AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Are Tube Amps a waste of money?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Are Tube Amps a waste of money?

post #1 of 51
Thread Starter 
A lot of hi fi stores that I called to ask if they have Music Hall a15.2 to hear in the store said no. I asked what other integrated amps they have to hear. They have tube amps starting a 1,200 all the way to 3 grand. I hear that tube amps get hot. What if I leave it on to long, or turn it up to loud. Have any of you experienced them catching fire on you? I hear that they sound the best only for a couple hundred hours. Is this true? Do you really need to replace parts in the tube amp about every 6 months to a year like bulbs? Would tube amps sound weird to me compared to the Nad c326bee? I have never heard a tube amp before. One of the 1200 dollar ones was only 16 watts each channel. I think the brand was Cayin. I hear that tube amps get louder then regular amps. Is this true? Someone today told me they no longer carry Music Hall, but had Rogue amps that sound good and Creek. Is Rogue and Creek much better then Nad c26bee? I still feel impressed with the Nad amp. I want to make sure that I make the right choice, before I buy the wrong amp and might be unhappy with it.
post #2 of 51
Thread Starter 
I wish that you would get more watts for your money on a tube amp.
post #3 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by keyboardcat View Post

A lot of hi fi stores that I called to ask if they have Music Hall a15.2 to hear in the store said no. I asked what other integrated amps they have to hear. They have tube amps starting a 1,200 all the way to 3 grand. I hear that tube amps get hot. What if I leave it on to loud, or turn it up to loud. Have any of you experienced them catching fire on you? I hear that they sound the best only for a couple hundred hours. Is this true? Do you relly need to replace parts in the tube amp about every 6 months to a year like bulbs? Would tube amps sound weird to me compared to the nad ce326bee? I have never heard a tube amp before. One of the 1200 dollar ones was only 16 watts each channel. I think the brand was Cayin. I hear that tube amps get louder then regular amps. Is this true? Someone today told me they no longer carry Music Hall, but had Rogue amps that sound good and Creek. Is Rogue and Creek much better then Nad c26bee? I still feel impressed with the Nad amp. I want to make sure that I make the right choice, before I buy the wrong amp and might be unhappy with it.

I can only answer some questions.

I believe they make tube amps with good reliability....
Tube amps usually cost more per watt
Home electronics have used tube amps for a long time, and I have not heard of them being dangerous (assuming competent engineering)

There are some die hard tube amp lovers

Not sure why tube amps would sound weird. A good amp should,behave like any good amp,...low distortion, high fidelity

One thing good about tube amps, according to some experts...they are more forgiving during clipping
post #4 of 51
Thread Starter 
Do you have any tube amps Michael? If so Do you like them as much as the regular amps?
post #5 of 51
Never owned one. Always wanted to build a dynamo clone
post #6 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by keyboardcat View Post

I wish that you would get more watts for your money on a tube amp.

You have clearly never heard a tube amp have you? I am a guitar player, and it would take a 150w solid state amp to get anywhere near as loud as my 50w all tube amp. Tube amps just have much more output per watt than a solid state amp.
post #7 of 51
I love tube amps, but they are more economical to own as headphone amps. This way, you can experiment with different tubes to get the sound you like.

They aren't exactly cheap amps for 2.0 systems with speakers.
post #8 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tweaked05 View Post

Tube amps just have much more output per watt than a solid state amp.

What you claim defies the laws of physics. A watt is a unit of power. One watt cannot be any more powerful than another watt, just as one second cannot be any longer than another second.

AJ
post #9 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiWavelength View Post

What you claim defies the laws of physics. A watt is a unit of power. One watt cannot be any more powerful than another watt, just as one second can be any longer than another second.

AJ

I don't claim to understand the physics or engineering behind tube amps vs Solid State. I can only tell you what any other guitar player will tell you. It takes 2-3 times the amount of power to make a solid state amp as loud as a tube amp.
post #10 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tweaked05 View Post

I don't claim to understand the physics or engineering behind tube amps vs Solid State. I can only tell you what any other guitar player will tell you. It takes 2-3 times the amount of power to make a solid state amp as loud as a tube amp.

