AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › DIY Speakers and Subs › Stereo Integrity's new HT Subwoofer
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Stereo Integrity's new HT Subwoofer - Page 23

post #661 of 1715
The CHT is more of a hybrid driver like a cross between a sub and a pro driver. The surround is smaller than all the subs I've had but not accordian like most pro. Because of this it's high in sensitivity and most will attest has great midbass. With multiples you can definitely achieve ulf, it's just not the best tool for the job for that sole purpose.
post #662 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Smith View Post

Plenty of misinformation here. rolleyes.gif
First thing to note is the CHT sub compared in that graph is the VS18.1; which is a single 18" in a vented cabinet, and not the dual 18" sealed that SeaNile is getting a pair of.
Second thing to note is the CHT sub is not even compared against the Stereo Integrity 18" that this thread is about; it's the Dayton 18" instead (which admittedly is extremely close).
Third thing (and most important as far as skewing of data) is that graph shown is of the 'basic response'; not max output. I'm not smart enough to say exactly what 'basic response' is, but I can tell you that a single SI 18 also 'destroys' a DTS-10
s basic response of 72-90 dB from 10-50 Hz as well.
I am not a CHT fanboy at all (never owned anything they make), but if that was meant to be any kind of 'comparison', the layman taking a glance at that post might thing the CHT is a POS. The CHT products are pretty dang nice for the guy that doesn't want to make his own stuff but wants alot of the performance that DIY can offer.
On another not dlbeck, how were you able to get that comparison graph posted? I've tried to post a few Data-Bass comparisons and can't figure out how to link the picture. Printscreen?

My post wasnt the one with the misinformation

I didnt notice at first that it was just a response chart. I brushed off the fact that it was the Dayton since the Dayton and the SI measure similar. the basic response chart isn't about output. And you are correct, the vs is the vented design.
post #663 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian6751 View Post

My post wasnt the one with the misinformation
I didnt notice at first that it was just a response chart. I brushed off the fact that it was the Dayton since the Dayton and the SI measure similar. the basic response chart isn't about output. And you are correct, the vs is the vented design.

I realize you didn't make the original statement (probably should have quoted dlbeck I suppose).

I quoted your post as it was the one that stated "the Dayton kills the CHT." It looked to me that there was the distinct probability that many would casually glance at that and think it was an output comparison...which is what you initially did, right? wink.gif

"Kills the CHT" in what? What exactly is 'basic response'?

As I pointed out, a single sealed 18" SI or Dayton also 'kills' a DTS-10 in basic response. I admit I'm not exactly sure how basic response is defined, but I sure the hell am curious now after this thread! biggrin.gif

My main goal here is to ease SeaNile's mind as it appears to me by the tone of his posts after dlbeck's that he might think he is buying a turd (or two); which isn't the case. smile.gif
post #664 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Smith View Post

I realize you didn't make the original statement (probably should have quoted dlbeck I suppose).
I quoted your post as it was the one that stated "the Dayton kills the CHT." It looked to me that there was the distinct probability that many would casually glance at that and think it was an output comparison...which is what you initially did, right? wink.gif
"Kills the CHT" in what? What exactly is 'basic response'?
As I pointed out, a single sealed 18" SI or Dayton also 'kills' a DTS-10 in basic response. I admit I'm not exactly sure how basic response is defined, but I sure the hell am curious now after this thread! biggrin.gif
My main goal here is to ease SeaNile's mind as it appears to me by the tone of his posts after dlbeck's that he might think he is buying a turd (or two); which isn't the case. smile.gif

No worries. I think the idea of the basic response is just to see how they roll off. That's it. Has nothing to do with max output. You could reverse the names on the chart and it would mean the same thing.
post #665 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpmbc View Post

That graph seems off comparing the Dayton and the cht. A ulf monster it is not but there's no way it should be almost 20db lower in output.

The purpose of that chart isn't to show max output it is to show native frequency response. That is to say a relatively small sealed sub In the dayton 18 sub has a near identical frequency response to a large ported sub using the cht driver. The same cht driver in a sealed box like the dayton will fare worse.

