AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Speakers ~$10K for rock, alternative and some pop. Not Jazz or Classical.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Speakers ~$10K for rock, alternative and some pop. Not Jazz or Classical. - Page 12

post #331 of 411
In audio, we use measurements as a guide to improve upon the unsatisfactory sound.
Edited by AcuDefTechGuy - 6/29/12 at 5:07pm
post #332 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcuDefTechGuy View Post

My graphs look much better than even that........on Photoshop.
I just don't know about the accuracy of some of these home measuring equipments/software.

GIGO. It has nothing to do with "accuracy" and everything to do with how, type and relevance/understanding of user.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcuDefTechGuy View Post

Nuance measured a defective Phil2 (1 speaker was defective) not too long ago, and the graphs still looked great!
However, subjective listening was able to determine that one of the Phil2 speakers was defective!

Then he wasn't measuring the right thing - either with the speaker...or the possibility that it wasn't the speaker at all. FR wouldn't necessarily show a bad driver. Impedance and a distortion sweeps (such as rub and buzz) would be far more revealing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcuDefTechGuy View Post

So I have no faith in some of these measuring equipments/software.

And you own Phils, KEFs, Orions and Revels??? Hmmmm.
Perhaps no faith in the measurer might be more appropriate, than blaming software. Remember, GIGO.

cheers,

AJ
post #333 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJinFLA View Post

GIGO. It has nothing to do with "accuracy" and everything to do with how, type and relevance/understanding of user...And you own Phils, KEFs, Orions and Revels??? Hmmmm..........Perhaps no faith in the measurer might be more appropriate, than blaming software.

Yeah....That.....Too.
post #334 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJinFLA View Post

FR wouldn't necessarily show a bad driver. Impedance and a distortion sweeps (such as rub and buzz) would be far more revealing.

AJ

Good point.
post #335 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

Said measurements are important to some (not to you, though, it would seem). Personally I don't think most people can even hear if they're suffering from room induced issues...

So.......why would they want to fix a "problem" they can't even hear?

Are you saying that "room induced issues that people can't even hear" are like untreated hypertension that leads to cardiovascular dysfunction or like untreated hyperglycemia that leads to renal dysfunction?
post #336 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcuDefTechGuy View Post


After 7 years at a university and obtaining a bachelor of science degree and a doctorate degree, I'm sure I could buy some equipments and figure out how to measure my speakers.

You think the inexpensive equipment you use is close to being as accurate as the expensive pro equipments used by NRC, Stereophile, and Home Theater Magazine?

Everyone knows the most important thing about the speakers is how they sound, not how they measure on the inexpensive equipments.

Like they say in the medical field, we treat the patients, not the labs.

So in audio, we use measurements as a guide to improve upon the unsatisfactory sound. If the sound is already as crystal clear as life itself, why waste money and time on equipments just for the sake of measurements?

I never claimed my measurement gear was as accurate as the "high end stuff."

Taking in room measurements isn't a waste, even if the speakers measure flat anechoic. In-room measurements, as in how the room is affecting the speaker. Said measurements are important to some (apparently not to you, though). Personally I don't think most people can even hear if they're suffering from room induced issues, or perhaps they dont want to (most members of this forum excluded), hence why they choose not to measure. I think that's why you don't measure, ADTG - because you'll realize that all of the critics of the way you set up your speakers/room will be proven right. Sorry man, but someone who can't hear the difference between his four speakers or hear the affect the room is having on the sound isn't really a credible witness when it comes to the importance of in-room measurements. Nor is he the authority on measurement techniques or equipment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcuDefTechGuy View Post


Yeah....That.....Too.

I had witnesses! Seriously, though, I couldn't care less what you think of my measuring equipment or skills. At least I have some of both and am not scared to use it. . In the end you'll keep on assuming what you want to, even though it has been explained numerous times; trying to reason with you is a fool's errand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcuDefTechGuy View Post

So.......why would they want to fix a "problem" they can't even hear?

