AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Ultra Hi-End HT Gear ($20,000+) › Theta CB III HD in the house (with my ADA Mach IV)!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Theta CB III HD in the house (with my ADA Mach IV)! - Page 5

post #121 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebland View Post

Well... The talk is over.. I have a CB III HD with Extreme DACs up front and Superior II DACs in the back loaded in my rack for an extended stay.

I placed it close to my ADA Mach IV B for easy swapping of XLRs.

I'll spend the few days setting up, balancing the channels, setting crossovers and A/B testing vs my own SSP. I also want to see how reliable it is, too. Let's see what you get for $26,000!

I've been wanting to do thus for some time and finally this piece fell into my lap.

More to come. I just got this today.

I'm late to the party but congrads Jeff.
post #122 of 271
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogger View Post

A year and a half ago, I would have been interested. Now, I am waiting to hear the new dacs with Dirac Live. PEQ, that's like last century tech and I am completely uninterested in that. My set-up is going to include at least one Gen 8, the new Digi out card, and Dirac live. None of which you have.


PEQ is here and now. DIRAC is still vapor for you and who knows how good the installation be in the Theta. A lot of unknowns.

I've never built a system for what's coming as you miss out on excellence sonics today (and yesterday). Today you're compromised in sonics on Blu Ray tracks. I don't think you even have HDMI. The PEQ is light years past what you have.
post #123 of 271
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by javry View Post

I'm late to the party but congrads Jeff.

Hey!@

Thanks! Should be a fun, telling shoot out!
post #124 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebland View Post


PEQ is here and now. DIRAC is still vapor for you and who knows how good the installation be in the Theta. A lot of unknowns.

Theta is currently demonstrating Dirac Live and will be doing so at the June show. I have a 2 week free trial of Dirac Live to run on my PC and will then feed out 24/96 digital to my Gen 8. Dirac Live is not vapor ware. You like Curt
@ Trinnov? When I spoke with him, he didn't have good things to say about PEQ.
I don't think you will ever buy advanced room correction. PEQ is just too limited. There are just too many areas that room correction can tackle, like phase and first reflections that PEQ is just too primitive to address.
post #125 of 271
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogger View Post

Theta is currently demonstrating Dirac Live and will be doing so at the June show. I have a 2 week free trial of Dirac Live to run on my PC and will then feed out 24/96 digital to my Gen 8. Dirac Live is not vapor ware. You like Curt
@ Trinnov? When I spoke with him, he didn't have good things to say about PEQ.
I don't think you will ever buy advanced room correction. PEQ is just too limited. There are just too many areas that room correction can tackle, like phase and first reflections that PEQ is just too primitive to address.

Didn't Theta demonstrate the Valis - and fail to release it? Even had ads in the magazines. Yes. I was there at CEDIA in Indianapolis to see the 'promised' prototype. Dirac is not set in stone until it is.

And Yes, I am aware of the DIRAC Beta test (Mattias).

I like Curt. Smart guy. He has a great product that competes with PEQ on the ADA. I would expect he would prefer it, he sells it... and I agree with his assessment. I have traveled to shows to hear it in action. No argument - it is a superior product. For $10K, you get a lot better reference room correction.

The ADA PEQ is better than you think. And I will soon test the ADA with PEQ vs the Theta without. We'll see how weak it really is...

And how have you been addressing things over the last 5-10 years (e.g. phase)?? You haven't - but you talk as if you have. I have. So, what is your point and why so argumentative??
post #126 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebland View Post


Didn't Theta test demonstrate Valis - and fail to release it? Yes. I was there at CEDIA in Indianapolis. Dirac is not set in stone.

I like Curt. Smart guy. He has a great product that competes with PEQ on the ADA.

The ADA PEQ is better than you think. And how have you been addressing things over the last 5-10 years (e.g. phase and first reflections - besides foam)?? You haven't.

I don't know about the Valis and was never interested I'm it. That was the processor you wanted? The one that starred this whole thing,rage, when you didn't get it !? I never knew you had actually heard it? Ahhh, now I understand the psychological mechanisms. Expectation,disappointment,ANGER.


