have been really good about the situation. I'm likely to stick with them because I know they'll be there if (god forbid) something else goes wrong. I'm heartbroken but you've seemed to have eased the pain. I knew the 65 had some issues but I thought it was a very low percentage. So, you have both the 65 & 60 and see that big of a difference?
post #11316 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jestered View Post

I've decided to buy a meter to really calibrate this thing. I honestly don't want to spend as much for the i1D3 with Chromapure or CalMAN, so I was looking at the Spyder 4 Elite, which apparently doesn't require purchasing software like the other I mentioned. I haven't done a whole lot of research, but want to do this quick. Anybody have any suggestions?

Thats my story :
-started with i1 display LT + HCFR (with help of fantastic kal's guide)
- then I bought chromapure standard w/o meter
-now I'm waiting for i1 display 3 from curtpalme .

-Compared price of your set with mine (about 1/3 of es8000), go with i1 D3 + chromapure (419USD).
-I have HCFR, i tested calman 4.5 an 5, i have chromapure.
-HCFR is without support and help. Author is not working on newer version. For its price (is free) it is good piece of programmers work, but prepare to learn a lot. Prepare to fight with drivers for meter...
-I1 D3 is class leading meter
-from my I1 LT I have to remove rubber suckers and is not so precise in low levels (and we want to have beautiful blacks)
-spyder has some negative reviews

I am professional programmer - from this point of view, calman is fantastic work, but chromapure is intuitive and straightforward, more user friendly
And at last, but not least, Tom Huffman or Kal will answer in few hours to any question. (not saying calman support is wrong, I have no licensed version, only betas)
Trust me, I'm playing with calibration almost once a week. It is really challenge but still pure joy to get maxx from TV. And each set is bit different, you will see how far your calibrated setting differs from forum's setting (sorry Garnoch...tongue.gif).
If you are not two-left-handed, also you learn much about color spaces, cie diagrams, gamma, how menu setting work, what about is warm1 or warm2 settings, what dark tone is doing with your blacks and at the end you will love your set even more..
Thats my 2cents.

FYI here is my report...
Film03012013.pdf 1343k .pdf file
Edited by prsut - 2/2/13 at 12:42am
post #11317 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jestered View Post

I've decided to buy a meter to really calibrate this thing. I honestly don't want to spend as much for the i1D3 with Chromapure or CalMAN, so I was looking at the Spyder 4 Elite, which apparently doesn't require purchasing software like the other I mentioned. I haven't done a whole lot of research, but want to do this quick. Anybody have any suggestions?
It has been a while since I looked what is available on the market.
I also read the post from prsut.
Two years ago, I also worked with HCFR. But support is lacking. I do not know the HCFR capabilities now.
Chromapure is easy enough. Standard version would be sufficient for you.
Never tried out Calman.
Originally I had a i1D2 (Display2) which I believed in blindly. Until I got a i1Dsplay3PRO, which is much more accurate, and then I saw how much the Display2 was off.
So getting an accurate meter is important. I would now recommend i1D3 or i1D3PRO.
I am very sorry my aim to lend my calibrated i1Dispaly2 together with Chromapure license did not work out, as the meter disappeared mysteriously and did not turn up anymore. That would have been quick and easy for you.
post #11318 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by prsut View Post

Thats my story :
-started with i1 display LT + HCFR (with help of fantastic kal's guide)
- then I bought chromapure standard w/o meter
-now I'm waiting for i1 display 3 from curtpalme .

-Compared price of your set with mine (about 1/3 of es8000), go with i1 D3 + chromapure (419USD).
-I have HCFR, i tested calman 4.5 an 5, i have chromapure.
-HCFR is without support and help. Author is not working on newer version. For its price (is free) it is good piece of programmers work, but prepare to learn a lot. Prepare to fight with drivers for meter...
-I1 D3 is class leading meter
-from my I1 LT I have to remove rubber suckers and is not so precise in low levels (and we want to have beautiful blacks)
-spyder has some negative reviews

I am professional programmer - from this point of view, calman is fantastic work, but chromapure is intuitive and straightforward, more user friendly
And at last, but not least, Tom Huffman or Kal will answer in few hours to any question. (not saying calman support is wrong, I have no licensed version, only betas)
Trust me, I'm playing with calibration almost once a week. It is really challenge but still pure joy to get maxx from TV. And each set is bit different, you will see how far your calibrated setting differs from forum's setting (sorry Garnoch...tongue.gif).
If you are not two-left-handed, also you learn much about color spaces, cie diagrams, gamma, how menu setting work, what about is warm1 or warm2 settings, what dark tone is doing with your blacks and at the end you will love your set even more..
Thats my 2cents.

