AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › The **OFFICIAL** DENON AVR-4520CI thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The **OFFICIAL** DENON AVR-4520CI thread - Page 93

post #2761 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nameless_87 View Post

I tried another HDMI cable as I had a spare one (high speed) and same problem

Then I tried the Reset PS3 method...

I noticed some things... The screen appears in 576p saying that it found an HDMI... when I press yes, nothing... black screen again.

I tried it a second time and same thing happens, then I tried switching input and back to GAME input and it appeared with the message 1080p, do you want to keep... I say yes and everything seems fine.

I turned everything off then and started normal power up... TV, AVR on correct input and then PS3 and nothing is visible, just blank screen with STEREO audio... I change to another input and back to GAME and screen comes on for 1 second and then turns black again...

I tried to connect the HTPC(1080p) and Dreambox (1080i) to GAME input to see if the problem is with the AVR and both worked good... I played Avatar on HTPC and played flawlessly as well!

At this point I have no idea what to do and I don't know what the problem is!

Any help

Did you check the hdmi cable from Ps3 to Recv, from Recv to Tv, Also make sure that the Recv Video up conversion is NOT! set on 4k ,if it is you will not get a Signal!!
post #2762 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post

... I don't know if Denon owners tend to feel the same or just shrug it off. but it really put me off when I was considering going to Denon last year...
Yes, it certainly put me off from getting a 4520. My DBPA100 is DL4 and to this day I don't know if thre's a way to convert DL4 (Cat5) to the DLHD (coax). So I'd need to get the new Denon player with DLHD. In addition, it costs me an axtra $150 to upgrade the AVR as I'll need a new Audyssey Pro license for the new model. And then I'd have to offload both the used player and the AVRA100.

The clincher is really that it sounds so good now that I'm chasing after smaller and smaller increments of SQ from more hardware, none of which are certain to pan out. Treating the room acoustics would probably make the most difference and I'm not prepared to take that step.
So for now I'm focusing on buying good music and enjoying the system.
post #2763 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by EVT View Post

...I recall an occasion where a salesman at a high-end A/V store demoed the previous version of Denon Link for me and I just wasn't hearing the difference that he so eloquently described...
My somewhat cynical opinion on the matter is that Denon Link is a marketing gimmick to sell a player that offers less for more, at least when compared to the performance/value proposition offered by Oppo.
Well DenonLink hasn't really been an effective marketing gimmick, has it? Hardly anyone has heard of it and fewer still bother with it! biggrin.gif It's true that HDMI sounds pretty darn good, as does analog from top players.

I was quite skeptical of DenonLink-after all, as someone here recently posted, if DL is that good, why wouldn't more people use it? So I started a thread "Does DenonLink really matter?". Enough posters spoke positively of it that I bought a Denon DBPA100/4010 and did fairly extensive level-matched A/B tests of DenonLink vs Oppo83SE HDMI. I posted the results in the 4010 thread. Sold the Oppo, kept the Denon. YMMV. smile.gif
post #2764 of 4873
Thank you for the reply, and that mostly makes sense to me.
If I add in a stereo receiver with A/B posts do you think it would be possible to control the volume for each room with a slider in each room? If so, how would one go ahead with wiring it?
I have wired things with cat6-stp, and speaker cable, but have not added sliders for volume control b/c I was not clear on how to add such a switch.

Thank you
Quote:
Originally Posted by batpig View Post

Yes, the receiver supports a total of FOUR zones. There is the main zone, then Zones 2 and 3 support basic stereo audio output (although you can also send HD video via component if desired), and then Zone 4 is exclusively the HDMI matrix output (#3 out).
The key thing to understand is that the receiver only has NINE amps. Although there are eleven speaker posts, once you are using the "core" 5 channels in the main zone, you only have four amps left for other zones. So your plan wouldn't work as stated because those three pairs of speaker posts would not all be active.