Are you saying that "room induced issues that people can't even hear" are like untreated hypertension that leads to cardiovascular dysfunction or like untreated hyperglycemia that leads to renal dysfunction?

Thanks for proving my point about reasoning with you. I clearly meant they can't hear issues because they don't know how to listen for them; they're inexperienced. Ignorance is bliss, right?
post #337 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

Says the guy who refuses to measure his room and likely doesn't know how.

As for the Phils, that's because there wasn't a defect with it at that time chief. Get your facts straight. Had the midrange driver been not outputting any sound, even a radio shack meter would have measured it. There is actually no explanation that Dennis and I could come up with other than the driver would short at times during listening sessions, which didnt happen during the measurements. The equipment was fine slick.

Do you mean the equipment was fine except when the defect was present? If so, all equipment is fine, except when it is not.
post #338 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by MUDCAT45 View Post

Do you mean the equipment was fine except when the defect was present? If so, all equipment is fine, except when it is not.

Nope. There was no defect, which is what I meant; at least none that showed up with a FR measurement. AJ is right, though, other measurements may have shown it. This is way off topic for this thread and has already been discussed in the Philharmonic thread.

-=Steers the ship back on course.=-
post #339 of 411
Keep things civil, fellas.

Kyser
post #340 of 411
Go give the Sonus Faber Cremona M towers a try.
post #341 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

What he said, in regards to everything. Superb speakers!


Nuance, for $3 grand... salk songtowers with ribbon tweeters of philarmonic 3?
post #342 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarvelousMarvin View Post


Nuance, for $3 grand... salk songtowers with ribbon tweeters of philarmonic 3?

Both would be an awesome choice sir; which one depends on the individual and room, though. Both would have the RAAL tweeter and famous Dennis Murphy crossover, so I think its a win win either way. I'm biased, though.
post #343 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

Both would be an awesome choice sir; which one depends on the individual and room, though. Both would have the RAAL tweeter and famous Dennis Murphy crossover, so I think its a win win either way. I'm biased, though.

No problem being biased and who wouldn't be, if you own Salk Songtowers with upgraded ribbon tweeters.
post #344 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarvelousMarvin View Post


No problem being biased and who wouldn't be, if you own Salk Songtowers with upgraded ribbon tweeters.

Well, if I do find something better for the money I'll happy spill the beans, but I'm just one man with one opinion. Heading them for yourself is the best route. YMMV, of course .
post #345 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

Well, if I do find something better for the money I'll happy spill the beans, but I'm just one man with one opinion. Heading them for yourself is the best route. YMMV, of course .

What I meant is, I couldn't blame you to be biased of your Songtowers as I would be to if I have one like yours that has the upgraded ribbon tweeters considering how very well regarded the original Salk Songtowers.
post #346 of 411
Thread Starter 
Just an update. I tried to find audition opportunities by myself and kept running into dead ends. I even tried to work around a business trip and that fell through. Finally I tried contacting the national distributors and now have had some sucess. I was told there was a dealer in town who had some Salon2s so I called him. Just my luck, he had recently sold them but on the positive side he had the JBL Synthesis Array 1400s which was one of the recommended speakers from the community. Made the appointment and went for a listen. They were driven by Bryston 4B SST2 amp, Bryston SP3 processor and Arcam DV139 universal player. Very good speakers, can only imagine what they would be like in home theater. They actually look much better in person than the pictures. There is no way they would fit in my room, especially being rear ported. These need lots of room.

