AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Audio theory, Setup and Chat › 9-channel 101 - most bang for buck configuration?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

9-channel 101 - most bang for buck configuration?

post #1 of 6
Thread Starter 
I'm currently running a 7.1 system consisting of the traditional 5-channel + front "presence" speakers (Yamaha receiver).

I purchased the L/C/R and the bookshelf speakers I'm using for the heights as a set (Boston Acoustics), so they all match. The side surrounds are bi-poles of a different brand.

Considering going to a 9.1/2 setup, changing AVR and adding speakers. I know different AVR brands have slightly different configurations for 9-channel.

So, I'm kind of wondering, if I went to a 9-channel, whether I would get the best effect from adding another set of bi-poles in the rear, another set of bookshelves in the rear, a set of floorstanders in the rear, or a set of floorstanders as "wides" in the front. (I am pre-wired for any/all of these potential placements)

Any thoughts?
post #2 of 6
What are the dimensions of your room? Do you have 3 to 6 feet behind the main listening position to accomodate for proper rear surround placement?
post #3 of 6
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by flickhtguru View Post

What are the dimensions of your room? Do you have 3 to 6 feet behind the main listening position to accomodate for proper rear surround placement?



My room is roughly 19 x 22 - with the TV on one of the 22' walls. Have not measured exactly, but I would have about 3.5 - 4ft distance to the wall behind the main listening position.
post #4 of 6
I would vote for rear surround in that case then with direct radiating monopole bookshelves.
post #5 of 6
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by flickhtguru View Post

I would vote for rear surround in that case then with direct radiating monopole bookshelves.



Thanks for your vote. Can I ask why you would prefer direct monopoles over bipoles?

From a lot of the things I've read, many people seem to suggest bi- or dipoles on the back wall and mono books on the side. I decided to go with bipoles on the side as my room is not a dedicated HT room, it's a family-type room with various different seating positions. My thinking was that the bipoles would "spread out" the sound a little better for everyone in the room who wasn't seated in the main position - which is my La-Z-Boy recliner

I was kind of thinking monos on the back wall for my setup - partly because I think I can still grab a set of bookshelves that match the 5 in the front of my system for fairly cheap, but also because my thinking is that putting the bipoles on the back wall might have the effect of cancelling out with the side bipoles where their soundwaves meet??

Also, at the rear left of my room there is an opening to a stairwell leading up to the main floor, which would only be about 2ft from the bipole on that side - kind of thinking that the sound from that side might go up into the stairwell rather than "staying" in the room - but I'm just guessing; I'm an accountant, not a sound technician
post #6 of 6
Actually I have usually heard either monopoles all the way around OR bi/di/tripoles for side surrounds and monopoles for rear surround. Many ppl say monopoles to be too distracting for side surround speakers, I have never had that experience. Although I have my surrounds mounted 3ft above seated ear level and 4 to 6ft to the sides. I guess if you had monopoles at seated ear level and they were right next to the seating then maybe they would be distracting.

I have had great results with monopoles all the way around and right now have excellent results using direct/reflecting speakers for the side and rear surrounds (BIC Acoustech PL-66).
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Audio theory, Setup and Chat
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Audio theory, Setup and Chat › 9-channel 101 - most bang for buck configuration?