I don't need any help with reflections. I use RPG Skylines and Owens-Corning 705 for that. There was not much I could do, until now about phase that I found acceptable. Now however there is no excuse to only use PEQ. As for ADA PEQ competing with Trinnov, that's ridiculous. The proof is that ADA adopted Trinnov themselves.
post #127 of 271
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogger View Post

I don't know about the Valis and was never interested I'm it. That was the processor you wanted? The one that starred this whole thing,rage, when you didn't get it !? I never knew you had actually heard it? Ahhh, now I understand the psychological mechanisms. Expectation,disappointment,ANGER.

Nice colorful spin. But Theta has a history of advertising products that never materialize. We agree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogger View Post

I don't need any help with reflections. I use RPG Skylines and Owens-Corning 705 for that. There was not much I could do, until now about phase that I found acceptable. Now however there is no excuse to only use PEQ. As for ADA PEQ competing with Trinnov, that's ridiculous. The proof is that ADA adopted Trinnov themselves.


And yes, you chide me for the way I deal with phase, but you have no solution in your theater. That's a problem for you and may explain your disappointment in your sound.

Are you using even a CB III HD (meaning is your set up even relevant when you're bad mouthing mine) or are you theorizing?
post #128 of 271
I am going to check out until after you declare the ADA superior to the Casablanca. Then we can talk about how it effects the ability of others to demo at home when some abuse dealers by taking gear that they have no intention of buying.
post #129 of 271
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogger View Post

I am going to check out until after you declare the ADA superior to the Casablanca. Then we can talk about how it effects the ability of others to demo at home when some abuse dealers by taking gear that they have no intention of buying.

Thank you from all of us (and the moderator) and I'll let the dealer know the dealer police checked in.
post #130 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebland View Post

Nice colorful spin. But Theta has a history of advertising products that never materialize. We agree.




And yes, you chide me for the way I deal with phase, but you have no solution in your theater. That's a problem for you and may explain your disappointment in your sound.

Are you using even a CB III HD (meaning is your set up even relevant when you're bad mouthing mine) or are you theorizing?

Jeff

After all these years your still starting trouble.. My oh my i thought you would eventually settle in with a pre Pro you love and leave us to enjoy our Theta's !!

So you have a Loaner Cb3HD ? Loaner from who ? I just want people to Know the Loaner is not from Theta or myself.

You have been pre disposed for so long to hate theta that if the Theta sounded 100 times better than your ADA, you would still hate it. Your rants and negative comments about the Valis never coming to fruition are silly. They showed a Valis which Neil spent tons of money on and the technology was changing so he decided to hold off and wait. He didn't cost anyone any money so why would this bother you ?

Morris buys the company and sinks huge dollars into the Cb3HD and comes out with a once again amazing upgrade for a machine that was released a long time ago bringing up to a very current and more than current now Fully upgradable chassis with new Dac options and HDMI 1.4 and lots more and your still knocking it.

Jeff, you and i both know that your ADA doesn't hold a candle to the CB3HD and for you to even consider A/B ing them is ridiculous. Worse off is that you have no idea how to setup the Cb3Hd to make it sound right and even more worse off is the gear you are using is all commercial and is not even close to a revealing home theater setup like you would get with Aerial or something like them. For super loud playing which your system is clearly designed around , a Denon receiver would be fine. If you dare to put on a 2 Channel CD and actually listen to someone singing or guitar playing you might be able to understand why Theta Rules in the Multi Use Category.

QSC's and Crowns are not well known for high end vocal reproduction and being that i have installed hundreds of Crowns over the years in large venue applications that i have done, I can tell you they suck for making music and im being nice.

I know NOS(Sweet Air) is flowing freely at your dental office but you need to stop hitting the mask so hard because its apparently causing you to come in and out of consciousness. Enjoy your ADA and give the CB3HD back to whomever loaned it to you so they can enjoy it and you can enjoy your ADA along with the Crown amps and all the other commercial equipment you are using.

