AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Sony HW50 / BenQ W7000 / Epson 5020 / JVC RS55 / JVC RS 46 / JVC RS4810 / JVC RS56 Mini-shootout 2012-2013
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sony HW50 / BenQ W7000 / Epson 5020 / JVC RS55 / JVC RS 46 / JVC RS4810 / JVC RS56 Mini-shootout... - Page 85

post #2521 of 4168
My REFURB w7000 should be here next week, I'll let people know what I think. Price was good and it comes with 1.03 firmware, Zombie pointed it out to me (Thanks Z). We'll see if I'm still thanking him next week (j/k).
Haven't ordered the glasses yet...

Projector # 12 for me I think since 2006...
Edited by coderguy - 12/27/12 at 7:42pm
post #2522 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

it might be time to break out the hot glue gun. Or create a 'stockade' to hold the lens in place from your heavy bass. smile.gif

Dont give me any ideas! eek.gif This projector is as close overall to 3d nirvana as I have seen (of course things like brightness could still be improved and I would love a more stable lens as well as improved sync with the glasses) and I am bound and determined to resolve this. Looks like I was able to improve and maybe fix the lens movement. Two toothpicks wedged in the joystick and a piece of velcro between the zoom ring and housing may be the ticket from my tests. biggrin.gif

Just watched Sammys in 3d for the first time on the 7000 and WOW was that awesome! Great depth throughout and some amazing pop out moments. No hint of ghosting or flicker and once you throw in the FI......HOLY $HIT! I now know why Zombie and so many others have raved about this one.

Coder,

Good luck on your refurb. I went that route as well and while my first unit had a sharpness issue, my advanced replacement is excellent. So far, I am glad I went this route.
Edited by Toe - 12/27/12 at 10:05pm
post #2523 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toe View Post

Coder,
Good luck on your refurb. I went that route as well and while my first unit had a sharpness issue, my advanced replacement is excellent. So far, I am glad I went this route.

By sharpness issue, do you mean it had a lens problem or just pre-1.03 firmware?

Good to know, I was going to go with a refurb Optoma hd8300 at first, but I missed the timeframe where they had them cheap. I kind of have buyer's remorse a little (just because the hd8300 was my first choice).

Hopefully you guys are right about the FI in 3D, that is why I bought the Benq, although the brightness is great, I am only on a 106" HP screen, so the hd8300 would have been plenty bright enough too in 3D. I figure the sub-par blacks shouldn't be too big of a deal, I mean I didn't buy it to watch space scenes (that's what the JVC is for), I bought it to watch bright 3D.
post #2524 of 4168
Both my machines have/had 1.03. The first unit had a sharpness uniformity issue where I could focus the center/right side of the screen well or the left side but not both. The replacement fixed this (BenQ covered all the shipping).
post #2525 of 4168
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cl7gr View Post

Stephen Withers tested both (new firmware and glasses) and by the score that he gives seems that jvc is better than sony... I am waiting Jason's review to decide... :-)

http://www.avforums.com/reviews/JVC-DLA-X35-X35BE-X35WE-3D-DILA-Projector-Review_452/Review.html
http://www.avforums.com/reviews/Sony-VPL-HW50ES-SXRD-3D-Projector-Review_413/Review.html

There isn't much objective info to go by on these reviews. There is no 3D lumen comparisons, through the lens screenshots or direct A/B comparisons.

If the post firmware RS46/X35 patch makes the 3D the same as the RS4810, then the HW50 is going to exceed it by nearly 2x the 3D output with the CT controls set to factory (0) for minimal crosstalk.

Pre-firmware, the RS46 3D output is ~900 lumens, but with identical performance to the current RS45/55.

The HW50 2D PQ is closer to the JVC this year than the HW30 was last year. It's a tough decision depending on how important 3D is. The HW50 has less flicker and the FI in 3D to consider as well.
post #2526 of 4168
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by coderguy View Post


Hopefully you guys are right about the FI in 3D, that is why I bought the Benq, although the brightness is great, I am only on a 106" HP screen, so the hd8300 would have been plenty bright enough too in 3D. I figure the sub-par blacks shouldn't be too big of a deal, I mean I didn't buy it to watch space scenes (that's what the JVC is for), I bought it to watch bright 3D.

you're going to hate this projector, I can't believe you bought it. we're never going to hear the end of this if you don't like it....

this is all toe's fault. btw, the buttkicker is one of the coolest things ever... this is never going to get old.. it's a perfect extension of my subs.
post #2527 of 4168
@Toe or @Zombie
The Benq's dynamic mode is pretty good right?
I assume I will need to keep the Benq in dynamic mode because I am so sensitive when I watch projectors with 4x color wheels unless I am watching only bright scenes with no black mixed in. On a 4x color wheel, I can even see rainbows in bright scenes somewhat (well only like if a guy was wearing a black leather jacket or a jet black car next to bright white or something). Still it's much worse in dark scenes.
post #2528 of 4168
Thread Starter 
see, it's already starting... biggrin.gif

rainbows, red DLP flash, you're done for...

