Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolt989 
Heh, I am going to debunk the rumor right now about Plasma's being "Energy pigs" That was so 5 years ago. They have gotten much better.
As far as power consumption goes, here are the FTC’s Energy Guide numbers for each TV:
Samsung 55ES8000: $17 per year.
Panasonic P55VT50: $24 per year.
really? 7 dollars extra a year is worth the argument? LOL!
Rumor Debunked.
Billy

Heh, I am going to debunk the rumor right now about Plasma's being "Energy pigs" That was so 5 years ago. They have gotten much better.
As far as power consumption goes, here are the FTC’s Energy Guide numbers for each TV:
Samsung 55ES8000: $17 per year.
Panasonic P55VT50: $24 per year.
really? 7 dollars extra a year is worth the argument? LOL!

Rumor Debunked.
Billy
Hey, Billy, I thought you were done posting here being you weren't an owner?
Ha, honestly I don't care, just busting on you. That being said though, although I agree $7 isn't much, I don't think that's the way to look at it. The way I see it is that even a modern day plasma is 30% less efficient so will cost you..... 30% more. 30% is nothing to sneeze at so I wouldn't call it a rumor. But..... I actually do have to agree that that really doesn't need to be a deciding factor in choosing one over the other - it wouldn't be for me.




