Most people on AVS are using speakers and other gear from well known companies such as Aerial, Wilson, Faber, Bryston and so many other high end companies that are known for great home audio. People who try to re-create the 300 Seat Imax theater in their home using commercial gear quickly find out that the gear works great for super loud movie watching but for home use and well defined music and movies it never works.

Be honest the reason you brought the Theta in was simply to see if you can fix your bad choice in other gear, Thats my guess !

Craig
post #131 of 271
Thread Starter 
Hey Craig!

I've heard the audiophile speakers and they're great for music or 100 db peaks but they all lack the dynamics of compression drivers and at higher volumes ALL suffer driver compression. I just couldn't rationalize doing such in my theater. I didn't design my room to handcuff my dynamic range.

If the Theta is that great, I'll order one.

But we have a lot of talk here and everyone thinks what they own is the best and argue incessantly on theory or high MSRP and offer no proof of their claims.

I'm taking the matter into my own hands. It only costs me time. But no one else has done it. Nobody has had more SSPs than me and I love the changing out and variety. Just like cars.

At $26000 I'd expect it to whoop ass against my piece at 1/3 of the price!!

We'll see.

Remember this is hobby and shoot outside this are what it's all about.
post #132 of 271
Wow, you guys are pushing to get this thread shut down. I think everyone needs to turn it down a notch or two and chill.

I'd like to interject, if I may;

1.) Rhapsody utilizing PEQ does not in any way compete with the CBIII HD etc, etc. You're talking 8k vs 26k that's a ridiculous comparisson. The Rhapsody/TEQ-12 combo is a more accurate comparo at 24k retail. Now you have an interesting race; the ADA is going to do things with movies and music that the Theta cannot (sorry fanboys); and the Theta is going to treat music with a character that the ADA combo cannot (sorry Jeff). Having said that: if you were to take a 2-channel input directly into the TEQ (no Rhapsody at all) and compare to 2-channel from the CBIII; then it gives the Casa a run for it's money.

2.) Valis was conceived under Neil, prototyped under Morris (oem by ATI with some other stuff thrown in from another mfr). That device was essentially just the ATP 8500 from ATI with sweeter sounding electronics (Neil did work some love into it, thankfully).

3.) Pro gear vs. audiophile gear is such a bull$hit argument these days, I shouldn't have to even discuss; but once again... If one looks at the science of the two, you see that in almost all but the cheapest garbage pro gear, the impulse, phase, power, and frequency responses from pro (read companies like l'acoustic, EAW, Innovox, d&b acoustique) speakers are as good, if not better than stuff like Triad, Wilson, Aerial, CAT, B&W, JBL Synth. The comments of pro speakers are for tin ears or less accurate than audiophile speakers are flat out wrong. Remeber it is a loudspeaker/room system, not a vacuum; since they interact they must be tuned together, it matters much less once correction is thrown into the mix.

3.) I certainly agree that receiving loaner gear when there is no intention of a purchase is unethical, but so is demoing gear at one dealer and purchasing from another, or using one person's price to haggle a second dealer. We cannot stop behavior like this, and I don't really think that's the case here.

4.) Comparissons between Dirac equipped gear and Trinnov are really pretty pointless: when 3d remapping is turned off, they perform quite similarly. But WHY would you turn off the 3D remapping That's the feature that puts Trinnov in its own league! The Dirac runtime I used was clunky, it appears that the new runtime is much easier to deal with- I'm jealous of that. Morris most likely chose Dirac because it was the easies to implement given the limited real-estate available. In fact it had to be delayed so processor size (chip) could be reduced by development (heat gets generated, needs to be dissipated; big chip big heatsink, lots of unavailable space).

Trinnov would not have fit; it would have to be a second chasis with a digital link... and with HDCP that becomes a serious pain.

