AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › 2 Channel Audio › A/V Reciever Pre-out to Integrated Tube Question
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

A/V Reciever Pre-out to Integrated Tube Question

post #1 of 26
Thread Starter 
I've searched for this but get bits and pieces so I thought I'd seek advice on my exact issue/question.

After sliding down the HT slippery slope I decided to upgrade my 2 channel set up. To that end I've purchased a set of Salk Songtowers and a Jolida intigrated tube amp.

I just recentley built my home and pre wired so that I have an AV closet with speaker wires running into the living room (where I will do my 2 channel listening). We do most of our listening through our squeezebox duet using Pandora or CD ripped (MP3 format) into my office PC.


When I first got the speakers and amp home (bought them from the same guy) I put the amp on the floor (not realistic long term), plugged Oppo BDP-83 to amp, ran wires from amp to Salks and thought it sounded great.

My question is this. Would you?

a. Go from the AV reciever (Pioneer Elite VSX-23) pre-out to the intigrated amp to the speakers using the existing, in wall, wires. This keeps all gear in closet.

b. Use the intigrated amp on Zone 2 of the AV reciever?

c. Hook the tube amp directley to the speakers from the AV closet. This option becomes an issue of ease of operation for other (wife) family members.

Is there a huge differance from direct CD to MP3 through squeezebox? I know I could set up the different scenarios but it is time consuming and doesn't nec. allow A/B comparisons on the spot.

Thanks for your input.

Jamie
post #2 of 26
d) Sell the Jolida.
post #3 of 26
^Harsh, but I have to say I agree. The Jolida isn't going to do anything to help, and if anything will only color the sound.
post #4 of 26
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by A9X-308 View Post

d) Sell the Jolida.

Quote:
Originally Posted by beaveav View Post

^Harsh, but I have to say I agree. The Jolida isn't going to do anything to help, and if anything will only color the sound.

It would certainley keep it easy. I think the Pioneer is a good AVR and am not sure how much better, if at all, the Jolida sounds.
post #5 of 26
I have a Marantaz receiver and feed the left and right channels from pre-out to Jolida 502A Works fine. Marantaz does center and surround. Also have turntable and one CD player just into Jolida for stereo without using HT reciver which has TV and BluRAy connected to it.
post #6 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamie ford View Post

am not sure how much better, if at all, the Jolida sounds.
Not a case of better but worse.
post #7 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by A9X-308 View Post

Not a case of better but worse.

To some, to others not.....its called preference.

Tubes add distortion, some prefer it, some dont.
Depending on your speakers and listening environment
you may or may not hear a difference.

Make your mind up for yourself, if you
feel theres no difference I'd sell the Jolida.
post #8 of 26
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perry R View Post

To some, to others not.....its called preference.
Tubes add distortion, some prefer it, some dont.
Depending on your speakers and listening environment
you may or may not hear a difference.
Make your mind up for yourself, if you
feel theres no difference I'd sell the Jolida.

I will need to do an a/b set up for sure. I suppose I was being a little lazy but if I'm going to keep the tube amp I should make sure it is an improvement.
post #9 of 26
I currently have a seperate area for my 2 channel system. In our last house, we had to share an area with where we watched movies. When I had this set up, I had a Cayin TA-30 tube integrade and then a seperate tube preamp and 100 watt tube amps for the two channel setup and my seperates for the home theater setup. To me, there was a difference between my tube gear and the seperates I had for home theater. That is why I bought them and tried several setups before deciding on what I ended up with. When I shared the same space I used a splitter that allowed me to use different amps with the same speakers. It worked well for me. I ran my tube based cd player through the tube equipment. I do not know how I would use Pandora through a system like yours. Hopefully someone will point you in the right direction without criticizing your choices.

Jeff
post #10 of 26
Squeezebox into the Jolida. All in the living room (unless you gear closet allows for short speaker cable runs). Rerip all your CDs to lossless.
post #11 of 26
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Chemist View Post

Squeezebox into the Jolida. All in the living room (unless you gear closet allows for short speaker cable runs). Rerip all your CDs to lossless.

I need to re-rip into lossless. The speaker wire run from closet is about 20 to 25 ft.

I need to a/b the Jolida vs. AVR.
post #12 of 26
Replace the Chinese made stock tubes with American made tubes for the Jolida. Usually they're called "New Old Stock". You'll hear the difference. Tubes have an advantage over solid state in transient sounds. The electrons travel faster in a vacuum than through silicon transistors. Some people hear the difference, some don't.
post #13 of 26
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tazishere View Post

Replace the Chinese made stock tubes with American made tubes for the Jolida. Usually they're called "New Old Stock". You'll hear the difference. Tubes have an advantage over solid state in transient sounds. The electrons travel faster in a vacuum than through silicon transistors. Some people hear the difference, some don't.

It came with two sets of tubes. It currentley has KT88SC tubes. Looking forwards to the a/b. If I like the Jolida over the AVR do you think its better to run direct from the AV closet via the 25', in wall, wires or is it ok to use the AVR pre outs and control all input function through the AVR?

It will be very difficult, if not imposible, to use a shorter speaker wire and have the Jolida within a few feet of the songtowers.

Thanks.
post #14 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tazishere View Post

Tubes have an advantage over solid state in transient sounds. The electrons travel faster in a vacuum than through silicon transistors.
That's priceless.
post #15 of 26
And hilarious! biggrin.gif
post #16 of 26
It's ludicrous! preposterous! Who told you to put the balm on?biggrin.gif
post #17 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tazishere View Post

Replace the Chinese made stock tubes with American made tubes for the Jolida. Usually they're called "New Old Stock". You'll hear the difference.

