AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Comparison, Unbiased Review & Ranking of 12 High-End Home Cinema Audio Systems
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Comparison, Unbiased Review & Ranking of 12 High-End Home Cinema Audio Systems - Page 6

post #151 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post

Dude, I don't want to fight with you... I want to completely discredit you. I want to ensure that anyone reading your "review" knows not to believe the nonsense you are spewing... simple as that. smile.gif
Quote:
Let's agree to disagree OK? I respect your opinion. I simply ask that you respect mine.
Sorry, but I can't just agree to disagree. I know from everyday, first-hand experience that your opinion of the Triad Platinum speaker system is 180 degrees out of phase with the truth. I can't permit your disparaging comments to go unchallenged. Your disrespect for the quality of these speakers, as well as your disparaging comments about the manufacturer, (some of these people I know personally), as well as your disparaging comments about a number of other excellent speaker systems, makes you look like a total fool.
Quote:
And with regards to the SPL capability of the Steinway S-Series Audio system I will publish the test results of the system I am installing into the Cinema I am currently building. Let's wait for those and see, OK?
You can harp on about the fact that the S-15's 5 /14" driver isn't capable of outputting the SPL levels necessary to achieve reference levels til the cows come home... it won't change the FACT that I measured it doing just that with an SPL Meter. wink.gif
So I repeat let's wait and see how the test results of the S-Series System I am installing pans out, OK? smile.gif
I couldn't care less about the system you plan to install in your concrete bunker. At this point, it's vaporware. You can quit talking about it until it's something more than that. (BTW, you may not be a "shill" for S-L, but are they cutting you a deal on those speakers so you'll write a "review" for them and publish it on the internet? Hmmmm....)
Moreover, even if you do show some impressive measurements of the "physically-challenged" S-L system, it won't change what I think of you, or your totally inappropriate and incorrect comments about other systems.
Craig

Hi Craig,

I must correct you with regards to your accusation that I have made "disparaging comments about the manufacturer", when I have done no such thing. Please kindly quote these so-called "disparaging comments about the manufacturer" to which you are referring. confused.gif

Further to this, for what it's worth, I’d like to apologise for calling you “boy”; I reacted badly to your unwarrantedly patronizing, insulting and attacking me. I should have realized more quickly that you were doing so simply because you were upset by my review and personal opinion of the audio system that you own. smile.gif

However, I must point out that you have admitted having a personal association with Triad, so you are not exactly wholly unbiased are you? tongue.gif

So go ahead, throw your toys out the pram and insult me as much as you like. In my opinion I found that audio system to be bright and harsh when played at reference levels and seemingly suffered the flaws typically associated with horn-type speakers. Whereas, in my opinion, I found that the PRO Audio Technology audio system, which also has horn-type speakers, did not. In fact, I thought it sounded pretty incredible and was without a doubt one of the best that I auditioned, and score reflects my opinion. Now you might have listened to the same Triad audio system that I did and really liked it; in which case, you would purchase the system whilst I would choose not to. And that’s the wonderful thing about the world we live in; we are not all clones, in that we have our own personal preferences. You have clearly demonstrated that you are a very intelligent chap who is knowledgeable about A/V, in which case you must know all about the age-old debate over the audio colouration that often plagues horn-type speakers. This matter has been argued over for decades, and will never, ever reach a resolution; and as will will probably be aware has been the cause of many, many heated debates, and more recently Internet flamewars.

Unfortunately, when one expresses one’s opinion without ‘sugar coating’ it (or modifying it to appease one’s advertisers, which is what A/V magazines typically do) inevitably the low scores will upset fans of those particular brands or items. You are clearly a huge fan of Triad speakers and I both welcome and respect your opinion, even though it is somewhat biased due to your personal relationship with the manufacturer. I ask again that you please kindly respect mine. Personally, I didn’t like the particular Triad audio system that I listened to. Let’s agree to disagree. I am entitled to my opinion and you are entitled to yours.

Given your strong feelings, I suggest that you might like to post an intelligently composed rebuttal, comprising your own opinion on and review of the respective Triad audio system. Feel free to include details as to how and why you don’t agree with my perspective, but please try to keep matters professional and not lower yourself to petty jibes or insults.