My take: Very good speakers and with their relatively high efficiency, I would guess they would be awesome for home theater. I listened to a number of tracks selected by my host and both of the disks that I use for auditioning which proved quite revealing. You can see the music choices on the "What Audition Music do you use" thread, page 1. Disk 2 which is more recent material (mostly) was very good, in fact as good as I've heard. Disk 1 started good also, the tracks that GoldenEar Triton2s had trouble with the Arrays did wonderfully. The 1400s do female vocals very well and also with the limited string section material I have. They did most everything incrediably well, I have a whole new appreciation of horns. They did come up short, IMO, on a couple tracks. The first was REM's Everybody Hurts. I listen for how clear the rattle from the balls sound (I'm sure a musician can tell what instrument that is) and that was not as super clear as I've heard on some others. REM's Drive at the 2 plus minute mark on the other hand was awesome, makes my current system seem a bit weak, which is in part why I am in the market for a move up. The second track was Supertramp's Hide in Your Shell which I listen for the background "Ghostly sound" to see how well it comes through. With my current XQ40s this sound is more recessed than my previous Kef Reference 103/4s. With the Array 1400s, this sound was even further recessed than the XQ40s. I also feel they could have been a bit tighter on bass on a couple songs but that is very picky.

Overall the JBL Synthesis Array 1400s were very awesome and I really enjoyed being able to audition them, they did so much so very well. No harshness, no listener fatigue, great imaging. My previous experiences with much lesser priced Klipsch had me somewhat apprehensive on horn driven speakers but these showed me how good they could be. I certainly would listen to higher end Klipsch given the chance. The Arrays would not fit my room anyway but I am now waiting to hear Studio2s and Kef 207/2s (in place of 205/2s), which should be coming soon. I can not wait.
Edited by jima4a - 6/16/12 at 9:03pm
post #347 of 411
I don't have the experience of many others here but surprised not to see Martin Logan's mentioned. Would think the Montis set would be very competitive. I recently heard the Theos and was amazed by the clarity and this was in a terrible huge room. I am following this thread as like the OP am looking for almost identical needs. I am tempted by the Seaton Catalyst 12c with so many loving them although they are not a true tower and do require subs.
post #348 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by jima4a View Post

Overall the JBL Synthesis Array 1400s were very awesome and I really enjoyed being able to audition them, they did so much so very well. No harshness, no listener fatigue, great imaging. My previous experiences with much lesser priced Klipsch had me somewhat apprehensive on horn driven speakers but these showed me how good they could be. I certainly would listen to higher end Klipsch given the chance. The Arrays would not fit my room anyway but I am now waiting to hear Studio2s and Kef 207/2s (in place of 205/2s), which should be coming soon. I can not wait.

If you love the JBL and your KEF, you will love the Revel Ultima2 and KEF Reference for sure. Ultra accurate speakers will get you as close to crystal clear real life sound as they can be. True lifelike accurate exciting breathtaking dynamic sound for sure. None of that compressed lifeless dead boring sound some of these other speakers produce.biggrin.gif

Everything is so relative in life. You don't know what you have until it's gone. And you don't know what great awesome sound is until you have actually heard many great speakers.

The good news is, unlike some people, you've already heard great awesome sound! biggrin.gif
post #349 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterK View Post

I don't have the experience of many others here but surprised not to see Martin Logan's mentioned. Would think the Montis set would be very competitive. I recently heard the Theos and was amazed by the clarity and this was in a terrible huge room. I am following this thread as like the OP am looking for almost identical needs. I am tempted by the Seaton Catalyst 12c with so many loving them although they are not a true tower and do require subs.

I've heard ML Vantage. I thought the DefTech BP7001SC & BP7000SC sounded much better.

I have a friend who swears by ML. He loves the SQ of the Montis as you do. That's great.

I've heard wonderful things about Seaton and other speakers as well. They probably sound fantastic. That's great too.

But for me, for my $10,000, I expect speakers that not only sound wonderful and fantastic (because many speakers do), but also measure wonderful and fantastic (because many speakers don't). For my $10,000.

So my question is, how do the ML and Seaton measure on-axis and 60-degrees off-axis?
post #350 of 411
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterK View Post

I don't have the experience of many others here but surprised not to see Martin Logan's mentioned. Would think the Montis set would be very competitive. I recently heard the Theos and was amazed by the clarity and this was in a terrible huge room. I am following this thread as like the OP am looking for almost identical needs. I am tempted by the Seaton Catalyst 12c with so many loving them although they are not a true tower and do require subs.