In a large 48' long room like seaniles room he will have very little room gain and he can likely count on buying the additional pair right now. Luke is right, he should probably be looking at a large ported sub/s for that big a room.

We can take this to pm if preferred.
post #666 of 1715
So, for those keeping track at home, basic response is the native frequency response and the output spl levels shown on Data-Bass are meaningless as they will show whatever drive level that Josh happened to be at when recording the sub's response.
post #667 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian6751 View Post

No worries. I think the idea of the basic response is just to see how they roll off. That's it. Has nothing to do with max output. You could reverse the names on the chart and it would mean the same thing.

Correct, the two subs were not measured at the same levels. Only purpose is to see the response of the sub. lets you know if there is any peaking, how flat a response it has and the roll-off at each end.
Reply
Reply
post #668 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpmbc View Post

Regarding excursion, from where the holes are to screw in the driver to the top of the surround is 1”. Does the xmax begin from where the cone rests to the top of the surround or beyond? Trying to account for how close the driver could be to a boundary without hitting it during potential high excursion.

The posted excursion is one way 22mm. but the surround itself will not move that far, the cone will.

Just a few more tasty treats. All are unboxed and seem to operate by touch perfectly smile.gif




Merry Christmas to me smile.gif
post #669 of 1715
Lmao! I like the under the tree shot.

Is that a "commence humping" position in the next one? Lololol
post #670 of 1715
Not again.
post #671 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post

In a large 48' long room like seaniles room he will have very little room gain and he can likely count on buying the additional pair right now. Luke is right, he should probably be looking at a large ported sub/s for that big a room.

I don't think it's quite like that. If I'm not mistaken, Gorilla83's room has a total length of somewhere around 42' (his HT area is open to the rest of the basement) and he was pretty impressed when he tested 4 of his Daytons. Much of the bass impact has to do with how close you sit to the subs as well. There has been a huge trend to overkilling everything lately with the proliferation of the Dayton and SI drivers, but 4 sealed 18's is still a pretty respectable system. FWIW, the CHT driver is from Eminence and has 19 mm xmax and an Fs of 19.4 Hz...it's not too different than the SI or Dayton.
post #672 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian6751 View Post

Lmao! I like the under the tree shot.
Is that a "commence humping" position in the next one? Lololol

Haha it is more like a WTH was I thinking getting 8 of these??!?! I like to think back once again of the good holiday quote:

"it's not going in our yard Russ! It is going in our Living Room!!!!"

I know the will all fit well downstairs, but dayum they are a sight to behold.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MKtheater View Post

Not again.

Getting an ichy trigger finger yet MK?
post #673 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by beastaudio View Post

Haha it is more like a WTH was I thinking getting 8 of these??!?! I like to think back once again of the good holiday quote:
"it's not going in our yard Russ! It is going in our Living Room!!!!"

LOL! biggrin.gif
Quote:
I know the will all fit well downstairs, but dayum they are a sight to behold.

Sub porn is a definite affliction. I am getting the itch to throw all of the big drivers I have onto the floor and snap a pic that would spin some heads:

8 SI 18's
4 FI 18's (getting 4 more soon)
4 Mach 5 18's
10 Lab 15's
6 JBL 2226J 15's
5 TC 15's
5 Eighteensound 15's (in 5 Yorkville U15 Unitys)
4 MFW 15's

I'll leave out the smaller stuff (including a DTS-10). smile.gif

Soon, I might have to actually use all that garbage in one system just to keep up with some of the sickos on here! biggrin.gif
Edited by Aaron Smith - 1/5/13 at 9:26pm
post #674 of 1715
trade you some mcm 2421 for a SI 18 or lab 15's.. pretty good offer, but its only valid for this holiday season
post #675 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Smith View Post


Third thing (and most important as far as skewing of data) is that graph shown is of the 'basic response'; not max output. I'm not smart enough to say exactly what 'basic response' as tested by Data-Bass is, but I can tell you that a single sealed SI 18 also 'destroys' a DTS-10's basic response of 72-90 dB from 10-50 Hz as well.
yeah, it seems this is the correct chart to post. But as you said, he's talking about the sealed 18.2 CHT offering, not the ported VS18.1.
post #676 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Smith View Post

On another note dlbeck, how were you able to get that comparison graph posted? I've tried to post a few Data-Bass comparisons and can't figure out how to link the picture. Printscreen?