I believe that this would achieve much more than simply attacking me. After all, your opinion of my A/V skills is just that, your opinion; and hence your time would be much better invested in supporting your view that the respective Triad audio system is in fact really good, by posting your own review.

I expect you will probably persist in your mudslinging against me, just because I don't agree with your perspective of that particular audio system; but I am hoping that you will surprise me. smile.gif

P.S. I should reply to these or the fact I don't might trigger another barrage of false accusations:

1) RE "BTW, you may not be a "shill" for S-L, but are they cutting you a deal on those speakers so you'll write a "review" for them and publish it on the internet? Hmmmm...." - For your information I paid no less than the Trade Price for the audio system, and I already placed the order way before writing and posting my review. wink.gif

2) RE: "Moreover, even if you do show some impressive measurements of the "physically-challenged" S-L system, it won't change what I think of you..." - Awww, you mean we're not going to be best buddies? tongue.gif Seriously, though, I hope in time you calm down and realise that an opinion is an opinion; and that just because yours differs from mine it doesn't make mine 'incorrect' smile.gif Let me put it this way, say a SOUND ENGINEER and a DOCTOR audition the same audio system; the SOUND ENGINEER's opinion is that the audio is amazing and writes a 1000 page report about it; the DOCTOR's opinion is that it sounded harsh and gave him a headache. Who is correct? smile.gif
Edited by madboynutter - 7/8/12 at 5:49am
post #152 of 388
and the hole gets deeper and deeper...
post #153 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post

You don't even know what "Reference Level" is, or how to measure it. I showed that a few pages back, which you never responded to. rolleyes.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by psgcdn View Post

That is pretty clear, a sum of 115 dB doesn't mean reference (maybe the sub alone was playing). The denial of basic physics supports this as well.


Pfahaaha! Oh yes, how silly of me... only the subwoofer was playing when I measured the SPL and I didn't notice. Are you guys serious? rolleyes.gif

You do realise that is the vest majority of cases the audio systems that I auditioned had been installed, setup and calibrated by the UK distributor, which included the guy who carries out the CEDIA training? And when they demonstrated the respective audio systems to me they informed me the volume setting was set to Reference Level; I simply confirmed that it was indeed so via use of an SPL Meter. So you've basically just insulted all the major UK Distributors for all these brands of A/V equipment with your ludicrous insinuations that the systems weren't set up or calibrated properly or that they don't know how to set the volume to Reference Level. That's hilarious! tongue.gif

Come on, you guys are a bit more intelligent than this surely? smile.gif
post #154 of 388
Quote:
Hi Craig,
I must correct you with regards to your accusation that I have made "disparaging comments about the manufacturer", when I have done no such thing. Please kindly quote these so-called "disparaging comments about the manufacturer" to which you are referring. confused.gif
"Wolf" = predator. "Sheep" = prey. You have portrayed Triad as a predator preying on the innocent. You may not have intended to portray them that way, but that is how I read it when I first saw it, and I'm sure other first-time readers will see it the same way. If you want a "civil discourse" with me, you will NEED to change your totally inaccurate and disparaging characterization of Triad in this way.
Quote:
Further to this, for what it's worth, I’d like to apologise for calling you “boy”; I reacted badly to your unwarrantedly patronizing, insulting and attacking me. I should have realized more quickly that you were doing so simply because you were upset by my review and personal opinion of the audio system that you own. smile.gif
In my recollection, and without reviewing every post, I don't think you called me "boy." I believe that was directed at another poster.
Quote:
However, I must point out that you have admitted having a personal association with Triad, so you are not exactly wholly unbiased are you? tongue.gif
No, obviously I'm not unbiased. I OWN the speakers! I know Paul Scarpelli, the now-retired Director of Sales and Marketing. Paul is a very helpful forum member and a very honest and upstanding representative of Triad, even though he is currently retired. He never disparages another manufacturer, and he often recommends other speakers to forum members if Triad speakers are not their "best" option. I also have met David Nelson, the Chief Speaker Designer for Triad and the lead engineer on the Platinum system.

