Featured Stories
Topics Discussed
- brandVizio
Related Forum Threads
- Vizio screen shot.... Last post on 3/21/13 at 11:19am in LCD Flat Panel Displays
- Recommendations - 32" to 42" LED for bedroom with lots of light. Last post on 3/20/13 at 11:20am in LCD Flat Panel Displays
- Looking for LCD/LED's that are Full Array and have Local Dimming Last post on 4/1/13 at 5:57am in LCD Flat Panel Displays
- Anyone have an idea when new Vizio E series are available to purchase Last post on 3/7/13 at 4:10pm in LCD Flat Panel Displays
- Which TV? Last post on 3/5/13 at 11:02am in LCD Flat Panel Displays
Related Reviews
Official Vizio XVT3Dxx0CM 21:9 CinemaWide Owner's Thread - Page 5
Gear mentioned in this thread:

To my dismay, when I got the Cinemawide, I couldn't even come close to replicating the black level of my Sharp, which is an older model. Cinemawide's blacks, as dad1153 said, were "milky" and dark grey at best. By turning down the backlight and adding bias light, I managed to get the perceived blacks to my acceptable level but I cannot help feeling a bit disappointed in Vizio for not being able to come close to my mid-tier Sharp TV's picture quality in their top-tier XVT line, contrary to what Cnet said in its review.
I like the unique aspect ratio of Cinemawide and it does do a passable job as "movie" TV well enough that I am going to keep it. But it does have occasional unexplained misfires so I will definitely get an extended warranty.
I used Warner's "Green Lantern" because it's the only 3D movie I have that is 2:35:1 (all the others are 1:78:1 or 1:85:1) and I had only seen the 2D extended edition on BD. Except for a couple of times where faint outlines of vertical lines were seen during fast-moving scenes (around where the edge of the screen would appear if the XVT were displaying a 1:33:1 image) and the 'milky' blacks making the outer space scenes look a little more grey/purple than black (good enough for me, obviously not good-enough for kawika4) I liked it a lot... the 3D effect that is, not the movie (duh!). And during the entire length of "Green Lantern" I didn't experience a single drop-out or switch back to 16:9 until I switched the display back to 'Normal,' so knock on wood. Textures were colorful and the immersion was comparable to theatrical 3D flicks I've seen (although no one would confuse my Vizio's 3D with an IMAX screen). 3D was a big selling point for me getting the XVT, and so far its living up to the hype.
More to come.

Edited by dad1153 - 12/20/12 at 8:59pm
- thebesthereis
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 453 Posts. Joined 3/2008
- Location: Fort Apache
- Select All Posts By This User

I managed to update the PS3's OS today, so finally got to test the 3D Blu-ray display (can't take pictures of that though). The PS3 even detected that my HDTV was 58" and asked if I wanted to adjust to display for a TV that size. As expected, with a direct HDMI connection to the Vizio the 3D effect and sharpness were noticeably better than the 1080i 3D from cable, though not by leaps and bounds. While still showing the typical 'passive' tell-signs (slightly lower-res textures and seldom-seen horizontal lines) I liked what I saw.
I used Warner's "Green Lantern" because it's the only 3D movie I have that is 2:35:1 (all the others are 1:78:1 or 1:85:1) and I had only seen the 2D extended edition on BD. Except for a couple of times where faint outlines of vertical lines were seen during fast-moving scenes (around where the edge of the screen would appear if the XVT were displaying a 1:33:1 image) and the 'milky' blacks making the outer space scenes look a little more grey/purple than black (good enough for me, obviously not good-enough for kawika4) I liked it a lot... the 3D effect that is, not the movie (duh!). And during the entire length of "Green Lantern" I didn't experience a single drop-out or switch back to 16:9 until I switched the display back to 'Normal,' so knock on wood. Textures were colorful and the immersion was comparable to theatrical 3D flicks I've seen (although no one would confuse my Vizio's 3D with an IMAX screen). 3D was a big selling point for me getting the XVT, and so far its living up to the hype.
More to come.