Let's just leave Jeff alone while he toils with this unfamiliar processor to compare to his...then we can wonder how things might turn out if umr tuned both systems instead of just the ADA. BTW; the QSCs are more powerful than the PEQ program and ultimately a better tool overall (phase corrections, filter types, crossover adjustments, etc).

Dan
post #133 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebland View Post

Hey Craig!

I've heard the audiophile speakers and they're great for music or 100 db peaks but they all lack the dynamics of compression drivers and at higher volumes ALL suffer driver compression. I just couldn't rationalize doing such in my theater. I didn't design my room to handcuff my dynamic range.

If the Theta is that great, I'll order one.

But we have a lot of talk here and everyone thinks what they own is the best and argue incessantly on theory or high MSRP and offer no proof of their claims.

I'm taking the matter into my own hands. It only costs me time. But no one else has done it. Nobody has had more SSPs than me and I love the changing out and variety. Just like cars.

At $26000 I'd expect it to whoop ass against my piece at 1/3 of the price!!

We'll see.

Remember this is hobby and shoot outside this are what it's all about.


If you think my Aerials compress what dimension are you from????

Your comments like this prove your lack of knowledge when it comes to audio. Your shool of audio is "The Louder, The Better"!
My school is "Quieter with More Dynamics"!

When I play Iron Man 2 for example, every time the whip cracks or the boot rocket boosters flare, you can feel and hear it and it sounds just right! Ask Mani, he was here!
post #134 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by VGI View Post

Jeff, you and i both know that your ADA doesn't hold a candle to the CB3HD and for you to even consider A/B ing them is ridiculous.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanFrancis View Post

1.) Rhapsody utilizing PEQ does not in any way compete with the CBIII HD etc, etc. You're talking 8k vs 26k that's a ridiculous comparisson. The Rhapsody/TEQ-12 combo is a more accurate comparo at 24k retail.

Both dead wrong assumptions in my opinion. Just because the CBIII HD with Xtreme cards lists for 26K means absolutely nothing. Craig himself is dumping them for 50% below retail on Audiogon. This is not a 26K processor. A used chassis is worth 2K, the DACs are worth 40% of retail used, and streetprice for the upgrade is 30% off.

There is a very legitimate question as to whether a piece selling for around 12K used, using 12 year old DACs is still competitive against a $10K piece designed from the ground up using the latest technology.

The ONLY way to find the answer to that question is to line up two processors and do a shootout, which is precisely what Jeff is about to do. All the rest is speculation.

Another good candidate for such a shootout would be the new Bryston, which is in the same ballpark new as the CBIII HD used, and has no room correction either.
post #135 of 271
How old do you think the Rhapsody is? Do you think it's actually been re-engineered from the ground-up? No.

Input cards, mother board, DSP boards, power supplies, output cards, all pretty modular. The Mach4 is an evolution that started over a decade ago, just like the Casablanca.

because used market is so variable and there's no warranty on used, one really should compare MSRP to MSRP. what YOU pay for it has nothing to do with it- the only non-variable price is the one set by the manufacturer. Also, what Craig charges using Audiogon and Videogon has nothing to do with it: only because it is determined by how much profit he's willing to give up.

Dan
post #136 of 271
I vote to close this thread. I can hear the vomit about to spout out, "See I told you so, Theta is overpriced, not as good as product for a lot less money, blah blah blah".

Let's compare 2 different cars at different price points too. Porsche Carrera Turbo and a Ford Focus. Both cars. Both get you from A to B.

Who is administering a medical hearing test to qualify A/B listeners?

Good luck playing War of the Worlds. Higher resolution shows off subtleties. Explosions are dynamic but you won't hear fine details. While there is some validity in testing in same environment, one should really invest in proper room treatments. They are not that expensive and can blend in. They don't have to look hideous.

My old home had acoustic treatments. My temp condo does not. My next home will again have proper treatments. If you were in a temp situation then I understand, but in your home you are settled into there is no excuse. Every sound control room or studio has them when using pro speakers. Why would you deviate?
post #137 of 271
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim HTPC View Post


Good luck playing War of the Worlds. Higher resolution shows off subtleties. Explosions are dynamic but you won't hear fine details. While there is some validity in testing in same environment, one should really invest in proper room treatments. They are not that expensive and can blend in. They don't have to look hideous.

