Quote:
Originally Posted by
3Dtechno 
Hi all - my first post and hate to bring the bad news !
So the great news we have been hearing from many people before you, about the exact same product, is now invalid because of your first post !!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
3Dtechno 
Regd. the 3d - the depth is not all that perceivable compared with his bravia - dunno why - may be the demo disc was to be blamed whatever.
Uhm, you might want to check with another disc then instead of basing all your judgements on one source.
Why dont you try, lets say, Avatar ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
3Dtechno 
But i believe 3d looks best on his 46 incher sony bravia than on t2 for the same demo disc.
Yes, I am sure it does, but this is how you see it, not everyone else.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
3Dtechno 
I think it's becoz of HMd itself since there is no reference frame / background to perceive depth from - limitation of HMDs.
We can all agree that 3D in modern productions is mainly about depth.
According to you, the limitation of HMDs is that they cant display depth yet they are marketed solely for the purpose of 3D and they sell really well ???!!!
I am sorry but this makes no sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
3Dtechno 
I spent close to 5hrs alternating between bravia and T2 and arguing with him on this.
Why do you have to convince him to see what you do when only you seem to see it ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
3Dtechno 
I have read a lot about t2 on the internet and can safely say 99% is true except for 3d performance which is the limitation as described.
99% of what is written about the device IS about the 3D performance because thats why people buy it so what 99% truth are you referring to ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
3Dtechno 
Those who say that t2 delivers best 3d are either sony employees or the 'Sony' fanatics.
By that logic, the rest of your post pegs you as a Sony-hater which is just as bad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
3Dtechno 
My question - How can the 3d be great when the depth is not subtle since there is no reference frame / background to compare it with.?
A reference frame is required for pop-out [negative parallax], not for depth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
3Dtechno 
poor fellow wanted my opinion i argued with him on this - poor fellow wanted to justify his mistake.
Not a very nice way to talk about your friend, especially behind his back.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
3Dtechno 
It'd not cost more than usd$500 - anything above is rip-off in the name of 3d - subtle marketing by Sony.
We can all safely assume you have inside knowledge on how much it costs them to make such a device.
This product is made by the same company that sold a gaming console at a loss for years.
Also, you might want to check the current prices of OLED displays.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
3Dtechno 
lemme see when he 'd sell T2 after knowing what i understood - i may strike a cheap bargain for my 2D needs, who knows .

Yes, because a lot of people buy an HMZ-T2 for its 2D capabilities.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
3Dtechno 
2.make it 1080p though it does great with 720p
At the seating distance and screen-size that the HMD emulates, 720p is more than enough.
I also wish people would stop requesting this as the price-point would put it out of reach of the market its aimed at.
It would also make no sense until the PS4 comes out and is actually capable of 3D in 1080p.
Also, this would not help your issues with its lack of 3D depth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
3Dtechno 
3.get most of the controls on the big box and make the HMD light enough.
And thus make the controls very inconvenient in terms of placement and you would have to fumble around behind or in front of you.
You are the only person who has even hinted at this being an issue.