Alright DAD!! Glad to hear you finally updated your PS3 dude. Next up - a little bit of gaming perhaps? Multiple systems maybe? I'd REALLY like to see some Uncharted 3 IF you have it.
A guy can dream, can't he? 
Stay tuned boys and girls!!
Edited by thebesthereis - 12/21/12 at 5:04pm
- OconRecon
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 443 Posts. Joined 7/2006
- Location: Ohio
- Select All Posts By This User
Just curious, what's the shipping charge amazon has if you're not a Prime member? Also, if you have a friend or relative that has a PS3 with up-to-date OS and 3D-compatible HDMI cables (I got two from amazon for around 11 bucks), you can use that as your BD player. Might want to go to Best Buy and check some 3D movies they have on sale for Christmas (the last two-part "Harry Potter" movie, for example, for 15 bucks each). Welcome to the cult. 
I was curious over the weekend how the XVT would handle 1:33:1 material since a lot of the stuff I own (classic TV, older/foreign/classic movies on Criterion DVD/Blu-ray, etc.) is framed in that aspect ratio and the normal 'stretch' for 16:9 TV's still leaves black bars on the XVT's 21:9 screen. I found that, depending on the resolution of the 1:33:1 material being shown, the XVT will stretch the picture differently. With high-def 1:33:1 material (1080p, 1080i and 720p) the XVT will stretch the image corner-to-corner, which it doesn't do with standard-def (480i or lower) 1:33:1, at the expense of some of the image getting cut on all of the options. Let me show you.
Here's a TCM-HD recording (1080i with HDMI) on my DVR of Hiroshi Teshigahara's "Antonio Gaudi.".
Normal (original 1:33:1 AR):
Zoom 1 (same as the XVT's Stretch mode, except it expands 1:33:1 to approx. 1:85:1):
Zoom 2 (notice how the bottom row of teeth and upper part of the picture gets cut-off):
Here's an OTA broadcast of a Spanish station on 480i (use the logo on the right-lower corner of the screen as a guide). Bonus: notice how reflective the glossy screen of the XVT is at 10AM on my studio apartment from a window just to camera-left of the pictures (ouch).
Normal:
Zoom 1:
Zoom 2:
Here's the Sega Saturn (the first of many videogame systems that I'll be hooking up to the XVT over the coming weeks) hooked up to the XVT with a composite cable (which the XVT labels as '240p'). I turned game mode on and booted up "NiGHTS... Into Dreams," a game that requires precision timing when executing mid-air stunts to increase one's score. I've played this game to death since '96 and can honestly say that only my old Sony XBR tube TV (which I've kept around precisely to play older game systems) had better response time than what the XVT gave me. My still-working 747i definitely has a little more lag than the XVT even though the 747i was labeled as having a 4m response time and the XVT is supposedly 5m. Please note: activating other features on the XVT (apps, the PIP/POP options, etc.) disables the Game Mode and increases lag, which affects some games more than others. "NiGHTS," for example, was still playable while PIP was activated; other games' precise controls went to s*** while PIP/POP were on.
Normal:
Zoom 1:
Zoom 1 (top; ignore the PIP, I was checking a sports score) and Zoom 2 (bottom; notice how the picture is cropped but, as with the Spanish TV station, there are still black bars on the screen):
While we're at it, how about a little more PIP/POP porn with our good friend the Sega Saturn?

Now, I found a trick to get the XVT to display 1:33:1 pictures (HD or SD) corner-to-corner: if your cable box or DVD/Blu-ray player has a zoom mode that expands a 1:33:1 picture to 1:85:1, you can then take that picture and apply 'Zoom 1' to get it to show the entire content corner-to-corner without getting the picture cut-off. Using this B&W full screen footage from a TCM-HD broadcast (use the TCM logo as reference):
Normal (1:33:1):
Cable box 'fattens' SD 1:33:1 to 16:9
Zoom 1 (voala, corner-to-corner 1:33:1 content without anything cut off)
Zoom 2 without the cable box expanding 1:33:1 to 1:85:1 (notice how the logo and trees on both sides are cut-off)
Next up: videogames and HD-DVD's. MORE TO COME.
Edited by dad1153 - 12/24/12 at 12:12am
- thebesthereis
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 453 Posts. Joined 3/2008
- Location: Fort Apache
- Select All Posts By This User