Perhaps I am misinformed but while I am sure MLs are great sounding, a couple things kept me from looking at them. First is I believe they need to be out from the wall a ways and don't have that option in my current room (I have eliminated rear ported designs also) and second I believe they are low efficiency/high power design that is not the best for HT as this system will double for that.
post #351 of 411
I would try ML anyway and see what you think. I've my ML story before and at Magnolia of all places. I heard AC/DC cranked when I hit the store and I had to seek out the sound. Got to speaker room (if you call it that) and ML were playing and sounded great!

I have auditioned a large number of speakers but not as many as others here and my $$$$ went with Dynaudio Confidence C1, Confidence Center, REL B1 sub and Dynaudio Focus 110 for surround. I am into rock, classic as well as pop.

Dynaudio won for me in my genre and my money. The C1s and the REL have been magic to me.

But try the MLs as well. I also thought the Cremona M was interesting with rock although at times maybe a bit veiled. Other times with Pink Floyd magic.

I do hope you try Dynaudio Focus, Contour or the C1 with a nice sub to compare. There are many nice speakers in this range.

Good Luck...

Rick
Edited by Mr.SoftDome - 6/18/12 at 4:02am
post #352 of 411
The current MartinLogans are not power hogs as the woofer is internally powered on the higher end units and the panels have been redesigned to require far less watts. Many are using tube amps now. Yes they need about 3 feet from the panel to the rear wall which is actually only pulling the speaker base box out a foot or so. As they are very light weight, they can easily be pulled out to use and slid back to get out of the way.
post #353 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by jima4a View Post

They did come up short, IMO, on a couple tracks. The first was REM's Everybody Hurts. I listen for how clear the rattle from the balls sound (I'm sure a musician can tell what instrument that is) and that was not as super clear as I've heard on some others.
Is this a case of the JBLs having a deficiency in a certain frequency range, or other speakers having a peak that overemphasizes this? IOW, what is your reference standard in memory for this track Jim? What is it being compared to as "correct"? Or is it "I would prefer if it were this way, 'correct' or not"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jima4a View Post

REM's Drive at the 2 plus minute mark on the other hand was awesome, makes my current system seem a bit weak, which is in part why I am in the market for a move up. The second track was Supertramp's Hide in Your Shell which I listen for the background "Ghostly sound" to see how well it comes through. With my current XQ40s this sound is more recessed than my previous Kef Reference 103/4s. With the Array 1400s, this sound was even further recessed than the XQ40s.
Is it supposed to be recessed, or brought more forward? Again, what is the reference here for reproduction? Have you listened to these tracks on say, hi quality headphones, to see if the spectral balance is what you think it's supposed to be?

cheers,

AJ
post #354 of 411
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJinFLA View Post

Is this a case of the JBLs having a deficiency in a certain frequency range, or other speakers having a peak that overemphasizes this? IOW, what is your reference standard in memory for this track Jim? What is it being compared to as "correct"? Or is it "I would prefer if it were this way, 'correct' or not"?
Is it supposed to be recessed, or brought more forward? Again, what is the reference here for reproduction? Have you listened to these tracks on say, hi quality headphones, to see if the spectral balance is what you think it's supposed to be?
cheers,
AJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJinFLA View Post

Is this a case of the JBLs having a deficiency in a certain frequency range, or other speakers having a peak that overemphasizes this? IOW, what is your reference standard in memory for this track Jim? What is it being compared to as "correct"? Or is it "I would prefer if it were this way, 'correct' or not"?
Is it supposed to be recessed, or brought more forward? Again, what is the reference here for reproduction? Have you listened to these tracks on say, hi quality headphones, to see if the spectral balance is what you think it's supposed to be?
cheers,
AJ

Good point,I certainly would not want to complain about something for being more accurate. Unfortunately my son broke my Sony MDR-7506 headphones and then my wife bought me Bose headphones as a gift to replace them. The Bose cost more than the new model Sonys but as you know....I gave them to my son. I need to replace them.

