AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Comparison, Unbiased Review & Ranking of 12 High-End Home Cinema Audio Systems
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Comparison, Unbiased Review & Ranking of 12 High-End Home Cinema Audio Systems - Page 8

post #211 of 388
AVS radio chat recently discussed this thread with David Bott (it beings roughly in the middle of the broadcast):

http://www.avsforum.com/t/1419598/avs-radio-episode-2-7-10-12/0_50
post #212 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post

According to the S-L website, the woofers will produce 114 dB at 1 meter, or 117 dB when corner loaded. They have a stated frequency response of 25 Hz to 500 Hz, but with no reference to a -3 dB point or a stated SPL measurement. They might do 25 Hz at 90 dB, but it's inlikely they'll do 25 Hz at 115 dB. They're dual-opposed, 10" designs, (similar to the Submerive and Epik Empire, but with smaller drivers), and a 400 watt amp. These are nothing special. Since they're sealed, they'll need a Linkwitz Transform circuit, (boost below F3), to get to 25 Hz, which will use up a lot of amplifier power and driver excursion. It's probably built into the room correction software, but driving these two small drivers to Reference Level at 25 Hz will be quite a trick. I would be astonished if they dig below 40 or 45 Hz at 115 dB. These seem more like powered "woofers" than subwoofers.
Craig

In which case prepare to "be astonished" wink.gif

Yesterday I paid a visit to the demonstration centre at GECKO, the UK's Distributor at Steinway Lyngdorf and played a 25Hz audio signal off a test disc through only a LS Boundary Woofer and am pleased to confirm that it exceeded 115dB at 25Hz at the listening position. smile.gif

Here I took a photo for you of the reading:

700
post #213 of 388
It can hit reference, but it depends on the room. If the LP loses 9dBs or more from the speaker it will not, if it loses 6 dBs than it can, but it could be compressing at certain frequencies but still sound good. Like I said before, I have heard speakers sound great at reference although their dynamic peaks were being squashed. Many audiophiles have no clue about HT reference levels and my two local custom HT install dealers have no clue. I still say this review was more about the room interactions and how each speaker handled their own room. I tell people all the time that debate me over how their speakers sound better than the local cinema. I told them the two rooms are completely different and try putting those big JBL screenarrays in their little HT and all of a sudden all the distortion and fatigue goes away but not the big dynamic sound! It makes their HT speakers sound anemic in comparison. Instead, people go to a theater and say that sounds like crap, it must be the speakers and it is not, it is pushing the speakers too hard or bad setup. I am also saying not everyone will love them either but too many assume around here. Oh look, this speaker has a beautiful finish with a ribbon and that speaker is ugly with a horn! I guarantee before even listening the mind was already made up on which will sound better. I love blind testing! This is the only way to take away all the bias because some people like the looks of certain things and audition is over before it is started. There is no way around it, it happens to everyone! When we can admit and accept it is when true facts can come out. Sure this hobby is subjective, but we need to be true to ourselves. You know how bad I wanted my M&K's to be better than everything in my shootout, I have always loved those things. I was very biased for them but I told myself that I would be honest or what is the point! BTW, this SL system reminds me of some of the linn stuff I used to audition all the time with proceed and B&W speakers.
post #214 of 388
This thread is GOLD! The OP is quite obviously a fanboi of his purchase. That's fine. It is unfortunate he tried to pass himself as an expert or professional. I've read the entire thread and it is quoite obvious he has 0 technical knowledge of speakers, speaker design, physics, etc.
*Note to OP*- This is AVS-Audio Video SCIENCE
I understand you want to be happy with your overpriced, underperforming set up. We all like to be told our purchase was a good one and we like to be praised. You will not get that here on this forum making the claims you did in your report without PROOF! You are, however, masterful at evading pointed technical questions which you obviouusly know nothing about. BRAVO!
I sincerely look forward to more info on your theatre. Please start a dedicated thread in the theatre section. When you are finished, buy some software/hardware and members of the AVS community will help you learn how to use it properly. Then you can post measurements and either tell everyone "SEE, I told you!" or eat that delicious humble pie.
post #215 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post