^^^ Rats, I had to pay a hundred bucks for shipping and I do have Prime.
Just curious, what's the shipping charge amazon has if you're not a Prime member? Also, if you have a friend or relative that has a PS3 with up-to-date OS and 3D-compatible HDMI cables (I got two from amazon for around 11 bucks), you can use that as your BD player. Might want to go to Best Buy and check some 3D movies they have on sale for Christmas (the last two-part "Harry Potter" movie, for example, for 15 bucks each). Welcome to the cult. 
I was curious over the weekend how the XVT would handle 1:33:1 material since a lot of the stuff I own (classic TV, older/foreign/classic movies on Criterion DVD/Blu-ray, etc.) is framed in that aspect ratio and the normal 'stretch' for 16:9 TV's still leaves black bars on the XVT's 21:9 screen. I found that, depending on the resolution of the 1:33:1 material being shown, the XVT will stretch the picture differently. With high-def 1:33:1 material (1080p, 1080i and 720p) the XVT will stretch the image corner-to-corner, which it doesn't do with standard-def (480i or lower) 1:33:1, at the expense of some of the image getting cut on all of the options.
Next up: videogames and HD-DVD's. MORE TO COME.
Thank you kind sir!!
I was wondering how the XVT would handle this. Puts a slight damper on things.
Given that you and I have the same 747i and we know what to expect regarding watching content that does not fill the screen as far as image retention bars being left on our screens, what are your expectations going forward with this set?
Looking forward to some more gaming pics. 
- OconRecon
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 443 Posts. Joined 7/2006
- Location: Ohio
- Select All Posts By This User
Man, when I woke up just now, I thought I'd check to see if the deal was still active - but it looks like it is gone. When I ordered it said "11 left" and when I went to sleep it said "9 left". Now there's just a used one for $1800. Traditionally, I'm the snooze-lose guy. Dumb luck for once I suppose.
Sam's Club is the only link from Vizio's site which has it in stock. $988 + $99 shipping + $78 tax. Still darn good.
Edited by OconRecon - 12/24/12 at 2:10am
Except for the Dreamcast (wink, wink
) I expect to keep doing most of my SD gaming on the 27" XBR Trinitron tube TV I've kept, and what little gaming I do on HD systems will be on the XVT. The 747i is getting retention issues not because the sets were bad (if they were the banding would have started appearing right away when they were new) but because we've been using them for years and bars/scores 'burn in' a lot more easy now than they would on any new HDTV that isn't garbage (like the XVT, which Vizio saddled with an inferior panel and edge lit LED but it's still better than an Insignia or the no-name brands from Walmart or Radio Shack) that isn't prone to banding out of the gate (i.e. plasmas). I still use the 747i to watch primarily "Law & Order" and non-B&W 1:85:1 color stuff that doesn't show too much the now-permanent banding. So, yeah, three TV sets and all three will get a workout from me for as long as they work. 
STREET FIGHTER III: 2nd IMPACT
Normal:
Stretch (still leaves thinner black bars on both sides):
THE TYPING OF THE DEAD
Normal:
Stretch:
"Typing" requires split-second of typing to get through to the latter levels, and the XVT's response time was pretty good. Same with "Hot Shots Golf" for PS3 (720p HDMI), a game that on my 747i I had some issues getting with the control even with that TV's Game Mode on.
Normal (yes, that's my thumb
):Stretch:
Time for some splt-screen, PIP love with both the Dreamcast ("Space Channel 5") and PS3 (still "HSG") which threw control out the window for both games; when played individually each game's control was perfect:
That's it for now gang. Stay tuned for more pics, but not for a while. To those new to the XVT from the Costco and amazon deals, welcome to the cult.