In addition, Triad is a very well-respected company used by well-respected theater designers. Dennis Erskine, http://www.erskine-group.com/about.php has designed many, many HT's for members of this forum, as well as being the Moderator of the Dedicated Theater Design and Construction Forum. In addition, Anthony Grimani, uses Traid speakers and has published about them. http://www.pmiltd.com/about.html formerly of Dolby Labs, Lucas Film and THX. Here is one of his articles about using Triad speakers in a baffle wall: http://www.triadspeakers.com/cinemaplus/partners/pdfs/pmi/040601_baffled_again.pdf I'll take their opinions any day over someone who posts some a "review"on the internet.
Quote:
So go ahead, throw your toys out the pram and insult me as much as you like. In my opinion I found that audio system to be bright and harsh when played at reference levels and seemingly suffered the flaws typically associated with horn-type speakers.
Without the context of the room they were installed in, I can't address your issues. I can categorically state that the 3 systems I have heard these speakers in, they exhibit no "honkiness" whatsoever. Here is a measurement of them in my room:

290

Please exhibit the expertise you claim to have and explain exactly what it is in this measurement that would cause them to sound "honky".

Quote:
Whereas, in my opinion, I found that the PRO Audio Technology audio system, which also has horn-type speakers, did not. In fact, I thought it sounded pretty incredible and was without a doubt one of the best that I auditioned, and score reflects my opinion. Now you might have listened to the same Triad audio system that I did and really liked it; in which case, you would purchase the system whilst I would choose not to. And that’s the wonderful thing about the world we live in; we are not all clones, in that we have our own personal preferences. You have clearly demonstrated that you are a very intelligent chap who is knowledgeable about A/V, in which case you must know all about the age-old debate over the audio colouration that often plagues horn-type speakers. This matter has been argued over for decades, and will never, ever reach a resolution; and as will will probably be aware has been the cause of many, many heated debates, and more recently Internet flamewars.
Unfortunately, when one expresses one’s opinion without ‘sugar coating’ it (or modifying it to appease one’s advertisers, which is what A/V magazines typically do) inevitably the low scores will upset fans of those particular brands or items. You are clearly a huge fan of Triad speakers and I both welcome and respect your opinion, even though it is somewhat biased due to your personal relationship with the manufacturer. I ask again that you please kindly respect mine. Personally, I didn’t like the particular Triad audio system that I listened to. Let’s agree to disagree. I am entitled to my opinion and you are entitled to yours.

Given your strong feelings, I suggest that you might like to post an intelligently composed rebuttal, comprising your own opinion on and review of the respective Triad audio system. Feel free to include details as to how and why you don’t agree with my perspective, but please try to keep matters professional and not lower yourself to petty jibes or insults.

I have posted my opinion of these speakers multiple times on this forum, both in the Traid Owner's Thread and in my own thread linked in my signature. Feel free to look them up.
Quote:
I believe that this would achieve much more than simply attacking me. After all, your opinion of my A/V skills is just that, your opinion; and hence your time would be much better invested in supporting your view that the respective Triad audio system is in fact really good, by posting your own review.
I expect you will probably persist in your mudslinging against me, just because I don't agree with your perspective of that particular audio system; but I am hoping that you will surprise me. smile.gif
P.S. I should reply to these or the fact I don't might trigger another barrage of false accusations:

Now I'm off to watch Wimbledon. Go Roger! smile.gif

Craig
post #155 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post


Please exhibit the expertise you claim to have.
He has none, but he's the only poster here who seems unaware of that. There's a name for what he suffers from, and it's explained here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Continuing to feed the troll gives him what he craves. Put him on your blocked list, get on with your life, it's far too short to waste any of it on this sillyness.
post #156 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccotenj View Post

and the hole gets deeper and deeper...

And yesterday's shovel has been replaced by a backhoe.
post #157 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Fitzmaurice View Post

He has none, but he's the only poster here who seems unaware of that. There's a name for what he suffers from, and it's explained here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
Continuing to feed the troll gives him what he craves. Put him on your blocked list, get on with your life, it's far too short to waste any of it on this sillyness.

