AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › DIY Speakers and Subs › 7 x RE Audio XXX 18" subs, Infinite Baffle Sub, Ultimate IB build
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

7 x RE Audio XXX 18" subs, Infinite Baffle Sub, Ultimate IB build - Page 16

post #451 of 530
1/27/13 at 9:54pm
Quote:
So you would say that all those guys with Rotary subs are doing it for the bragging rights? .
Rotary sub buyers aren't installing them for 1Hz performance
Quote:
But the whole point is so that I can apply a house curve into the single digits,
Quote:
as FOH pointed out earlier in this thread, the lower you go the louder it needs to be to be heard.

Where higher SPLs make lower frequencies 'audible' are in the mid to upper teens ie 15-16Hz not low single digits.
The frequencies you're talking about will never be 'heard' regardless of SPL, they will only be manifest as room vibration (shake). So it doesn't matter if the system is reproducing 1Hz or 8Hz no one will be able to tell the difference
Quote:
There would be 3 drivers on the left wall of the manifold and 3 drivers on the back wall of the manifold. Would this cancel vibrations?
They must be mounted in opposition to cancel the mechanical reactive forces
Reply
Reply

AVS Top Picks

post #452 of 530
1/28/13 at 12:51am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pitviper33 View Post

For what it's worth, my understanding is that movies are only encored down to 3Hz. Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong on that.
Well these movies all have LF extension to 2hz , Battle of LA, Star Trek, Tron, Batman Begins,The Dark Knight, 9, Amazing Spider-Man, Quantum of Solace and should I go on, b/c there are many more?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas-W View Post

Rotary sub buyers aren't installing them for 1Hz performance

Where higher SPLs make lower frequencies 'audible' are in the mid to upper teens ie 15-16Hz not low single digits.
The frequencies you're talking about will never be 'heard' regardless of SPL, they will only be manifest as room vibration (shake). So it doesn't matter if the system is reproducing 1Hz or 8Hz no one will be able to tell the difference
They must be mounted in opposition to cancel the mechanical reactive forces
Nor did I say I wanted 1hz performance. I said "No need for a rotary sub at all. Should get me flat to 1hz.", which means what it says, I may not need a Rotary Sub to flat to 1 hz, but then again I don't know how much that curve drops off after 2hz??? In any case having the head room to play that low would be welcomed by most who enjoy ULF I would think.
A quote from the Rotarywoofer.com/

"Want to hear what 5Hz sounds like? A new woofer technology unlike any other and a new product category for home audio. This is the first home audio woofer delivering true response to DC. The Thigpen Rotary Woofer is the worlds first true infrasonic home audio or home theater woofer. Conventional subwoofers roll off rapidly below 20Hz. With no cone the rotary woofer achieves high efficiency at very low frequencies. Most subwoofers have a difficult time producing acoustic output below 20Hz at audible levels. They generally require large amounts of equalization, distortion rises rapidly, and even the most expensive available cannot produce significant output below 10Hz. Subwoofer electronics usually contain a cutoff filter which sharply rolls off content to the subwoofer below 20Hz to protect the speaker. On the other hand, the rotary woofer has enough acoustic output to move an open door back and forth .5” between 1 and 5Hz! It has enough output to find resonance frequencies of walls and ceilings in a room. It requires no equalization to achieve flat response to below 1Hz. Microphones have low frequency capability that far exceeds the low frequency output of current subwoofers. In many cases infrasonic information is in a recording, it is not being reproduced by the sound system.
A missing link in sound reproduction. Experience special effects like never before. If you want to hear and feel the 11hz hertz fundamental frequency from a helicopter rotor, the low frequency rumble of wind, the space of a concert hall or infrasonic information contained in an explosion, this is the only woofer technology available. Over the years the generally accepted low frequency limit of hearing has been 20Hz, some suggesting 16Hz. However nothing existed to produce significant enough output to change this belief. This development will spawn new special effects and we will begin to understand the true low frequency limit of human hearing. The TRW-17 rotary woofer is now being used in theme park attractions, concert venues, professional audio applications and research projects."

