AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Official Pioneer SC-68/67 Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official Pioneer SC-68/67 Thread - Page 35

post #1021 of 1451
Thread Starter 
^^
for both of you - just double checking -

do you have HDMI Control turned On in the receiver's HDMI setup menu & HDMI CEC turned On in the TV?
HDMI ARC turned on in the receiver's HDMI setup menu & TV's menu?
using HDMI 1 output on the receiver. HDMI Control isn't available for HDMI out 2 on the receiver so you have to use HDMI out 1. use the remote's HDMI Out button, make sure you select HDMI out 1 as the HDMI output, pg 80 in the manual. the default is HDMI All but you may need to try specifically selecting HDMI Out 1 since it's the output with HDMI Control.

in Audio Parameters, make sure HDMI Audio is not set to Through. If it is, there will be no sound from the receiver since Through shunts incoming HDMI audio to the TV, not from the TV. Make sure it's set to Amp, which is the default setting.

for signal select audio input signal, either try auto or manually select HDMI, this setting is on the remote, Signal Sel & described in the manual pg 60.

make sure your HDMI cable can support ARC. this is an HDMI 1.4 feature, so your cable should also be, as well as the TV.

finally, if still no sound from the receiver, I would recommend selecting another input that has HDMI assigned to it. if you check the manual, pg 47, TV is not an input with a pre-assigned HDMI associated with it. while you could change the HDMI input assignments to match an HDMI input to "TV", for now, try selecting another one, say SAT/CBL. out of the box, "TV" only as an optical dig input assigned to it so it's logical that it worked with opt.

my TV is pre-ARC, being a Pioneer kuro plasma, so I can't try this feature for myself. all I can go by is what makes sense to me from the manual.

let us know if you've done all these & it works or not.
Edited by ss9001 - 1/31/13 at 12:18pm
post #1022 of 1451
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post

^^
for both of you - just double checking -

do you have HDMI Control turned On in the receiver and HDMI CEC turned On in the TV?
HDMI ARC turned on in both?
and using HDMI 1 output on the receiver? HDMI Control isn't available for HDMI out 2 on the receiver so you have to use HDMI out 1.
Is it possible for you to tell me what settings you used on the HDMI home menu on the 68 and what HDMI port did you plug into?
post #1023 of 1451
Sure can’t wait to get the SC-68—I’m working on it—but it would be nice to see/hear about some comparisons with comparable ones from NAD and Denon.

You just don’t like that feeling that there was something out there that was/is better and you missed it.

And sometimes this IS NOT a matter of preference. Sometimes there are actual sonic differences.
post #1024 of 1451
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hd-man View Post

Is it possible for you to tell me what settings you used on the HDMI home menu on the 68 and what HDMI port did you plug into?

I can't use ARC so don't have ports or settings to share wink.gif what I posted is all from the manual on how to enable it and other settings that may be needed.

1. connect the HDMI cable to the TV to receiver HDMI output 1 not 2. it will not work on output 2. input ports are irrelevant since ARC is sending the TV's audio from the TV TO the receiver, using the receiver's OUTPUT not an input into the receiver. the manual states the output to use in the HDMI section. you may also connect a cable from the TV to one of the receiver's inputs if you want to SEND audio TO the TV from a blu-ray/dvd player, etc. as you would do for normal use but do not use the TV input unless you re-assign one of the HDMI inputs from their default assignments to TV. the default assignments are pg. 47. I would assume you'd connect a BD player to the BD input, etc.

2. go into the HDMI setup menu, turn HDMI Control on. that makes ARC, PQLS available to select.
ARC will no longer be grayed out; turn it on.

3. I'm not sure what HDMI Synch mode will do using ARC. but you can set it to on, and if no sound, try it set to off. the way it's described, it allows you to control the receiver's volume & mute using the TV remote. so this & another statement about audio being played by the receiver implies that it can be on but it doesn't specifically say that it has to be on. it's possible that's if it's on, the receiver was muted if you hit the TV mute button. try both ways. what sync mode does exactly is on pg 71 and it ties the control of the TV & receiver together.

4. use the HDMI Output remote button to select HDMI output 1. it may work with HDMI All but I can't tell you for sure since I don't use ARC. for now, try just setting it to output 1. you can always try All later.

