AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Offical JVC DLA-RS4810 Owners Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Offical JVC DLA-RS4810 Owners Thread - Page 35

post #1021 of 1151
Im using the jvc rf emitter, and the supercheap SSG-4100B 3d glasses from samsung. The glasses cost a little over 20usd. Its not the best 3d glasses in the world, but comfy to wear and light at 23 grams.
Sending 4 kids into the theather with 3d glasses costing 200 usd a pair is not an option.
post #1022 of 1151
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamsys View Post

I have heard there are better and less expensive options for the 3d emitter and glasses from JVC

Anyone?
The JVC emitter at around $80 is very reasonably priced. You can also use the newer Panasonic RF/Bluetooth 3D glasses if you're not jazzed by the Samsung ones. I use both the Panasonic and JVC glasses with my RS4810 and I like the JVC ones the best.
post #1023 of 1151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schwa View Post

The JVC emitter at around $80 is very reasonably priced. You can also use the newer Panasonic RF/Bluetooth 3D glasses if you're not jazzed by the Samsung ones. I use both the Panasonic and JVC glasses with my RS4810 and I like the JVC ones the best.

Where have you found the emitter for $80? I have only been able to find it for $99 and with what little I watch 3D couldn't justify spending $99 on it.
post #1024 of 1151
For anyone who has the JVC RF glasses, a request.

I'm currently using the Samsung glasses with a high power screen, I only have one pair so far. I am thinking about switching to another screen. For this reason, and the fact that the JVC glasses might be more accurate, would it be possible for anyone with a pair of them to send to me to compare the Samsungs, I have screen samples of the screens I'm considering to note the effect the JVC have vs the Samsungs. I only need them for a day or two, I would try to send them back the day after I get them. I'll happily pay shipping both ways and insurance,as well as clean the glasses after use. Thanks.
post #1025 of 1151
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamsys View Post

I have heard there are better and less expensive options for the 3d emitter and glasses from JVC

Anyone?
I'm using the cheap Xpand 104 glasses with good result. You can get a PAIR of Medium size from Amazon for $50!! Large size still only runs for $50 or so each. Much cheaper when you are getting more than just a couple. In my case, 8 glasses really add up!! eek.gif
post #1026 of 1151
Does anyone know how far the JVC RF emitter extends beyond the rear of the case? I don't have much room.



Dan
post #1027 of 1151
Just joined the club! Thanks to Mike @ AVS
post #1028 of 1151
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanAllen View Post

Does anyone know how far the JVC RF emitter extends beyond the rear of the case? I don't have much room.

About an inch. Same ballpark as you'll have with the HDMI cable and power cord.
post #1029 of 1151
Can anyone tell me the difference between the different modes on the PJ? Are they just different memory banks with presets? So if cinema and natural have all settings set at the same adjustable levels there will be no change between the two modes?
I tried this question in a different thread, but it seems no-one is reading that one anymore smile.gif

Cheers
Kjell
post #1030 of 1151
Thread Starter 
Post 2 in this bread has your answer. But if you don't know what your looking at, it may not help. If you do, it will help you see what one is closer to accurate out of the box.
post #1031 of 1151
Well I am joining the club also. Getting a little over anxious at this point. I did something I wouldn't normally do at all. I got the extra great deal that Craig was talking about one page back. Thank You Craig for the great customer service. But I opted for the calibration, mainly because I wanted it Quality Checked like my RS1x a few years back. Which by the way was an awesome sample. Great convergence and focus. Great grayscale and so on. I never felt I needed a calibration on it. It was that good. And yes I have had three different calibrations on three different sets. But I just knew with my luck my next projector would be a boat anchor. Low and behold the person doing the calibration just sent me info through the grapevine that here again I got an A++ sample with amazing focus and convergence across the screen. The moon and the stars line up perfectly. He said it is the best he has seen on any set in a long time. Now I am really getting anxious. I know I went against everything I believe in here. 100 hrs on bulb, my equipment, and so on. But I got a great deal on the projector and told them my throw distance my screen and my room conditions so to get as accurate as they could. I am just hoping the calibration will be as good as the projector seems to be. biggrin.gif
post #1032 of 1151
I'm sure you're going to be pleased Ron.
Quote:
Well I am joining the club also

Welcome to the club - it's a good club to be in !! biggrin.gif
post #1033 of 1151
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhale64L7 View Post

Well I am joining the club also. Getting a little over anxious at this point. I did something I wouldn't normally do at all. I got the extra great deal that Craig was talking about one page back. Thank You Craig for the great customer service. But I opted for the calibration, mainly because I wanted it Quality Checked like my RS1x a few years back. Which by the way was an awesome sample. Great convergence and focus. Great grayscale and so on. I never felt I needed a calibration on it. It was that good. And yes I have had three different calibrations on three different sets. But I just knew with my luck my next projector would be a boat anchor. Low and behold the person doing the calibration just sent me info through the grapevine that here again I got an A++ sample with amazing focus and convergence across the screen. The moon and the stars line up perfectly. He said it is the best he has seen on any set in a long time. Now I am really getting anxious. I know I went against everything I believe in here. 100 hrs on bulb, my equipment, and so on. But I got a great deal on the projector and told them my throw distance my screen and my room conditions so to get as accurate as they could. I am just hoping the calibration will be as good as the projector seems to be. biggrin.gif

