Quote:
Originally Posted by jdsmoothie 
^^
A key point to note is that when comparing the various models at Magnolia, you were not listening to the speakers using Audyssey. There would likely have been a noticeable difference when comparing the 1403/1603 which use MultEQ to the higher version Audyssey MultEQ XT in the 5006/7 and Denon "CI" models. Also the 1603 would be considered the sister model to the 1913.

^^
A key point to note is that when comparing the various models at Magnolia, you were not listening to the speakers using Audyssey. There would likely have been a noticeable difference when comparing the 1403/1603 which use MultEQ to the higher version Audyssey MultEQ XT in the 5006/7 and Denon "CI" models. Also the 1603 would be considered the sister model to the 1913.
Good point about the difference between Marantz and Denon with Audyssey post calibration. I would love for someone to post there results comparing a Marantz 1603 to the Marantz 5007/6007 with the same exact speakers being only the audyssey and amplifier wattage but post calibration set to the same spl level for critical listening to see if the audyssey actually makes a difference or is snake oil marketing like monster cable. Maybe post calibration both brands sound the exact same, then it would make sense to go with the best features to price ratio.
Also I noticed that the 1403/ 1603 and 6007 and 2113/3113 all ran cool for the entire listening session with 5007 running hot the entire time.



