I used the "Snipping Tool" program that comes with Windows 7.
post #677 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Smith View Post

I don't think it's quite like that. If I'm not mistaken, Gorilla83's room has a total length of somewhere around 42' (his HT area is open to the rest of the basement) and he was pretty impressed when he tested 4 of his Daytons. Much of the bass impact has to do with how close you sit to the subs as well. There has been a huge trend to overkilling everything lately with the proliferation of the Dayton and SI drivers, but 4 sealed 18's is still a pretty respectable system. FWIW, the CHT driver is from Eminence and has 19 mm xmax and an Fs of 19.4 Hz...it's not too different than the SI or Dayton.

Guys I've measured John's (Seanile) room recently and it actually does have a fair amount of gain. I believe his length is closer to 36' or so and he sits about 18' from the subs. Heck my room is also 44' long and I get a lot of reinforcement below 20hz.

He is still taking a huge step up from the 12" Captivator versions. At 800 a pop I'm not aware of a better value outside of DIY for twin capable 18s?

Sorry I didn't mean to sidetrack further but there was so much chatter I had to clarify things. smile.gif
post #678 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gorilla83 View Post

Guys I've measured John's (Seanile) room recently and it actually does have a fair amount of gain. I believe his length is closer to 36' or so and he sits about 18' from the subs. Heck my room is also 44' long and I get a lot of reinforcement below 20hz.
He is still taking a huge step up from the 12" Captivator versions. At 800 a pop I'm not aware of a better value outside of DIY for twin capable 18s?
Sorry I didn't mean to sidetrack further but there was so much chatter I had to clarify things. smile.gif

Does that $800 for the CHT include shipping?

Tell SeaNile that I will replicate your build (4 dual opposed cabs), but load the cabinets up with the SI's. All for the low low price of $4,000 delivered to his doorstep on April 13th!

What a deal!!! lol
Edited by popalock - 1/6/13 at 5:08am
post #679 of 1715
By April 13th I'll either be happy with the 2 subs or will have 4. I'm not too worried about things, whatever I do will be a huge improvement from what I have now.
post #680 of 1715
2 will be fine unless you want more low end, then 4 is the way to go.

I don't want to change as my bass sounds so freaking good right now I would be a complete idiot to change buti have been called worse! I mean I am clean to 130 dBs already, no need for anything else.
post #681 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaNile View Post

By April 13th I'll either be happy with the 2 subs or will have 4. I'm not too worried about things, whatever I do will be a huge improvement from what I have now.
That's a great attitude. I am fairly certain you will be pleased with the toys. Do you have any means to EQ other than audyssey?
post #682 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by zheka View Post

That's a great attitude. I am fairly certain you will be pleased with the toys. Do you have any means to EQ other than audyssey?

+1

$800 for what you are getting is hard to beat given DIY isn't an option for you...yet.
post #683 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by popalock View Post

Does that $800 for the CHT include shipping?
Tell SeaNile that I will replicate your build (4 dual opposed cabs), but load the cabinets up with the SI's. All for the low low price of $4,000 delivered to his doorstep on April 13th!
What a deal!!! lol

I think John was offered a flat 200.00 shipping for either 2 or 4 boxes.

I can say this, there is no way I'd be able to build these boxes by hand, offer them at 800.00, and still make any notable profit. Well, at least not for anything more than minimum wage for labor, heh. The new 18.2 cabinets are pretty slick and appear well made.
post #684 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by zheka View Post

That's a great attitude. I am fairly certain you will be pleased with the toys. Do you have any means to EQ other than audyssey?