What you will do is set the amp assign to "5.1ch + Zone 2/3". This will leave the 5.1 active in the main zone, and reassign the other four amps, with two each to Zone 2 and Zone 3. Each of those zones can play an independent audio source.

With this setting, the Surr.Back speakers will put out the Zone 2 signal, and the Wide speakers will put out the Zone 3 signal. The Height speaker posts will be muted.

If you want to play TWO pairs of speakers off one of these zones (e.g. so the kitchen and dining room will put out the same signal) then you can use an impedance matching speaker splitter/selector to hook them all up to the two amps. In this case the bathroom would then be the independent Zone 3, and the kitchen and dining room would be conjoined as Zone 2. You could still output HDMI to the bedroom display as Zone 4 HDMI.

You might also consider adding a secondary 2ch amp to power one of the zones, which would allow you to expand to 7ch in the main zone. A separate stereo receiver with A/B speaker posts would allow you to easily power the kitchen + dining room and switch them on/off independently (although it would be the same source of course) while leaving the Denon powering the bathroom as Zone 3.
post #2765 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyingvfreak View Post

Did you check the hdmi cable from Ps3 to Recv, from Recv to Tv, Also make sure that the Recv Video up conversion is NOT! set on 4k ,if it is you will not get a Signal!!

i/p scaler is off so I don't think that's it.
post #2766 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoundofMind View Post

Well DenonLink hasn't really been an effective marketing gimmick, has it? Hardly anyone has heard of it and fewer still bother with it! biggrin.gif It's true that HDMI sounds pretty darn good, as does analog from top players.

I was quite skeptical of DenonLink-after all, as someone here recently posted, if DL is that good, why wouldn't more people use it? So I started a thread "Does DenonLink really matter?". Enough posters spoke positively of it that I bought a Denon DBPA100/4010 and did fairly extensive level-matched A/B tests of DenonLink vs Oppo83SE HDMI. I posted the results in the 4010 thread. Sold the Oppo, kept the Denon. YMMV. smile.gif

Interesting, were the differences noticeable to you in movies as well or just music?
post #2767 of 4873
Hey guys, wanted to get some thoughts on using an external amp for this receiver. I purchased the 4520 a week ago and am loving the sound so far. I am running Mythos ST's, Mythos Ten and Gem XL's in a 5.1 configuration. These are obviously very efficient speakers. My question is would I get a benefit in using my Outlaw 7125 that I having lying around or should I just stick with the receiver. I would rather just use the receiver alone but if I will get great benefit then I will connect the external amp. Thanks.
post #2768 of 4873
Thread Starter 
If you already have the amp lying around you can answer the question for yourself definitively. Anything we tell you will be speculation.

I can tell you with confidence though that its not likely to be a "great" benefit. Especially not if you are only using 5 channels.
post #2769 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by batpig View Post

If you already have the amp lying around you can answer the question for yourself definitively. Anything we tell you will be speculation.

I can tell you with confidence though that its not likely to be a "great" benefit. Especially not if you are only using 5 channels.

Thank you very much. To hook up the amp would mean breaking down my existing rack and setting everything up again. My thoughts were that since my fronts have built in powered subs, the difference in external amplification would be negligible.
post #2770 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by EVT View Post

Interesting, were the differences noticeable to you in movies as well or just music?
For me, it was not noticeable in movies, just music. It need not be high rez, but well recorded. Highly compressed crappy recordings still sound crappy over DL! tongue.gif

See this post on RBCD and just scroll down the page for my posts on SACD and DVDA.
Interestingly, I did not hear SQ anything significant improvement from DVD and BluRay music or film or see PQ improvement. Others have reported they did. I bitstreaming everything possible. YMMV

I'd like to hear from folks who duplicate such tests as I feel they are better-controlled than many of the reports we see.
post #2771 of 4873
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by GardenVariety View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by batpig View Post

If you already have the amp lying around you can answer the question for yourself definitively. Anything we tell you will be speculation.

