

I guess the 32-bit is just to "future proof". And perhaps it was just easier for the DAC designers to work with 32-bit.
sacd is "1-bit"...
and neither is pcm...why "32 bit"? well, a bigger number is OBVIOUSLY always better...

in the real world, 16/44.1 is audibly transparent... bigger numbers are pretty pointless... but they do make a certain segment of potential buyers sleep better at night...
Strictly speaking if you are performing DSP on 24 bit signals, you'd want your DSP to process it in more than 24 bits. And with binary data its easier to work in powers of 2. So a 32 bit processor is a logical choice.
Not that 32 bit DACs sound better than 24 bits because the implementation (power and analog circuit design) is as important if not more so.
And once you've processed in 32 bits it makes sense to feed that to a 32 bit DAC without truncation or down sampling.
As for the value of hires audio, I'll leave that to individuals. I do feel that analog media which isn't quantized sounds more dynamic so there is something to be said about using hires audio to better approximate the original analog source. I've been listening to Madonna's True Blue (I have the original CD pressing from Germany and recently got the HDTracks 24/192 releases) and I thought the 24/192s brought something new to the songs.
YMMV





















but that should work for RedZone for me as well. But I've just gotten my wife to sign on to a 37" above the 71" for football for when she wants to watch her crap and I, mine. So I've got that going for me too, and with full matrix included on this beast, I am happy.


