AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Just some info I found about Yamaha Aventage Receivers
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Just some info I found about Yamaha Aventage Receivers

post #1 of 27
Thread Starter 
Maybe everyone knows this but since my RX-A710 went bad I did some researching because I can't get another 710 as they're sold out. I can get a RX-V671 or a RX-A810.

Heres what I found out. Before Aventage seriers receivers came out, Yamaha had the Digital Top Art feature which was higher grade parts, higher grade design, and noise reducing circuits. This Top Art Design was carried on previous RX-V665 and up models for the RX-V*65 series (2010 model).

The Aventage design replaced the Digital Top Art design, as it seems in name only, to more easily name which models had the higher quality build.

So the 2010 model RX-V665 was replaced by the 2011 model, the RX-A700. The RX-V667 was not a direct replacement for the RX-V665 as it dropped the Digital Top Art performance design to keep cost down, but with added features.

Now the RX-V667, RX-V867, RX-V671 and RX-V871 models do not have the better Digital Top Art Design and share the same circuit designs as the lower models with discrete amplifier circuits.

I have owned a RX-V793, RX-V995, and RX-V2095 that have all had the Digital Top Art Design previously but was considering the RX-V671 since the RX-A710 is no longer available. I really don't want to go down in audio performance so this was very enlightening.
post #2 of 27
The Aventage name is purely a marketing label. I wouldn't try to infer anything by it. The Aventage labeled RX-A1000 had the exact same amplifiers as the non-Aventage RX-V1067 and HTR-8063. Aside for regional differences (and a fifth foot) these are all the same receivers with all the same components. The same is true for the RX-A1010 and RX-V1071.

You can't assume just because one Yamaha receiver has the Aventage label and one doesn't that they must have differently designed amplifiers.
post #3 of 27
Thread Starter 
But they're not the same. The Aventage/Digital Top Art design has circuit and structure differences, it's a known fact. I just didn't realize that the new RX-V667 above and later year models, dropped that Digital Top Art Feature since they redesigned them without that feature, creating a new receiver line with that feature, called the Aventage. Previously you just had to see if the receiver had the Digital Top Art Design now it's easier as they renamed all the receivers with this feature as an Aventage receiver with the prefix RX-A instead of RX-V. Much easier to tell which receivers have that performance design now.

If those earlier HTR models had Digital Top Art, then they were the equivalent, which many did. Now that Yamaha has dropped the feature label and actually started renaming the series that has this feature, for sure this Digital Top Art Design is not not offered in the newer RX-Vs including the RX-V871 and RX-V671.

Not saying that they're not good, or even if it's audible, but to some it may be. Just saying that their chassis doesn't off the better noise and vibration dampening, parts are of lower grade (I'm an electronic Tech so I know about how this makes a difference), and circuits designs are slightly different as each DAC in the Aventage series has a separate ground. That means less chance of ground loops which can bring interference and noise.

BTW, there is no such thing as a RX-V1071. The RX-V series stops at the RX-V871.

If you're talking about another country, I have no idea since this is an English speaking forum, I'm going by the USA, and normally Canada models.
post #4 of 27
You've got no evidence to support your claims. You're just making assumptions.

And just because something isn't sold in the US doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Yamaha is a Japanese company that sells its products throughout the world.
post #5 of 27
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ross Ridge View Post

You've got no evidence to support your claims. You're just making assumptions.

And just because something isn't sold in the US doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Yamaha is a Japanese company that sells its products throughout the world.

They are not claims, tear one apart. Yamaha could not make such false claims as that is frawd and they could legally be held accountable for such fraudulent claims.

The chassis is in itself evidence are they are different as a simple look can tell this.
post #6 of 27
What are you on about? Top Art, Digital Top Art and Aventage are marketing labels. I don't see how you can read anything else into it. Yamaha has used such labels for years.

Yamaha marketers love labels (Sony was another company who liked labels as I recall.)

