New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Big Bay Home Theatre - Page 3

post #61 of 121
Thread Starter 
Agreed. I will not be putting the projector entirely within the theater. What I'm wondering however is -- why not leave a hole in the rear wall and have a shelf straddle both the theater and equipment room. On the theater side, a "hushbox' of sorts would be built with some basic framing + DD + GG and the backside would be left open to the equipment room side -- where an exhaust vent in the ceiling would assist with cooling.

The "hushbox" wouldn't extend more than 14-15 inches into the theater (ie. the distance of my soffit), it would just extend down a bit lower). This essentially would allow me to move the projector almost 2 feet closer than if it was sitting in the equipment room entirely and firing through the 2x6 wall.

As a reminder, the equipment room will also feature DD + GG + Clips.

Thoughts?
post #62 of 121
Also keep in mind where the top of the screen is vs. the top of the projector. Best practice is to the keep the projector lens level with the top of the screen. As long as the heat can be exhausted out of the box and the room, you can't hear projector noise, you can get around the hush box, the projector has adequate air flow to remain cool, the box does not interfere with the light path in any way, and you can easily access the projector front, rear and remove it easily for service purposes (also keep in mind you may upgrade to a larger projector in the future)...you've met your objectives! smile.gif
Edited by SierraMikeBravo - 11/23/12 at 1:11pm
post #63 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by SierraMikeBravo View Post

Also, keep in mind you don't count the total width of a 2.35 screen. You only count what the height is for a 16:9 screen. So, the throw ratio is the same for a 2.35 as it is a 16:9.

Shawn, Isn't that only true if you are using a lens, If you are doing a poor mans zoom CIH setup you need a projector capable of producing a 16:9 image, (native of the chip) as wide as the 2.35 screen discarding the bits above and below the screen. I remember running the numbers for a Sony and the sweet spot where the projector was capable of handling a zoom CIH was actually a very limited range of distances from the screen.
post #64 of 121
I suppose you could zoom it to a point it fills the screen (memory zoom), but you could do that with just about anything (don't need a memory to do that other than saving the zoom spot). Don't think it really changes the throw ratio much though unless you don't care about CIH.
post #65 of 121
Shawn you've totally lost me in that last sentence maybe we are talking about different concepts.

Isn't throw ratio the distance screen to lens divided by the width of an image in native chip format. Watching 16:9 on 2.35 screen is at one ratio filling the height. watching 2.35 content you zoom out to a much wider image filling the height and width of a 2.35 screen. Two different throw ratios and when electing to go with the zoom method of a CIH setup, calculating both ratios and making sure they fall withing the projectors specifications is important.
post #66 of 121
Big,

As we know, at this time all native chip format is 16:9. Hence, that is your constant image height. Expanding the image with a lens fills the screen without changing the height. Hence, all calculations for throw ratio should be calculated using a 16:9 width of the screen. Zooming throws that all out the window. All you are doing is taking an anamorphic image and expanding it to fill the screen. There is no CIH about it. If the image switches to a 16:9 format midstream, with zooming, some of your image will be above and below the screen. So, you'll have to change zooming. All the poor mans method is is a holding spot for the various zoom spots. You aren't cheating anything, just having a convenience with a zoom memory. In order to maintain CIH with a 2.35 and 16:9 you have to have a lens. No two ways around it. Therefore, you should calculate your throw ratio from a 16:9 perspective.
post #67 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by SierraMikeBravo View Post

Big,
Therefore, you should calculate your throw ratio from a 16:9 perspective.

That is exactly what I said. you calculate the required throw ratio once for displaying 16:9 material in the center of 2.35 screen for filling the height , then you zoom out and the throw ratio changes to fill a 2.35 screen with a 2.35 ratio image. I'm talking about the zoom method, not using a lens.
post #68 of 121
Hmmmm...maybe we are saying the same thing only in a different language. Bottom line is, I always calculate based on 16:9 whether using zoom or not.
post #69 of 121
here are some numbers I worked up for Damelon and the Bacon Race theater

He wanted the Sony VW95ES on a 130 inch wide 2.39:1 screen. He also wanted to use the automatic zoom memory feature to shift back and forth. The Projector has a throw ratio range of 1.39 to 2.19

The two images he needed to throw were a 130 wide (2.39:1) and 96 wide (16:9)


"to hit 130 your lens needs to be between 180 and 288 inches from the screen
to hit 96 your lens needs to be between 133 and 210 from the screen

So the overlap of those two is 180 to 210

for safety margin the lens should be between 185 to 205 inches from the screen

15.4 to 17 ft from the screen."

That is a pretty small target position and was the smallest of the projectors he was considering.
post #70 of 121
Thread Starter 
Giving some thought to the electrical this AM. I'll have a dedicated sub panel for the equipment room/theater - I bought a Schneider 100A Square D Sub Panel when it was on sale at home depot a few months ago.