Edited by dad1153 - 12/25/12 at 7:02pm
- OconRecon
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 443 Posts. Joined 7/2006
- Location: Ohio
- Select All Posts By This User
- thebesthereis
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 453 Posts. Joined 3/2008
- Location: Fort Apache
- Select All Posts By This User
Normal:
"Typing" requires split-second of typing to get through to the latter levels, and the XVT's response time was pretty good. Same with "Hot Shots Golf" for PS3 (720p HDMI), a game that on my 747i I had some issues getting with the control even with that TV's Game Mode on.
Normal (yes, that's my thumb
):Nice, thanks!
And here I'm thinking I'm the only person on the planet that actually bought the Typing Of The Dead game (complete with Dreamcast keyboard). 
Nevertheless, cool pics. Thanks for the show.
Does anyone have any info on Vizio releasing the larger size set in this series? I am considering a purchase, but it would have to be the larger model. Unfortunately, I've been hearing that it's release was doubtful.
- OconRecon
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 443 Posts. Joined 7/2006
- Location: Ohio
- Select All Posts By This User
I think that's what we've all been hearing too. CES ought to tell us in early January.
Avatar is one of the best demo disc 3d or 2d. It's not ideal for this TV since you will either have to stretch the picture or have bars on the left/right since the movie is 16x9.
- OconRecon
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 443 Posts. Joined 7/2006
- Location: Ohio
- Select All Posts By This User
Also, I'm replacing a 42" Vizio, wall mounted, with this set. I just browsed through the owner's manual on line, and can't determine if I'll need a new/wider wall mount bracket for this set. Anyone know the width of the mounting holes on the back of the CinemaWide?
----
Addendum: It looks like Prometheus 3D is 2.39:1. I have it, but haven't watched it yet. Heard it's not that great, but I heard that about Tron too, and it was actually pretty good.
Edited by OconRecon - 12/27/12 at 7:07am
"Green Lantern" and the last two "Harry Potter" movies are also 3D and $14.99 each this week at Best Buy (while supplies last). One of them's not good and the other two are "Harry Potter" movies
, but they'd fill up the 58" frame of the XVT. I wouldn't mind that "Avatar" is 1:78:1, although it sucks that there is a 2:39:1 version (the AR for the non-3D theatrical release of the movie) that has yet to make its way to home video. I trust Cameron enough when he says he covered the framing for both AR's (which is why I haven't gone ballistic that the "Titanic 3D" Blu-ray is 1:78:1 when the original movie was 2:35:1, which is why I'm keeping my "Titanic" DVD's) but it still kind-of sucks to get a 21:9 LED HDTV and the one movie that kick-started the whole 3D craze commercially can only be seen cropped in 1:78:1.- OconRecon
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 443 Posts. Joined 7/2006
- Location: Ohio
- Select All Posts By This User

^^^ Just keep your mind open (or closed if you're a diehard "Alien" fan) and you'll be OK. It uses 3D in subtle, none show-offy ways, and that's always appreciated because its the exception rather than the rule.
"Green Lantern" and the last two "Harry Potter" movies are also 3D and $14.99 each this week at Best Buy (while supplies last). One of them's not good and the other two are "Harry Potter" movies
, but they'd fill up the 58" frame of the XVT. I wouldn't mind that "Avatar" is 1:78:1, although it sucks that there is a 2:39:1 version (the AR for the non-3D theatrical release of the movie) that has yet to make its way to home video. I trust Cameron enough when he says he covered the framing for both AR's (which is why I haven't gone ballistic that the "Titanic 3D" Blu-ray is 1:78:1 when the original movie was 2:35:1, which is why I'm keeping my "Titanic" DVD's) but it still kind-of sucks to get a 21:9 LED HDTV and the one movie that kick-started the whole 3D craze commercially can only be seen cropped in 1:78:1.Hey, I forgot all about Potter. I already have that one in 3D. Thanks!
Unfortunately that's how mine looks as well when I first turn it on. That's called light bleeding and is rather endemic with edge lit LED TVs like Cinemawide. FWIW, Samsung, Sony, LG, etc. all suffer from it to various degrees.
One can mitigate the effect by turning down the backlight level and adjusting contrast/brightness. That's what I did. The light bleeding is only noticeable during the initial bootup and not noticeable during the movie, so I am okay with it.

Edited by Apostate - 1/5/13 at 2:02pm
I agree...but anamorphic blurays shouldnt be 1920x1080 to begin with..most of that data is being used wasted for the freaking black bars on top and bottom....
its a shame when using blurays on a 21:9 tv, that it has to be zoomed in to fit it all....
how hard is to encode these blurays to 21:9 with native 2560 x 1080 resolution?
Edited by EndeaverouX - 1/10/13 at 9:14pm
- OconRecon
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 443 Posts. Joined 7/2006
- Location: Ohio
- Select All Posts By This User