MK,
Your older version of the Triad Gold LCR used the same dispersion lens as the Platinum LCR's and CC. Did you *ever* notice any honkiness from that tweeter/lens combo?? I know you really liked the sound quality of that speaker, and your only concern was it's max output capability. It would be interesting, and another valuable data point, to know if you ever heard honkiness from this speaker.
Craig

I'm sorry and I don't mean to sound like a Triad Platinum fanboy as I am not tied to any specific manufacturer. I will go with what sounds best to my ears and drop what I current own like a hot potato. But I must say, I just don't agree with that document.. Had the equipment been auditioned in the same room with the same electronics and some detail on how they were set up (crossover point, etc..) it may hold some merit (maybe) and that would strongly depend who is providing the opinion. As soon as I started to read the Plats were "honky" and "awful clarity and dynamics", the review lost some credibility. In no way would I consider the Plats "honky" and especially "awful in dynamics". It's commonly know to anyone that owns/owned or has heard the plats that dynamics is probably it's strongest feature. Then I starting to read this glowing multi-page expose on the Steinway and that summed it up for me. "No weaknesses" Seriously? Every speaker I've heard has it's strengths and weaknesses in my experience.

Anyway, my intent is not to insult anyone. Just wanted to state my opinion.
Edited by adidino - 7/10/12 at 11:01am
post #216 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by madboynutter View Post

In which case prepare to "be astonished" wink.gif
Yesterday I paid a visit to the demonstration centre at GECKO, the UK's Distributor at Steinway Lyngdorf and played a 25Hz audio signal off a test disc through only a LS Boundary Woofer and am pleased to confirm that it exceeded 115dB at 25Hz at the listening position. smile.gif
Here I took a photo for you of the reading:
700

You are missing the point, you have no idea at what THD or if it is compressing as well. When a speaker or sub distorts, whether audible or not, the spl's actually get higher. It happened with the paradigms. Also, the room it is in must not lose that much spl from the speaker to the LP which is a good thing. Hey, if my room could take a speaker that only hit max 110 dBs I would look for the best sounding speaker that can do it! You buy a speaker based on the room or build a room for the speakers. You just can't throw any speaker in any room and say it can hit reference, unless said speaker is an output monster and it won't matter.
post #217 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by madboynutter View Post

my opinion IS most certainly wholly unbiased
Bias is an unavoidable Freudian unconscious occurrence from which there is no escape. There are whole fields of study on the topic.
post #218 of 388
Did you walk around the room while the test tone was playing? Were there weak areas and strong areas? What was the reading at the LP in comparison, high or low?
post #219 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by madboynutter View Post

In which case prepare to "be astonished" wink.gif
Yesterday I paid a visit to the demonstration centre at GECKO, the UK's Distributor at Steinway Lyngdorf and played a 25Hz audio signal off a test disc through only a LS Boundary Woofer and am pleased to confirm that it exceeded 115dB at 25Hz at the listening position. smile.gif
Here I took a photo for you of the reading:
700

There you have it ... a definative test of a single Boundary Woofer (aka Acoustimass Module) playing a 25hz tone at 116db.cool.gif

Don't all you doubters feel foolish now ... rolleyes.gif

This was always a strange thread and now it is getting pathetic ...
post #220 of 388
If nothing else...how anyone can take serious a thread labelled "high end audio" and there is not one Bose system tested, well.. smile.gif
post #221 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elihawk View Post

If nothing else...how anyone can take serious a thread labelled "high end audio" and there is not one Bose system tested, well.. smile.gif

Well, and if people are going to discus audio setups in the 20K, 30K range, why not this one? http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/behringer-unveils-8-foot-inuke-boom-ipod-dock-goes-consumer-wit/

I'd like to know what kind of bass SPL output it has smile.gif
post #222 of 388
Thread Starter 
Regarding the Steinway Lyngdorf S-Series audio system’s volume capability:

A considerable number of you, of which the majority I am led to believe have not in fact actually ever auditioned a Steinway Lyndgorf audio system, have stated, repeated and insisted that the respective Steinway Lyngdorf S-Series Audio System is not capable of outputting audio volume at Cinema Reference Levels within the respective room sizes mentioned.