Maybe the distortion from tube amps better translates into more output or maybe a "typical" 150w solid state guitar amp has inflated specs compared to a "typical" 50w tube amp. Not at all sure just trying to offer an explanation as to why you may have observed this because I agree with Wiwavelength in that a watt is a watt.
post #11 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tweaked05 View Post

I don't claim to understand the physics or engineering behind tube amps vs Solid State. I can only tell you what any other guitar player will tell you. It takes 2-3 times the amount of power to make a solid state amp as loud as a tube amp.

Possibly because you can overdrIve a tube amp more and still enjoy the sound. I can't think of any other reason if the amps are honestly rated. There are laws of electricity that must be obeyed.
post #12 of 51
Thread Starter 
The hi fi store today that I called said that the Rogue tube that was 50 watts made his Magnepan speakers at his store sound good. has anyone ever had the tube amps get so hot that you worried about them?
post #13 of 51
Thread Starter 
Is Rogue better then Cain?
post #14 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by keyboardcat View Post

The hi fi store today that I called said that the Rogue tube that was 50 watts made his Magnepan speakers at his store sound good. has anyone ever had the tube amps get so hot that you worried about them?

50 watts per channel is pretty good for a "simple" stereo tube amp. That amp is probably running a pair of KT88 output tubes per channel. Electro-Harmonix makes reasonably good KT88s for about $50 per pair, so you don't have to spend much when tube replacements are needed.

And no, you shouldn't need to replace tubes every 6 months. Most power tubes (KT88, 6550, 6L6, EL84, 7591, etc) will last for 2000 - 3000 hours of use. More for the old-stock tubes made prior to 1992 (or thereabouts); maybe a bit less for the new stuff (but the new stuff is much cheaper). The smaller signal tubes (12AU7, 12AX7, 6SN7, 6DJ8, etc) will usually last for 5000 - 10000 hours of use. Again, more for the older-production tubes and a bit less for new production.

So hot to be worrisome? No. Not with a "simple" tube amp using one or two power tubes per channel. You might heat up the room a bit during summer if the amp is in a small room (e.g. small bedroom), but that's all.

Now, if you're running one of the monster tube amps with 6 or more power tubes per channel (and usually > 100 watts per channel), then those will run a lot hotter of course. Those will also set you back at least several thousand dollars -- for a used one.
post #15 of 51
Thread Starter 
this is where I get the 6 month replacement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBbnh7boFVA
fast forward to 4 minutes and about 6 seconds. I know that he is talking about guitars but still it made me wonder about the home stereo tube amps
post #16 of 51
Thread Starter 
skriefal Do you use the monster tube amps? which ones and brands do you use? Do a lot of tube amps have subwoofer outputs?
post #17 of 51
Guitar amps often run the tubes much harder than a hi-fi amp would. So the tubes probably do need to be replaced more frequently in those amps.

And no, I don't use any of the monster amps with > 4 power tubes per channel. I have a few amps, but the two most used are a JWN amp that is built into a vintage Baldwin organ amp chassis -- with two EL34 tubes per channel, and about 40 watts/channel. And a pair of Dynaco Mark III monoblock amps, each with a pair of 6550/KT88 tubes per channel for about 50 watts/channel.

Tube power amps will not have a subwoofer output. The same is true of solid state power amps. Tube integrated amps or tube preamps, however, may have a subwoofer output. But it'll be rare, and confined to only new(er) models [no vintage equipment].
post #18 of 51
Thread Starter 
I called another store today and they tried to tell me that tubes are good. They didn't have the music hall amp I wanted to hear either. They said get rega or tube amp. They denied Rega amps being bright. I saw a youtube video a while back, saying that rega sounded bright. I guess I am going to hear some tube amps sometime to make sure that I am not missing anything. I wish that they were cheaper in cost like the NAd amps though. In about another two or three months I should be able to afford nad amp. If I decide to buy a tube amp it will be towards the end of this year or next year to afford it. If it does end up sounding better to me, maybe it is worth saving for.
post #19 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by keyboardcat View Post

this is where I get the 6 month replacement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBbnh7boFVA
fast forward to 4 minutes and about 6 seconds. I know that he is talking about guitars but still it made me wonder about the home stereo tube amps

