Quote:
Originally Posted by markus767 
Objects only mixes could be a real revolution but that's probably not feasible for various reasons. For example, Brave is mixed in 7.1 and then gets the Atmos treatment.
Let's see how everything develops (especially now that AMC got sold). After the presentation I had the feeling the whole system is still under development.
On a side note, I believe the built-in room correction is a big step forward. Currently the whole X-curve correction is based more on beliefs and not on proper science. I've seen frequency response curves from different theaters and they showed such huge variations (even after 1/3 octave based correction) that it really didn't matter much what the underlying curve was. With Atmos any target curve can be closely matched. This makes it much easier to reveal the underlying parameters for timbre and loudness.
They could also apply something similar to Dolby Volume because it's common (bad) practice for theater owners to arbitrarily change playback volume based on consumer reports ("The movie was too loud" vs. "I couldn't understand the dialog").

Objects only mixes could be a real revolution but that's probably not feasible for various reasons. For example, Brave is mixed in 7.1 and then gets the Atmos treatment.
Let's see how everything develops (especially now that AMC got sold). After the presentation I had the feeling the whole system is still under development.
On a side note, I believe the built-in room correction is a big step forward. Currently the whole X-curve correction is based more on beliefs and not on proper science. I've seen frequency response curves from different theaters and they showed such huge variations (even after 1/3 octave based correction) that it really didn't matter much what the underlying curve was. With Atmos any target curve can be closely matched. This makes it much easier to reveal the underlying parameters for timbre and loudness.
They could also apply something similar to Dolby Volume because it's common (bad) practice for theater owners to arbitrarily change playback volume based on consumer reports ("The movie was too loud" vs. "I couldn't understand the dialog").
Markus.. I agree with your side note.. as I may or may not have mentioned here, there are several working groups right now focused on reevaluating room tuning standards, practices, etc...
I would love to help dissuade theater operators from playing below reference... I think there was a golden opportunity missed with the adoption of D-Cinema and network connectivity in the booth. We could've instigated a modern THX TAP type program, whereas the content creators could monitor light output of the projectors and at the least what SPL the film was being played back at.
I still don't think I agree that an object only mix is any different than what we have here... again, since we are tied to a fixed screen, I don't think you can re-invent the way you present dialog, for example... you can call it an object if you want, but the dialog track isn't in need of being heard outside of the center channel a great deal of the time.
Obviously, being the first "test" project done, "Brave" isn't how we anyone would like to do ii in the future... I think most agree that starting in "Atmos" is the way to go, and the down mixing should come after...
I know how they are going about "Brave" and while labor intensive, it really shouldn't compromise the end product....
On another note, my understanding of the hardware "partnership" deal should be fairly separate from what AMC is doing in this acquisition... I don't think AMC is footing the bill.






























