So I thought I was ready to roll in purchasing a new Da-Lite Model C w/High Power in a 2.35:1 (or thereabouts) ratio. I have an Epson 8350 which has a wide zoom range and was perfectly fine going ghetto without an anamorphic lens and just zooming in/out manually. I did want to reduce the light overspillage in the black bar area (when watching 2.35:1 movies) and thought it would be great to order a custom Model C where they basically gave me a 2.35:1 screen with enough extra black masking above/below the white portion of the screen, so that the overall screen ratio was still 16:9.
Sounded like an ingenious idea, but when doing the online chat on the Da-Lite site, the rep mentioned that the black fabric was heat-seamed above/below the High Power fabric, and this created a slight ridge/bump along the seam which, when rolled up into the case, could case a slight bend/crease in the High-Power fabric every 10" or so.
Presumably this would relax by itself if you left the screen fully retracted for an extended period of time, but I'm not anticipating doing that, as we're moving my movie room from the loft to the living room and the screen will need to be retracted when not in use.
So now I have to decide whether to take the risk that I'll notice this 'Ladder Effect' and go with my original plan, or just go with a regular 16:9 screen and live with the gray bars when watching 2.35:1 movies. But I was also kind of wanting to go with the 2.35:1 format because I was going to bump up the size but I actually wanted to keep the 16:9 content smaller since much of that will be HDTV watching from Comcast where there will be more compression artifacts.
I suppose another option would be to go with a 2.35:1 screen with no extra masking and let the light spillage push out past the screen and onto the back wall. Hmm...
Sounded like an ingenious idea, but when doing the online chat on the Da-Lite site, the rep mentioned that the black fabric was heat-seamed above/below the High Power fabric, and this created a slight ridge/bump along the seam which, when rolled up into the case, could case a slight bend/crease in the High-Power fabric every 10" or so.
Presumably this would relax by itself if you left the screen fully retracted for an extended period of time, but I'm not anticipating doing that, as we're moving my movie room from the loft to the living room and the screen will need to be retracted when not in use.
So now I have to decide whether to take the risk that I'll notice this 'Ladder Effect' and go with my original plan, or just go with a regular 16:9 screen and live with the gray bars when watching 2.35:1 movies. But I was also kind of wanting to go with the 2.35:1 format because I was going to bump up the size but I actually wanted to keep the 16:9 content smaller since much of that will be HDTV watching from Comcast where there will be more compression artifacts.
I suppose another option would be to go with a 2.35:1 screen with no extra masking and let the light spillage push out past the screen and onto the back wall. Hmm...