I'm not sure why, but I saw more rainbows on the HC8000 vs the W7000 but I can't explain why. On the HC8000 when I switched to 6x, it was better but the image was a bit flatter (colors) and we lost some lumens.

Most 3D movies have bright scenes, I don't think it will be a problem in 3D but you'll just have to see how it goes.
post #2529 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

you're going to hate this projector, I can't believe you bought it. we're never going to hear the end of this if you don't like it....
this is all toe's fault. btw, the buttkicker is one of the coolest things ever... this is never going to get old.. it's a perfect extension of my subs.

The only regret I would have is if Sharp updated the firmware to include FI and then found out it could do 800+ lumens in 3D, then yah I'd want the Sharp instead.

Ahh, I know you're half-joking, but I am watching Fringe on my Pro8200 instead of the JVC right now. My cheap Pro8200 has 3000+ hours on it and I still get 14 fL calibrated lumens in ECO mode, how is that for a $500 refurb going 3000 hours on a lamp. I expect the Benq to beat the Viewsonic, so not too worried, it's my 2D workhorse replacement as well as my 3D. The main thing though is, I can actually watch some of my 3D movies without cringing from the ghosting. My RS-45 is completely a joke with 800 hours on it, saying the ghosting is bad doesn't even describe it, it is completely unwatchable now.
Edited by coderguy - 12/27/12 at 11:17pm
post #2530 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

you're going to hate this projector, I can't believe you bought it. we're never going to hear the end of this if you don't like it....
this is all toe's fault. btw, the buttkicker is one of the coolest things ever... this is never going to get old.. it's a perfect extension of my subs.

Nice! cool.gif Glad you are enjoying the BK! I am still amazed how well it blends in with the sub and just seems like a natural extension.
post #2531 of 4168
The old saying is true, this forum is the most expensive place I ever visited. Geeze, now still have to buy a Lumagen, some b-kicker thing, replace HT speakers, get some super blacker than black materials, more 3D glasses.
When does it stop...
Edited by coderguy - 12/27/12 at 10:57pm
post #2532 of 4168
Both you err guys are getting old, it's menapause, nothing more, nothing less. smile.gif

I do want to clear something else that zombie10K I think said.

My comments about Bluray 1080p be so vastly inferior to 2K and 4K DCI content and feeds. Zombie said what I was seeing, flaws in the bluray 1080p medium being visable on because of my superior projector, the 4K Sony VPL-vw1000ES and my reference quality Stewart Snomatt 100 screen.

That is not the reason. Its comparing DCI feeds to commercial 2K and 4K DCI machines and then viewing the same Bluray material on my 1000ES fed by Bluray 1080p. The greater bit depth and absence of edge enhancement compared to 8 bit and severely edge enhanced Bluray content. My comments thus are not dependent on the quality of the 1080p projectors compared to the 1000ES. The projectors under discussion in this thread are fine machines and for many are their proud possessions chosen in part because of the great information presented by zombie and verified and supllemented by many of the participants here. All these machines like any other machines have strengths and weaknesses. many caused by compromises necessitated because of the price points and some of course by the type of technology employed.

My comments go to the weaknesses of Blurays noticed by me and others whose cmpetence would be recognized by all if I were at liberty to identify them not posting here but who have posted in the past based on their observations of DCI content on their commerciasl quality msachines present in theirs HTs. I hope as the late president Kennedy once said, have I made myself perfectly clear?.
post #2533 of 4168
You are not lying..... I need black material now as well
post #2534 of 4168
I miss my old living room, 20+ foot vaulted ceiling so the PJ beam didn't even reflect off the ceiling (it was better than having a blacked out ceiling).
If I could build the ultimate HT room, it would be 50x50 with a 50 feet ceiling, that is the only way to get TRUE black. Although concentrated light does not diminish much, scattered light reflections go outward so in a large room the amount of light scatter that hits the walls and ceiling is very small (but it takes a gigantic room).

Mom, look at that 6 story house (no son the neighbor just built a new HT add-on ROOM).
Edited by coderguy - 12/27/12 at 11:13pm
post #2535 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by coderguy View Post

I miss my old living room at my old place, 20+ foot vaulted ceiling so the PJ beam didn't even reflect off the ceiling (it was better than having a blacked out ceiling).
If I could build the ultimate HT room, it would be 50x50 with a 50 feet ceiling, that is the only way to get TRUE black. Although concentrated light does not diminish much, scattered light reflections go outward so in a large room the amount of light scatter that hits the walls and ceiling is very small (but it takes a gigantic room).
Mom, look at that 6 story house (no son the neighbor just built a new HT add-on ROOM).