Which begs the question, who ever did good bias-controlled tests to verify claims like these?

I am aware of a DBT of a classic tubed amp versus a SS amp that ended up with a hung jury, suggesting that a lot of this "sounds better" posturing is just that, posturing.
Quote:
Tubes have an advantage over solid state in transient sounds.

The inverse is true. Tubed amps with OPTs have that giant boat-anchor standing between them and SS-like transient response.
Quote:
The electrons travel faster in a vacuum than through silicon transistors.

Not true

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_resistivity_and_conductivity

"
In metals, the Fermi level lies in the conduction band (see Band Theory, above) giving rise to free conduction electrons. However, in semiconductors the position of the Fermi level is within the band gap, approximately half-way between the conduction band minimum and valence band maximum for intrinsic (undoped) semiconductors. This means that at 0 kelvins, there are no free conduction electrons and the resistance is infinite. However, the resistance will continue to decrease as the charge carrier density in the conduction band increases. In extrinsic (doped) semiconductors, dopant atoms increase the majority charge carrier concentration by donating electrons to the conduction band or accepting holes in the valence band. For both types of donor or acceptor atoms, increasing the dopant density leads to a reduction in the resistance, hence highly doped semiconductors behave metallically. At very high temperatures, the contribution of thermally generated carriers will dominate over the contribution from dopant atoms and the resistance will decrease exponentially with temperature.
"

but even if the speed were the same, the charge carriers in SS have a far shorter distance to move.
Quote:
Some people hear the difference, some don't.

Some people know how to do reliable tests, others just want to believe what they believe.
post #18 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnyk View Post

Which begs the question, who ever did good bias-controlled tests to verify claims like these?
I am aware of a DBT of a classic tubed amp versus a SS amp that ended up with a hung jury, suggesting that a lot of this "sounds better" posturing is just that, posturing.

vs
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnyk View Post

The inverse is true. Tubed amps with OPTs have that giant boat-anchor standing between them and SS-like transient response.
Not true

Seems like to me if there is a "giant boat-anchor standing between them and SS-like transient response" but yet a "DBT of a classic tubed amp versus a SS amp that ended up with a hung jury" then your claim " is just that, posturing".
post #19 of 26
It's entirely possible to have a difference in transient response that's not audibly different in a controlled test.
post #20 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Chemist View Post

Seems like to me if there is a "giant boat-anchor standing between them and SS-like transient response" but yet a "DBT of a classic tubed amp versus a SS amp that ended up with a hung jury" then your claim " is just that, posturing".
Search Carver Challenge.
post #21 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by A9X-308 View Post

Search Carver Challenge.

My point was if the transient response is so much better on solid state but yet no one could tell the difference in a DBT, then who gives a rip?
post #22 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Chemist View Post

My point was if the transient response is so much better on solid state but yet no one could tell the difference in a DBT, then who gives a rip?
If you'd read and understood the results of the challenge, then you'd understand that was (part of) the point. Transfer function determines amp sonics and it doesn't really matter how you do it. The CC challenged showed that a talented designer could use a cheap SS amp and change the TF so that some supposedly highly skilled listeners could not determine the difference between it and a very expensive brand name amp blind.

The claim was made that tubes have some property that gives improved transient response. Let's for a moment assume that they have this property, then the OPT in tube power amps limits the bandwidth of the design so the dynamic response of the amp will be reduced by it's presence.
post #23 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreeFire View Post

It's entirely possible to have a difference in transient response that's not audibly different in a controlled test.

while that is true...

if it is not audible, what's the point in chasing it?
post #24 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by A9X-308 View Post

If you'd read and understood the results of the challenge, then you'd understand that was (part of) the point. Transfer function determines amp sonics and it doesn't really matter how you do it. The CC challenged showed that a talented designer could use a cheap SS amp and change the TF so that some supposedly highly skilled listeners could not determine the difference between it and a very expensive brand name amp blind.
The claim was made that tubes have some property that gives improved transient response. Let's for a moment assume that they have this property, then the OPT in tube power amps limits the bandwidth of the design so the dynamic response of the amp will be reduced by it's presence.

The funny thing with that is that eventually, Bob switched to making tube amplifiers.
post #25 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Chemist View Post

The funny thing with that is that eventually, Bob switched to making tube amplifiers.
That's an easier way into making money in the niche/boutique world of speciality amps. Plus after having built many of both types, tube amps are more enjoyable to construct and work on. Bob had nothing further to prove and I assume being an electronics nerd still likes to make things that he derives pleasure out of.
post #26 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by A9X-308 View Post

That's an easier way into making money in the niche/boutique world of speciality amps. Plus after having built many of both types, tube amps are more enjoyable to construct and work on. Bob had nothing further to prove and I assume being an electronics nerd still likes to make things that he derives pleasure out of.

I've had similar experiences. Building SS power amps is a lot more stressful because you can blow up 100's of dollars worth of parts in a millisecond with one stupid mistake. Tubes are less likely to be damaged, and when they are in danger of being damaged they take a lot longer to actually be damaged. At least a few seconds. On balance, tubed amps especially really powerful ones or even some low powered SETs can kill you outright if you touch the wrong thing. Most SS amps are more likely to just give you a good strong tingle. Either way you need to know what you are doing and be very careful.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: 2 Channel Audio
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › 2 Channel Audio › A/V Reciever Pre-out to Integrated Tube Question