It is interesting to note that the ones who are egotistically claiming that I have inferior A/V skills and knowledge have proven that they are unable to tell the difference between the method of operation of Steinway Lyngdorf audio systems and Meridian; and as it happens are also under the misapprehension that the Panasonic SA-XR55 which is just a £250 A/V Receiver with class D amps is the same as an SL system which is a complete end to end audio system excluding a source. rolleyes.gif

Furthermore, these same individuals mistakenly claim that the SL audio systems, which they have never in fact listened to, are unable to play audio at Cinema Reference Levels, despite the UK Distributor demonstrating as such and my confirming as such via use of an SPL meter. IF I had any affiliation with SL, which I don't, then I would indubitably be able to post some lab test data to so just how ridiculous are the statements made by these self-proclaimed superior individuals... tongue.gif

I could go on... but all of this begs the question, who is really embarrassing themselves? Me, who has simply posted an opinion that differs from some other peoples' ; or YOU guys who don't seem to know your arse from your elbow for all of the above reasons and more. wink.gif
Edited by madboynutter - 7/8/12 at 7:15am
post #158 of 388
Quote:
and as it happens are also under the misapprehension that the Panasonic SA-XR55 which is just a £250 A/V Receiver with class D amps is the same as an SL system which is a complete end to end audio system excluding a source.

Never said they were the "same" I said that the SL system was not the only one to be digital from source to speaker. You extolled the virtues of the SL speaker for not having any hiss. This 200 dollar XR55 has zero hiss from speakers but not enough power for my needs; I sold mine years ago. Is the XR55 as good an amp as those in the SL speakers? Probably not, but they both have all digital audio chains, and both have zero hiss. In those two aspects they are alike. You made it sound like the SL had a monopoly on those two aspects, while clearly it doesn't.
post #159 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sound dropouts View Post

Quote:
and as it happens are also under the misapprehension that the Panasonic SA-XR55 which is just a £250 A/V Receiver with class D amps is the same as an SL system which is a complete end to end audio system excluding a source.
Never said they were the "same" I said that the SL system was not the only one to be digital from source to speaker. You extolled the virtues of the SL speaker for not having any hiss. This 200 dollar XR55 has zero hiss from speakers but not enough power for my needs; I sold mine years ago. Is the XR55 as good an amp as those in the SL speakers? Probably not, but they both have all digital audio chains, and both have zero hiss. In those two aspects they are alike. You made it sound like the SL had a monopoly on those two aspects, while clearly it doesn't.

Erm... please kindly confirm which other brand of audio system is an end to end audio system that operates the same way as Steinway Lyngdorf smile.gif
post #160 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by madboynutter View Post

Erm... please kindly confirm which other brand of audio equipment comprises an end to end audio system that operates the same way as Steinway Lyngdorf smile.gif

LOL, exactly the same way? No speaker operates exactly the same way as each other. However the XR55 is all digital and has zero hiss, characteristics its shares with the SL.

I also don't care whether something is perceived as "high end" or not if it sounds the same.
post #161 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post

"Wolf" = predator. "Sheep" = prey. You have portrayed Triad as a predator preying on the innocent. You may not have intended to portray them that way, but that is how I read it when I first saw it, and I'm sure other first-time readers will see it the same way. If you want a "civil discourse" with me, you will NEED to change your totally inaccurate and disparaging characterization of Triad in this way.

Craig,

Hopefully you realise that that was an analogy referring to the fact that, in my opinion, in almost all (but not all) cases however much you dress up a horn speaker fundamentally it is a horn speaker; and that I was most certainly NOT portraying "Triad as a predator preying on the innocent"; however, I have taken your point on board and of couse immediately deleted said sentence for you. smile.gif

With regards to everything else I stand by what I have already said regarding all of that being a difference of opinions. So let's agree to disagree. And it's fully understandable you not being a happy bunny, given you own a Triad Platinum series system however I am sure that we would not have had this interchange if I had sang its praises and slated PRO Audio Technology instead... wink.gif

Enjoy the tennis, my money is on Andy tongue.gif
post #162 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sound dropouts View Post

LOL, exactly the same way? No speaker operates exactly the same way as each other. However the XR55 is all digital and has zero hiss, characteristics its shares with the SL.
I also don't care whether something is perceived as "high end" or not if it sounds the same.