Most modern tube amps have what is called a soft start that slowly powers up the tubes. This helps for a longer life. My solid state amps run hotter than most tube amps. I have a pair of Threshold T-50's and a Forte 4A which run in Class A mode 100% of the time. You can keep your dinner warm on them. And if you really want hot, spend some time w/a pair of Pass Aleph solid state amps. You need to dress cool and keep the window open to survive a session w/those amps.
post #20 of 51
Thread Starter 
I read a review about Cain integrated tube amp needing 30 seconds to turn on and load everything. I think it was the 50t or something like that. How well would tube amps do on something big like a 12 or 12 inch Cerwin Vega floorstanding speaker? I may someday in the future buy one. I always thought about buying them, but they are pricey. The used ones that I see for sale usually need surrounds replaced. I don't want to fool with that. I don't know if I would be good at refoaming.
post #21 of 51
Thread Starter 
Do the new tube amps sound better then the older tube amps? The soft start helps it last longer?
post #22 of 51
Thread Starter 
Peach tree audio is good tube amp? Why do they want to be a tube amp, but have a solid state design like the nova on crutchfield?
post #23 of 51
Thread Starter 
Another reason why I worry about the tube amps needing replaced every 6 months.
http://www.crutchfield.com/p_731NOVA...48#details-tab

Parts Warranty 1 Year/6 Months Tube
Labor Warranty 1 Year/6 Months Tube
I saw other tube amps that also said 6 months only on the tubes. Why don't they feel more confident in them to only last 6 months? This is scary.
post #24 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by keyboardcat View Post

Do the new tube amps sound better then the older tube amps? The soft start helps it last longer?

When power is turned on the electricity activates a cold filament in the tube and a surge of current will occur. As a result resistance will be low. So the sudden surge will weaken and shorten the life of the filament in the tube. A soft start will bring up the voltage slowly thus putting less strain on tube & prolonging the life. Time on soft starts can vary I had a Prima Luna and the soft start was about a minute. My current Audio Research SP-16 is about 30 seconds. Just about every major audio company that makes tube audio gear has this feature. As far as old vs. new. If it's in proper working order no difference. The only problem you may have w/old gear is finding the right parts and a qualified tech to service the amp. Cost also could be higher.
post #25 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by keyboardcat View Post

Another reason why I worry about the tube amps needing replaced every 6 months.
http://www.crutchfield.com/p_731NOVA...48#details-tab

Parts Warranty 1 Year/6 Months Tube
Labor Warranty 1 Year/6 Months Tube
I saw other tube amps that also said 6 months only on the tubes. Why don't they feel more confident in them to only last 6 months? This is scary.

Tubes are "consumables", they are to be replaced periodically and are not as robust as the rest of the amp. Poor analogy, but tubes are like film in a camera.

No worries.
post #26 of 51
Thread Starter 
from your experience Tesseract67 how long was it till you had to replace your tubes?
post #27 of 51
Thread Starter 
Venomous what kind of tube amps do you use?
post #28 of 51
Thread Starter 
Class A what were the worst new tube amps that seemed over priced, but didn't sound that great for the money. I saw a lot of people bashing a jolida hybrid amp the other day saying it lied about being built well. One reviewer felt like he wasted his money on it. http://www.amazon.com/Jolida-301A-In...6360355&sr=8-1

he even said that it was an insult to tube/hybrid amps. The guy at the stereo store today said that Jolida was better then NAD. after reading this review I am not so sure.
post #29 of 51
I don't know about worst but over the years I've owned tube gear from Odyssey, Rogue and Prima Luna and found all three to have well built excellent sounding products. The Jolida comments surprise me as I've heard them and seen them and they seemed quite good.
post #30 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by keyboardcat View Post

Venomous what kind of tube amps do you use?

I have only one tube amp and it is a Little Dot MK-IV, which is a headphone amp. Since I don't have a dedicated 2.0 system right now, this is the only tube setup I have. I've had a few in the past when I owned separates and I love the ability to change out tubes to change the tone of the amp. I have all kinds of tubes like EF92, CV131, WE403A/B, GE5654, M8100, CV4010, EF95, 6JI. All have their special characteristics.

Tube amps are amazing. If your aren't concerned about crazy wattage values, these sound really nice, ESP if you have older coaxial speakers.

I would like to see Consonance, GLOW or Nohr enter the hifi tube amp arena. They have done very well in the mini am dept without killing your wallet.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Are Tube Amps a waste of money?