The best I am able to do is forcing 2560x1080 (via the nvidia control panel) which results in a small screen with black bars all around it, (the TV menu says it is still receiving a 1920x1080 input signal) and using stretch mode to force it to be full screen. What the TV is doing is taking the space of a cropped 1920x1080 picture and stretching it across the entire panel. This results with a full screen correct aspect ratio picture, but its just stretching that smaller picture across the entire panel so it is very blurry/hard to read. The other option is to use 1920x1080 and stretching the picture which obviously results in everything being stretched super wide. In either case, you are not able to actually display a raw 2560x1080 resolution. What bothers me the most is the sticker that comes on the screen says right there that it is a 2560x1080 screen. Talk about false advertisement
.Listen, you are wrong with all due respect...it is not false advertisement....
this tv does have a native 2560x1080 resolution. But there is no content out there with that resolution. All commercial Bluray discs today are encoded at 1920x1080. so its normal that even a bluray disc will look blurry on this tv...
just like if you get a 480p sd dvd and play on your 16:9 hdtv...even though it fills the screen, it does look blurry....
so here's the solution....manufactures have to start encoding 21:9 bluray movies natively to 2560x1080 so everysingle pixel is used without stretching and blurriness....until then, your bluray movies wont look crisp as you anticipated....until 21:9 hdtvs become popular, i dont see mfct re encoding anamorphic blurays....which sucks....
these are the facts......any video geek will confirm what i just said....

I just don't understand the logic in buying this.
You are getting a screen that is 56.7”W x 29.0”H
Why not just get a 65" that gives you a dimension of 60.9”W x 40.9”H
16:9 content & 4:3 content will both be larger on a 16:9 65"
21:9 content will be slightly larger on a 16:9 65" TV
Are black bars really that annoying?
to each its own...lol...
so by your logic, why even have a 16:9 tv? why not have a huge 4:3 old tv set, after all those black bars on the 4:3 never bothered anyone, right??? NOT.....remmber those days?
why do you think they came out with 16:9 tvs , so we could get the bars off those 4:3 tvs...
it just happens now that most movies are made in 21:9, not all but most....
it is all relative....lol....
- Official Vizio XVT3Dxx0CM 21:9 CinemaWide Owner's Thread
Gear mentioned in this thread:
Recent Discussions
- › Orlando, FL - BHN 9 seconds ago
- › Official 2013 Sony R550A series TVs (KDL-xxR550A) --- 50", 60", and... 37 seconds ago
- › S.E.O.S.R. MEGA BUILD 54 seconds ago
- › Official Seiki SE50UY04 50-Inch 4K UHD Owners Thread 2 minutes ago
- › Official Samsung PNxxF8500 Series Discussion Thread [No Street... 3 minutes ago
- › Boston, MA - Comcast 3 minutes ago
- › HDHomerun Prime Owners Thread 3 minutes ago
- › Lab Gruppen FP14000 clone amplifiers 4 minutes ago
- › SEOS 12/ DNA360 / TD12M Mains and Inwall Center Build 4 minutes ago
- › Anyone use the Festool TS55 REQ Track Saw? 5 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Epson V11H501020 PowerLite Home Cinema 3020 2D and 3D 1080p Home... by sailorb
- › BenQ W1070 1080P 3D Projector by jakob_s
- › Elite Screens ER110WH1 Sable Fixed Frame (110" 16:9 AR) by DDT0C
- › Elite Screens ER100WH1-A1080P2 Sable Fixed Frame Projection Screen by DDT0C
- › Peerless PRG Mount, Black by DDT0C
- › Epson 5020UB Powerlite Home Cinema 3D Front Projector by DDT0C
- › Sony VPLHS20 Cineza Digital Home Entertainment LCD Projector by varkeast
- › JVC DLA-RS45 Home Theater Projector 1080P HDMI by jmccarei
- › Sharp DT 510 DLP Projector by rdcollns
- › Onkyo TXNR801 / TX-NR801 / TX-NR801 7.1 Channel Digital Home... by mswope63
New Articles
- › Projector Review Contest by Nick Val
- › "List Your Gear to Win Some Gear"... by Nick Val
- › Most Economical Thin Client PC`s from RDP... by RDPThinClients
- › Media Browser 3 Announced by xzener
- › AVS Guide to Media Servers, Part 1 by Scott Wilkinson
- › Join the AVS Team! by Nick Val
- › 25 Top Blu-ray releases for 2012 by Ralph Potts
- › Sony Launches 4k Ultra HD Flat Panel - AVS... by Scott Wilkinson
- › Clarus Power Cords by Good Tunes
- › A Theater Is Just Is Not A Theater, Unless... by David Bott
About AVS | Join the Community | Advertise | Contact Us
© 2013 AVS is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map