Last time I checked you needed to plug the Panasonic XR55 into some speakers for it to produce sound, no? Whereas, the SL is a complete end to end audio system. So how exactly is that the same? smile.gif

I get the point about the Panasonic's amplifiers being digital, but that's where the similarity ends. wink.gif

I don't know whether or not SL invented the technology that their systems' use; but as far as I am aware they are the one's offering it as part of a complete audio system solution. And whether or not they did or did not invent the technology is a moot point; look at Widsom Audio for example, their flagship audio system uses decades old technology revamped to astonishing effect, which delivers incredible audio performance in spades. In fact, I was intending to buy the Wisdom Audio system before I auditioned the SL system... it's amazing, and comparitively in its way unique and extraordinary, just as is the SL system but for different reasons smile.gif

I should add that if I had bought the Wisdom Audio system and not the SL system and hence written my full review singing its praises and not the SL system, then I am sure I would be defending my high opinion of the Wisdom Audio system's audio performance instead of the SL's! tongue.gif
Edited by madboynutter - 7/8/12 at 8:30am
post #163 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by madboynutter View Post

Last time I checked you needed to plug the Panasonic XR55 into some speakers for it to produce sound, no? Whereas, the SL is a complete end to end audio system. So how exactly is that the same? wink.gif

I presume that there are wires connecting the amp in the SL to the woofer/tweeter. Who cares whether the wires are inside or outside the speaker?

You are now just making excuses so you don't have to admit to being shown up by a 200 dollar receiver.
post #164 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sound dropouts View Post

I presume that there are wires connecting the amp in the SL to the woofer/tweeter. Who cares whether the wires are inside or outside the speaker?

Sorry, but does the Panasonic SA-XR55 come with speakers then? I thought it was just an A/V Receiver, no? smile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by sound dropouts View Post

You are now just making excuses so you don't have to admit to being shown up by a 200 dollar receiver.

I tell you what, you are most welcome to bring along your 200 dollar receiver anytime to an SL dealer and have them run a direct comparison for you. Then, you will realise just how silly you are being... just remember to bring along some speakers though! wink.gif
post #165 of 388
I agree that your opinion is just that, However, saying these speakers can play reference levels better than the other speakers is clearly not fact. The only way it can play reference(which is a known spl number at the seats from each speaker) is if the seating position does not lose more than 9 dBs from the speakers and if that is the case that is pushing the speaker at max levels which introduces compression which BTW would be easy on your ears. All rooms are different and if you place that speaker in a room that loses 9dBs or more, like mine, they will fail at reference where the other speakers will not. Stating that they are better at reference is much too generalized and not a fact. This is where the problem comes in for me. I only listen at reference and I have spent a huge amount of time and money finding the right gear for the job in my dedicated room. I have swapped out more than 20 systems in my single room within the last 7 years alone! This is not hard to figure out. I have a friend who thinks his paradigms sound awesome at reference and they can"t even play that loud without distortion and compression but he thinks they are great! I let him listen to a real reference speaker in his room and he said it was boring with less energy, he was right, the paradigm had tons of energy but that extra volume and feel was distortion and compressing! I can easily measure how much distortion each speaker gives at 105 dBs but most won't believe it.
post #166 of 388
Quote:
I tell you what, you are most welcome to bring along your 200 dollar receiver anytime to an SL dealer and have them run a direct comparison for you. Then, you will realise just how silly you are being... just remember to bring along some speakers though!

I have no doubt that the DSP is far superior in the SLs (they better be at the price...), so the comparison would be invalid. But if I connected the XR55 to the woofers and tweeters of the SL (disconnecting the built in amp) the SL will still have no hiss and will have no unnecessary DAC or ADC.
post #167 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MKtheater View Post

I agree that your opinion is just that, However, saying these speakers can play reference levels better than the other speakers is clearly not fact. The only way it can play reference(which is a known spl number at the seats from each speaker) is if the seating position does not lose more than 9 dBs from the speakers and if that is the case that is pushing the speaker at max levels which introduces compression which BTW would be easy on your ears. All rooms are different and if you place that speaker in a room that loses 9dBs or more, like mine, they will fail at reference where the other speakers will not. Stating that they are better at reference is much too generalized and not a fact. This is where the problem comes in for me. I only listen at reference and I have spent a huge amount of time and money finding the right gear for the job in my dedicated room. I have swapped out more than 20 systems in my single room within the last 7 years alone! This is not hard to figure out. I have a friend who thinks his paradigms sound awesome at reference and they can"t even play that loud without distortion and compression but he thinks they are great! I let him listen to a real reference speaker in his room and he said it was boring with less energy, he was right, the paradigm had tons of energy but that extra volume and feel was distortion and compressing! I can easily measure how much distortion each speaker gives at 105 dBs but most won't believe it.