FYI here is my report...
Film03012013.pdf 1343k .pdf file
hello prsut
Can you post your settings? I would be very interested in that.
post #11319 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by turboman123 View Post

hello prsut
Can you post your settings? I would be very interested in that.

:turboman
but note, I have another es model.. (es6710)

http://www.avsforum.com/t/1435194/tweak-disabling-autodimming-for-samsung-eseries-smart-led-tv-mine-is-es6710#post_22827782

I have posted calibration report as example how far default film mode is from calibrated settings on my set...
post #11320 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by quicknick View Post

That's interesting. I didn't know that the 65 & the 60 have different panels. I assumed that the series had the same internal hardware and software. Pauls had matched prices. They have been really good about the situation. I'm likely to stick with them because I know they'll be there if (god forbid) something else goes wrong. I'm heartbroken but you've seemed to have eased the pain. I knew the 65 had some issues but I thought it was a very low percentage. So, you have both the 65 & 60 and see that big of a difference?

It is not uncommon for manufacturers to use panels from other companies in assembling the various models in a series Lineup. In fact, in this day and age, it is actually the norm. For instance, the Sony HX950 series uses a Samsung panel in its 65" model, but not in their 55" TV. Interestingly, owners report banding in the 65", albeit not as pronounced as in the Samsung. There are other factors to consider. The Samsung is edge lit and the Sony is full array. Even if (and I have no idea whether they do or not) both TV's use the same Samsung panel, they can (and do) wind up looking dramatically different.
post #11321 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by pitchman View Post

It is not uncommon for manufacturers to use panels from other companies in assembling the various models in a series Lineup. In fact, in this day and age, it is actually the norm. For instance, the Sony HX950 series uses a Samsung panel in its 65" model, but not in their 55" TV. Interestingly, owners report banding in the 65", albeit not as pronounced as in the Samsung. There are other factors to consider. The Samsung is edge lit and the Sony is full array. Even if (and I have no idea whether they do or not) both TV's use the same Samsung panel, they can (and do) wind up looking dramatically different.

+++100!

Exactly! This is why I always knew why the 65" Sony HX950 has the same banding as my 65" ES8000 Samsung. I have an article that explains how when Sony sold their devision back to Samsung, that they decided to still use Samsung's panels in their sets. Also, when I mentioned the Sony to one of their "upper" level reps in Corporate, he laughed and said "that's our panel" in those models.

My 60" looks way better than my 65" that's for sure.. I'm sure if two different size 8000 can look different, then the 7500 has an even bigger chance at looking different as well.

I also want to say in case the "guests" that aren't members here that read these posts and can't post, that when I mentioned the "Default" settings looking pretty close now, I am only referring to "Standard" Mode here. NOT movie mode, since I haven't had time to check yet. And also, the only way this happened, was for me to "Reset" my "Standard" settings to default and tweak to my liking from there. As far as the "Dynamic Contrast" setting goes, I have never had to use this before this update and I wouldn't recommend using it in "Movie" mode, unless that's what you like. The norm though is to keep this setting off. But since Samsung is saying that their Micro Dimming is tied to this setting, I didn't want to disable it for "Standard" mode because the whole point in buying the 8000 and not the 7500, was because of the "Ultimate" micro Dimming Vs the Pro in the 7500. Samsung has confirmed that their "Dynamic Contrast" is based of "Their" design of their Micro dimming from Software.

