Quote:
Originally Posted by HLdan 
Me emotional? Check you previous post. You sound very much like your hurt from the backside and you needed to take it out on a television.
. I was asking D-Nice a question and made a point why I was asking. You replied to me. No need for you to throw your weight around and now throw insults. You're just wasting your time, but not mine, I'm getting a good laugh at you. Rather than being rude why don't attempt to show me those competitors that are offering more than the GT50 with equal price comparisons? Can you?

Me emotional? Check you previous post. You sound very much like your hurt from the backside and you needed to take it out on a television.
. I was asking D-Nice a question and made a point why I was asking. You replied to me. No need for you to throw your weight around and now throw insults. You're just wasting your time, but not mine, I'm getting a good laugh at you. Rather than being rude why don't attempt to show me those competitors that are offering more than the GT50 with equal price comparisons? Can you?Hey buddy, you're the one getting emotionally upset that people are being critical of the GT50. I don't think anyone said it's a bad television- it just doesn't make any sense in that product stack. You seem to have such a knee-jerk reaction to people criticizing the GT50 that you'd think it's your child. It's a television dude. Get over it.
And as for comparable TV's, check out Samsung's Plasma line this year, starting with the PNE6500. As far as I'm aware, it has comparable picture options to what the VT50 has. This is what makes the GT50 an odd-ball choice of a television for 2012. ST50 and VT50 make perfect sense given their price points and feature sets.











![Wow: World of Wonder [Blu-ray]](http://cdn.avsforum.com/1/11/50x50px-ZC-1166fb14_B00462PTDQ-51E0ByQYHsL.jpeg)





