I have repeatedly insisted that it IS indeed capable of not only producing audio at Reference Levels (at the listening position), but also audio exceeding Reference Levels, and without any noticeable reduction in audio performance.

To which many of you, including the same individuals as before, have reiterated, (in a manner which I consider to be demeaning and insulting) that the Steinway Lyngdorf S-Series Audio System most certainly cannot hit Reference Levels at the listening position.

I have questioned how you can make such a bold statement without auditioning and testing the respective Steinway Lyngdorf S-Series audio system yourself; to which the reply has been that you don’t need to audition or test it to know that it can’t hit Reference Levels.

Firstly, I disagree that you do not need to audition or test an audio system in order to know without a doubt whether or not that audio system is capable of outputting audio volume at Cinema Reference Levels. And personally I find it baffling and amazing that anyone would think otherwise.

Secondly, I have to question the fact that many of the individuals participating in so frantically seeking to undermine my opinion are in fact wholly biased, having their own agenda, wherein they are highly motivated to argue against my opinion, and be persistently argumentative as such, irrespective of its validity; whether their particular bias is affiliation or personal relationship with a manufacturer, or owner of one of the audio systems that received a low score, or otherwise.

Thirdly, I visited GECKO, the UK Distributor for Steinway Lyngdorf yesterday, for the purposes of conducting fully comprehensive audio testing to confirm once and for all whether or not the respective Steinway Lyngdorf S-Series Audio system is or is not capable of outputting audio volume at Cinema Reference Levels.

In short, I am pleased to report, that (as per my prior findings) the respective Steinway Lyngdorf S-Series Audio system most certainly IS capable of outputting audio volume at Cinema Reference Levels (and without distortion).

So, without wishing to gloat, I find myself in the position of telling all of you who have stated otherwise (and belittled me in the process) that ALL of you are in fact WRONG!

What I have stated in my review about the Steinway Lyngdorf’s S-Series audio system’s volume capability, specifically with regards to achieving (and in fact exceeding) Reference Levels without distortion is in fact quite CORRECT.

Details as follows:

- Room size = 12 x 5 x 3.5m = 7,416 cubic feet.

- TWO different SPL meters were used (mine and Rob Sinden’s) to eliminate the possibility of the results being affected by a malfunctioning or inaccurate SPL meter.

- The SPL of each audio channel at the listening position was measured individually one at a time via use of a professional audio test disc.



Here’s a copy of an email I received yesterday evening from Rob Sinden at GECKO:

“Hi Nigel

Please find enclosed the photos I took during our testing of the system today.

THX Reference Level requires that each audio channel is measured at 85db on a SPL meter, “C” weighting “slow: from 4m away (or the listening position) with a full bandwidth signal. It also requires 20db headroom so in effect the ability to peak at 105db without distortion. The exception to this is that the LFE (subwoofer channel) must be measured at 95db with 115db peak at the same position.

As you know we measured this, and the system wasn’t anywhere near its maximum capability.

You will remember I turned the volume level up on the system until it was playing each audio channel at 110db continuously, not just peak (and the boundary woofers even more) with a full range signal and it did very comfortably – with at least 20db more headroom left on the volume dial and with virtually no cone movement seen from the S15 speaker drivers.

As you can see from what we measured today Steinway Lyngdorfs Model S system comfortably exceeds the THX Reference Level spec.