You make some interesting points. Have you ever tested an SL audio system? smile.gif

And out of curosity how does MK Sound perform at reference levels?
post #168 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sound dropouts View Post

Quote:
I have no doubt that the DSP is far superior in the SLs (they better be at the price...), so the comparison would be invalid....

Invalid or a joke? You are yanking my chain right? smile.gif
post #169 of 388
Quote:
Invalid or a joke? You are yanking my chain right?

How am I yanking your chain?
post #170 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by madboynutter View Post

You make some interesting points. Have you ever tested an SL audio system? smile.gif
And out of curosity how does MK Sound perform at reference levels?

I have not tested a SL system. I have owned so many M&K speakers and the best of the bunch for reference were the S-5000's. I had 7 of them with 4 subs(DIY). Reference for them were great but they could play 130 dBs from 200hz on up without distorting the wave form! This was tested by Don Keele. They are truly exceptional speakers.
post #171 of 388
Although the “review” does read like an SL brochure written by an enthusiastic SL marketing apprentice, I’m sure there is some substance to the comments. The unabashed praising of SL is off putting, but for me it does create an interest in hearing the SL system (I have always found the concept of a fully integrated audio system intriguing).

Honestly, I find the rabid attacks on the “review” equally off putting and although I may disagree with the style of the “review”, I find many of the comments interesting. We all have a certain amount of passion about the hobby and when we find something we like, we don’t like to hear disparaging comments no matter how well intended.

My take away is that I have been informed about a product I did not know existed and if the opportunity presents itself, I will make an effort to hear this system. In the meantime, I will just continue to enjoy my shrill sounding (fingernails on the chalkboard) system blissfully unaware of just how bad it really sounds … rolleyes.gifwink.gif
Edited by RMK! - 7/8/12 at 9:58am
post #172 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by madboynutter View Post

It is interesting to note that the ones who are egotistically claiming that I have inferior A/V skills and knowledge have proven that they are unable to tell the difference between the method of operation of Steinway Lyngdorf audio systems and Meridian; and as it happens are also under the misapprehension that the Panasonic SA-XR55 which is just a £250 A/V Receiver with class D amps is the same as an SL system which is a complete end to end audio system excluding a source. rolleyes.gif
Furthermore, these same individuals mistakenly claim that the SL audio systems, which they have never in fact listened to, are unable to play audio at Cinema Reference Levels, despite the UK Distributor demonstrating as such and my confirming as such via use of an SPL meter. IF I had any affiliation with SL, which I don't, then I would indubitably be able to post some lab test data to so just how ridiculous are the statements made by these self-proclaimed superior individuals... tongue.gif
I could go on... but all of this begs the question, who is really embarrassing themselves? Me, who has simply posted an opinion that differs from some other peoples' ; or YOU guys who don't seem to know your arse from your elbow for all of the above reasons and more. wink.gif

http://www.billfitzmaurice.com/


373
post #173 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by madboynutter View Post

It is interesting to note that the ones who are egotistically claiming that I have inferior A/V skills and knowledge have proven that they are unable to tell the difference between the method of operation of Steinway Lyngdorf audio systems and Meridian; and as it happens are also under the misapprehension that the Panasonic SA-XR55 which is just a £250 A/V Receiver with class D amps is the same as an SL system which is a complete end to end audio system excluding a source. rolleyes.gif
Furthermore, these same individuals mistakenly claim that the SL audio systems, which they have never in fact listened to, are unable to play audio at Cinema Reference Levels, despite the UK Distributor demonstrating as such and my confirming as such via use of an SPL meter. IF I had any affiliation with SL, which I don't, then I would indubitably be able to post some lab test data to so just how ridiculous are the statements made by these self-proclaimed superior individuals... tongue.gif
I could go on... but all of this begs the question, who is really embarrassing themselves? Me, who has simply posted an opinion that differs from some other peoples' ; or YOU guys who don't seem to know your arse from your elbow for all of the above reasons and more. wink.gif

http://www.billfitzmaurice.com/

(in case you lost track of who you made those comments toward, there's his website)