I wish they could be more specific with this info, so people aren't so confused, but if you don't have your settings set up right and have the Dynamic contrast too high, then you will suffer from crushed Details. The only way I was able to have this dynamic contrast set to low or even medium, was to lower other settings and by using this new THX app, I was able to do this and now have a really vivid, vibrant and bright picture with Inky blacks

If you read this article, David K from Cnet confirms that The dynamic contrast and black enhancer work with the micro dimming. Is also states that he left these "off" when he did he review which explains now why he didn't like the TV, Because at that time, I wasn't happy with it either, but with this last FW update, I'm very happy now. This Micro dimming is all based of software which is really easy for Samsung to tweak and push to us with a FW update.

http://forums.cnet.com/7723-19410_102-567650/samsung-un55es8000-picture-settings/
Edited by Anthony5362 - 2/2/13 at 8:03am
post #11322 of 15284
Ricodome Update - Phase I Completed

(Gee, I sound like a developer!)

A couple pics of the new HT with my new Studio CC690 center - - just in time for my Super Bowl get together on Sunday. So far, an unbelievable center channel - - very clear, precise and well balanced dialogue. Perfectly matches my vintage Paradigm Studio 60's - V2. I can't believe how "out of phase" my other center channels were. This ones "like butter."

Phase II won't happen for a while - - but I now have the capability (after wall mounting the Sammy) to eventually get a projector with an electric screen going over the 65" LCD/LED panel - - strictly for Cinemascope 2.35 to 1 (or variations) movies.

Note to Bolt - - I kept the lamp. I thought I was going to replace it but it actually provides a nice, warm color and some light to my viewing environment. It works out quite well since it has a dimmer. Bias lighting used for 3D with other lights out.



post #11323 of 15284
Wow man! That center looks amazing! Between you and that other dude showing off your speakers, you guys had me looking up speakers all night last night buzzed off my ...even spent $300 on some..lol!

Congrats Rico! It looks great.. The lamp looks good too smile.gif
post #11324 of 15284
Sammy panel problems...

I have to consider myself lucky - - in that the 65" replacement LCD/LED TV I received last summer shows very, very minimal banding, virtually zero clouding and flashlighting. (So far, knock, knock!)

With the new 1046 firmware upate (Standard settings, Standard Color, Auto Color Space) - - the colors are unbelievably rich and the auto dimming is much less noticeable now. Especially for movie credits. The blacks are inky dark and great shadow detail present.

For those of you who are having problems with their panels - - to paraphrase Bill Clinton, "I feel your pain." And I'm not trying to be flippant or patronizing. To spend this type of money on a TV and not get anywhere near where you should be is a crime. I know everyone is doing the best they can to get these issues fixed.

Hopefully, if you are not satisfied, you are within the "return window" and can get a full refund towards a different TV. And... as Anthony and many others have mentioned - - having an extended warranty through SquareTrade (or any other reputable company) goes a long way for piece of mind.
post #11325 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by prsut View Post

Thats my story :
-started with i1 display LT + HCFR (with help of fantastic kal's guide)
- then I bought chromapure standard w/o meter
-now I'm waiting for i1 display 3 from curtpalme .

-Compared price of your set with mine (about 1/3 of es8000), go with i1 D3 + chromapure (419USD).
-I have HCFR, i tested calman 4.5 an 5, i have chromapure.
-HCFR is without support and help. Author is not working on newer version. For its price (is free) it is good piece of programmers work, but prepare to learn a lot. Prepare to fight with drivers for meter...
-I1 D3 is class leading meter
-from my I1 LT I have to remove rubber suckers and is not so precise in low levels (and we want to have beautiful blacks)
-spyder has some negative reviews

I am professional programmer - from this point of view, calman is fantastic work, but chromapure is intuitive and straightforward, more user friendly
And at last, but not least, Tom Huffman or Kal will answer in few hours to any question. (not saying calman support is wrong, I have no licensed version, only betas)
Trust me, I'm playing with calibration almost once a week. It is really challenge but still pure joy to get maxx from TV. And each set is bit different, you will see how far your calibrated setting differs from forum's setting (sorry Garnoch...tongue.gif).
If you are not two-left-handed, also you learn much about color spaces, cie diagrams, gamma, how menu setting work, what about is warm1 or warm2 settings, what dark tone is doing with your blacks and at the end you will love your set even more..
Thats my 2cents.