Short of knowing the exact info on all the parts used (100's of them,) which I suspect you don't know, I don't see how you can make the claims you are making.

As for fraud, companies make claims all the time, that can't easily be disproved - they are usually so vague, or subjective, there's no way to discount them. Look at all the products and companies that are 'the best'. They can't all be the best now, can they? I have rarely heard of a company being sued for false claims, unless it's damn specific.
post #7 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchoolMETAL View Post

But they're not the same. The Aventage/Digital Top Art design has circuit and structure differences, it's a known fact. I just didn't realize that the new RX-V667 above and later year models, dropped that Digital Top Art Feature since they redesigned them without that feature, creating a new receiver line with that feature, called the Aventage. Previously you just had to see if the receiver had the Digital Top Art Design now it's easier as they renamed all the receivers with this feature as an Aventage receiver with the prefix RX-A instead of RX-V. Much easier to tell which receivers have that performance design now.

If those earlier HTR models had Digital Top Art, then they were the equivalent, which many did. Now that Yamaha has dropped the feature label and actually started renaming the series that has this feature, for sure this Digital Top Art Design is not not offered in the newer RX-Vs including the RX-V871 and RX-V671.

Not saying that they're not good, or even if it's audible, but to some it may be. Just saying that their chassis doesn't off the better noise and vibration dampening, parts are of lower grade (I'm an electronic Tech so I know about how this makes a difference), and circuits designs are slightly different as each DAC in the Aventage series has a separate ground. That means less chance of ground loops which can bring interference and noise.

BTW, there is no such thing as a RX-V1071. The RX-V series stops at the RX-V871.

If you're talking about another country, I have no idea since this is an English speaking forum, I'm going by the USA, and normally Canada models.

I'm going from memory alone, but I believe that the 871 does use top art technology. I haven't checked the yamaha site recently but do remember reading it in the past. There are some minor differences in the model lines, but I doubt you'll hear any difference in them. The main thing is the aventage line carries an extra year on the warranty. Though any Yamaha that makes it through its first year of use will likely last ten or more if cared for.
post #8 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDEaston View Post

Though any Yamaha that makes it through its first year of use will likely last ten or more if cared for.

Spot On..I just replaced a +14 year old working perfectly RX-V992 with a RX-A3000 which I absolutely love.
post #9 of 27
Metal,

I believe you. I think the aventage are better than the rx lines. It's more than the fifth leg and longer warranty.

I'm sure marketing plays a big part in their naming, but that doesn't mean everything is named strictly for marketing purposes.
post #10 of 27
Thread Starter 
Wow, sounds like a lot of anti-Yamaha bias here. Sorry just stating the facts.

All I was saying with this new thread is that the technology has changed it's name or labeling to make it more clear as to what receivers have this performance technology. I think this is a much better way to differentiate the models with this peformance than needing to see if they have the Digital Top Art design.
post #11 of 27
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdfox18doe View Post

Spot On..I just replaced a +14 year old working perfectly RX-V992 with a RX-A3000 which I absolutely love.

Yep, my old RX-V2095 is still doing Stereo duties at my buddies house.

Yamaha does seem to have a high percentage of defective receivers out of the box. Looks like their quality control has been pretty bad since 2000. Back in the 90's, their receivers were solid out of the box. Since 2000, this is now the 3rd defective receiver out of the box I received. It isn't confidence inspiring.

My new RX-A710 is bad out of the box with defective video conversion circuitry. My options right now are a RX-V671 (for which I did the research to find the info mentioned) or an RX-A810 or a Denon AVR-2312Ci. the Denon is very limited in connections so it's not completely compatible with my system with out the additions of an external input switching box. For that matter, either is the AVR-3312CI. Denon has gone way downhill since my AVR-3803.
post #12 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchoolMETAL View Post

Wow, sounds like a lot of anti-Yamaha bias here. Sorry just stating the facts.

All I was saying with this new thread is that the technology has changed it's name or labeling to make it more clear as to what receivers have this performance technology. I think this is a much better way to differentiate the models with this peformance than needing to see if they have the Digital Top Art design.

