To start I understand the VT model won the award for best TV of 2012 and I have read up TONS on the VT model and am close to be sold on it ... BUT ... I am not a huge video buff guy that needs "The Best" all around TV (heck I have had a 55" Vizio XVT Tru-LED Full Array for over 2 years and have loved it) but I want a TV that is awesome and gives atleast close to the best picture as possible and This Panasonic seems to be the clear winner this year ... but for a guy like me is the VT something thats worth it? I don;t know how to calibrate and I probably won't be paying anyone to do that ... I will more than likely just search for certain picture settings from members here and find something that I like and that will be good for me.
I recently purchased the Sharp Quattron 70" Edge-LED TV and love the size (the reason I am at least staying at 65" now) but the picture has some major issues with ghosting/halo on sports and other occasional programs and that is a No Go for this sports buff, so it's going back and I am looking for a replacement, and this 65XX50 is gonna be the TV I think will be the best for me hopefully.
I have tossed around the Panny and the Samsung 8000 but from what I see after the shoot-out results the Panasonic is the way to go in terms of just overall picture quality and other major factors and my assumption is it will just look better and hopefully even be better with the halo effect issue I currently have on the sharp 70" (this is a major deal for me to have my Sports games and primetime shows looking superb).
Now back to my main question .... I think I have basically decided to go with the Panny Plasma and really am close to just pulling the trigger on one of these two models ... but like I said I am not a guy who needs "The Best" ... I want the best, but if the GT really is kinda close to the VT in terms of overall picture quality, panel, etc. etc. then I would much rather save the money and go that route and have some money for say audio upgrades or what not (or just have the extra money now to buy the 4 year BB extended warranty that I would like to have for peace of mind which I may not be able to get with the VT ... Also to the warranty is 100 bucks less for the GT over the VT so there's another $100 bucks in savings from the two).
The price from the VT down to the GT currently is $800 cheaper at BB (VT is 3500, GT is 2700 on sale this week) .... Where is the 800 dollars being applied for a basic guy like me who may not even be able to tell the difference in these two sets???
I am ok with spending more money if there is some big difference between the two that is major driving factor and constitutes the 800 bucks ... if so what may that be?
I am returning the Sharp this week and turning right around and going to BB and buying this Panasonic TV ... I just have No Clue which one to get ... the VT to have the best of the best or save the $800 and get the GT if there is really no huge difference for someone like me.
I am a big sports guy ... I love watching tons of primetime HD programs wife (we have SO many shows we watch), and I have tons of movies and we watch at least one movie a week on bluray. My main thing is a nice clear picture with NO ghosting / halo effect on sports etc., Nice colors and though I do like brightness I am willing to compromise that for a far superior picture. I hate seeing pixelization on the screen from time to time and just want a nice overall TV experience.
I know I have said it many times but I'll say it again ... I'm not a guy that knows much about the video stuff and all the thing I have read that we're tested on the TV shootout this year ... I just know the basics of audio and video and want something NICE ... not over the best king of the hill stuff ... just nice and a GREAT above average performing TV.
So with all that info and what I like and don't like etc. etc.
Would a GT be fine for me or should I stay away from it for some reason and go with the VT for the $880 more? If so "why"?
Please provide as much detailed info as possible to help me with this huge decision.
Thanks you SO much all your help ... AVS members are so awesome and I look forward to hearing from you all.
Thanks Again
Chris
Edited by falconman515 - 8/1/12 at 2:55am
I recently purchased the Sharp Quattron 70" Edge-LED TV and love the size (the reason I am at least staying at 65" now) but the picture has some major issues with ghosting/halo on sports and other occasional programs and that is a No Go for this sports buff, so it's going back and I am looking for a replacement, and this 65XX50 is gonna be the TV I think will be the best for me hopefully.
I have tossed around the Panny and the Samsung 8000 but from what I see after the shoot-out results the Panasonic is the way to go in terms of just overall picture quality and other major factors and my assumption is it will just look better and hopefully even be better with the halo effect issue I currently have on the sharp 70" (this is a major deal for me to have my Sports games and primetime shows looking superb).
Now back to my main question .... I think I have basically decided to go with the Panny Plasma and really am close to just pulling the trigger on one of these two models ... but like I said I am not a guy who needs "The Best" ... I want the best, but if the GT really is kinda close to the VT in terms of overall picture quality, panel, etc. etc. then I would much rather save the money and go that route and have some money for say audio upgrades or what not (or just have the extra money now to buy the 4 year BB extended warranty that I would like to have for peace of mind which I may not be able to get with the VT ... Also to the warranty is 100 bucks less for the GT over the VT so there's another $100 bucks in savings from the two).
The price from the VT down to the GT currently is $800 cheaper at BB (VT is 3500, GT is 2700 on sale this week) .... Where is the 800 dollars being applied for a basic guy like me who may not even be able to tell the difference in these two sets???
I am ok with spending more money if there is some big difference between the two that is major driving factor and constitutes the 800 bucks ... if so what may that be?
I am returning the Sharp this week and turning right around and going to BB and buying this Panasonic TV ... I just have No Clue which one to get ... the VT to have the best of the best or save the $800 and get the GT if there is really no huge difference for someone like me.
I am a big sports guy ... I love watching tons of primetime HD programs wife (we have SO many shows we watch), and I have tons of movies and we watch at least one movie a week on bluray. My main thing is a nice clear picture with NO ghosting / halo effect on sports etc., Nice colors and though I do like brightness I am willing to compromise that for a far superior picture. I hate seeing pixelization on the screen from time to time and just want a nice overall TV experience.
I know I have said it many times but I'll say it again ... I'm not a guy that knows much about the video stuff and all the thing I have read that we're tested on the TV shootout this year ... I just know the basics of audio and video and want something NICE ... not over the best king of the hill stuff ... just nice and a GREAT above average performing TV.
So with all that info and what I like and don't like etc. etc.
Would a GT be fine for me or should I stay away from it for some reason and go with the VT for the $880 more? If so "why"?

Please provide as much detailed info as possible to help me with this huge decision.
Thanks you SO much all your help ... AVS members are so awesome and I look forward to hearing from you all.
Thanks Again

Chris
Edited by falconman515 - 8/1/12 at 2:55am













To my knowledge that is still the lowest price but I was 