FYI here is my report...
Film03012013.pdf 1343k .pdf file

Great info, man, and good to see you around. Ladies and gentlemen, this is the guy that brought the wonderful CE Dimming workaround to AVS. I noticed you're not using the trick in your settings though. I realize it's a different model and may not translate at all, but I think I'll test your settings out to see how they look and add up with the WOW BD, AVS files and THX app. For the life of me, I can't understand why I had to change Movie mode after this update to Warm 1 but not Standard's. I agree and have said it many times here that if you want a truly calibrated picture to see programs the way the director meant them to be seen, you'll have to pay someone or buy your own equipment and learn how to do it yourself. Unfortunately a lot of the people doing that, don't share their settings and I understand that. One, it's mostly panel specific. Two, which rarely gets said, is they paid for it so why should it be given away. When I came here again for the ES, I knew I wasn't going to spend money on that but needed a good starting point and at least knew what to look for in general because of what I do for a living, so I make sure people coming here like I did can find some settings to start with and help them out. And a lot of those people never post. Plus a lot of people don't actually even like a calibrated monitor, so they change certain things and make it cooler or whatever they want so that their eyes are happy. I'm fine with that too, I get it. That's why I never promote my settings though. They aren't the be all end all. They're a starting point and one of many settings here that people who come hear looking for that type of thing can try before settling of what they like. By eye, and by the tools I have at my disposal, I'd say I'm 90% there though for my panel, definitely not 100 but good enough that I won't be spending money on it, although part of me would love a meter setup. smile.gif

Turbo, could you post a link back to your settings again too please? I'll try them out too and see how they fair on my panel.

Feel free to plug my settings in too to see how they fair with meters and software. I will say I'm curious. I drives me a little crazy that they had to not only be tweaked after a firmware update but did indeed need to be tweaked after a full reset. I'll adjust my settings posted here with a note about that. Here's the deal for people wondering about a full reset though. Can it change how your settings look? Yes. Once you re-tweak it to get all your tests looking correctly though, it looks the same as before - for me. I'm a little ticked that I did the reset and had to change things more to get the same outcome because it took me a couple hours of back and forth between settings, inputs and tests. One glaring change being Standard's color moving from 51 to 48 - but not Movie mode's. Why? Reset aside though, I've had to tweak after every firmware update. Why after this update, for the first time, did I have to move to Warm 1 on movie mode (but not Standard), and why did Movie mode's Color have to get bumped up to 52 when it used to be on 49? No freaking idea. For someone who also is not going to hire someone or buy their own equipment, all I can say is that regardless of who's setting in this thread you decide to settle on (try many), get something like a calibration disc, the free files here on AVS and perhaps something like the THX app and simply tweak from there the basic settings like Contrast, Brightness, overall Color specific to your panel.

Prsut, great to see you back again, man!
post #11326 of 15284
++10

I totally agree man.. Especially the improvement in standard mode now. About that Square trade warranty, I wanted to post that I saw on Panasonic's website that they recommend Square trade for a extended warranty. I was happy to see that, cause that could mean that they are a really good company to deal with.
post #11327 of 15284
Holy, crap, Rico!!!! What a change, looks amazing - and look at that new center channel!!!!!! Happy with the sound? Be honest now. smile.gif
post #11328 of 15284
Ha! Yes man, be 150% honest about the sound on that beast! Although, it probably needs hours of break in first though
post #11329 of 15284
Deleted
Edited by Garnoch - 2/2/13 at 8:44am
post #11330 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony5362 View Post

Wow man! That center looks amazing! Between you and that other dude showing off your speakers, you guys had me looking up speakers all night last night buzzed off my ...even spent $300 on some..lol!

Congrats Rico! It looks great.. The lamp looks good too smile.gif

Thanks, Anthony. This is addicting, isn't it! I saw the other pictures you talked about and those speakers look phenomenal!

I was in HT heaven yesterday. I went to pickup my Studio CC690 speaker and I saw some real high end stereo and home theater equipment (projectors, speakers, amps). To paraphrase the owner of the shop - - who was a great guy to work with - - we're "power hounds" here. Not so much for the loudness - - for the clarity. I could easily spend fifty grand on this stuff if I had the money. (Probably more....)