Regarding the question of distortion, as you know I consider it is obvious when you listen to this system and view just how little is the cone movement when played high volumes that distortion is not an issue. As you saw there was less than 2mm peak to peak excursion from the midrange driver on the S15 and this driver is designed to work within 7mm peak to peak excursion so it is both sonically and visibly not distorting.

With regard to your upset Triad owner, I can sympathise with him. I owned the same Triad Platinum LCR system in the past and on paper you simply wouldn’t believe that a speaker as tiny as the S15 would play anything like as loud as the huge 94db efficient Triads - but they most certainly do.

More importantly, when I sold Triad speakers, I would never have dreamt of demonstrating them with good classical or jazz music. Admittedly they aren’t designed for this – but nonetheless you would think a speaker of this size and cost should be able to handle it.

On an anecdotal level, I can tell you that presently we have a customer in Bristol who is just upgrading to Steinway Lyngdorf Model S from a Triad Gold LCR system that he uses in a large room at high SPL levels.

By the way – did you believe both how much louder and better the Steinway Model S system would be than anything else until you had heard it for yourself?

Best regards,

Rob Sinden”



To reiterate, ALL of you who have stated that the respective Steinway Lyngdorf S-Series audio system “cannot hit Reference Levels at the listening position” are in fact WRONG; it can, and easily so.

So, I find myself in the ridiculous position of saying “I told you so” to several individuals, the majority of whom are clearly AUDIO PROFESSIONALS.

Not bad for someone like me, who so many of you have insulted as being ‘unskilled’ with regards to A/V, and nothing more than an ‘enthusiast’, eh?


Here’s the photos:

700

700
post #223 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post

There you have it ... a definative test of a single Boundary Woofer (aka Acoustimass Module) playing a 25hz tone at 116db.cool.gif
Don't all you doubters feel foolish now ... rolleyes.gif
This was always a strange thread and now it is getting pathetic ...

Not really... Criag John stated that it was unable to do so... I (with a little help from GECKO) have just proved him wrong wink.gif
post #224 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrischaos View Post

This thread is GOLD! The OP is quite obviously a fanboi of his purchase. That's fine. It is unfortunate he tried to pass himself as an expert or professional. I've read the entire thread and it is quoite obvious he has 0 technical knowledge of speakers, speaker design, physics, etc.
*Note to OP*- This is AVS-Audio Video SCIENCE
I understand you want to be happy with your overpriced, underperforming set up. We all like to be told our purchase was a good one and we like to be praised. You will not get that here on this forum making the claims you did in your report without PROOF! You are, however, masterful at evading pointed technical questions which you obviouusly know nothing about. BRAVO!
I sincerely look forward to more info on your theatre. Please start a dedicated thread in the theatre section. When you are finished, buy some software/hardware and members of the AVS community will help you learn how to use it properly. Then you can post measurements and either tell everyone "SEE, I told you!" or eat that delicious humble pie.

Oh and that's not at all patronizing is it? rolleyes.gif

It's funny, I thought this was a forum for intellectual discussion of A/V equipment... wink.gif

Like I've honestly stated from the very beginning I am not a SOUND ENGINEER however I do know a little bit more about A/V and a mere ENTHUSIAST; something which I have just demonstrated wherein about a dozen AV PROFESSIONALS have repeatedly stated a fact that GECKO, the UK Distributor for Steinway Lyngdorf have just debunked and proven is entirely INCORRECT. So "SEE, I told you!" and stick that it your pipe and smoke it. smile.gif
Edited by madboynutter - 7/10/12 at 11:10am
post #225 of 388
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovinthehd View Post

Nigel's over the top claim on his latest purchase or his own experience isn't unusual. Seems both Sceptre Property and Audio Visual are recently incorporated (per a UK business info website) so claims of 100 years family experience in the former and 20 years in the latter are possibly more sales drivel.

