I'm looking at getting some floor spikes for my speakers/subs and I've been reading up on different brands/types. I've noticed A LOT of extremely dramatic tales of speakers sounding 5.7 million times better than they did before they stuck a few spikes underneath.
One thing that struck me as absolutely ridiculous was when I checked out some stories on BDR cones. I checked out 2 different "models" - the mk3 and mk4. Apparently the mk3 gives a warmer sound with greater bass response while the mk4 sounds colder with an emphasis on higher frequencies. What was even more ridiculous was the idea that you can mix and match to get the perfect sound. Say you buy a set of mk3 cones and your speakers sound too warm and bass heavy (hypothetically of course
), well apparently you can stick one mk4 cone on and it will cool it right down and bring the mid and high range back into the mix.
This sounds absurd to me like so much other audio "theory". I was planning on buying a few sets of $20 Dayton spikes (4 in a set) from Parts Express. Am I fine doing this or is it actually worth investing a bit more money into a higher end product?
One thing that struck me as absolutely ridiculous was when I checked out some stories on BDR cones. I checked out 2 different "models" - the mk3 and mk4. Apparently the mk3 gives a warmer sound with greater bass response while the mk4 sounds colder with an emphasis on higher frequencies. What was even more ridiculous was the idea that you can mix and match to get the perfect sound. Say you buy a set of mk3 cones and your speakers sound too warm and bass heavy (hypothetically of course
), well apparently you can stick one mk4 cone on and it will cool it right down and bring the mid and high range back into the mix.This sounds absurd to me like so much other audio "theory". I was planning on buying a few sets of $20 Dayton spikes (4 in a set) from Parts Express. Am I fine doing this or is it actually worth investing a bit more money into a higher end product?



