FYI - the center speaker - CC690 weighs 70+ pounds and luckily, my neighbor was able to help me carry in in and downstairs to the man cave. From there, it was a "power lift" up to the cabinet. tongue.gif
post #11331 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by turboman123 View Post

It has been a while since I looked what is available on the market.
I also read the post from prsut.
Two years ago, I also worked with HCFR. But support is lacking. I do not know the HCFR capabilities now.
Chromapure is easy enough. Standard version would be sufficient for you.
Never tried out Calman.
Originally I had a i1D2 (Display2) which I believed in blindly. Until I got a i1Dsplay3PRO, which is much more accurate, and then I saw how much the Display2 was off.
So getting an accurate meter is important. I would now recommend i1D3 or i1D3PRO.
I am very sorry my aim to lend my calibrated i1Dispaly2 together with Chromapure license did not work out, as the meter disappeared mysteriously and did not turn up anymore. That would have been quick and easy for you.

Turboman,

Good to see you on here again. I'm really sorry that someone took advantage of you lending out your meter from here. That's pretty low for someone to do that. Is there anyway you can track it to see if it made it to who you sent it too?
post #11332 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnoch View Post

Holy, crap, Rico!!!! What a change, looks amazing - and look at that new center channel!!!!!! Happy with the sound? Be honest now. smile.gif


Happy with the sound? Ecstatic!!! I was breaking in the speaker, so to speak, last night and Mama wasn't a happy camper. She said, and I quote, "Yeah, you bet that center speaker is clear. I can hear it all the way upstairs!"

First impression and biggest improvement has to be the full matching of the Left, Center & Right soundstage and the depth and clarity of the dialogue.

The center does not seem "overtaxed" compared to other center channels I've used. The Paradigm Studio CCC690 doesn't break a sweat and it's really noticeable with movies - - seamless soundstage from left to center to right with clear vocals and resonant imaging.

For anyone who likes movies - - I strongly suggest getting the best, matching center channel you can. It's like a getting a whole new setup!
post #11333 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony5362 View Post

+++100!

Exactly! This is why I always knew why the 65" Sony HX950 has the same banding as my 65" ES8000 Samsung. I have an article that explains how when Sony sold their devision back to Samsung, that they decided to still use Samsung's panels in their sets. Also, when I mentioned the Sony to one of their "upper" level reps in Corporate, he laughed and said "that's our panel" in those models.

My 60" looks way better than my 65" that's for sure.. I'm sure if two different size 8000 can look different, then the 7500 has an even bigger chance at looking different as well.

I also want to say in case the "guests" that aren't members here that read these posts and can't post, that when I mentioned the "Default" settings looking pretty close now, I am only referring to "Standard" Mode here. NOT movie mode, since I haven't had time to check yet. And also, the only way this happened, was for me to "Reset" my "Standard" settings to default and tweak to my liking from there. As far as the "Dynamic Contrast" setting goes, I have never had to use this before this update and I wouldn't recommend using it in "Movie" mode, unless that's what you like. The norm though is to keep this setting off. But since Samsung is saying that their Micro Dimming is tied to this setting, I didn't want to disable it for "Standard" mode because the whole point in buying the 8000 and not the 7500, was because of the "Ultimate" micro Dimming Vs the Pro in the 7500. Samsung has confirmed that their "Dynamic Contrast" is based of "Their" design of their Micro dimming from Software.

I wish they could be more specific with this info, so people aren't so confused, but if you don't have your settings set up right and have the Dynamic contrast too high, then you will suffer from crushed Details. The only way I was able to have this dynamic contrast set to low or even medium, was to lower other settings and by using this new THX app, I was able to do this and now have a really vivid, vibrant and bright picture with Inky blacks

If you read this article, David K from Cnet confirms that The dynamic contrast and black enhancer work with the micro dimming. Is also states that he left these "off" when he did he review which explains now why he didn't like the TV, Because at that time, I wasn't happy with it either, but with this last FW update, I'm very happy now. This Micro dimming is all based of software which is really easy for Samsung to tweak and push to us with a FW update.

http://forums.cnet.com/7723-19410_102-567650/samsung-un55es8000-picture-settings/

Garnoch, is it possible to calibrate your standard settings with the Dynamic contrast set to low and medium? I hate to see others missing out on their fabulous micro dimming tech and inky black levels by having this setting off. I mean, this is the reason why most of us bought the 8000 and not the 7500 right? . I was able to do this with the ThX app, but had to lower my contrast to 75 and color to 47 or 48
Edited by Anthony5362 - 2/2/13 at 8:51am
post #11334 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricoflashback View Post

Happy with the sound? Ecstatic!!! I was breaking in the speaker, so to speak, last night and Mama wasn't a happy camper. She said, and I quote, "Yeah, you bet that center speaker is clear. I can hear it all the way upstairs!"