My old home had acoustic treatments. My temp condo does not. My next home will again have proper treatments. If you were in a temp situation then I understand, but in your home you are settled into there is no excuse. Every sound control room or studio has them when using pro speakers. Why would you deviate?

Hi Jim,

I'm familiar with the Porsche analogies (i own a new Turbo S). But the Nissan GTR by many professional reviewers deem it better than my Turbo S on the track and nearly so in acceleration... At almost $80,000 less! Price is not always commensurate with performance. That's AVS 101. There are world beaters out there. No regrets on owning the more expensive car just like regardless of what I find here, the Theta in your own rig will still sound the same whether I find it better, worse, or the equal to the ADA.

My room is acoustically treated. The HT designer contracted out an acoustical company who spent 8 days fully treating my 'built from the ground up' room. This isn't a basement theater like the majority here. It's on the main from built as an extension to the main house. Its as balanced I room as I have ever seen.

Craig calls the Theta a great'multi use' processor. And I agree. But I am home theater only. If music was my thing I'd have your run of the mil $20K - $30K LCRs and I'd have ditch my Microperf and baffle wall (no way)!!!!!

But in working with Mark Seaton and having a goal to build the best home theater movie playback system I could, horns had to implemented. Tweeters no matter what the design (dispersion and dynamics) can't compete with compression drivers in my opinion. And yes, we had to do some EQing to tame the LCRs with DSPs but the results are amazing... Even with LCR monitors that retail at just under $10K for three of them. I have been doing room correction well before it was popular as I understand you just can't let the movie play and hope for the best even with pain stakingly placed acoustical treatments.

I don't know how the Theta will fare but I've never put a lot of Credit in the fact that the SSP is the most important factor in sound. I rank the room, acoustical treatments, DSPs and speakers far ahead a box with a power supply, DACs, and a few chips. Testing the Theta will prove or disprove my theory - that's my main reason for doing it.

Instead of attacking me for taking the time to do this, I'd hope the Theta guys would help with set up or make recommendations on setting slopes, etc or other buried settings.

I'm getting my cabling on Monday but with the holidays coming won't be around much over the next 2 weeks. I'm going to cable it and set up one of my blu Ray players on it.

I guess what many Theta guys don't understand is the choices I made in my theater were my own based on my own decisions, professionals, and my own research. I chose to use pro audio equipment in meting out the sound I wanted. If I wanted to spend more on a Theta, boutique amps and speakers, don't you think I would've. Heck, I spent $8000 on a piece of glass (ISCO). It wasn't a budget issue (my weekend car cost far more than Bulldogger and Bruzonky's equipment combined). These were my choices based on achieving a desired outcome. How can you bash someone for that? It'd be like me bashing someone's wife because she wasn't my type! Ive been critical to Theta Inc. for a long time but never personally to any Theta guy. So, let's cut the personal crap and try and be more constructive and grown up. A lot of arguing and I haven't even powered up the CBIII yet!

Let's get back to fun and civility. I'll do my best to set it up fairly and will have others from AVS to listen, too. All this bashing against someone taking the time to do a test that is long over due...
post #138 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanFrancis View Post

How old do you think the Rhapsody is? Do you think it's actually been re-engineered from the ground-up? No.

Input cards, mother board, DSP boards, power supplies, output cards, all pretty modular. The Mach4 is an evolution that started over a decade ago, just like the Casablanca.

because used market is so variable and there's no warranty on used, one really should compare MSRP to MSRP. what YOU pay for it has nothing to do with it- the only non-variable price is the one set by the manufacturer. Also, what Craig charges using Audiogon and Videogon has nothing to do with it: only because it is determined by how much profit he's willing to give up.