I can tell you with confidence though that its not likely to be a "great" benefit. Especially not if you are only using 5 channels.

Thank you very much. To hook up the amp would mean breaking down my existing rack and setting everything up again. My thoughts were that since my fronts have built in powered subs, the difference in external amplification would be negligible.

That Outlaw is only rated at 125w x 7. Now, of course, it's much more likely that it will actually achieve this rating with all 7 channels driven than a receiver, but if you are only running 5 channels, with 8 ohm speakers, it's very likely that the 4520 can put out 100-120 w/ch with all 5 channels driven. So I am highly skeptical of any significant benefit.

Now, if you wanted to use the Outlaw to expand your system out to 9 or 11 channels, then we'd be talkin' biggrin.gif
post #2772 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoundofMind View Post

For me, it was not noticeable in movies, just music. It need not be high rez, but well recorded. Highly compressed crappy recordings still sound crappy over DL! tongue.gif

See this post on RBCD and just scroll down the page for my posts on SACD and DVDA.
Interestingly, I did not hear SQ anything significant improvement from DVD and BluRay music or film or see PQ improvement. Others have reported they did. I bitstreaming everything possible. YMMV

I'd like to hear from folks who duplicate such tests as I feel they are better-controlled than many of the reports we see.

Thanks for the feedback. For me I think you've validated my purchase (Oppo BDP-103) for my specific situation as I would say my habits are 90% movies and just 10% music.
post #2773 of 4873
Bonjour Keith,
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Bonjour mon ami!

It's interesting that you see the 'tweakings' of the unit's frequency response as positives. I see them as huge negatives and would never, ever deliberately buy a unit that was introducing 'tone controls' in this way. What I want is total transparency to the source, nothing added and nothing taken away.

I am not suggesting you are 'wrong' - just that your aims are diametrically opposed to my own.

I do in fact own a stereo amp that adds 'emotion' and 'warmth' and so on to the input source. It sounds wonderfully seductive. But it is not accurate and these days (I have owned this amp for over 20 years) I wouldn't buy such a unit.

Amicalement... K

biggrin.gif + biggrin.gif + biggrin.gif, merci pour la leçon. smile.gif

But in my case I HATE (sound) colored products. So this is a preaching for an already converted person... wink.gif

Now I stand by what I said, the 8801 is superbly "natural", "credible"... and "transparent". But then "transparent" is a word that can often be associated with "clinical", which is not the 8801's case.

Does this mean that an 8801 will embellish "clinically" mixed tracks? No as in my (recent) experience, a 8801 will just precisely reproduce EVERYTHING which it is fed with, but without adding or substracting anything, though the "emotion" I felt.

A "natural credibility", which is something I personally directly associate to some specific audiophile stereo memorable listenings of my youth.

Amitiés à Toi,

Hugo
post #2774 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugo S View Post

Bonjour Keith,
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Bonjour mon ami!

It's interesting that you see the 'tweakings' of the unit's frequency response as positives. I see them as huge negatives and would never, ever deliberately buy a unit that was introducing 'tone controls' in this way. What I want is total transparency to the source, nothing added and nothing taken away.

I am not suggesting you are 'wrong' - just that your aims are diametrically opposed to my own.

I do in fact own a stereo amp that adds 'emotion' and 'warmth' and so on to the input source. It sounds wonderfully seductive. But it is not accurate and these days (I have owned this amp for over 20 years) I wouldn't buy such a unit.

Amicalement... K

biggrin.gif + biggrin.gif + biggrin.gif, merci pour la leçon. smile.gif

But in my case I HATE (sound) colored products. So this is a preaching for an already converted person... wink.gif

Now I stand by what I said, the 8801 is superbly "natural", "credible"... and "transparent". But then "transparent" is a word that can often be associated with "clinical", which is not the 8801's case.