First impression and biggest improvement has to be the full matching of the Left, Center & Right soundstage and the depth and clarity of the dialogue.

The center does not seem "overtaxed" compared to other center channels I've used. The Paradigm Studio CCC690 doesn't break a sweat and it's really noticeable with movies - - seamless soundstage from left to center to right with clear vocals and resonant imaging.

For anyone who likes movies - - I strongly suggest getting the best, matching center channel you can. It's like a getting a whole new setup!

The center is the "Most" important speaker of them all! I totally agree which is why I bought the Definitive technology 8060 center. I'm sure yours is way better though. I love how nice yours looks.

And yes, its very addicting. Was up all night looking at speakers thanks to you! And those Kefs I bought, say they were $1,200 and I bought them on Amazon from Paul's TV for only $300. Can't wait to hear them..
post #11335 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony5362 View Post

+++100!

. . . As far as the "Dynamic Contrast" setting goes, I have never had to use this before this update and I wouldn't recommend using it in "Movie" mode, unless that's what you like. The norm though is to keep this setting off. But since Samsung is saying that their Micro Dimming is tied to this setting, I didn't want to disable it for "Standard" mode because the whole point in buying the 8000 and not the 7500, was because of the "Ultimate" micro Dimming Vs the Pro in the 7500. Samsung has confirmed that their "Dynamic Contrast" is based of "Their" design of their Micro dimming from Software.

I wish they could be more specific with this info, so people aren't so confused, but if you don't have your settings set up right and have the Dynamic contrast too high, then you will suffer from crushed Details. The only way I was able to have this dynamic contrast set to low or even medium, was to lower other settings and by using this new THX app, I was able to do this and now have a really vivid, vibrant and bright picture with Inky blacks

If you read this article, David K from Cnet confirms that The dynamic contrast and black enhancer work with the micro dimming. Is also states that he left these "off" when he did he review which explains now why he didn't like the TV, Because at that time, I wasn't happy with it either, but with this last FW update, I'm very happy now. This Micro dimming is all based of software which is really easy for Samsung to tweak and push to us with a FW update.

http://forums.cnet.com/7723-19410_102-567650/samsung-un55es8000-picture-settings/

Anthony, I think you are misinterpreting the statements around the web - but who knows, given that Samsung has not been terribly clear about what is actually happening, it is hard to say.

That said, I have seen nothing that indicates any benefits (or drawbacks, depending on your perspective) of Micro Dimming is tied to having enabled Dynamic Contrast or Black Enhancer. I read the materials I've seen, as well as the link to David K's review and update differently. I currently believe that Micro Dimming is disabled in Movie Mode but enabled in Standard Mode. I further believe that both DC and BE are seperate controls, but that may do something similar to Micro Dimming. Remember, MD is software that analyzes indidivudal zones and then adjusts contrast, sharpness, and color. My best guess is that both DC and BE are doing something similar, primarily around contrast and color. In other words, I believe that MD is operating in Standard at all times, and is accomplishing some things (either good or bad) that may be similar to enabling some level of DC and BE; and that in order to accomplish the same or similar things in Movie Mode, one might play with DC and BE (or to increase the effects otherwise seen with MD in Standard, one could also juice up DC and BE).

Note that David K in his update says: "To see for myself, I tried a calibration in Standard mode and include the settings below in case readers want to try it themselves. Long story short: it does have better black levels, but they're still not as deep as the Sony KDL-55HX850 or Vizio M3D550KD, for example. In just about every other way, however, the image looked worse than in Movie mode, with less-accurate color, dim highlights and obscured shadow detail." His reference to settings includes DC and BE turned OFF. And yet he sees better blacks but degradations in other aspects of PQ -- put another way, there's something different in Standard versus Movie in his calibration, even with DC and BE turned off (i.e., Micro Dimming). He even states so: "It appears to me that some kind of active contrast control is going on in Standard (independent of any picture settings since my Standard calibration disabled Dynamic Contrast and Black Enhancer was grayed out in Standard), which perhaps is what Samsung means by "micro dimming." " So all in all I continue to believe that MicroDimming operates in Standard Mode regardless of these user-selectable settings.