5. the other things I mentioned as possible things to check are all in your manual on the pages I listed.

you may not need to set the receiver to any specific input since you're getting the audio back from the TV not from an input per se. but if after all this, you get no audio, try changing the input to one that has an assigned HDMI, like BD, SAT/CBL. I don't think this will be needed, but just in case.
Edited by ss9001 - 1/31/13 at 2:06pm
post #1025 of 1451
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by zachman View Post

Anybody using the arc feature on their SC-68?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hd-man View Post


any progress on ARC?
post #1026 of 1451
Quote:
Originally Posted by davehale View Post

ALAC
Can someone correct me if I am wrong? After the Firmware update I seem to have to turn down the volume by 5 decibles. I am now listening at -30 instead of -25 on my 2.1 system. My small sub seems to have reached a new bottom note and gapless is great. Of course all this is in a small room. As I am writing this in another room, the sub sounds phenomenal compared to what I was used to. For this I have my ipod nano connected to the front of the SC-67 and havn't tried dlna yet
Dave

I noticed similar behavior after latest firmware updated for the SC-67 but for me the volume seemed lower. I checked all settings and they had not changed. I called Pioneer today and was told that you cannot roll back firmware. Tech support said all settings should have went back to factory default. Mine were still the same values that I had set previously. It's possible that they could just be showing that but are not having any effect and that's why is sounds low to me. He told me to reset unit and redo settings to see if it sounds the way it was before firmware update. I will reset SC-67 tonight or tomorrow to see it that's the case

Can anyone confirm that after doing latest firmware update all setting are reset to default? (for EQ, Speaker Levels, Speaker Sizes and other settings)

If everything should have been reset to factory defaults that's probably why it seems lower to me. A factory reset and re-inputting previous values should get it back to the way I had it.
post #1027 of 1451
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escape View Post

Can anyone confirm that after doing latest firmware update all setting are reset to default? (for EQ, Speaker Levels, Speaker Sizes and other settings)

they are all unchanged. all MCACC settings are same as before all of the updates so far, incl the gapless one.
and I just checked again wink.gif
post #1028 of 1451
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post

they are all unchanged. all MCACC settings are same as before all of the updates so far, incl the gapless one.
and I just checked again wink.gif

Thanks for the info. To me it sounds a little lower but I could be mistaken. The program that I was watching could have been a little low. I will reset anyway and see what happens.

The one thing that is crazy is that you cannot revert to previous firmware. If Pioneer sent out a bad firmware update an could not fix with a new one there is a potential for a lot of expensive paperweights that would need to go back to the factory to be fixed. Pioneer tech said they would have to replace chip to revert back to earlier firmware
post #1029 of 1451
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escape View Post

The one thing that is crazy is that you cannot revert to previous firmware.

this is not unique to Pioneer nor receivers. BD & HD-DVD (remember those? wink.gif) players are all irreversible. AFAIK, no receiver from any company had reversible FW. I could be wrong & if someone corrects me, that's OK.

but I don't recall any thread or post where said they could roll back a Denon or other receiver's FW. I don't frequent Onkyo threads hardly at all nor Yamaha so it's possible but not likely.

that's one reason why it takes Pioneer US a month or so longer to release FW updates than their counterparts in Europe, Canada, etc. in Pio BD threads over several years, various owners have supposedly been told the Pio US legal dept apparently requires Pio US to do more testing before signing off on it.

and until very recently, like either the SC-57 or SC-37 era, can't recall which, Pio AVR owners could NOT update FW on their own. you had to take the receiver to an authorized service shop to do all updates. and updates were by RS-232, flash drive & CDR, using a special utility program from Pioneer. Pioneer wouldn't give an owner an update even if you begged eek.gif the answer was flatly no, with a capital N.

so it's very nice we can do them ourselves now.
Edited by ss9001 - 2/1/13 at 1:03pm
post #1030 of 1451
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post

this is not unique to Pioneer nor receivers. BD & HD-DVD (remember those? wink.gif) players were all irreversible. AFAIK, no receiver from any company had reversible FW. I could be wrong & if someone corrects me, that's OK.

but I don't recall any thread or post where said they could roll back a Denon or Pioneer FW. I don't frequent Onkyo threads hardly at all nor Yamaha so it's possible but not likely.

