| Specs. |
i1PRO |
i1PRO2 |
| Spectral Analyzer |
Holographic diffraction grating with 128-pixel diode array |
Same with i1PRO |
| Spectral Range |
380 - 730 nm |
Same with i1PRO |
| Physical Sampling Interval |
3.5 nm |
Same with i1PRO |
| Optical Resolution |
10 nm |
Same with i1PRO |
| Spectral Reporting |
380 ... 730 nm in 10 nm steps |
Same with i1PRO |
| Measurement Scan Frequency |
200 measurements per second (Rev. D) |
Same with i1PRO |
| Measurement Range |
0.2 - 300 cd/m2 on a typical LCD-Monitor |
0.2 - 1200 cd/m2 on a typical LCD-Monitor |
| Short-term Repeatability |
x,y: +/- 0.002 typical (5000°K, 80 cd/m2) |
Same with i1PRO |
| Inter-Instrument Agreement |
0.4 ∆E94* average, 1.0 ∆E94* max. |
Same with i1PRO |
| Short-term Repeatability |
0.1 ∆E94* on white |
Same with i1PRO |
1200 cd/m2 capability is unnecessary for HT conditions.
For Emissive Measurement Mode, the specs seems the same.
Using i1PRO1 in non-contact mode the meter is not influenced by the heat and the temperature is stable over the time. Using iBeamer the dark reading is very fast, without moving the meter.
i1PRO1 was not so accurate for measurements lower than 10 cd/m2, how is the minimum luminance measuring level of 1iPRO2 that we can safely trust?
i1PRO2 generally gives closer xy readings from i1PRO1 versus a JETI or Minotla reference spectro?
I hope Tom Huffman (ChromaPure) can give us an in-depth review of that new i1PRO2 (like the sweet review of i1D3) or Derek Smith (CalMAN) can post any comparison Test from SpectraCAL's Labs after NAB.
BTW, X-Rite will announce an upgrade discount offer for i1Pro1 users on the weekend.