FWIW, I still am happy with Standard over Movie, despite David K's stated results / concerns with the effect of MD.
post #11336 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catt99 View Post

Anthony, I think you are misinterpreting the statements around the web - but who knows, given that Samsung has not been terribly clear about what is actually happening, it is hard to say.

That said, I have seen nothing that indicates any benefits (or drawbacks, depending on your perspective) of Micro Dimming is tied to having enabled Dynamic Contrast or Black Enhancer. I read the materials I've seen, as well as the link to David K's review and update differently. I currently believe that Micro Dimming is disabled in Movie Mode but enabled in Standard Mode. I further believe that both DC and BE are seperate controls, but that may do something similar to Micro Dimming. Remember, MD is software that analyzes indidivudal zones and then adjusts contrast, sharpness, and color. My best guess is that both DC and BE are doing something similar, primarily around contrast and color. In other words, I believe that MD is operating in Standard at all times, and is accomplishing some things (either good or bad) that may be similar to enabling some level of DC and BE; and that in order to accomplish the same or similar things in Movie Mode, one might play with DC and BE (or to increase the effects otherwise seen with MD in Standard, one could also juice up DC and BE).

Note that David K in his update says: "To see for myself, I tried a calibration in Standard mode and include the settings below in case readers want to try it themselves. Long story short: it does have better black levels, but they're still not as deep as the Sony KDL-55HX850 or Vizio M3D550KD, for example. In just about every other way, however, the image looked worse than in Movie mode, with less-accurate color, dim highlights and obscured shadow detail." His reference to settings includes DC and BE turned OFF. And yet he sees better blacks but degradations in other aspects of PQ -- put another way, there's something different in Standard versus Movie in his calibration, even with DC and BE turned off (i.e., Micro Dimming). He even states so: "It appears to me that some kind of active contrast control is going on in Standard (independent of any picture settings since my Standard calibration disabled Dynamic Contrast and Black Enhancer was grayed out in Standard), which perhaps is what Samsung means by "micro dimming." " So all in all I continue to believe that MicroDimming operates in Standard Mode regardless of these user-selectable settings.

FWIW, I still am happy with Standard over Movie, despite David K's stated results / concerns with the effect of MD.

Catt,
I hear what your saying and I agree that Micro Diimimg is active all the time, but I also think these two settings work with and enhance it. Especially when you read these articles from reviewers. As far as what David K, that was way before this new update when the Dynamic C didn't look so good enabled. It gave way too much over saturation. But now after this update, I think Samsung may have fixed this issue and since its software based, they can do this.

Have you read this? I'm curious what you think about this article..I'm just trying to get to the bottom of this since Samsung leaves us all in the dark with their technology

http://hometheaterreview.com/samsung-un55es8000-ledlcd-hdtv/

I wasn't really a big fan of using the Dynamic contrast until I read these articles and then tried calibrated my sets with the THX app having it on low or medium and saw how amazing it can look without that fake over saturated colors. I do like more of a pop though, which is why I barely use Movie mode. Movie mode is more for a "what the director intended" kinda look where standard mode, is more for everyday viewing like TV shows and sports.. This is how I always looked at it anyways. We also have to remember that 2012 was the first year where they really took advantage of this software based technology, I think anyways, besides the D8000 from 2011 which had hardware for the dimming, so maybe because this was so new at that time David K did his review, he didn't realize that now for 2012, these settings help the picture become more vivid and help with with getting that really inky black levels, where as precious years, it was always best to keep them off? Idk..
Edited by Anthony5362 - 2/2/13 at 9:27am
post #11337 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle_2 View Post

I'm curious to hear what you think of Native once you try it out for a bit. Let us know!

