I know the Polk PSW10 seems to be hated, but it is one of the few subs in my budget range. Certainly, it is an upgrade over the Kenwood?
After reading what information I should give to a good recommendation, this are my requirements:
150 budget (I know this is small budget, but that's all I can spend)
Room size: 20x20x12 (approx 5000 cubic feet)
Usage: 60% ht;20% music;20% video games
Circumstances: live in town home, so needs to be good accent, but not too "boomy"
Are there any other recommendations? If the Polk is not an upgrade, then I will probably have to pass until next year to upgrade.
if it helps, I have Polk Monitor 30 for rear surrounds, Polk Monitor 40 for front and a Yamaha VX-867 receiver, which is capable of running 2 powered subs...
Thanks!
Update:
Kenwood Specs for the amplifier:
100W RMS at 4ohms, from 20Hz to 200Hz with no more than .09% THD. It is just an 8" sub, however. That's why I thought the PSW10 would be an upgrade...
Edited by webpoet73 - 8/13/12 at 1:24pm
After reading what information I should give to a good recommendation, this are my requirements:
150 budget (I know this is small budget, but that's all I can spend)
Room size: 20x20x12 (approx 5000 cubic feet)
Usage: 60% ht;20% music;20% video games
Circumstances: live in town home, so needs to be good accent, but not too "boomy"
Are there any other recommendations? If the Polk is not an upgrade, then I will probably have to pass until next year to upgrade.
if it helps, I have Polk Monitor 30 for rear surrounds, Polk Monitor 40 for front and a Yamaha VX-867 receiver, which is capable of running 2 powered subs...
Thanks!
Update:
Kenwood Specs for the amplifier:
100W RMS at 4ohms, from 20Hz to 200Hz with no more than .09% THD. It is just an 8" sub, however. That's why I thought the PSW10 would be an upgrade...
Edited by webpoet73 - 8/13/12 at 1:24pm