Does this mean that an 8801 will embellish "clinically" mixed tracks? No as in my (recent) experience, a 8801 will just precisely reproduce EVERYTHING which it is fed with, but without adding or substracting anything, though the "emotion" I felt.

A "natural credibility", which is something I personally directly associate to some specific audiophile stereo memorable listenings of my youth.

Amitiés à Toi,

Hugo

 

Bonjour Hugo,

 

Dans ce cas, nous sommes d'accord. Nous aimons tous les deux la même chose et le 8801 est, sans doute, un appareil formidable! 

 

Cordialement à toi.

 

Keith

post #2775 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nameless_87 View Post

i/p scaler is off so I don't think that's it.

I found the problem and I am 100% sure that the denon somehow is not recognising the ps3 signal cause it says unrecognised signal everytime.

The funny thing is that the signal input is exactly as my HTPC with the same settings which is 1080p60, RGB 4:4:4

The frustrating thing is that 1080p from PS3 directly to TV works and I just cannot understand why the signal is not unrecognised!

Any idea what to do next? Can this be solved by a firmware update or do you think there is a problem with the Denon hardware?
post #2776 of 4873
Thread Starter 
have you tried turning off the "Deep Color" setting on the PS3? This has been reported in the past to successfully resolve video issues with the PS3 passing through Denon AVR's.
post #2777 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by batpig View Post

have you tried turning off the "Deep Color" setting on the PS3? This has been reported in the past to successfully resolve video issues with the PS3 passing through Denon AVR's.

Yes Deep Color is off, but still no change frown.gif
post #2778 of 4873
Confirm again that the Deep Color Output setting on the PS3 is set to OFF and then try resetting the PS3 (press/hold the power on button for longer than normal). Also try connecting to the other HDMI inputs as well as swapping the HDMI cable out with another cable.
post #2779 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by GardenVariety View Post

Hey guys, wanted to get some thoughts on using an external amp for this receiver. I purchased the 4520 a week ago and am loving the sound so far. I am running Mythos ST's, Mythos Ten and Gem XL's in a 5.1 configu
ration. These are obviously very efficient speakers. My question is would I get a benefit in using my Outlaw 7125 that I having lying around or should I just stick with the receiver. I would rather just use the receiver alone but if I will get great benefit then I will connect the external amp. Thanks.

Hoook it up and Find out for yourself, If not you can send me the 7125 and I will tell you.. I think I can use the extra 25 watts. biggrin.gif been looking for a 7125 cool.gif
post #2780 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nameless_87 View Post

I found the problem and I am 100% sure that the denon somehow is not recognising the ps3 signal cause it says unrecognised signal everytime.

The funny thing is that the signal input is exactly as my HTPC with the same settings which is 1080p60, RGB 4:4:4

The frustrating thing is that 1080p from PS3 directly to TV works and I just cannot understand why the signal is not unrecognised!

Any idea what to do next? Can this be solved by a firmware update or do you think there is a problem with the Denon hardware?

IDK, confused.gif I have no Issues with my Ps3 to my 4520 in the Game input , output to my Sony 1080P LCD, Everything works Flawlessly as it should.
post #2781 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdsmoothie View Post

Confirm again that the Deep Color Output setting on the PS3 is set to OFF and then try resetting the PS3 (press/hold the power on button for longer than normal). Also try connecting to the other HDMI inputs as well as swapping the HDMI cable out with another cable.

I tried new cables, I resetted the PS3 3 times, I tried all ports on the Denon and I still get a black picture frown.gif

Putting the video settings on the PS3 in 1080i works, I just don't know why 1080p is not recognised as I am using it with my HTPC and that is fine!

On the PS3 RGB range should be Limited or Full? What about other settings?

Also, are there maybe any settings on the Denon that I should try?
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyingvfreak View Post

IDK, confused.gif I have no Issues with my Ps3 to my 4520 in the Game input , output to my Sony 1080P LCD, Everything works Flawlessly as it should.