I've played a little with both native pass-through and having the box scale to 1080p. Watched and (recorded) some HD sports in 720p, and some TNT reruns in 1080i, and compared the results through both native and scaled. Sometimes I think I see a difference, and other times not. Being able to watch the same material right after one another has made it a bit easier to compare. Frankly, at this point, I am not sure I see any real differences to speak of. I am going to keep playing around with it over the next few days, but early returns seem to indicate that the comcast / motorola box and the TV are pretty darn comparable when scaling broadcast content. I was hoping for more of a clear difference, and maybe it will present itself at some point, but not just yet.

Reminds me of back in the day when I got sucked in (quite happily!) to the early Oppo DV971H standard DVD player when 1080p panels were pretty rare -- the scaling capabilities of the Oppo provided a dramatic difference in image quality for standard DVDs when fed to your 720p or 1080i set - a real, demonstrable, positive difference between the typical scalers in most players and most TVs. Maybe the more commodity scalers available in typical STBs and TVs have raised their game significantly and are more bunched together in terms of performance until you step up to some of the higher end scalers available in some video components and AVRs.
post #11338 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony5362 View Post

Catt,
I hear what your saying and I agree that Micro Diimimg is active all the time, but I also think these two settings work with and enhance it. Especially when you read these articles from reviewers. As far as what David K, that was way before this new update when the Dynamic C didn't look so good enabled. It gave way too much over saturation. But now after this update, I think Samsung may have fixed this issue and since its software based, they can do this.

Have you read this? I'm curious what you think about this article..I'm just trying to get to the bottom of this since Samsung leaves us all in the dark with their technology

http://hometheaterreview.com/samsung-un55es8000-ledlcd-hdtv/

Yeah, I'd read that and read a bunch of stuff when I was trying to better understand what MD was actually doing. I've come to believe that MD is a sort of "fixed formula" of dynamic image changes across the zones. DC and BE may be more "user configurable" aspects of the formula, but it's not clear if MD is doing more or is entirely a combination of software adjustments that are also enabled, wholly or partly, through manual settings of DC and BE. So I think if you're using Standard Mode, you're getting the (partial) equivalent of image modification that might happen by playing with DC and BE even when those features are off; and when you're in Movie Mode, you might get a (partial) equivalent of MD through the use of DC and BE. From a purist standpoint, that might indicate a preference to Movie Mode for accuracy within the panel's capabilities. I'm not a purist though - I just want what is most visually pleasing for me, and though I occassionally switch over to Movie Mode for awhile, I find myself gravitating back to Standard without being able to pinpoint exactly why.
post #11339 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony5362 View Post

Movie mode is more for a "what the director intended" kinda look where standard mode, is more for everyday viewing like TV shows and sports.. This is how I always looked at it anyways.

Funny, I tried the picture reset on the ES7100 and the PQ did impove after the FW update.

After I re-entered my settings the blacks were darker and color more accurate.

I use Movie for Blu-rays and DirecTV, Standard for Xbox360.
post #11340 of 15284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catt99 View Post

Yeah, I'd read that and read a bunch of stuff when I was trying to better understand what MD was actually doing. I've come to believe that MD is a sort of "fixed formula" of dynamic image changes across the zones. DC and BE may be more "user configurable" aspects of the formula, but it's not clear if MD is doing more or is entirely a combination of software adjustments that are also enabled, wholly or partly, through manual settings of DC and BE. So I think if you're using Standard Mode, you're getting the (partial) equivalent of image modification that might happen by playing with DC and BE even when those features are off; and when you're in Movie Mode, you might get a (partial) equivalent of MD through the use of DC and BE. From a purist standpoint, that might indicate a preference to Movie Mode for accuracy within the panel's capabilities. I'm not a purist though - I just want what is most visually pleasing for me, and though I occassionally switch over to Movie Mode for awhile, I find myself gravitating back to Standard without being able to pinpoint exactly why.

I was going back and fourth as well before the update and now, I can't pin point either. I wish they explained this better to us though so we can take full advantage of these sets. I know before all this software based dimming, the professionals always were against using dynamic contrast. On my older C530, I have this disabled since there's no dimming software in that model and this setting makes the picture look way too fake, but with this ES8000, I'm getting amazing results now having it on without any clipping and crushing.

Maybe we will know more once this Evo kit comes out. I hope anyways, cause its really confusing when your really trying to understand all this tech stuff Samsung has came up with
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: LCD Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Official Samsung UNxxES8000 Owner's Thread