373
post #174 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post

Although the “review” does read like an SL brochure written by an enthusiastic SL marketing apprentice, I’m sure there is some substance to the comments. The unabashed praising of SL is off putting, but for me it does create an interest in hearing the SL system (I have always found the concept of a fully integrated audio system intriguing).
Honestly, I find the rabid attacks on the “review” equally off putting and although I may disagree with the style of the “review”, I find many of the comments interesting. We all have a certain amount of passion about the hobby and when we find something we like, we don’t like to hear disparaging comments no matter how well intended.
My take away is that I have been informed about a product I did not know existed and I and if the opportunity presents itself, I will make an effort to hear this system. In the meantime, I will just continue to enjoy my shrill sounding (fingernails on the chalkboard) system blissfully unaware of just how bad it really sounds … rolleyes.gifwink.gif

I recommend you also check out the WIDSOM AUDIO system if you get the chance... its pretty awesome too. The only reason I didn't compose as detailed write-ups of my opinion of that and the others is the document would have ended up about 400 pages long! biggrin.gif

Interestingly, I would have bought that system had I not auditioned the SL system; in which case I am sure I would be defending my high opinion of that audio system instead of SL! wink.gif
Edited by madboynutter - 7/8/12 at 10:00am
post #175 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by madboynutter View Post

I recommend you also check out the WIDSOM AUDIO system if you get the chance... its pretty awesome too. The only reason I didn't compose as detailed write-ups of my opinion of that and the others is the document would have ended up about 400 pages long! biggrin.gif
Interestingly, I would have bought that system had I not auditioned the SL system; in which case I am sure I would be defending my high opinion of that audio system instead of SL! wink.gif

My interest in a fully integrated audio system was spawned by the NHT XD powered system that I heard several years ago. I have always regretted not buying that system as a music only system. I will keep an open mind (and ear) regarding the SL and Wisdom Audio products. Thanks for taking the time to write the review and I'm glad it wasn't 400 pages. smile.gif
post #176 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post

My interest in a fully integrated audio system was spawned by the NHT XD powered system that I heard several years ago. I have always regretted not buying that system as a music only system. I will keep an open mind (and ear) regarding the SL and Wisdom Audio products. Thanks for taking the time to write the review and I'm glad it wasn't 400 pages. smile.gif

Thank you for taking my review as it was intended, and being a thoroughly decent individual to boot; unlike some of these other characters who remind me of cartoon villains. biggrin.gif
post #177 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay1 View Post

http://www.billfitzmaurice.com/
(in case you lost track of who you made those comments toward, there's his website)

Meaning no insult, and with the utmost repect, it is perfectly clear from my post its content was directed at more than one individual... wink.gif

P.S. I am genuinely sorry if I upset you by correcting you on this particular matter smile.gif
post #178 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by madboynutter View Post

Enjoy the tennis, my money is on Andy tongue.gif
Wrong again. smile.gif
post #179 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cschang View Post

Wrong again. smile.gif

Well of course I'd be supporting Andy and not Roger... I'm BRITISH! rolleyes.gif
post #180 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by madboynutter View Post

Craig,
Hopefully you realise that that was an analogy referring to the fact that, in my opinion, in almost all (but not all) cases however much you dress up a horn speaker fundamentally it is a horn speaker; and that I was most certainly NOT portraying "Triad as a predator preying on the innocent"; however, I have taken your point on board and of couse immediately deleted said sentence for you. smile.gif
Thank you.
Quote:
With regards to everything else I stand by what I have already said regarding all of that being a difference of opinions. So let's agree to disagree. And it's fully understandable you not being a happy bunny, given you own a Triad Platinum series system however I am sure that we would not have had this interchange if I had sang its praises and slated PRO Audio Technology instead... wink.gif
I still would have disagreed with you about the Klipsch, Procella and JBL speakers, and about the honkiness of horns in general.
Quote:
Enjoy the tennis, my money is on Andy tongue.gif
Andy acquitted himself quite well and he was very gracious in defeat. One had to feel sorry for him. He played his heart out... and was beaten by the greatest tennis player to ever play the game, IMO. I think Andy felt the weight of his country was on him, and that is a huge cross to bear. I hope he doesn't feel he let them down.

************************************************************************************************************************************

Now, about those measurements and how they relate to honkiness....

Here's another one, taken by Stereophile:

319
http://www.hometheater.com/content/triad-inroom-platinum-speaker-system-measurements
(The purple is on-axis, the red is 15 degrees off axis horizontally, and blue is 30 degrees off axis horizontally.)