What PS3 do you have?

I have a phat 80GB one, but I don't think that should effect anything as 1080p when connected to the TV is fine.
post #2782 of 4873
Are all your cables "High speed" cables? Try using the cable currently used with the HTPC. Also try resetting the AVR (p. 201).
post #2783 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdsmoothie View Post

Are all your cables "High speed" cables? Try using the cable currently used with the HTPC. Also try resetting the AVR (p. 201).

Yes they are all high speed, and bought new 2 days ago.

Regarding using the cable used by the HTPC, I cannot because the HPTC uses mini HDMI.

The only thing I haven't tried is resetting the AVR, which I am a bit wary about since it will remove all my settings :/
post #2784 of 4873
Use the Web Control feature (pp. 108-109) to SAVE a copy of the config.dat file to your HTPC prior to doing the reset.
post #2785 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyingvfreak View Post

Hoook it up and Find out for yourself, If not you can send me the 7125 and I will tell you.. I think I can use the extra 25 watts. biggrin.gif been looking for a 7125 cool.gif

I'm not sure it's worth the trouble. You are about 45 minutes from me, if you want it I'll sell it to you. smile.gif
post #2786 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by GardenVariety View Post

Hey guys, wanted to get some thoughts on using an external amp for this receiver. I purchased the 4520 a week ago and am loving the sound so far. I am running Mythos ST's, Mythos Ten and Gem XL's in a 5.1 configuration. These are obviously very efficient speakers. My question is would I get a benefit in using my Outlaw 7125 that I having lying around or should I just stick with the receiver. I would rather just use the receiver alone but if I will get great benefit then I will connect the external amp. Thanks.


I had those same speakers years ago, and I ran them with two types of mono amps Classe' 250 watts, and then Cary 500 watts. They took it like champs, then again I also experimented with some 15 wpc tube amps and they sounded glorious as well.

DJoel
post #2787 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe6P View Post

Thanks for sharing this with me.
I think what attracts me the most to the 5010 is its multiple and separate power supply: one for audio, one for video and the toroidal transformer with two huge capacitors to drive its power amps. Its 12.4Amps AC power input vs. 6.5Amps in the 5420ci means double the power outputs not to mention Onkyo does not avoid mentioning 4ohms ratings. All reviewers admit Denon sounds better than Pioneer but Onkyo sounds better than all of them.

4311ci owner chiming in here.

IMHO, the built-in power amps are the LAST reason to choose a receiver. Companies like Onkyo and Denon are spending all their money on licensing cool technologies such as DSX, NeoX, video scalers.. things that add to a checklist. Onkyo is particularly adept at this.

The downside is that not much money is left for boring stuff like amps.

If you honestly need something more powerful than what Denon provides, you will need something more powerful than the Onkyo also. Another thing to remember, is that even though the previous generation Onkyo's had better amp specs than the Denon, in actual tests, the Denon had just as much or more output.

The nice thing is that all these receivers have pre-outs for everything, and insanely clean and powerful amps which DESTROY the built-in ones are cheap.

I'm using a pro-amp (Behringer EP4000) for my mains. The thing cost me $250 and puts out 500 clean watts per channel at 8 ohms. Overkill... but for the price... who cares?

After doing tons of research, I'd go for the Denon every time. Listen to the people posting above with experience with both.
post #2788 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe6P View Post

Thanks for sharing this with me.
I think what attracts me the most to the 5010 is its multiple and separate power supply: one for audio, one for video and the toroidal transformer with two huge capacitors to drive its power amps. Its 12.4Amps AC power input vs. 6.5Amps in the 5420ci means double the power outputs not to mention Onkyo does not avoid mentioning 4ohms ratings. All reviewers admit Denon sounds better than Pioneer but Onkyo sounds better than all of them.