Here's what I was thinking... am I overlooking something? Am I going overboard?

Equipment Room
The equipment room will not only house the gear for the theater, but also the gear for the main distributed a/v system

  • 20A for Power Amps (probably 4 x Byston 4B ST)
  • 20A for the rest of the A/V Gear: Pre-Pro, 3x Denon AVR, 3x Cable Box, Blu-ray
  • 15A for the projector
  • 15A for the computer related gear: 3x mac mini (plex clients), Synology NAS, cisco switches, cable modem, router, HDMI Baluns, Insteon Controller etc

Stage

  • 20A for Subs
  • 20A for possible active LCR (future proofing)

Column Locations
Shared circuit between side and rear columns

  • 20A for possible active speakers (future proofing)

Lighting

  • 15A for 8 recessed cans
  • 15A for sconces
  • 15A for rope lighting and riser lights

Misc

  • 15A for wall plugs
post #71 of 121
Thread Starter 
Spent the last week and a bit getting quotes on fixing a few hairline cracks in the foundation walls. I figured it was best to get them sorted before closing everything in. Much easier than ripping everything out if there ever was a leak and/or moisture problems.

Have a guy coming to complete the work later this week and then I'll use some time off over the holidays to start framing! Anyone have any tips?
post #72 of 121
Use the straightest lumber you can find, respect your tools particularly a framing gun if you plan on using one.
post #73 of 121
Thread Starter 
Getting started with framing tomorrow and wanted some opinions.

The door will be installed in a 2x6 staggered wall. When I get to the rough opening, I've read that I abandon the staggered studs and use full 2x6 studs to frame the opening?

Also, is there a recommended door size? I was thinking either a 34" or 36" door which would make moving in gear/furniture easy. I suppose a solid core door at those sizes would be more expensive but if treated properly (i.e., adding a couple layers of MDF with GG) would it pose any huge sound proofing/isolation concerns?
post #74 of 121
Thread Starter 
Just about finished framing (pics coming this weekend) and have some more accurate measurements of the space. Here's an elevation with updated measurements. Thoughts?

post #75 of 121
Thread Starter 
nobody?
post #76 of 121
looks great to me
post #77 of 121
Thread Starter 
Time to get caught up on some progress.

I had 3 hairline foundation cracks in the basement. I decided to address them before I started framing. At $200 per crack I figured it was worth the peace of mind. Basically, holes were drilled every 4 inches along the length of the crack and a resin was injected all the way up.



post #78 of 121
Thread Starter 
Framing is nearly complete now. I originally intended to do a staggered wall underneath the I-beam (side wall of the theatre) but decided to do a double wall instead. I haven't built the outer wall yet, but will after I get my wiring done.

I used IB-3 clips to decouple the walls from the joists and in the case of the photo below, I used Liquid Nails to attach a 2x6 to the underside of an I-beam, then secured the wall to that using the IB-3s.



View from the equipment room -- looking toward the screen wall:


Edited by memmo - 1/29/13 at 6:15pm
post #79 of 121
Thread Starter 
I also decided to run the conduit.

I bought 200 feet of 1.5" conduit + fittings (This is Kwikpath Resigard which was cheaper to source locally than the Carlon stuff).

2 runs to projector:



2 runs to stage:



I built a "backer-box" of sorts between 2 studs and brought all runs into it which seemed like an elegant solution. A Middle Atlantic Slim 5 rack will be built into a wall directly in front of that area. I also put three more runs to connect the main rack with a secondary rack which I'll use for my networking/computer + server gear and 1 run to my structured panel for future use.





View from screen wall, looking into equipment room:


Edited by memmo - 1/29/13 at 6:17pm
post #80 of 121
Thread Starter 
Trying to debate whether I should spend a few hundred bucks on some mic/balanced cable for runs to all speaker locations and whether or not I should run dedicated power to the surround columns for possible future active speakers.

Any thoughts? Probably a waste of money but the walls are still open so it would be easy lol
post #81 of 121
Thread Starter 
Found a good deal on Markertek so I decided to bite the bullet and bought a roll of Canare mic/balanced cable.

Here's what I'm planning for low voltage runs within the theater. Have a missed anything?

Stage
  • 5 x 12-2 Speaker (LCR, possible height speakers in the future)
  • 3 x Cat6 (IR, future, misc)
  • 5 x balanced/mic (2 subs, possible active LCR in the future)
  • 2 x RG6 (alternative for subs)

Projector
  • 2 x HDMI
  • 2 x Cat6
  • 2 x RG6

Columns
  • 1 x 12-2 Speaker
  • 1 x balanced/mic (possible active speakers in the future)

Riser
  • 3 x Cat6 (HDMI, Ethernet, future)
  • 12-2 speaker for aura bass shakers (how many runs would I need?)
  • 2 x balanced/mic (rear subs)
  • 2 x RG6 (alternate for subs)

Main Light Switch Box
  • 1 x Cat6 (control interface support for possible Grafik Eye)
post #82 of 121
I would run more cat6 to the projectors.. It seems like 2x cat5 is needed for most baluns.. if you had to go that route you wouldn't have anything for IR, enet etc.