I do remember back in the Toshiba HD-DVD days, that someone managed to hack the FW and you could use a hex editor to change the FW version # to trick the player into accepting it.

but try to roll back a BD player FW, and you'll find you can't.

that's one reason why it takes Pioneer US a month or so longer to release FW updates than their counterparts in Europe, Canada, etc. in Pio BD threads over several years, various owners have supposedly been told the Pio US legal dept apparently requires Pio US to do more testing before signing off on it.

and until very recently, like either the SC-57 or SC-37 era, can't recall which, Pio AVR owners could NOT update FW on their own. you had to take the receiver to an authorized service shop to do all updates. and updates were by RS-232, flash drive & CDR, using a special utility program from Pioneer. Pioneer wouldn't give an owner an update even if you begged eek.gif the answer was flatly no, with a capital N.

so it's very nice we now can do them ourselves.

The SC-67 is the first receiver I have that can be updated with firmware.

My prior one was a Yamaha RX-V3300 no firmware upgrade

All the the PCs I have, firmware rollback is always possible in the event of a problem.

I also have an HDI Dune MAX media player which is also a bluray player that you can rollback firmware if you have an issue

So not being able to rollback firmware is a first for me.

Like I said before it may have been the program I was watching that was a little low so really no issue with the latest firmware

I will reset unit and redo setting and compare
post #1031 of 1451
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escape View Post

I will reset unit and redo setting and compare

be interesting to read what you think afterwards

I hope you write down your readings or save them as another preset to compare to. you can always clear the preset after you compare. without knowing the existing settings or using a SPL meter I'm not sure how you can compare before & after objectively.

btw - along with unchanged settings, I have noticed no change in volume, I continue to set it to what I always set it for most of my viewing. just saying....

IMO, the FW update made no difference but let us know what you think smile.gif
post #1032 of 1451
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escape View Post

All the the PCs I have, firmware rollback is always possible in the event of a problem.

understood & I agree but AVR's are not products of the PC industry and AVR's are not PC's.

updating AVR FW is not same as updating a PC BIOS. for 1 thing, instead of updating one chip, modern AVR's have 2-3 SoC DSP's each coded to do its unique tasks and everything has to function in an integrated way with HDMI receiver/transmitter chips, video processor chips, DAC's, ADC's, preamp opamps, switching functions, decoding functions. in some respects, a HT AVR is a more complex integrated device than a PC which uses software on a blank slate CPU to perform tasks. you don't see Intel offering many updates to CPU's do you? sound cards, video cards, NIC's, any PCI Ex card are all updated by their respective companies and the companies do not have necessarily have to ensure that their subsystem update has to play nice with all the others. in some cases they don't & have to re-do their software. OTOH, AVR's don't use a CPU & software. they use DSP's with pre-embedded code that is supplied by other companies, like Dolby, DTS, THX, etc and are tightly integrated so that each one has to work with every other subsystem. A FW update for an AVR is not a one shot deal, it updates each subsystem independently. so rolling back may not be as EZ as it seems to you, otherwise, all of them would be doing it and so far, none of them do...that should tell you something eek.gif

don't take this the wrong way, I'm not picking on you or your post. but it amazes me that I can go to a top model Denon, Marantz thread and typically see high level conversations about sound quality, how Audyssey works for them, sharing info on how to use it effectively, how to setup networked media sources, bass management while in Pioneer threads there's more carping about this or that, things which no company does any differently yet Pioneer owners seem more inclined to expect it to do things that NO receiver has done, or complained about things that you just don't see that much complaining about in these other brands.

why? what is it about Pioneer that somehow owners expect things to be something they aren't or have never been...just saying rolleyes.gif I can only attribute it to lack of knowledge, newcomers or thinking their Pioneer is not doing something other receivers can do when that's not true at all.

I can't recall any posts since the Denon 4520 came out about this kind of nitpicking...just a lot of enthusiasts & enthusiastic owners posting. are these models that bad that every day I read someone complaining about this or that? shoot, there's people who have to reboot their new Marantz 8801's just to restore sound and people are being very cool-headed about it, reporting glitches to Marantz and others so eventually any bugs get addressed. in a Pioneer thread, I've seen posts threatening to sue the company over not updating the iphone app! rolleyes.giftongue.gif

not trying to scare you off or not have you speak your mind...but why do you expect this Pioneer model to or this company to do anything different than every other company's comparable model does? I don't see 4520 owners complaining about not being able to rollback FW. it's accepted - probably because there are now a whole lot more experienced owners with Denon & Marantz now.

peace & let us know how your reset goes.

