Originally Posted by NicksHitachi
Very cool. Thats the fastest sub build I ever saw!!!
Wheres the pikchers!!!!
I understand space contraints for sure. Those look like they would play very nice. If your needing output, ported is the way to go imo.
Also FWIW the MFW is for all intents and purposes the same driver as the Dayton DVC 15. They model nearly identical so consider them interchangeable. If you need more spl just pickup more DVCs when they on sale.
How much power are you feeding the MFW in ~7cubes?
Haha, when you read the thread on that ported sub (link in my sig) you will find that the build was anything but "fast"
When I model the MFW vs the DVC the DVC does seem to do better in the 20Hz region. Of course I am just looking at the lines on a graph.. They may be negligible in reality.
The only amp I have atm is a BKa-1000, so I am feeding them plenty. Not sure how to determine what I am actually giving them-- can I figure it out with a DMM?
All I can say is at ~22Hz the difference between the F-20 and ported box is like night and day. The F-20 rocks the place.. the ported is nothing special. It really makes me want to go with the two F-20s but I just realized they might not fit at all
due to the screen frame. Need to really buckle down and draft the screen wall to figure out how to make this work.
The ported box is sized to slip right in under the screen, but the output is clearly not the same as the F20. I thought it would perform a tad better than the F20 at sub-20Hz.. but they are surprisingly similar.
I posted about the Kicker C154 in the DIY forum.. this seems like another cheap alternative. Not quite as good as the DVC, but man it's real close. Wait, why am I looking at more subs?
What I really want s to fill in the low end (sub-20) but I guess I'm talking bigger speaker and bigger dollars to make that happen. Also seems like it is going to create a bigger EQ issue.