As for bass shakers, it depends how many you want and what you are going to power them with. You could run 12-2 for each shaker to be safe. I have 2 buttkickers and only ran one 12-2 because I am going to wire them in parallel.

AFAIK cat6 is not the wire you need for a grafik eye. 18ga PELV is what Lutron recommends, although other types comply with the NEC.

Tim
post #83 of 121
+1 on the CAT6. You can never have too much.
Some time back I put Cat6 all over my house (4 runs to each room and a few extras also) and I still kick myself for not putting in more.
For the PJ I would have at least 4 (2 for HDMI balun, one for network, one for RS232/IR) but better to have 6 in case something goes wrong or you want to put another piece of kit there. In my room I would like to have one more run to put the wireless AP by the projector (up high, out of the way) but can't so it sits in another room, limiting the signal.

Edit:
Forgot you may use a 12v trigger for something - that can be wired over CAT6
post #84 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by memmo View Post

I built a "backer-box" of sorts between 2 studs and brought all runs into it which seemed like an elegant solution. A Middle Atlantic Slim 5 rack will be built into a wall directly in front of that area. I also put three more runs to connect the main rack with a secondary rack which I'll use for my networking/computer + server gear and 1 run to my structured panel for future use.


Nice. That is going to be sweet when you start running wires.
post #85 of 121
Subscribed.....Looking forward to future updates.
post #86 of 121
Thread Starter 
I'm trying to come up with a backer box design for the electrical boxes that can't reside in columns. I built a 3 sided box and made the back of it 1.5 inches wider so that it can hook onto a regular 2x4 stud. The plan would be to glue and screw the box to the stud and seal the inside edges with SilenSeal. The box would simply sit over the electrical box itself.

I found Nutek Air Tight boxes at Home Depot which have gaskets on the rear where cables will enter the box and on a flange at the front.

I'm wondering if this box, combined with the backer box design will be sufficient. I also have a bunch of putty pads that I could use in combination if it would help further.

Thoughts?



post #87 of 121
If it were me doing it, I would probably make a 4 sided box with a back the same as yours. That way you can seal the box completly before you mount it to the stud. It would also allow you to screw the box to the stud from the side and not just from the back peice. The only thing left to seal would be the wire penetration through the box with putty. Make sense?
post #88 of 121
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmajor55 View Post

If it were me doing it, I would probably make a 4 sided box with a back the same as yours. That way you can seal the box completly before you mount it to the stud. It would also allow you to screw the box to the stud from the side and not just from the back peice. The only thing left to seal would be the wire penetration through the box with putty. Make sense?

Yah makes sense. I guess the tricky part would be how to secure the electrical box to the backer box after its built.

These are the boxes I'm using:



On a related note, these boxes actually have depth marks on the side for 5/8" and for 1 1/8" which I thought was great, but in practice, how would you mount them? If I were to line up the mark for 1 1/8", the flange obviously sticks way out from the the face of the stud which would prevent sheet material from going behind no? I must be missing something haha
post #89 of 121
The back box and those gasketed outlets looks like a plan. As shown in the picture however the backer box looks to fall short of sitting on the back of the drywall. Be sure to put a generous bead of caulk on the edge before lifting the drywall into place.

If however any of those outlet locations back up to other rooms that you can drywall after the theater I would be tempted to just go with outlet boxes mounted after the fact. You can cut a more exact hole after the two layers are up and install the box from the back. Then caulk and back butter the box with putty pads as much as you want. Old work boxes and it looks like that flange box can be installed just to the drywall if you want. The later with some screws though the flange.



As for the flange and the 1 1/8 marks that must be for walls with furring. In your case it doesn't make a difference the flange needs to sit tight to the backside of the drywall.
post #90 of 121
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGmouthinDC View Post

The back box and those gasketed outlets looks like a plan. As shown in the picture however the backer box looks to fall short of sitting on the back of the drywall. Be sure to put a generous bead of caulk on the edge before lifting the drywall into place.

This was simply a mistake in cutting. If I move forward with them, I'll make sure the box sits flush with the edge of the stud and of course use a generous bead of caulk. I guess the only question now then is whether to build 4 sided boxes instead of the 3 in my prototype. I suppose It would be easier to seal the inside of the box if I built an enclosed box. I'd then screw the electrical box into the face of the MDF piece (instead of using those brackets from the side) and finally secure the whole thing to the stud from the lip that I have on the back of the box. Wonder if there would be any code related issues doing it like this... hrmm
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home