I really am interested in what you find out.

my above "rant" is not directed to you personally; it's an observation from last several months where repeatedly people say they are unhappy about something with their Pioneer when reality is they haven't bothered to thoroughly read the manual, or don't know how HDMI works in a receiver or expected to be able to use it in way no receiver does. These kind of posts have been pretty common in Pioneer threads. it's amazing really. are there that many uninformed people buying Pioneer? it can't be that these are that glitchy..because I just don't see some of these kinds of issues with multiple Pioneer receivers I've owned. everything that I've tried to do with them just works exactly the way it's described in the manual wink.gif

every Pioneer I've owned has been stable, glitch-free, no HDMI problems, hasn't failed or not done something it should have done. why am I so lucky when others seem determined that theirs doesn't work right rolleyes.gif

like ARC, I'd like to try it out just to prove to myself it does work...but my TV doesn't support it. you notice the guy who had problems just disappeared after my advice on what settings to check...did he get it to work or not? this would be nice to know. o well.
Edited by ss9001 - 2/1/13 at 4:03pm
post #1033 of 1451
Awesome rant, ss9001. I came hear looking for comments on the sound quality of the SC-67/68. I'm amazed by the lack of commentary in this regard. Why?
post #1034 of 1451
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goalline View Post

Awesome rant, ss9001. I came hear looking for comments on the sound quality of the SC-67/68. I'm amazed by the lack of commentary in this regard. Why?

in a nutshell, the sound quality is great! and I've owned 4 flagships from Pioneer, incl the discontinued $7000 SC-09. this holds its own vs all of them. there are members here like Filmmixer who hasn't been here recently, bbear & others who really know their stuff on computer audio, far more than I'll ever know, who have discussed audio quality.

and if you go back to the beginning of the thread, I did post initial impressions & subjective comparisons trying PQLS, USB-DAC, the new surround formats, and others.

but I wish this thread had more people who shared their listening observations and posted about them.

here's several reviews you can check out, several are from Europe (UK & German) on the SC-LX86, their equivalent to the SC-68, very informative, but you'll have to do some translation, plus the recent ones from Home Theater Mag & HomeTheaterHiFi. I'll post all the links:

http://www.hometheater.com/content/pioneer-elite-sc-68-av-receiver
http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/receivers/receivers-reviews/pioneer-sc68-receiver.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Of7QJPDC-E

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.areadvd.de/hardware/2012/pioneer_sc_lx86.shtml&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dsc-lx86%2Breview%26start%3D20%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3DIH3%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26channel%3Dnp%26biw%3D1024%26bih%3D629%26prmd%3Dimvns&sa=X&ei=EyJbUMu8LoKs8AT8joFQ&ved=0CDMQ7gEwAjgU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_tRCMDj1tM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEnkJhDvmxg

http://www.meetgadget.com/gadget/60831/Pioneer+SC-LX86/videos/video/4Of7QJPDC-E
http://www.whathifi.com/review/sc-lx86

the German YouTube reviews are interesting if you use the rough YouTube translation tool, very detailed analysis of sound. this reviewer also has one comparing the SC-68 (LX86) to the Denon 4520 & Onkyo 5010.

every one of these has been overwhelmingly positive about audio performance & sound quality.

does this help or is there something specific you want to know? smile.gif
Edited by ss9001 - 2/1/13 at 7:03pm
post #1035 of 1451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escape View Post

All the the PCs I have, firmware rollback is always possible in the event of a problem.

That may be true for the PCs you have now, but that capability will be disappearing. Particularly if the firmware update closes a security hole in the BIOS of the PC, you won't want to re-open the hole by allowing the firmware to roll back. BluRay players have the same problem since BluRay updates can contain new revocation lists (security keys being revoked because they have been compromised).

--Steve Fintel
post #1036 of 1451
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post

you don't see Intel offering many updates to CPU's do you?

Actually, Intel does update their CPUs. It's called the microcode update. It's usually embedded in the BIOS, but it can be updated from Windows (that's why the processors have drivers in device manager).

--Steve Fintel
post #1037 of 1451
Thread Starter 
^^
yes I know but I was trying to make a point smile.gif In my PC building days, I do remember Intel having various CPU utilities & updates. but you are correct, sir. thanks for keeping me honest smile.gif
post #1038 of 1451
SS9001, thank you so much for the links. I finally got a chance to hear one of the receivers today. It was the SC-65. I was impressed. I'm getting the SC-67 in a couple of weeks. I will post my opinion when I get it home.
post #1039 of 1451
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post

understood & I agree but AVR's are not products of the PC industry and AVR's are not PC's.