I certainly am not bias against yamaha, I am just saying that the differences in the aventage line are subtle enough that your not likely to hear a difference in them and the upper level rx line. It actually says a lot about yamahas build quality in general, that even their lower tier receivers are just as reliable as their high end line, which is top notch. If anything you seem to be the one that is sour towards yamaha, which I understand, but its rare to have the problems you keep having.
post #13 of 27
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDEaston View Post

I certainly am not bias against yamaha, I am just saying that the differences in the aventage line are subtle enough that your not likely to hear a difference in them and the upper level rx line. It actually says a lot about yamahas build quality in general, that even their lower tier receivers are just as reliable as their high end line, which is top notch. If anything you seem to be the one that is sour towards yamaha, which I understand, but its rare to have the problems you keep having.

No, I'm sour against them all. I'm an equal opportunity hater.

Just not happy with so many limitations on the new receivers. Hard to find any that are compatible with all of my equipment. Yamaha is the only one so far, other than the ONkyo TX-NR*09 series which was plagued with trouble.
post #14 of 27
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDEaston View Post

I'm going from memory alone, but I believe that the 871 does use top art technology. I haven't checked the yamaha site recently but do remember reading it in the past.

Unfortunately no, the RX-V871 (look under technology tab) does not have Digital Top Art as does the RX-V765 (look under technology tab) as seen by the technology feature all the way at the bottom of the page.
post #15 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchoolMETAL View Post

Wow, sounds like a lot of anti-Yamaha bias here. Sorry just stating the facts.

It's not a fact just because you said it. If what you said is true you should be able to come with a better a response than accusing us of anti-Yamaha bias.
post #16 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchoolMETAL View Post

Unfortunately no, the RX-V871 (look under technology tab) does not have Digital Top Art as does the RX-V765 (look under technology tab) as seen by the technology feature all the way at the bottom of the page.

If this proves that the RX-V871 doesn't use Digital Top Art, then it should also prove that none of the Aventage models use Digital Top Art technology either. Digital Top Art is not listed on technology tab for any Aventage receiver.
post #17 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchoolMETAL View Post

Unfortunately no, the RX-V871 (look under technology tab) does not have Digital Top Art as does the RX-V765 (look under technology tab) as seen by the technology feature all the way at the bottom of the page.

The 810 is clearly better than the 671. Can you get them both for the same price? You can't afford "top art". lol
post #18 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchoolMETAL View Post


Unfortunately no, the RX-V871 (look under technology tab) does not have Digital Top Art as does the RX-V765 (look under technology tab) as seen by the technology feature all the way at the bottom of the page.

What I read must have been that the 871 uses "top quality hand selected parts" and low jitter circuitry, which are two of the main differences between the top tier and bottom tier yamahas.
post #19 of 27
My history with Yamaha has been nothing short of great. I will continue to shop their brand until I have reason not to. I've had very good tech support in the few cases where I had questions years ago. They're headquartered locally in Buena Park Ca.

1981-2001 ; Yamaha R-900

2001-2011 ; Yamaha RX-V3200 (TopArt) only replaced for lack of AV delay - still in perfect operating condition.

2011-Current ; Yamaha RX-A800
post #20 of 27
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbobuick86 View Post

My history with Yamaha has been nothing short of great. I will continue to shop their brand until I have reason not to. I've had very good tech support in the few cases where I had questions years ago. They're headquartered locally in Buena Park Ca.

1981-2001 ; Yamaha R-900

2001-2011 ; Yamaha RX-V3200 (TopArt) only replaced for lack of AV delay - still in perfect operating condition.

2011-Current ; Yamaha RX-A800

Once you get a good one, they last. My one friend is still using the RX-V2095 I sold him.

Another friend just sold the late 90's RX-V793 I sold him along with his floor standing Polk speakers.