Wow, good for you. I wish that service would have been available when I ordered mine.
post #1034 of 1151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Peer View Post

I'm sure you're going to be pleased Ron.
Welcome to the club - it's a good club to be in !! biggrin.gif

Thank you again Craig I appreciate your help. And I cant wait obviously. biggrin.gif
Also thank you Ed
Edited by rhale64L7 - 3/8/13 at 1:24pm
post #1035 of 1151
...just remember. there's no amount of good convergence that UPS and FEDEX can't undo. tongue.gif
post #1036 of 1151
That's why we double box everything! And somehow my Lumis has survived two round trips from Miami to California !! eek.gif
post #1037 of 1151
man I hope they dont wig it out. I talked to my ups guy today and told him about what I was getting. He will take care of me. It is that drop on there conveyors they told me about that scares me. I cant believe stuff drops that far on there conveyors.
post #1038 of 1151
Does anyone calibrate orange color at 4810 CMS? Do you also see skintone is a little bit yellowish w/o orange calibration?
post #1039 of 1151
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebits View Post

Does anyone calibrate orange color at 4810 CMS? Do you also see skintone is a little bit yellowish w/o orange calibration?

No and No
post #1040 of 1151
If you check each R/G/B/C/M/Y after calibration, it would look good with 4 dE or less. But for me, skin tones were not natural and I additionally changed orange color while other colors stayed the same.
I see ppl look more natural in film if you change orange from CMS menu.
post #1041 of 1151
x, y and luminance for orange?
post #1042 of 1151
Thread Starter 
Thinking again of trying another projector... Lol.

Looking to gage interest on a used RS4810.
post #1043 of 1151
Hah, just admit it, the fun is not in the capture of the best picture, but more so it is in the chase. Or to put it in a cheesier way, the journey is the destination.
Edited by coderguy - 3/23/13 at 5:25am
post #1044 of 1151
Thread Starter 
I guess so... smile.gif
post #1045 of 1151
I performed a calibration at 60 hours and again just yesterday at about 180 hours. At 60 hours there was some light output variation above 65% stimulus. AT 180 hours there is significantly less so the lamp appears to be more stable after some hours of run time. I also noticed that gamma and WB needed calibrating but they were not far off. I did not record pre/post results but I can say, without equivocation, that the change in gamma and grayscale was far less than what I experienced with the previous lamp. As I somewhat expected, I did not need to rerun the 125point autocal (CMS) because there was basically no change and all ∆E's were basically what they were at 60 hours. I did not measure lux levels but may do so in the immediate future but I do not expect much change from the 60 hour numbers.
post #1046 of 1151
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOWK View Post

Thinking again of trying another projector... Lol.

Looking to gage interest on a used RS4810.

What are you looking to replace it with?
post #1047 of 1151
Thread Starter 
Possibly a used SIM2

Willing to spend up to $8000+ for a 3 chipper.
post #1048 of 1151
Guys,

Need a little help. I thought I had this all figured out.

I have an Lumagen Radiance 2021 that should be here tonight (basically a Mini 3D with Darblet integrated) for my 4810.

I also have Calman v5 Enthusiast with i1Pro 2 and an i1 Display Pro, was told this would cover the low readings the Pro2 couldn't. Calman allows for 2 choices of meters correct?

Is autocal supported with the Lumagen using Calman? Are there any open issues with this approach?

Thanks for any help!
post #1049 of 1151
Quote:
Originally Posted by colleycol View Post

Guys,

Need a little help. I thought I had this all figured out.

I have an Lumagen Radiance 2021 that should be here tonight (basically a Mini 3D with Darblet integrated) for my 4810.

I also have Calman v5 Enthusiast with i1Pro 2 and an i1 Display Pro, was told this would cover the low readings the Pro2 couldn't. Calman allows for 2 choices of meters correct?

Is autocal supported with the Lumagen using Calman? Are there any open issues with this approach?

Thanks for any help!

Yes, you can do auto-cal with your setup. And it's even better than just auto-cal, Enthusiast with the Lumagen will do the 125pt Color Cube.
post #1050 of 1151
Instruction Manual.

On page 47 of the instruction manual it states that the Gain in custom modes should be -255 to 0 and Offset should be -50 to 50. Not the case.. at least with my PJ. (Not in front of my PJ right now, but I believe the range for both settings are -14 to 14. Is this the case for everyone.

Over the weekend I performed a quick calibration with a lens aperture at -7, custom Gamma on Cinema mode I came up with with a max FL of 12.96. I would like to close the lens down but I feel it will be to dim. Those that have had the lens close what kind of FL where you readings?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Offical JVC DLA-RS4810 Owners Thread