And this is also from that web page and is was the reason why I thought that it was possible to hear ULF even in the single digits. 115db @ 3hz.. Is this graph wrong?



Thanks for the info on the opposing drivers, much appreciated. smile.gif

BTW , I am no expert and I probably know as much about subs as you guys have forgotten. I just want a great experience while watching my favorite movies.

Cheers Dave

.
Edited by JapanDave - 1/28/13 at 1:01am
Reply
Reply
post #453 of 530
1/28/13 at 4:19am
Quote:
Originally Posted by JapanDave View Post




Thanks for the info on the opposing drivers, much appreciated. smile.gif

BTW , I am no expert and I probably know as much about subs as you guys have forgotten. I just want a great experience while watching my favorite movies.

Cheers Dave

Dave, at this point, I'm going to have to let someone smarter than I weigh in. Just keep in mind the drastically different methodologies behind either approach you decide on.

While adding 12 more RE XXX may potentially get you the same amount of extension as the TRW-17 down to 1Hz, I just want to again remind you of the intrinsic cost associated with adding that much more fire power:

1. Additional dedicated circuits ($X,XXX)
2. Additional Amps ($X,XXX)
3. Additional Drivers ($X,XXX)
4. Engineering design to support 1,200lbs of additional subwoofage ($X,XXX)

vs.

TRW-17 Turn Key design & installation about $25K…

While I consider myself an unwavering ULF enabler, and I'm all for helping you spend your money, even I seriously doubt that you will be able to ascertain a notable difference in an increase in output between 2.5Hz down to 1Hz… Definitely not $25K+ worth.

On the other hand… Right now, given you are at reference (let's call reference 105db) @ 2.5Hz with 4 RE XXX, If you purchased 9 additional RE XXX to supplement the 3 you have yet to install (total of 16 RE XXX), I think 117db @ 2.5Hz and a +12db gain accross the spectrum should be fun… Maybe even dangerous?

I've never experienced anything like that, so if that doesn't induce vertigo and/or nausea to your audience, I'm not sure what else will…

I've always wanted to visit Japan. 16 RE XXX might further justify the trip. If I do, I'll be sure to take my Airsickness bag with me from the plane.
Reply
Reply
post #454 of 530
1/28/13 at 7:31am
Dave,

Are you ever going to hit the limits of what you have now? If not I would save your cash. At the levels I listen to movies I am using maybe 10% of the headroom. I can't even see cone movement except on the heaviest LFE. REF level playback of any movie is nothing for it. Truthfully 4 would easily get the job done for me. All 8 gives me minimum short term output of >127dB from 6Hz on up which I have measured and in the process broke quite a few things throughout the house. Most of the range there is 135dB worth of headroom if not more. And I am amplifier not excursion limited. I would never listen to anything with this type of level in my home. Even the very short duration CEA-2010 tone bursts were uncomfortable and making me fear something would break which eventually happened at 32Hz when a large picture came off of the wall in the foyer and broke the frame and glass out of the front on the tile floor. That is just a split second burst signal.

Anyway what I am saying is if you really feel like you need more than 4, get 4 more for the back manifold. 8 is 104L of displacement. Forget liters or cc's that is over 3.5 cubic ft of air displacement. I am all for overkill but I dont see how you could ever need more than that. You would just be increasing the cost and complexity of the system for capabilities that will never be used.

My 2 cents
Edited by Ricci - 1/28/13 at 7:41am
Reply
Reply
post #455 of 530
1/28/13 at 7:39am
I have 36 liters of displacement which is more than any movie can give. I would bet even half that is overkill.
Reply
Reply
post #456 of 530
1/28/13 at 9:46am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricci View Post

Dave,

Are you ever going to hit the limits of what you have now? If not I would save your cash. At the levels I listen to movies I am using maybe 10% of the headroom. I can't even see cone movement except on the heaviest LFE. REF level playback of any movie is nothing for it. Truthfully 4 would easily get the job done for me. All 8 gives me minimum short term output of >127dB from 6Hz on up which I have measured and in the process broke quite a few things throughout the house. Most of the range there is 135dB worth of headroom if not more. And I am amplifier not excursion limited. I would never listen to anything with this type of level in my home. Even the very short duration CEA-2010 tone bursts were uncomfortable and making me fear something would break which eventually happened at 32Hz when a large picture came off of the wall in the foyer and broke the frame and glass out of the front on the tile floor. That is just a split second burst signal.