Dan

Dan, the fact of the matter is the vast maority of the guys on this forum paid a few grand for the upgrade, at which pricepoint it is a no brainer, and Theta is indeed the only game in town (for THEM). If the CBIII HD was available only for $26K, that equation would change entirely. Anyone but the staunchest Theta loyalist with unlimited resources, would audition a few different pieces before committing 26K. This would probably including the ADA and certainly the Bryston.

Also, keep in mind that what sets apart the CBIII HD from the rest of the pack is the Xtreme crads. Although I am not dismissing the possibility this is still a SOTA card, before actually paying 5K for a 12 year old card I would want to validate nothing better has come along at 1/3 of the price. You appear to be saying because the Xtreme sells for 5K retail, I would be wasting my time listening to cheaper DACs. I disagree.
post #139 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by VGI View Post

For super loud playing which your system is clearly designed around , a Denon receiver would be fine. If you dare to put on a 2 Channel CD and actually listen to someone singing or guitar playing you might be able to understand why Theta Rules in the Multi Use Category.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim HTPC View Post

Good luck playing War of the Worlds. Higher resolution shows off subtleties. Explosions are dynamic but you won't hear fine details.

What's you point? Jeff is in the single use category - not a big secret. If the Theta does not beat the ADA in his particular application then so be it. If it does - fine too. All interesting, empircally based, net new information.
post #140 of 271
I am really looking forward to the outcome of this, Jeff.

I own a suite 7.1hd and just put the deposit down on a Mach 4 rhapsody.

I will be going to hear the datasat offering also.

For me the majority of work is music, and as such I think the theta would truly be a stunning bit of kit. But I wonder like you whether it will be as good for movie work. Let's hope so.

But after a while I decided i need to seperate out my two systems. A processor for film and stereo pre for music. Room eq is important to me especially in movies as I like them real loud and music I like a lot quieter.

Please do not let certain people put you off putting up your findings.

Best of luck. Wish I lived in the states where I could get to listen to a theta.
post #141 of 271
"My school is "Quieter with More Dynamics"!"

If you get "more dynamics" by turning down the volume either your speakers are suffering from power compression at the higher volume level or you are running out of amplifier power at the higher level.

BTW, most speakers do suffer power compression. The overwhelming majority of the power put into them turns into heat, not sound. As the voice coil(s) heat up their efficiency drops further and you get power compression.

For example a speaker rated at 90dB/w/m is converting power into sound at about 0.6% efficiency. In other words if you are putting 100w into the speaker you are only getting out about 0.6 acoustic watts of power. The other 99.4w of power input are lost in the speaker (heating the voice coils and losses in the crossover).

Compare that to something like a compression driver rated at 111dB/w/m. That is converting electrical wattage into acoustic wattage at almost 80% efficiency. With 1w input you would be getting about 0.8 acoustic watts of power output with about 0.2w of power lost as heat.

It is not hard to see which speaker is going to have an easier time avoiding power compression and therefor preserving dynamics.

Shawn
post #142 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by edorr View Post


What's you point? Jeff is in the single use category - not a big secret. If the Theta does not beat the ADA in his particular application then so be it. If it does - fine too. All interesting, empircally based, net new information.

Quite obvious, listen to a live demolition and you would know what i speak of. Resolution increase from dts to dts ma hd is not easily or even heard during an explosion. Take a quiet scene with guitar strings, dialogue, it is easier to hear the difference of resolution increase. Wrong demo material if you're using just explosions. Yes is sounds cool and feels cool vibrating your pant legs, but that is about it.
post #143 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim HTPC View Post

Quite obvious, listen to a live demolition and you would know what i speak of. Resolution increase from dts to dts ma hd is not easily or even heard during an explosion. Take a quiet scene with guitar strings, dialogue, it is easier to hear the difference of resolution increase. Wrong demo material if you're using just explosions. Yes is sounds cool and feels cool vibrating your pant legs, but that is about it.

Most movie buffs are more interest in experiencing the impact of explosions than catching the subtleties of guitar strings, so for a lot of people this would be the right material to evaluate a processor. Personally, if I want to experience the subtleties of music I bypass my SSP altogether and listen to my 2 channel system.
post #144 of 271
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfogg View Post

"My school is "Quieter with More Dynamics"!"