Then I re-aquired my first True Dolby "Prologic" (NOT Dolby Surround) receiver I had by Technics from the mid 90s from the friend I sold the RX-V2095 to, as a good will jester for setting up his home theater. Then I sold that Technic's receiver along with some retired Infinity bookshelf speakers and a Sony Subwoofer to my friend who originally had the RX-V793. I had the RX-V2095, Infinity bookshelf speakers and Sony Subwoofer as a bedroom audio/video system, but stopped using it so it went up for sale.

My original RX-V995 was sold back to the dealer through a trade up program for the RX-V2095. I had it about a year.

The RX-V2095 is still operating in my friends system.

The RX-V793 was part of my other friends system up until about 5 years ago when he sold it.

The Technics is still operating as part of my friends new system.

No way in hell am I selling my Denon AVR-3803. This receiver is just awesome, but not necessarily easy to use with the wife after I converted everything to HDMI for the new LED LCD TV. After we move, it will be used in a secondary theater system and primary audio system.

Right now I'm trying to get a Yamaha RX-V671 at a very steeply discounted price compared to my defective RX-A710. That's if they can find me one. Or I may get a Denon AVR-2312CI but it's limited in connections but does have better I/P scaling and Audissey EQ XT.

If I can get the RX-V671 for the price I'm hoping, it will be a bargain I'll likely not see for many many years. I can get a good deal on the Denon but not nearly as good as the Yamaha. With upcoming expensive necessities, the Denon must be at a price to good to pass up and right now it's not.

Ah yes, I'm trying to buy a RX-V671 even without the (PREVIOUS) Digital Top Art Design or newly renamed Aventage performance package. If the price is right, I'm willing to accept a bit more noise and interference.
post #21 of 27
in the 90's I bought an RXV-870. There was an equivalent model that I think was the HTR-5040 (or something like that). I remember when I was shopping for this receiver going to the Yamaha website and looking up information on the two models. In black and white, the Yamaha website stated explicitly that the two receivers were identical. The labels were for marketing purposes and were sold through different outlets.

The HTR was sold at Sears and the RXV at places like Ultimate Electronics. This I recall because I was in UE one day and overhead a customer saying he could get a better price on the HTR and the salesman told him that the RXV used better parts.

I'm guessing your story was a hand me down as well.
post #22 of 27
Quote:


Right now I'm trying to get a Yamaha RX-V671 at a very steeply discounted price compared to my defective RX-A710. That's if they can find me one. Or I may get a Denon AVR-2312CI but it's limited in connections but does have better I/P scaling and Audissey EQ XT.

What connection does the A710 have that the Denon 2312 doesn't have?

Both have 2 optical and 2 coaxial inputs, 6 HDMI inputs, 2 component video inputs, 1 output, USB and networking. So what is it lacking vs the A710 or V671? The Denon has better room calibration with MultiEQ XT and Airplay.

http://usa.denon.com/us/Product/Page...2312CI(DenonNA)
post #23 of 27
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by afrogt View Post

What connection does the A710 have that the Denon 2312 doesn't have?

Both have 2 optical and 2 coaxial inputs, 6 HDMI inputs, 2 component video inputs, 1 output, USB and networking. So what is it lacking vs the A710 or V671? The Denon has better room calibration with MultiEQ XT and Airplay.

http://usa.denon.com/us/Product/Page...2312CI(DenonNA)

Denon groups all their connections together for fewer actual inputs. Example: Each digital audio connection, each HDMI connection, each analog analog audio connection, each analog composite video connection, and each analog component video connection must be grouped to "1" individual "input".

Yamaha doesn't group so there is many more actual inputs to connect more equipment. Each HDMI connection is 1 input separate from the analog composite video connections (which each are their own inputs) and each component video connection. The same is true for audio connections, HDMI connections, digital audio connections, and analog audio connections are not grouped together on the same input, they are each on separate inputs.

The Denon has 8 actual inputs: BD, DVD, CABLE, TV, DVR, DOCK, CD, AUX, GAME 1, GAME 2.