updating AVR FW is not same as updating a PC BIOS. for 1 thing, instead of updating one chip, modern AVR's have 2-3 SoC DSP's each coded to do its unique tasks and everything has to function in an integrated way with HDMI receiver/transmitter chips, video processor chips, DAC's, ADC's, preamp opamps, switching functions, decoding functions. in some respects, a HT AVR is a more complex integrated device than a PC which uses software on a blank slate CPU to perform tasks. you don't see Intel offering many updates to CPU's do you? sound cards, video cards, NIC's, any PCI Ex card are all updated by their respective companies and the companies do not have necessarily have to ensure that their subsystem update has to play nice with all the others. in some cases they don't & have to re-do their software. OTOH, AVR's don't use a CPU & software. they use DSP's with pre-embedded code that is supplied by other companies, like Dolby, DTS, THX, etc and are tightly integrated so that each one has to work with every other subsystem. A FW update for an AVR is not a one shot deal, it updates each subsystem independently. so rolling back may not be as EZ as it seems to you, otherwise, all of them would be doing it and so far, none of them do...that should tell you something eek.gif

don't take this the wrong way, I'm not picking on you or your post. but it amazes me that I can go to a top model Denon, Marantz thread and typically see high level conversations about sound quality, how Audyssey works for them, sharing info on how to use it effectively, how to setup networked media sources, bass management while in Pioneer threads there's more carping about this or that, things which no company does any differently yet Pioneer owners seem more inclined to expect it to do things that NO receiver has done, or complained about things that you just don't see that much complaining about in these other brands.

why? what is it about Pioneer that somehow owners expect things to be something they aren't or have never been...just saying rolleyes.gif I can only attribute it to lack of knowledge, newcomers or thinking their Pioneer is not doing something other receivers can do when that's not true at all.

I can't recall any posts since the Denon 4520 came out about this kind of nitpicking...just a lot of enthusiasts & enthusiastic owners posting. are these models that bad that every day I read someone complaining about this or that? shoot, there's people who have to reboot their new Marantz 8801's just to restore sound and people are being very cool-headed about it, reporting glitches to Marantz and others so eventually any bugs get addressed. in a Pioneer thread, I've seen posts threatening to sue the company over not updating the iphone app! rolleyes.giftongue.gif

not trying to scare you off or not have you speak your mind...but why do you expect this Pioneer model to or this company to do anything different than every other company's comparable model does? I don't see 4520 owners complaining about not being able to rollback FW. it's accepted - probably because there are now a whole lot more experienced owners with Denon & Marantz now.

peace & let us know how your reset goes.

I really am interested in what you find out.



PC's are constantly updated in the form of new driver releases for the hardware installed on it to make it function properly/better and in most cases drivers can be rolled back if their is a problem. I must disagree with you on the point that updates for sound, video, ect.. are not available by MFGs. They always are and they still support XP with driver updates presently which is 3 OS's old. This is important and should not be overlooked because its an AVR. The MFGs want thier AVRs to connect and play content that mostly PC have been doing for the last 5 or so years but don't adopt basic updating protocols that PCs MFGs have been doing for years.

People have had some issues with Pioneers DAC drivers I wonder if those could be rolled back or do you have to wait until they fix it for it to work properly. In the end as updates are rolled out even for the simplest update and if it's not properly tested and causes your AVR not to work you will be at the mercy of the MFG to get a fix out ASAP instead of rolling back to a previous version and atleast being able to use it and trust me you will be mad at Pioneer too but it will be after the fact and too late. Hope it does not happen but it could. This will make me think twice about doing an update especially if it's for something that may not affect me. If I have a device that cannot be rolled back I do not update unless it's neccessary.

Did not reset yet but all setting are written down so after rest I will just copy back
post #1040 of 1451
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goalline View Post

SS9001, thank you so much for the links. I finally got a chance to hear one of the receivers today. It was the SC-65. I was impressed. I'm getting the SC-67 in a couple of weeks. I will post my opinion when I get it home.

congratulations!! biggrin.gif
when you get it hooked up, let us know what you think. what speakers will you be using?
post #1041 of 1451
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escape View Post

PC's are constantly updated in the form of new driver releases for the hardware installed on it to make it function properly/better and in most cases drivers can be rolled back if their is a problem.

of course they are. you're very correct about how PC's/OS's/cards are done. I've built my share of PC's, installed OS's and taken cert classes, too wink.gif

but I repeat, receivers are not PC's and the CE industry is not the PC industry. and DSP's with embedded code are not the same as CPU's.

