or Connect
AVS › AVS Forum › Other Areas of Interest › Movies, Concerts, and Music Discussion › Ready For A "Starship Troopers" Reboot?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Ready For A "Starship Troopers" Reboot?

post #1 of 178
Thread Starter 
What will the difference be? Less violence to begin with. Story here:

http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/starship-troopers/21819/starship-troopers-reboot-to-cut-back-the-violence
post #2 of 178
Is it April 1st?rolleyes.gif
post #3 of 178
New Starship Troopers with less violence? Le sigh. rolleyes.gif
post #4 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Simonian View Post

New Starship Troopers with less violence? Le sigh. rolleyes.gif

Ditto
post #5 of 178
Pass.
post #6 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary McCoy 
Military service has nothing to do with Facism, which is a brutal and ineffective political ideology, beloved of those who seek political power by oppressing and enslaving others. Paul Verhoeven never understood this, and his film was fatally flawed because of it. I for one would welcome a new Starship Troopers film, if it were made by someone who understands the essence of "service".

Verhoeven made the film HE wanted to make. It was ironic, and effective ,for those who understood his message.

Do you not believe there is politics in the military, just as everywhere else? I was in the Army, what branch did you serve in?
post #7 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by smudge981 View Post

What will the difference be? Less violence to begin with. Story here:
http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/starship-troopers/21819/starship-troopers-reboot-to-cut-back-the-violence
FAIL!!!!
post #8 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z View Post

Verhoeven had the right idea when he tossed the book in the trash halfway through. I wish I'd done the same.

Verhoeven got all the way to halfway through? I pitched my copy a lot sooner than that. Boring doesn't even begin to describe it. The movie, however, was a lot of fun and deliciously subversive. A lot of folks just didn't get it.

Another remake that doesn't need to be made. Unless it has more violence and gratuitous nudity, of course. That might make it worthwhile.
post #9 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

The movie, however, was a lot of fun and deliciously subversive. A lot of folks just didn't get it.
+100
Verhoven went way over a lot of people's heads with ST.
Very topical and very much a poke with a sharp stick in the eye of those who Jefferson referred to in "Patriotism...the last refuge of scoundrels."
post #10 of 178
I recently watched Starship Troopers and I think it's a quite a sly riposte of itself. But what I really want to see is a movie version of "Bill the Galactic Hero". ;p
post #11 of 178
Another subversive element that probably pissed off moviegoers...(stop here if you've never seen the movie)





The good girl dies and the bitch lives! Not the typical Hollywood crowd-pleasing ending but I appreciated the cajones of Verhoeven for doing it.



As for the remake, I have ZERO interest in seeing a watered-down version. I mean. why not just call it G.I. JOE 3? Yawn



"Medic!!!!"
post #12 of 178
What I liked with Verhoevens movie was that they filmed it like a propaganda movie of the federation, dont think I have seen any scifi movie like that before. And since I served in the military when I saw the movie I really enjoyed the fun it played at various military stereotypes. Im also weak for good movie scores and Basil Poledouris rarely let you down.

I also have no problem with a remake done in another fashion. If its wellmade its wellmade.
post #13 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Kenobi View Post

FAIL!!!!

+1
post #14 of 178
AVS is not the website to discuss politics. Please remember this is a home theater website...our mission is to focus on HT hobby.

If it's not possible to discuss this film without a political discussion, then this thread will need to be closed. Sorry, but it's a slippery slope.
post #15 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by rboster View Post

AVS is not the website to discuss politics. Please remember this is a home theater website...our mission is to focus on HT hobby.
If it's not possible to discuss this film without a political discussion, then this thread will need to be closed. Sorry, but it's a slippery slope.

I didn't say one word about whether I agreed or disagreed with Heinlein's politics in any of my posts that have now been purged from this thread. My problem with the book had nothing to do with Heinlein's politcal leanings, but rather the fact that, as a piece of literature, the book is terribly written and tedious.

I disliked the Starship Troopers novel for the same reason that I dislike books and movies that attempt to pander to my own political leanings. They are inevitably sophomoric and boring. I prefer stories about characters who have personalities and do things, and aren't just mouthpieces for the author's political diatribes, no matter what side he's on. This should not be a controversial statement to make.

As I tried to say earlier, if this reboot movie is actually faithful to the book, it will be the most boring movie ever made. Because nothing at all happens in the book, except for the main character sitting down for long-winded sermons from his teachers and his commanding officers, over and over again.
post #16 of 178
Yeah, I thought the trigger got pulled a little too quickly this time as well. This movie provides plenty of meaty topics for discussion, and not every bit of politics needs to be purged if it's relevant to the topic. Heck, even the fishin' posts got flushed! eek.gif
post #17 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z View Post

I prefer stories about characters who have personalities and do things, and aren't just mouthpieces for the author's political diatribes, no matter what side he's on. This should not be a controversial statement to make.
As I tried to say earlier, if this reboot movie is actually faithful to the book, it will be the most boring movie ever made. Because nothing at all happens in the book, except for the main character sitting down for long-winded sermons from his teachers and his commanding officers, over and over again.
+1
We recently had a movie exactly like this.....wink.gif

Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

Yeah, I thought the trigger got pulled a little too quickly this time as well. This movie provides plenty of meaty topics for discussion, and not every bit of politics needs to be purged if it's relevant to the topic. Heck, even the fishin' posts got flushed! eek.gif
I can see why the fishing posts were deleted....
The fish that were singing for me were, in fact, GERMAN Brown Trout.biggrin.gif
http://www.trophytrouthunter.com/imagelib/sitebuilder/misc/show_image.html?linkedwidth=actual&linkpath=http://www.trophytrouthunter.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/messageboardpicscottdemellow19lb12oz33and3qtrmonster.jpg&target=tlx_
post #18 of 178
My irrelevant, inane restaurant critiques that I may or may not have posted are gone too. I demand reparations!
post #19 of 178
On the topic of deleting posts: Please keep in mind we get over a 100 report posts on a slow day. When we have to clean up a thread that has gotten misdirected, there will be times we delete posts that maybe were fine or a portion of the post violated policy (which requires us to be a copy editor) or you were quoting the problem post in question (again copy editor issue). The real world issue is we don't always have time to do some of the "little things". My apologies. Time to move forward.
post #20 of 178
Apparently everyone thinks they can make a movie better now. What made this movie was the large amount of violence, cheesy 1 liners and the shower scene. Take that away and its not a man movie anymore and being sci fi makes it not a chick flick. Are they going to explain why we are fighting a planet full of bugs on a foreign planet that if left alone will not harm us?
post #21 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by rboster View Post

On the topic of deleting posts: Please keep in mind we get over a 100 report posts on a slow day.
Question: does a Report Post message to mods result in said messages being deleted automatically?
If that is the case, maybe we shouldn't have a button for it?

If anyone can hit the button for any post they might want removed we would have, in effect, members engaging in outright censorship of others.
I can completely understand why mods would delete or edit posts, but having members hitting the Report Post button 100 times or more a day is frickin' ridiculous IMO.

We are supposed to be adults here, not children tattling on each other.rolleyes.gif
post #22 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCableMan View Post

Are they going to explain why we are fighting a planet full of bugs on a foreign planet that if left alone will not harm us?

I think that's one of the filmmaker's "subversive" points. wink.gif

Gosh, I hope nobody reports this post. rolleyes.gif
post #23 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCableMan View Post

Are they going to explain why we are fighting a planet full of bugs on a foreign planet that if left alone will not harm us?
I think the book mentions that as we expanded into space, we ended up having border incidents with the arachnids, which eventually led to them destroying an entire city (Buenos Aires, where the hero's parents lived), after which the full scale war was on. Don't know whether the new movie (if it is ever made) will treat it as our fault for disturbing a hornet's nest or their fault for responding disproportionately or a combination of the two. Or they may not feel the need to explain why we are fighting, but simply establish that the story takes place in the midst of a war.
post #24 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCableMan View Post

What made this movie was the large amount of violence, cheesy 1 liners and the shower scene.

What made the shower scene special?
post #25 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovieSwede View Post

What made the shower scene special?

In one of the posts that got flushed, I mentioned, among other topics, that one thing we can all agree on about the film is that Denise Richards should have had Dina Meyer's nude shower scene. cool.gif
post #26 of 178
Great book, terrible movie. Hope the reboot treats it with respect

Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
post #27 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by adpayne View Post

Verhoeven made the film HE wanted to make. It was ironic, and effective ,for those who understood his message.
Do you not believe there is politics in the military, just as everywhere else? I was in the Army, what branch did you serve in?

Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

Verhoeven got all the way to halfway through? I pitched my copy a lot sooner than that. Boring doesn't even begin to describe it. The movie, however, was a lot of fun and deliciously subversive. A lot of folks just didn't get it.
Another remake that doesn't need to be made. Unless it has more violence and gratuitous nudity, of course. That might make it worthwhile.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

+100
Verhoven went way over a lot of people's heads with ST.
Very topical and very much a poke with a sharp stick in the eye of those who Jefferson referred to in "Patriotism...the last refuge of scoundrels."

Quote:
Originally Posted by MovieSwede View Post

What I liked with Verhoevens movie was that they filmed it like a propaganda movie of the federation, dont think I have seen any scifi movie like that before. And since I served in the military when I saw the movie I really enjoyed the fun it played at various military stereotypes. Im also weak for good movie scores and Basil Poledouris rarely let you down.
I also have no problem with a remake done in another fashion. If its wellmade its wellmade.


agree with all of you. loved verhoven's take on this material and how he played into the propaganda of the federation.

no way any re-make can be as good as the original.
post #28 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

In one of the posts that got flushed, I mentioned, among other topics, that one thing we can all agree on about the film is that Denise Richards should have had Dina Meyer's nude shower scene. cool.gif
Absolutely right.
That shower scene made me cringe....eek.gifwink.gif
post #29 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

In one of the posts that got flushed, I mentioned, among other topics, that one thing we can all agree on about the film is that Denise Richards should have had Dina Meyer's nude shower scene. cool.gif

Wouldnt mind both of them to be in the scene actually. Just get rid of the one that talks about joining the federation because she wants to have a baby. smile.gif
post #30 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franin View Post

Wouldnt mind both of them to be in the scene actually. Just get rid of the one that talks about joining the federation because she wants to have a baby. smile.gif

More of that delicious subversion. wink.gif I really, really love this movie.
Don't be hatin' on me. I really love Plan 9 From Outer Space too. biggrin.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink 
Absolutely right.
That shower scene made me cringe...

Why is it that, more often than not, the gals we want to do nude scenes are not the gals that actually do them? That seem right to you?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Other Areas of Interest › Movies, Concerts, and Music Discussion › Ready For A "Starship Troopers" Reboot?