On the other hand, I’m concerned about degrading my picture when running it from my OPPO trough Denon’s HDMI to my projector because unlike Onkyo, Denon does not incorporate the state of the art Marvell's Kyoto-G2H video processor with the latest generation Qdeo technology. Kyoto-G2H is what OPPO employs for its HDMI-1 section. HDNI-2 is a lower grade processor.

As others have stated, when you are at this level of the game you will most likely be running separates. Granted, I don't find switching out a $2500 AVR every few years to keep up with technology the least bit appealing, it still does make more sense investing in separates to maximize performance. We can all argue all day whether or not these receivers will power 4ohm speakers, but the reality is you will probably be driving a very nice system if you need that much power and will more than likely have some kind of amp in the mix. That's one of the reasons Denon had the foresight to add the "preamp mode" to their AVRs. I think that's the one of the most intuitive things to see in a long time.

As for the Onkyo's performance, I too have read that out of the Holy Trinity (Denon, Onkyo, Pioneer), Onkyo is the most musical during playback. This might have something to do with their features list always being ahead of the curve, and having the latest badges from Audyssey, DTS, and Dolby. When I get my 4520, I will add my observations of SQ versus what I have been listening to for the last 9 years with my Pioneer Elite.
post #2789 of 4873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe6P View Post

Thanks for sharing this with me.
I think what attracts me the most to the 5010 is its multiple and separate power supply: one for audio, one for video and the toroidal transformer with two huge capacitors to drive its power amps. Its 12.4Amps AC power input vs. 6.5Amps in the 5420ci means double the power outputs not to mention Onkyo does not avoid mentioning 4ohms ratings. All reviewers admit Denon sounds better than Pioneer but Onkyo sounds better than all of them.
The only reason I replaced my AVR-5803 with the 5420ci was to fix that 180ms lip-sync problem that plagues OPPO-103. Denon took care of the problem since it can be manually set up to 200ms or in auto mode plus up to 100ms. Onkyo can do manual adjustment up to 800ms…
I prefer the Denon remote control, the front display, the versatility in its speaker configuration AND the 7.1 analogue input for SACD players that Onkyo doesn’t have.
On the other hand, I’m concerned about degrading my picture when running it from my OPPO trough Denon’s HDMI to my projector because unlike Onkyo, Denon does not incorporate the state of the art Marvell's Kyoto-G2H video processor with the latest generation Qdeo technology. Kyoto-G2H is what OPPO employs for its HDMI-1 section. HDNI-2 is a lower grade processor.

http://hstrial-jrodriguez996.homestead.com/DENON-AVR-4520CI-RECEIVER-REVIEW.html?_=1353372722253
http://hstrial-jrodriguez996.homestead.com/OPPO-BDP-103-Universal-Network-3D-Blu-ray-player.html?_=1351920348959

I went with the 3010. I did this because it came out before the Denon (with full Neo:X) and I wanted to try out the Onkyos (having owned a Denon 3808 and a Pioneer 1120). I have it sitting outside my dedicated theater room, so I cannot common on the clicking sound. I use a HTPC, so I cannot comment on changing input sources either, as my input source is always the same (except when I change to the Wii, but that is not HDMI). Since I use a HTPC, all my output is at the same resolution - so I never have to worry about resyncing HDMI anything. It takes 23 seconds to power up and be ready, but the projector takes longer, so I do not notice it at all. HDMI-CEC works perfectly on it, for which I am happy. It runs no hotter than my Denon 3808 ran, so I believe they fixed the heat issue finally. I have no lip sync problems either. If you get one, do the firmware upgrade before you do anything at all...the upgrade was released the day the product was released and fixed Audyssey issues detecting my front heights...they work perfectly now.
post #2790 of 4873
In comparison with my Onkyo 5508, my subjective impression is that the 4520 is slightly better in SQ. It is so slight though as to almost be inconsequential.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › The **OFFICIAL** DENON AVR-4520CI thread