why doesn't ANY company do rollbacks for any receiver or any player for that matter? why single out Pioneer for not doing something no CE does? not even Oppo, with its reputation for rapid FW updates, bug fixes and attentiveness to customers reporting issues, do FW rollbacks on their BD players.

maybe someday companies will make it possible for rollbacks in receivers.
Edited by ss9001 - 2/3/13 at 4:19am
post #1042 of 1451
Oppo used to allow firmware rollbacks until they added features like Netflix, where the parties responsible for these apps insisted that rollbacks no longer be permitted.
post #1043 of 1451
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzGuyy View Post

Oppo used to allow firmware rollbacks until they added features like Netflix, where the parties responsible for these apps insisted that rollbacks no longer be permitted.

thanks for the correction. I own the 93 & knew that it couldn't be rolled back, but it already has those streaming services built-in so makes sense now. sorry I made an assumption redface.gif

sometimes I do make mistakes wink.gif when I do, I have no problems saying so.
Edited by ss9001 - 2/3/13 at 5:11am
post #1044 of 1451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goalline View Post

Awesome rant, ss9001. I came hear looking for comments on the sound quality of the SC-67/68. I'm amazed by the lack of commentary in this regard. Why?

I think his awesome rant is fully justifiable. ss9001 is extremely helpful and knowledgable. As to firmware rollback no receivers nor, Tv or Blu Ray as far as I know has ever been able to do it. Comparing a receiver to a PC is absurd also!
post #1045 of 1451
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post


any progress on ARC?

I have always used ARC even on my SC-57 but some of the features you listed on your post I have to make sure I have set all of them like that. I have a Samsung D8000 series plasma, one thing I have noticed is that when I shut off the TV and my receiver stays on since I have everything set on my harmony to be on except the TV. So when I turn on the TV in the TV menu the receiver is showing as off, so I have to go into that menu and turn receiver on inside the Samsung menu. I cant remember I had to do it before when I had the SC-57 as the TV is the same Samsung I have.

Maybe I will try some of your suggestions, I haven't set up the SC-68 at all since I don't have a Blu Ray player, sold my Oppo 95 and also don't have a center channel speaker but only surrounds! Just running the 68 and pumping TV sound and Apple TV2 through it. I have a dedicated 2 channel Integrated Amp in HT bypass connected to the 68. So really not much utilization of the 68 for now. On the whole ARC works fine except that hitch, which I will look into by going over all the settings.
post #1046 of 1451
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post

why doesn't ANY company do rollbacks for any receiver or any player for that matter?

Anthem allows FW rollbacks... AFAIK, they are the only manufacturer I've owned equipment from that does (as far as pre-pro's/AVR's...)
post #1047 of 1451
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by FilmMixer View Post

Anthem allows FW rollbacks... AFAIK, they are the only manufacturer I've owned equipment from that does (as far as pre-pro's/AVR's...)

yes and it's $9000 wink.gif
thanks, Film for the correction.
post #1048 of 1451
Ss9001, Paradigm Monitor 7's and Mini's for surrounds. I will upgrade the speakers eventually, but haven't decided yet what to replace them with. Can't wait to muck around with the receiver.
Edited by Goalline - 2/3/13 at 1:56pm
post #1049 of 1451
I finally received my SC-67 on Thursday, and had a chance to hook it up on Sunday before the Superbowl. The first thing I did was pop in the Dire Straits Brothers in Arms SACD in Pure Direct. All i can is...wow! Compared to the VSX-33 the SC-67 replaced the new receiver had more dynamics, more resolution, and more soundstage depth; just a more musical presentation (as it should be; the VSX-33 is half the price of SC-67 when it was released two years ago). Very happy with the purchase. I will post any further relevant observations as I continue to use it, but the SC-67 is a definite keeper. .
post #1050 of 1451
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamtheatre View Post

I finally received my SC-67 on Thursday, and had a chance to hook it up on Sunday before the Superbowl. The first thing I did was pop in the Dire Straits Brothers in Arms SACD in Pure Direct. All i can is...wow! Compared to the VSX-33 the SC-67 replaced the new receiver had more dynamics, more resolution, and more soundstage depth; just a more musical presentation (as it should be; the VSX-33 is half the price of SC-67 when it was released two years ago). Very happy with the purchase. I will post any further relevant observations as I continue to use it, but the SC-67 is a definite keeper. .

That's one of my favorite discs to demo.

The other is Like Minds.

I had a Denon 5803 before and the Pioneer SC68 sounds great.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Official Pioneer SC-68/67 Thread