You now have 3 measurements of the Triad Platinum LCR. Please use these measurements to explain what you heard as "honkiness." Remember, the tweeter/dispersion lens is crossed out at 2.8 kHz, well above the "honkiness" range.

Again, without the context of the room you heard these in, I am at a loss to explain why they sounded the way they did to your ears, (assuming you were in fact being "brutally honest" and that you did not have some other agenda against Triad.) Please share were you heard these. I will pass it along to Triad and they can look into the setup. I'm sure they would not be happy if their speakers and subs are not being displayed advantageously, due to inadequate setup. I have no doubt that the complaints you had regarding the bass was a subwoofer setup issue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MKtheater View Post

I agree that your opinion is just that, However, saying these speakers can play reference levels better than the other speakers is clearly not fact. The only way it can play reference(which is a known spl number at the seats from each speaker) is if the seating position does not lose more than 9 dBs from the speakers and if that is the case that is pushing the speaker at max levels which introduces compression which BTW would be easy on your ears. All rooms are different and if you place that speaker in a room that loses 9dBs or more, like mine, they will fail at reference where the other speakers will not. Stating that they are better at reference is much too generalized and not a fact. This is where the problem comes in for me. I only listen at reference and I have spent a huge amount of time and money finding the right gear for the job in my dedicated room. I have swapped out more than 20 systems in my single room within the last 7 years alone! This is not hard to figure out. I have a friend who thinks his paradigms sound awesome at reference and they can"t even play that loud without distortion and compression but he thinks they are great! I let him listen to a real reference speaker in his room and he said it was boring with less energy, he was right, the paradigm had tons of energy but that extra volume and feel was distortion and compressing! I can easily measure how much distortion each speaker gives at 105 dBs but most won't believe it.
MKtheater's comments about Reference Level are based on the Inverse Square Law, which states that soundwaves will decrease in level by 6 dB per each doubling of distance. The ISL is only valid for a 3-dimensional radiation pattern from a point source, without any reflections from boundaries. Inside a room, the ISL is modified by the reflections. Depending on the size of the room and construction, a soundwave will lose something in the neighborhood of 3 to 6 dB per doubling of distance. That is how he calculated the SPL potential of the S-L system:

114 dB @ 1 meter (as specified by S=l, although without frequency limits)
111 to 108 dB @ 2 meter
109 to 102 dB at 4 meter

At 4 meters, in a low reflectivity room, the S-L system may not be able to produce the full 105 dB per speaker Reference Level. In a room larger than that, it's highly unlikely they'll be able to, unless the room is so reflective as to be unlistenable. This is why everyone is questioning your hyperbole regarding the massive output capability of this system. Nobody doubts it will get "loud", but it can't possibly have "limitless" output capability in all sized rooms.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post

Although the “review” does read like an SL brochure written by an enthusiastic SL marketing apprentice, I’m sure there is some substance to the comments. The unabashed praising of SL is off putting, but for me it does create an interest in hearing the SL system (I have always found the concept of a fully integrated audio system intriguing).
Honestly, I find the rabid attacks on the “review” equally off putting and although I may disagree with the style of the “review”, I find many of the comments interesting. We all have a certain amount of passion about the hobby and when we find something we like, we don’t like to hear disparaging comments no matter how well intended.
My take away is that I have been informed about a product I did not know existed and if the opportunity presents itself, I will make an effort to hear this system. In the meantime, I will just continue to enjoy my shrill sounding (fingernails on the chalkboard) system blissfully unaware of just how bad it really sounds … rolleyes.gifwink.gif

Rob, I apologize if you found any of my comments "off-putting." redface.gif

I suggest if you ever have a chance to hear the S-L system, you take the opportunity to do so. I have heard it twice and I thought it was a great sounding system, especially given it's diminutive size. I have always liked the "AMT" tweeter, (remember the old Heil Air Motion Transformers"?) The S-L system uses them to great advantage. It sounds excellent on music. It's much more limited dynamically than your current system, especially for high level HT applications. Nonetheless, if you liked the NHT xD system, you'll like the S-L system.

Craig
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Comparison, Unbiased Review & Ranking of 12 High-End Home Cinema Audio Systems