The point was not to incite arguments. I am glad to see a few people understand what I am talking about. I work hard for my money and $1500 to $2000 is a significant purchase in my household. I am not content to settle for half assed performance because the asthetics are there. It just infuriates me that the manufacturers are perfectly ok with taking people's money and giving them a product where flashlighting, bleed and clouding are "just the nature of the design". It's ridiculous. So as others suggested, I took my money elsewhere. The passive 3D was fantastic. I will give it to LG there. But IMO $1800 for a TV is not cheap. This isn't a Walmart special. You get what you pay for doesn't fly with me in this respect. Yes I could have dropped $3500 on a Panny VT but I like to live in the real world where my children have a college fund, my bills are paid and I don't have creditors calling me.
post #31 of 53
5/17/12 at 5:47pm