If you get "more dynamics" by turning down the volume either your speakers are suffering from power compression at the higher volume level or you are running out of amplifier power at the higher level.

BTW, most speakers do suffer power compression. The overwhelming majority of the power put into them turns into heat, not sound. As the voice coil(s) heat up their efficiency drops further and you get power compression.

For example a speaker rated at 90dB/w/m is converting power into sound at about 0.6% efficiency. In other words if you are putting 100w into the speaker you are only getting out about 0.6 acoustic watts of power. The other 99.4w of power input are lost in the speaker (heating the voice coils and losses in the crossover).

Compare that to something like a compression driver rated at 111dB/w/m. That is converting electrical wattage into acoustic wattage at almost 80% efficiency. With 1w input you would be getting about 0.8 acoustic watts of power output with about 0.2w of power lost as heat.

It is not hard to see which speaker is going to have an easier time avoiding power compression and therefor preserving dynamics.

Shawn

Clear and concise. In explaining my preference for compression drivers, I couldn't have been nearly so precise.. It fully acquits my argument. There's no free lunch, but dynamics are my #1 characteristic in movie sound speakers.

Quiet Dynamics"... I guess that means, as was implied, if you have a ceiling as in output on your speakers, you have to quiet the room for more dynamics.

Nice post.
post #145 of 271
Quote:


Porsche Carrera Turbo and a Ford Focus. Both cars. Both get you from A to B.

But you'll certainly look more stylish in Ford Focus.
post #146 of 271
Let's get back to fun and civility. I'll do my best to set it up fairly and will have others from AVS to listen, too. All this bashing against someone taking the time to do a test that is long over due...[/quote]

Amen!!! Lol, Jeff just make this your sig.
post #147 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by edorr View Post

Both dead wrong assumptions in my opinion. Just because the CBIII HD with Xtreme cards lists for 26K means absolutely nothing. Craig himself is dumping them for 50% below retail on Audiogon. This is not a 26K processor. A used chassis is worth 2K, the DACs are worth 40% of retail used, and streetprice for the upgrade is 30% off.

Thanks for stating this. Of course, it has occurred to me. The CBIII HD upgraded with Dirac would only be a few grand additional. True cost is less I believe for the Theta with Dirac, or close to what ADA and the outboard Trinnov piece cost.

Selling the ADA, buying the Casablanca he currently has in his rack, and upgrading it to Dirac would make the most financial sense
post #148 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanFrancis View Post

. Now you have an interesting race; the ADA is going to do things with movies and music that the Theta cannot (sorry fanboys)

Dan, years back I was told that a designer has to decide how to voice a processor, for movies or music. After have about 12, lost count different processors in my home, I noticed that some have razor sharp effects that don't "play well," with music but are great for movies. I remember when I had the Cal Audio piece, another owner dumped it because while great with music, he was looking for more exciting and dynamic movie presentation. The piece he chose sucked compared to the Cal piece for music IMO.

I keep saying this. There is never going to be a best anything. List speakers,amps,cars,etc. we all have different taste in life and personal preference always is a factor.

I think same my be true for Ken6217 who chose the ADA over the Meridian 861V6. Ask the reasons in switches like this and answers are typically the same.
post #149 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by edorr View Post

All interesting, empircally based, net new information.

This a completely subjective assessment. I can't even find the specs been looking long before now, for the ADA. Are they even published? Let's see some objective data here please.
post #150 of 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogger View Post

This a completely subjective assessment. I can't even find the specs been looking long before now, for the ADA. Are they even published? Let's see some objective data here please.

Evaluating audio gear is an inherently subjective excercise. When is the last time you bought a piece of equipment based on a specsheet?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Ultra Hi-End HT Gear ($20,000+)
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Ultra Hi-End HT Gear ($20,000+) › Theta CB III HD in the house (with my ADA Mach IV)!