My reference on Hide in Your Shell would be my old 103/4s and my current B&W685s when I pulled them out of the cabinet to AB with Kef IQ30s. I also listened to this track on the Goldenear Triton Twos and Vandersteen 2Ce but to be honest I was not in full audition mode, just listening for fun. However, that was not a track that I remember having issues with. REMs Everybody Hurts did not stand out either. When I get to hear the Studio2s and the Kef Reference I should know if this was just being exaggerated or not.
post #355 of 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by jima4a View Post

Good point,I certainly would not want to complain about something for being more accurate. Unfortunately my son broke my Sony MDR-7506 headphones and then my wife bought me Bose headphones as a gift to replace them. The Bose cost more than the new model Sonys but as you know....I gave them to my son. I need to replace them.
My reference on Hide in Your Shell would be my old 103/4s and my current B&W685s when I pulled them out of the cabinet to AB with Kef IQ30s. I also listened to this track on the Goldenear Triton Twos and Vandersteen 2Ce but to be honest I was not in full audition mode, just listening for fun. However, that was not a track that I remember having issues with. REMs Everybody Hurts did not stand out either. When I get to hear the Studio2s and the Kef Reference I should know if this was just being exaggerated or not.

I know Bose is a lightning rod for bashers (deserved or not), but I suspect their headphones (you didn't say which) might be up to the task, like your Sony, to at least determine the spectral balance of a recording > the bass region (yes, I am aware ear cavity resonances can affect the otherwise near perfect FR of some phones, etc.). IOW, I would give 'em a whirl with those recordings just to see.
Spectral balance of stereo loudspeakers in room is largely influenced by the off axis radiation, so speakers with a "flare" in certain regions may bring forward things in the mix that may actually not be as prominent with speakers with smooth controlled polar responses....like the JBL. What may sound great and "present" in one recording, may not be so pleasant in another.
The Salon & KEF Ref are both terrific speakers, with smooth balanced well controlled FR, but you will be hearing each in different circumstances (and room!) I imagine, not to mention aural memory can be quite tricky. Just be careful not to over focus on those aspects and miss out on the big picture.

cheers,

AJ
post #356 of 411
Thread Starter 
I don't know which Bose headphones I had only that she paid about $170 on line plus shipping 4 years ago and they did not have noise cancelling. They were not HiFi in my opinion. Not even adequate for IPod use. I know there are better headphones than the Sony Professional Monitors but none I heard until at least three times the price. So it looks like one can get Sony MDR7510s for around $130 or go to $3-400 minimum to try to get better. I'd just get the Sonys as they were pretty good.

Update 6/19/12: I guess I did not read your post well enough. My son has those headphones at the other side of the country, I don't have them available anymore. They were quite lacking IMO but he liked them so...
Edited by jima4a - 6/19/12 at 5:13pm
post #357 of 411
Thread Starter 
Well I hope to be able to audition the Revel Studio2s and Kef 205/2s next week. My guess is the Revels will a bit better for two channel but the Kefs may be better for HT. Also, the Kefs would be less $ for the front 3 as the 202/2c is quite a bit less than the Voice2 leaving a bit more for electronics.

I added a couple more speakers to the list today. One is the Totem Wind which at 87 dB efficiency would likely be only a good 2 channel speaker - can get a phenominal deal on them, I believe. The other is the Acoustic Zen Crescendo speakers which look quite interesting. However, I have not fully looked at specs and the pics show they apear quite large. Any feedback on either of these?

The other question is electronics. I was really planning on class D but after a lot of feedback (I tried very hard) I may be forced to stay with class AB. So these are just a couple options I am considering:

OPPO 95, Marantz AV7005 and ATI AT3003 (front 3) and AT1804 (heights and surrounds).

OPPO 93, Integra 80.3 with same amps as above.

I have also got a lot of feedback from others in the industry that I should opt for the Bryston 6B sst2 and perhaps go with a Arcam or Anthem receiver for the the other channels (or even the Denon 4311). Can't stretch for an Anthem or Arcam Pre/pro as I've already blown my original budget. I still would like to keep heights so Dolby Pro Logic llz would be a serious plus (they help blend my ceiling speaker surrounds).