The Yamaha RX-V710 or RX-V671 has 14 actual inputs: HDMI 1, HDMI 2, HDMI 3, HDMI 4, HDMI 5, V-AUX, AV1, AV2, AV3, AV4, AV5, AV6, AUDIO 1, AUDIO 2, PLUS has AV OUT along with a second AUDIO OUT. Denon lacks the second AUDIO OUT so I'll have to use an external switch box.

However the Denon could be more flexible based on the equipments connection needs. Example: if more than 2 inputs are needed with composite video and analog audio connections. The Denon provides 3 while the Yamaha provides 2.
post #24 of 27
Thread Starter 
Just talked to my Dealer. They were all sold out of the RX-V671 and the RX-A710 had a substantial wait from back order.

So I was able to get the price I wanted on the Denon AVR-2312Ci. In fact most had dropped their prices in anticipation of the new models. I was able to get even a lower price than most.

I was able to get a much much better price reduction than I did on my AVR-3803 and was able to get the AVR-2312CI for just $100 more than the Yamaha RX-A710.

The new Yamaha RX-V673 is pretty nice finally adding Air Play, a full I/P scaler, 4K upscaling and pass through, and a better YPAO system. The RX-V773WA multi-point YPAO is similar to denon with 8 positions. Of course prices went up where a RX-V673 would cost the same as the AVR-2312CI did me.

So I'm pretty happy I only had to go down 1 step from the AVR-3803's replacement, the AVR-3312CI.
post #25 of 27
This might help clear things up a bit regarding Yamaha HT amps.

Worldwide Yamaha have a 3 tiered range of receivers.
Depending on country, there is either a broadening or lessening of any particular tier of the range.
The USA has a much much larger amount of different models in the lower tiered HTR range, 6 of these.
For instance, in the USA Yamaha has 5 models in the RX range, that's NEW models replacing the RX V371-871 [ RX V373 to RX V773 which have the newest spec 4k pass through etc].
http://usa.yamaha.com/products/audio...product_lineup
Then after the RX-V871, in the USA you don't have any choice but to buy into the Aventage range.

Here's the difference.

Where in Australia for instance, we only have one low priced model in the HTR range.
Yamaha have an extra 4 models in the RX range, 3 of these extra models being the same as the higher end Aventage range, but without the Aventage build differences.
That's where the mysterious [to some] RX-V1071, RX-V2071 and RX-V3071 come from.
http://au.yamaha.com/en/products/aud...product_lineup

Both the USA & Australia have the same actual Aventage models.

What was previously known as "Top Art" build/+ component quality, have now been given a separate line called Aventage.
These amps are for all intended purposes exactly the same as the RX series.

Where the Aventage line differs is.
- Symmetrical power amplifier layout
- Large block capacitors.
- Stronger anti vibration H section chassis, and solid aluminium front panel
- Larger power transformer
- Larger speaker terminals
- A few Higher rated circuit board parts
- Burr Brown DAC's [differs as models get higher up the range]
- Anti vibration 5th support.

I only found out what the story was with these differences myself while searching for a review on the RX-V1071........which I ended up buying last week as there is only limited dealership of Yamaha's Aventage range here, and all were out of stock.
It's good enough to drive a HT in my small room anyway.
post #26 of 27
It's fighting a loosing battle on AVS.

To say anything is better than anything else is ludicrous to many on this forum.

Since none of us can catalog ALL the parts in a receiver it's an impossible argument with them.
post #27 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by dean-l View Post

It's fighting a loosing battle on AVS.

To say anything is better than anything else is ludicrous to many on this forum.

Since none of us can catalog ALL the parts in a receiver it's an impossible argument with them.

Aventages will stand toe to toe with everything out there. Where it lacks is room correction. If your listening room isn't an acoustic nightmare, ypao will work for you.

This would be the perfect receiver with added AirPlay and audyssey in a 3020 model. Im thinking yamaha will never swallow its pride and license audyssey.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Just some info I found about Yamaha Aventage Receivers