Digging into my personal details and attacking the honesty and integrity of both me and my family is wholly unacceptable and intolerable behaviour, and is where I regrettably am forced to draw the line. mad.gif

Many individuals with biased agendas have been frantically and repeatedly attacking me, including multple attempts at assassination of my character, which you have done in your frantic desperation to discredit my opinion so you can protect whatever biased agenda you have, whether it is affiliation or personal relationship with a manufacturer, or owner of one of the audio systems that received a low score in my review.

However, now you have crossed the line by venturing into what is by definition defamation of character; and in doing so steeped to the lowest of the low with regards to behaviour that is unlikely to be seen even in the basest of public Internet forums.

You should go and look up KELSEY INDUSTRIES PLC, which was my family's business until I recently rebranded the property development arm after my father recently passed away from small cell liver cancer, wherein there were reasons why I had to set up a new Limited company. As such, the "claims of 100 years family experience" are absolutely TRUE; and you should note that I have never stated that my company SCEPTRE AUDIO VISUAL LTD has 20 year's A/V experience; I have repeatedly stated that I have 20 year's A/V experience, which is also absolutely TRUE.

I have no interest in partaking in the on-going attempted assassination and defamation of my character, as well as that of me and my family’s integrity, and hence bid you all farewell.

Edited by madboynutter - 7/10/12 at 11:12am
post #226 of 388
Gee, four posts in a row. Don't you wish he was on your blocked list?
post #227 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by madboynutter View Post


I have no interest in partaking in the on-going attempted assassination and defamation of my character, as well as that of me and my family’s integrity, and hence bid you all farewell.

So long, you Tasmanian Devil.
post #228 of 388
Nice job, guys!
post #229 of 388
The MBL gas furnaces pulled the train on the S-L setup.
post #230 of 388
There he is maxing out his Radio Shack analogue SPL meter which reads at least 116 db for what he says is 25 hz. The correction tables for the RS SPL meter adds 5 db for 25 hz, so he is purportedly showing is those steinway speakers pushing 121+ db! This is the miracle speaker that rewrites all the known laws of physics! Forget the Higgs Boson, this is the biggest science revelation of the year, and I say give this Lyngdorf guy the Nobel Prize in physics!
Edited by shadyJ - 7/10/12 at 12:30pm
post #231 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Fitzmaurice View Post

Gee, four posts in a row. Don't you wish he was on your blocked list?

generally speaking, i would... but this train wreck is hard not to watch... the "usual" train wreck is packed with pseudo-science, "maybe/could be" and "they just can't measure it yet"... amoungst other flights of fancy...

this particular one doesn't even bother with that though... it just dispenses with physics from the git go... biggrin.gif
post #232 of 388
I am confused. He talks about measuring 25HZ with a LS Boundary Woofer but it looks like the speaker in the photos is the full range speaker (bookshelf). Actually, I think they recommend crossing over at 100HZ or greater. Anyway, anyone understand what he measured at 25HZ?
post #233 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by madboynutter View Post

In which case prepare to "be astonished" wink.gif
Yesterday I paid a visit to the demonstration centre at GECKO, the UK's Distributor at Steinway Lyngdorf and played a 25Hz audio signal off a test disc through only a LS Boundary Woofer and am pleased to confirm that it exceeded 115dB at 25Hz at the listening position. smile.gif
Here I took a photo for you of the reading:
700

If you're telling the truth, (and one of your other pictures shows an 80 Hz signal, not a 25 Hz signal, and there is no subwoofer to be seen),...

700

Anyway, if you're telling the truth, then I stand corrected. I eat my words. It's hard to believe that two 10" drivers can produce this kind of output, especially in a 7,400 cubic foot room, but, if you're telling the truth, it appears they can. It would be interesting to see measurements from more than one mic position because it is entirely possible that some room mode is augmenting the output at this one position. Frankly, I don't care because I have no intention of buying the system.