Auditioning the Focal 1038 Be's or the Salk Soundscapes doesn't look very likely. However, if I am not fully blown away next week I will try harder to hear more futher in the list.

Thanks to everyone who provided constructive input to this process. I realize many of us are passionate about audio and as such we may get a bit heated in our communications. Measurements are important but this is still a very subjective hobby, so not everyone will like the same things that others absolutely love. I spoke to a knowledgeable shop owner today who has never been thrilled by Kef and I've owned them for 20 year plus. I still feel he has a lot of knowledge in this industry and stayed open minded (or at least tried?) in getting his input. It will still come down to what I like best and I know that does not make me right, just happy.
post #358 of 411
These are slightly outside of your budget, but some of my favorites for $10-$15K that I have listened to extensively are

Vivid B-1. $15,000, by far my favorite for the most transparent and "real life" sound I've ever heard.
Kudos Cardea C30. $12,000. I own them. Passed on the Harbeth M40.1 to get the Kudos because they have much more controlled bass response.
Harbeth Monitor 40.1 $12,000. Incredibly impressive mid-range.
Marten Django. I think this one is $15,000. This has HUGE bass response. Very, very detailed and transparent. I really think this one would annihilate the others but I have not spent enough time listening to be able to call it my new favorite.

These are all currently available for auditioning at my local dealer near Metro Detroit. I'm not sure where you're located, but if you ever make it to the Metro Detroit area I would encourage you to check this place out! PM Me if you're interested.
post #359 of 411
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg121986 View Post

These are slightly outside of your budget, but some of my favorites for $10-$15K that I have listened to extensively are
Vivid B-1. $15,000, by far my favorite for the most transparent and "real life" sound I've ever heard.
Kudos Cardea C30.R $12,000. I own them. Passed on the Harbeth M40.1 to get the Kudos because they have much more controlled bass response.
Harbeth Monitor 40.1 $12,000. Incredibly impressive mid-range.
Marten Django. I think this one is $15,000. This has HUGE bass response. Very, very detailed and transparent. I really think this one would annihilate the others but I have not spent enough time listening to be able to call it my new favorite.
These are all currently available for auditioning at my local dealer near Metro Detroit. I'm not sure where you're located, but if you ever make it to the Metro Detroit area I would encourage you to check this place out! PM Me if you're interested.

I only got a chance to look at Marten Django so far and they look like they would be amazing! I need more time, more money, more space for a proper setup. Then after that I would need even more money and more space...am I alone on this?! There are so many fantastic speakers to hear and so little time. I wish I had known all this when I was living in Michigan. Not as much availability in the Florida panhandle. HiFi is not as big in the south, I believe, more to do outside in winter. Anyway the 205/2s are up tomorrow.

Edit: The Djangos have Accuton ceramic drivers on the highs and mids and three 8" aluminum woofers by SEAS. Recommend checking these out.
Edit2: I read the Stereophile article when it came out on the Vivid B1 and while it received many praises I see it as niche speaker. It would also not work in my room with 2nd rear mounted woofer. Still planning to complete the list. Thanks
Edited by jima4a - 6/29/12 at 8:55am
post #360 of 411
fwiw, i don't know if you have the reference 3a grand veenas still on your list but i still think you should at least give a listen at least you'll know what speakers that have no crossovers in their designs sound like . i went through the same thing you are going through now but with bookshelves in the $2000-$3000 range which i think is much more demanding because there are hundreds in this price rangewhen i came across the reference 3a mm de capo i 's and that was it, they sound so smooth and good from bottom to top end with incredible sound stage. i'm probualy one out of a hundred but don't think i'll ever go back to speakers with crossovers again.again just my 2 cents and good luck on your journey to speaker nirvana
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Speakers ~$10K for rock, alternative and some pop. Not Jazz or Classical.