Anyway what I am saying is if you really feel like you need more than 4, get 4 more for the back manifold. 8 is 104L of displacement. Forget liters or cc's that is over 3.5 cubic ft of air displacement. I am all for overkill but I dont see how you could ever need more than that. You would just be increasing the cost and complexity of the system for capabilities that will never be used.

My 2 cents

Werd. Well said, Josh.

Also, you're fighting an up hill battle, in the snow and with no shoes on chasing 1hz extension.
Reply
Reply
post #457 of 530
1/28/13 at 10:21am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Simonian View Post

Werd. Well said, Josh.

Also, you're fighting an up hill battle, in the snow and with no shoes on chasing 1hz extension.

Take note. First time I have ever seen Scott say anything was enough. biggrin.gif

I'm going to print screen this...
Reply
Reply
post #458 of 530
1/28/13 at 10:34am
Quote:
Originally Posted by popalock View Post

Take note. First time I have ever seen Scott say anything was enough. biggrin.gif

I'm going to print screen this...

Omg, I know! What was I thinking?

Well... to be fair, I was just agreeing with Josh for Dave's sake. wink.gif Me on the other hand.... I'll bury myself in subwoofers.

With all these nice, cheap drivers available now, I'm pushing for surround bass. It's about time it had it's day! smile.gif
Reply
Reply
post #459 of 530
1/28/13 at 11:07am
Quote:
Originally Posted by MKtheater View Post

I have 36 liters of displacement which is more than any movie can give. I would bet even half that is overkill.

I would agree. I have half what you have and I have a tremendous amount of clean bass.
AVScience Insider

Buy Gear From AVS

» Get the latest news and updates at the AVScience sponsor page.
Reply
AVScience Insider

Buy Gear From AVS

» Get the latest news and updates at the AVScience sponsor page.
Reply
post #460 of 530
1/28/13 at 11:19am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Simonian View Post

Omg, I know! What was I thinking?

Small lapse in judgement bro. I won't fault you for it... You won't catch me preaching that common sense BS!

biggrin.gif

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Simonian View Post

Well... to be fair, I was just agreeing with Josh for Dave's sake. wink.gif Me on the other hand.... I'll bury myself in subwoofers.

Bury yourself "in" subs or with your subs...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Simonian View Post

With all these nice, cheap drivers available now, I'm pushing for surround bass. It's about time it had it's day! smile.gif

There's the Scott we all know. 7.7 surround.
Reply
Reply
post #461 of 530
1/28/13 at 1:59pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by AV Science Sales 5 View Post

I would agree. I have half what you have and I have a tremendous amount of clean bass.

I have the 104L 8 pack Dave is talking about and it is totally excessive . Friends are picking their jaws up off the floor long before the drivers are even stretching their legs. Of course it does depend on the space you are in quite a bit but unless it is a gym or ballroom sized space...

BTW I just realized who you were the other day Mike. I was wondering where you had been and didnt know you had changed your handle.
Reply
Reply
post #462 of 530
1/28/13 at 2:26pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricci View Post

I have the 104L 8 pack Dave is talking about and it is totally excessive . Friends are picking their jaws up off the floor long before the drivers are even stretching their legs. Of course it does depend on the space you are in quite a bit but unless it is a gym or ballroom sized space...

BTW I just realized who you were the other day Mike. I was wondering where you had been and didnt know you had changed your handle.