However, before you go, I would appreciate it if you would address this post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by madcutterboy 
10) TRIAD:
- Equipment:
o Speakers: 2 x Triad InRoom Platinum LCR (L & R), Bi-Amped; 1 x Triad InRoom Platinum LCR Center, Bi-Amped (Centre); 4 x Triad OnWall Gold Surround (Surrounds)
o Subwoofers: 2 x Triad InRoom Platinum DSP Sub; with 2 x Triad RackAmp 1000 DSP
o Pre-Amp/Processor: Sherbourn PT-7020A
o Power Amplifier(s): 2 x Sherbourn PA 7-350
Hmmmmm....
Looking at this list of equipment shows that the Triad Platinums were "Bi-Amped". It also shows that TWO 7-channel amps, (14 total channels of amplification), were used to drive 5 speakers. That is VERY interesting! eek.gifeek.gifeek.gif If that's the case, they must have been active biamped because they can't be passive bi-amped. Triad only provides ONE set of speaker binding posts, (how refreshing is that... a high end speaker manufacturer who doesn't even provide the opportunity to indulge in "snake oil"!)
In addition, Triads are not set up from the factory for active bi-amping. There is no way to access the drivers individually, or in like-driver pairs. So, if this was done, the native internal passive crossovers would need to be disconnected and replaced with external crossovers, and additional speaker binding posts would need to be added in order to connect to the speakers individually.
This raises multiple questions: Who did this, and why? What external crossover was used? What crossover frequency and slope was used? How were the drivers accessed? What modifications were performed to the cabinet to allow the multiple connections? What drivers were grouped together: tweeter and midranges, or woofers and midranges?
If the tweeter/midranges were driven together, and the internal tweeter/midrange crossover was bypassed, the tweeter would be active down to the midrange/woofer crossover, well into the "honky" range. IOW, it is certainly possible that the tweeter in THIS system was crossed over low enough to make the system sound "honky." This would also severely limit the dynamic capability by driving the tweeter well outside it's bandwidth.
If this is the system under "review", it would hardly be a fair or appropriate system to "impartially" review. eek.gif
Nigel, please share where these speakers were demo'd, as well as how the speakers were modified. In addition, any details you can share about the room and setup, including the room correction system, would likely shed some light on the obvious issues in your demo. If the speakers were modified and made to sound worse, it's entirely possible that the subwoofer integration was similarly F'd up, which would explain the sub-optimal bass you heard.
Craig
post #234 of 388
Just visited the Gecko website (http://www.geckohomecinema.com/ultimate-home-cinema) and the whole thing reads like a giant Steinway Lyngdorf advertisement.

I see they are also pimping 4K projectors.. Ughh...
post #235 of 388
I have a question, how does a sub that can play 117 dBs max in a corner, I assume this means indoors, at 1 meter can play 121 dBs from 4 meters away? I never heard of gaining spl with distance.
post #236 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by ack_bk View Post

Just visited the Gecko website (http://www.geckohomecinema.com/ultimate-home-cinema) and the whole thing reads like a giant Steinway Lyngdorf advertisement.
I see they are also pimping 4K projectors.. Ughh...

Actually, if you go to the Home Cinema page, you'll see an M&K system, as well as a Wisdom Audio system. Wow, 3 of the top 5 systems in his review... how interesting. eek.gif
post #237 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by MKtheater View Post

I have a question, how does a sub that can play 117 dBs max in a corner, I assume this means indoors, at 1 meter can play 121 dBs from 4 meters away? I never heard of gaining spl with distance.
A room mode???
post #238 of 388
Not if their room correction works which brings up another issue, no headroom from EQ!
post #239 of 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by MKtheater View Post

I have a question, how does a sub that can play 117 dBs max in a corner, I assume this means indoors, at 1 meter can play 121 dBs from 4 meters away? I never heard of gaining spl with distance.
And how can the meter read that high when at 25Hz there's at least 6dB of correction factor? confused.gif
post #240 of 388
Yeah, I added the 5 dBs at 25 hz of error.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Comparison, Unbiased Review & Ranking of 12 High-End Home Cinema Audio Systems