I'm pretty fortunate that Gorilla83 lives about 5 minutes from my house and has been kind enough to help me out with my system. Right now my system is sounding the best ever from him tweaking a few things. Once these CHT's arrive I'll get them inside and hooked up for a while before Andrew comes over. That way they are warmed up and have begun their breaking in period.

I'm thinking by this time next week I'll have a good idea of what my system can do. That also gives R&L/CHT a full week to get them shipped to me.
post #685 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaNile View Post

I'm pretty fortunate that Gorilla83 lives about 5 minutes from my house and has been kind enough to help me out with my system. Right now my system is sounding the best ever from him tweaking a few things. Once these CHT's arrive I'll get them inside and hooked up for a while before Andrew comes over. That way they are warmed up and have begun their breaking in period.
I'm thinking by this time next week I'll have a good idea of what my system can do. That also gives R&L/CHT a full week to get them shipped to me.
wished i lived 5 minutes from gorilla83, so he could give me a hand here and there, hah.
post #686 of 1715
Quote:
Originally Posted by wth718 View Post

Hey all,
I just wanted to give you a heads up about the person who made the cab for my custom 18" Mag V2 and will be making another for my 18 D2. He's located in the Hampton, VA area.
Below are some examples of his work. Last link is to a thread mistakenly labelled as the SI HT. That is, in fact, the custom Mag that Nick created for me.
Price included the birch cab, including roundovers, customer grill, speakon connector, feet, and Duratex finish. I of course had to provide the neo magnets, grill cloth, speakon connector, feet, and Duratex. Turned out great, IMO. Just an option for those who want the DIY performance/price, but have neither the skills nor tools to do it yourself.
You can reach him at joeybutts32@gmail.com for direct quotes.
Backyard Outdoor Speakers
Bathroom In-wall speakers
Bill Fitz-Maurice Tuba
Poker Table
Khanspire HT Towers
Dayton RS Center Channel
MarkK RS225/28A Surrounds
Overnight Sensations Bookshelves
Current Subwoofer builds
SI 18" HT Subwoofer
Thanks fellas for throwing this up here. For those of you not interested in building, I would be more than happy to ship them for the cost of materials and shipping. I'll post up a few pics of the next two builds starting this week for this insane driver.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stereodude View Post

With an e-mail address like that, how can you not take him seriously? biggrin.gif

Thanks dude. I just let my work show my seriousness.
post #687 of 1715
Well I think this guy is gonna workout just fine smile.gif. I hooked up one to an old 24” box that used to house my maelstrom and have 750 Watts going to it. I was so eager to listen and see some cone movement that I just hooked it up under one main so it's playing full range from 350hz on down. I'm really surprised that it didn't stick out running up that high. Just going by ear, nothing rattles, no bad noises when the cone gets to moving, and it's certainly no one note wonder. Can't wait to have 7 more to join it on the FP14k and all dialed in. Most pleased out the gates.
post #688 of 1715
My "mini-wall" - 12 18" subs (daytons and SIs) and a few other boxes (AVR, etc):



One other note - I have seen both the prototype and production drivers at my place now. The finish on the basket and cone are MUCH nicer on the production models than the prototype I had here previously.

WELL done SI. Awesome, awesome product at this price point.
post #689 of 1715
More driver pics - again the finish is quite a bit nicer than the prototype I received a few weeks back. The packaging was even nicer, too.






When I finish up my mains build, I'm thinking about trying out a few ported boxes with these. I'm thinking of replacing my empires in the living room with 4 x of these in ported boxes powered by my XLS5000. Perhaps a bit too much power, but I'll start the modeling process. biggrin.gif
post #690 of 1715
Andrew, is that driver rim bent? or is that a rubber ring over the frame that can be pushed down? Hard to tell in the pic?

Otherwise - yes the cone and the driver's general cosmetic look is an improvement!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: DIY Speakers and Subs
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › DIY Speakers and Subs › Stereo Integrity's new HT Subwoofer