Hi Josh. I know what you mean about the drivers hardly moving and I don't have anything near what you have. I will play a bass heavy scene at reference and it has so much low end, that I get concerned, how much the drivers are moving (can't see them in the dark). So I turn on the lights and play the scene over again and the drivers are hardly moving.

How is the music going? Been playing many gigs?
AVScience Insider

Buy Gear From AVS

» Get the latest news and updates at the AVScience sponsor page.
Reply
AVScience Insider

Buy Gear From AVS

» Get the latest news and updates at the AVScience sponsor page.
Reply
post #463 of 530
1/28/13 at 6:22pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by popalock View Post

Dave, at this point, I'm going to have to let someone smarter than I weigh in. Just keep in mind the drastically different methodologies behind either approach you decide on.

While adding 12 more RE XXX may potentially get you the same amount of extension as the TRW-17 down to 1Hz, I just want to again remind you of the intrinsic cost associated with adding that much more fire power:

1. Additional dedicated circuits ($X,XXX)
2. Additional Amps ($X,XXX)
3. Additional Drivers ($X,XXX)
4. Engineering design to support 1,200lbs of additional subwoofage ($X,XXX)

vs.

TRW-17 Turn Key design & installation about $25K…

While I consider myself an unwavering ULF enabler, and I'm all for helping you spend your money, even I seriously doubt that you will be able to ascertain a notable difference in an increase in output between 2.5Hz down to 1Hz… Definitely not $25K+ worth.

On the other hand… Right now, given you are at reference (let's call reference 105db) @ 2.5Hz with 4 RE XXX, If you purchased 9 additional RE XXX to supplement the 3 you have yet to install (total of 16 RE XXX), I think 117db @ 2.5Hz and a +12db gain accross the spectrum should be fun… Maybe even dangerous?

I've never experienced anything like that, so if that doesn't induce vertigo and/or nausea to your audience, I'm not sure what else will…

I've always wanted to visit Japan. 16 RE XXX might further justify the trip. If I do, I'll be sure to take my Airsickness bag with me from the plane.
That is the problem with me, I get confused with the doubling the power gets you X amount of db's and the doubling of drivers get you x amount addition db's. Those figures make it a lot clear thanks. And the thing is , that graph is not max SPL yet with the 4, the baffle wall and the room being what it is really boosts the ULF. Thanks for the detailed post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricci View Post

Dave,

Are you ever going to hit the limits of what you have now? If not I would save your cash. At the levels I listen to movies I am using maybe 10% of the headroom. I can't even see cone movement except on the heaviest LFE. REF level playback of any movie is nothing for it. Truthfully 4 would easily get the job done for me. All 8 gives me minimum short term output of >127dB from 6Hz on up which I have measured and in the process broke quite a few things throughout the house. Most of the range there is 135dB worth of headroom if not more. And I am amplifier not excursion limited. I would never listen to anything with this type of level in my home. Even the very short duration CEA-2010 tone bursts were uncomfortable and making me fear something would break which eventually happened at 32Hz when a large picture came off of the wall in the foyer and broke the frame and glass out of the front on the tile floor. That is just a split second burst signal.

Anyway what I am saying is if you really feel like you need more than 4, get 4 more for the back manifold. 8 is 104L of displacement. Forget liters or cc's that is over 3.5 cubic ft of air displacement. I am all for overkill but I dont see how you could ever need more than that. You would just be increasing the cost and complexity of the system for capabilities that will never be used.

My 2 cents
Quote:
Originally Posted by MKtheater View Post

I have 36 liters of displacement which is more than any movie can give. I would bet even half that is overkill.
Thanks for the input Ricci & MK, it is hard to know when to stop, but I do want the IB at the back of the room to even the base out a bit more and I already have the drivers, so I guess I will stick with the plan of adding the drivers to back of the room to complement the front 4 drivers at the front and I won't worry about going with a 6 or 9 driver manifold, just stick with the line array I had planned. I know you are right about the complexity of integration, and since I will be the one integrating them I guess I better keep it simple.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Simonian View Post

Werd. Well said, Josh.

Also, you're fighting an up hill battle, in the snow and with no shoes on chasing 1hz extension.
Lucky I am off the Hokkaido for a sky trip next month, I may be able to try that out!!!!tongue.giftongue.giftongue.gif
Reply
Reply
post #464 of 530
1/28/13 at 9:18pm
I like the idea of adding more to smooth out response. Especially since it will be even more XXX18's. biggrin.gif

However, expecting 1hz extension is unrealistic but not because you don't have the displacement capability. Not at all. It's all limited by electronics <5hz. I have never seen consumer equipment flat to DC that we'd use in an HT environment. There might be some device that can do it but not everything in the signal chain. Sooo... enjoy your 3hz extension. wink.gifbiggrin.gif
Reply
Reply
post #465 of 530
1/29/13 at 9:07am
Dave,

You already have the other 3 drives? I would get a 4th and do an opposed design to balance out the forces. Also I assume you will use the same amplifier or model for the second set of 4 subs? That will keep your drive level matched for both sets of drives. If you go with three the impedance will be different and your gain structure and drive level of the 3 drivers will be different from the front four.
Reply
Reply
post #466 of 530
1/29/13 at 5:16pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricci View Post

Dave,

You already have the other 3 drives? I would get a 4th and do an opposed design to balance out the forces. Also I assume you will use the same amplifier or model for the second set of 4 subs? That will keep your drive level matched for both sets of drives. If you go with three the impedance will be different and your gain structure and drive level of the 3 drivers will be different from the front four.

Yes, I have the 3 drivers here. If I do a 4th, I will have to figure outr a way to mount them, but should not be a problem. Yes the amp will be the same.

On a different note, I need urgent advise.

I just was going through the RS20i setup menu and I realised that for my last movie I had played the entire movie with the 4 subs on the center channel. So I was feeding the subs a full range signal. Would this have damaged them? I did not watch the movie anywhere near reference levels.

Why I ask is b/c I went to test them in REW to see if I done some damage they they played them back I was getting all sorts of funky sounds, like scrapping sounds and vurtually no output at all. (I am using the beta HDMI REW)

But after playing a bit more I got the below measurements (Purposfully with low SPL) with the subs on a different channel. Does the below graph indicate any damage? (BTW, I was also playing around with the delays, so there may a few differences in the graph from the other day).



I am so hopeless at all this!!!!mad.gif
Reply
Reply
post #467 of 530
1/29/13 at 5:52pm
High frequencies shouldn't damage a woofer. They'll just sound bad.
Reply
Reply
post #468 of 530
1/29/13 at 7:22pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott C. View Post

High frequencies shouldn't damage a woofer. They'll just sound bad.
That is good to know, thanks

I forgot to mention that there were no strange noise when I did the sweep in that last graph above.
Reply
Reply
post #469 of 530
2/8/13 at 11:33pm
Thread Starter 
OK, after a bit of head scratching and consulting with the Engineer, I came up with a dual opposed design like this.

Will a staggered design like this work to cancel vibrations from the drivers?

This is the veiw from the back room, the drivers will be have their faces pointing into the room, since I don't have the height to do a 4 driver line array, this is the next best thing, sort like a huge outie design.

Reply
Reply
post #470 of 530
2/9/13 at 9:47am
This is an interesting question Dave. I have always assumed that to truly benefit from the dual opposed design, the drivers had to be mounted directly opposite of the opposed driver. Great question. I look forward to those that know chiming in.
Reply
Reply
post #471 of 530
2/9/13 at 10:15am
Keeping the drivers on common axes (the ˝normal" opposed design) would still be preferred, but the design you've shown should give you 90% of the benefit. You'll get a little twisting moment resultant that the ideal design doesn't have, but your relatively tall manifold will be fairly good at reacting that.

Is your sketch not to scale? It looks like the drivers are shallow enough that you could actually scoot them to common axes. Will that not work? I'm Aldo not sure of the cooling mechanism employed by these drivers, so that may be what's keeping you from aligning them.
Edited by pitviper33 - 2/9/13 at 11:52am
Reply
Reply
post #472 of 530
2/9/13 at 3:08pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pitviper33 View Post

Keeping the drivers on common axes (the ˝normal" opposed design) would still be preferred, but the design you've shown should give you 90% of the benefit. You'll get a little twisting moment resultant that the ideal design doesn't have, but your relatively tall manifold will be fairly good at reacting that.

Is your sketch not to scale? It looks like the drivers are shallow enough that you could actually scoot them to common axes. Will that not work? I'm Aldo not sure of the cooling mechanism employed by these drivers, so that may be what's keeping you from aligning them.
The sketch is pretty much to scale with placement, but the depth of the drivers are not. I have 24" wide opening and the drivers are nearly 15" deep, so a conventional opposing design is a no go.

See pic below.

Reply
Reply
post #473 of 530
2/9/13 at 7:46pm
If you could spare the height, another option would be to orient them like this:

>
<<br /> <<br /> >

As before, just put them as close together as you can. But because one pair of drivers isn't nested anymore, this has to be a little taller than your sketch. The advantage is that this configuration would be completely inert, just like the standard opposed setup.

But if there isn't room for that, don't worry. The option you presented is still good and gets you most of the benefit of the opposed design.
Reply
Reply
post #474 of 530
2/10/13 at 5:39pm
Thread Starter 
All I have is 73 inches to play with. I don't quite understand the setup you described?
Reply
Reply
post #475 of 530
2/11/13 at 4:42am
Haha... no wonder you didn't understand! My little text image didn't work at all. It got interpreted as html or something. Let me try again with parenthases representing drivers instead.
)-
-(
-(
)-

The basic idea is to have the top and bottom drivers facing the same way as each other. Then have the two middle drivers facing the other way. The middle two drivers wont nest together as well as in the alternating design, so that forces it to be a little taller. But if it still packages short enough to fit, it has the advantage of completely cancelling its own vibrations.
Reply
Reply
post #476 of 530
2/13/13 at 6:47am
Thread Starter 
I have been playing with the LP and I moved it forward a tad and this is what I got. Safe to say I never imagined that moving the main listening position forward would change the in room response this much.
I purposefully bumped the area from 22hz and below, other wise it would be flat. The biggest win I found was that the waterfall plot .

All measurements done with Audix TM1 and sound devices USBPre 2 mic pre amp.
Edited by JapanDave - 2/15/13 at 3:17am
Reply
Reply
post #477 of 530
2/13/13 at 7:52am
Dude is just running sweeps at 118dB's to 5 hz. That is plain stupid biggrin.gif;) Waterfall and graph look freakin awesome, are you doing any smoothing?
Reply
Reply
post #478 of 530
2/13/13 at 8:02am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by beastaudio View Post

Dude is just running sweeps at 118dB's to 5 hz. That is plain stupid biggrin.gif;) Waterfall and graph look freakin awesome, are you doing any smoothing?
No smoothing. And that is getting pretty close to max SPL for 4 drivers, I am not going to try and get any higher readings as I don't know how to tell how close I am to excursion limits.
Edited by JapanDave - 2/13/13 at 8:07am
Reply
Reply
post #479 of 530
2/13/13 at 8:49am
They should start to make some ugly noises when they get there dave. I still have not got mine to max, everything in the house shakes to a point of serious concern
Reply
Reply
post #480 of 530
2/13/13 at 9:08am
My mic and or electronics fall off at 5hz as well but that does not mean I don't get to 3hz. I have not measured 3hz but I will take a sweep with THD and see. I just replaced my processor and amps so maybe I will have less rolloff, maybe. It looks good to me, you were +/- 6 dBs from 3.2 hz and up so I won't mess with it too much. I like the blue response better!
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: DIY Speakers and Subs

AVS Top Picks

AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › DIY Speakers and Subs › 7 x RE Audio XXX 18" subs, Infinite Baffle Sub, Ultimate IB build