Even my lowly x10 looks substantially better in the back yard than it does in the living room... of course, the audio is a different story.
post #2536 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

There isn't much objective info to go by on these reviews. There is no 3D lumen comparisons, through the lens screenshots or direct A/B comparisons.
If the post firmware RS46/X35 patch makes the 3D the same as the RS4810, then the HW50 is going to exceed it by nearly 2x the 3D output with the CT controls set to factory (0) for minimal crosstalk.
Pre-firmware, the RS46 3D output is ~900 lumens, but with identical performance to the current RS45/55.
The HW50 2D PQ is closer to the JVC this year than the HW30 was last year. It's a tough decision depending on how important 3D is. The HW50 has less flicker and the FI in 3D to consider as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

There isn't much objective info to go by on these reviews. There is no 3D lumen comparisons, through the lens screenshots or direct A/B comparisons.
If the post firmware RS46/X35 patch makes the 3D the same as the RS4810, then the HW50 is going to exceed it by nearly 2x the 3D output with the CT controls set to factory (0) for minimal crosstalk.
Pre-firmware, the RS46 3D output is ~900 lumens, but with identical performance to the current RS45/55.
The HW50 2D PQ is closer to the JVC this year than the HW30 was last year. It's a tough decision depending on how important 3D is. The HW50 has less flicker and the FI in 3D to consider as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

There isn't much objective info to go by on these reviews. There is no 3D lumen comparisons, through the lens screenshots or direct A/B comparisons.
If the post firmware RS46/X35 patch makes the 3D the same as the RS4810, then the HW50 is going to exceed it by nearly 2x the 3D output with the CT controls set to factory (0) for minimal crosstalk.
Pre-firmware, the RS46 3D output is ~900 lumens, but with identical performance to the current RS45/55.
The HW50 2D PQ is closer to the JVC this year than the HW30 was last year. It's a tough decision depending on how important 3D is. The HW50 has less flicker and the FI in 3D to consider as well.
I know there isn't objective! That's why I am waiting for your final review... The reason is that I love jvc's 2d and I hope that if with the new firmware fixed the 3d issue then this would be my next projector... 4810 is less brighter in the specs as well... 1300 ANSI for 46 1200 ANSI for 4810... That's the reason I am still hoping... By the end I believe that is better to have a projector with the best 2d possible and an acceptable 3d than the opposite. I prefer jvc to be as close as possible to sony's 3d than sony to be close to jvc's 2d! All this with the hope that after the new firmware rs46 will be like sony in terms of ghosting and a little bit less bright... I own 4000 original DVD and blueray.... Only 43 of them are 3d...
If you translate these reviews from France, they also mention that rs46 is brighter than 4810 ! 939 lumens vs 539!!!

http://www.audiovideohd.fr/tests/351-JVC-X35-5.html
http://www.audiovideohd.fr/tests/342-JVC-DLA-X55-5.html
post #2537 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post

Both you err guys are getting old, it's menapause, nothing more, nothing less. smile.gif
I do want to clear something else that zombie10K I think said.
My comments about Bluray 1080p be so vastly inferior to 2K and 4K DCI content and feeds. Zombie said what I was seeing, flaws in the bluray 1080p medium being visable on because of my superior projector, the 4K Sony VPL-vw1000ES and my reference quality Stewart Snomatt 100 screen.
That is not the reason. Its comparing DCI feeds to commercial 2K and 4K DCI machines and then viewing the same Bluray material on my 1000ES fed by Bluray 1080p. The greater bit depth and absence of edge enhancement compared to 8 bit and severely edge enhanced Bluray content. My comments thus are not dependent on the quality of the 1080p projectors compared to the 1000ES. The projectors under discussion in this thread are fine machines and for many are their proud possessions chosen in part because of the great information presented by zombie and verified and supllemented by many of the participants here. All these machines like any other machines have strengths and weaknesses. many caused by compromises necessitated because of the price points and some of course by the type of technology employed.
My comments go to the weaknesses of Blurays noticed by me and others whose cmpetence would be recognized by all if I were at liberty to identify them not posting here but who have posted in the past based on their observations of DCI content on their commerciasl quality msachines present in theirs HTs. I hope as the late president Kennedy once said, have I made myself perfectly clear?.

Hi Mark,

So let's say I had a great source...like the red 4k player. Would we notice a better difference in quality when we play it on our 1080p PJ's>...since the blurays are hampered in quality.

I remember having run my Oppo BDP83 bluray player through my old SD PJ and noticed a difference in picture quality.
post #2538 of 4168
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post

My comments go to the weaknesses of Blurays noticed by me and others whose cmpetence would be recognized by all if I were at liberty to identify them not posting here but who have posted in the past based on their observations of DCI content on their commerciasl quality msachines present in theirs HTs. I hope as the late president Kennedy once said, have I made myself perfectly clear?.

everyone know that 4K Redray or a 2K commercial stream is going to be better than bluray. There is no arguments here.

my comment was based on your criticism that people shouldn't obsess over fan noise or 3D performance. By that idea, they shouldn't be concerned about BD quality either.... this is a comparison thread and these are the projector qualities folks are interested in. There are a number of other threads to discuss BD quality vs. the pending future formats.

I know folks will be looking forward to your observations of seeing some real 4K content on the VW1000. It's a look into the future, but not something that is viable today or tomorrow for the vast majority of forum visitors. We are stuck with BD for now but I'll have to find a way to suffer through the terrible PQ until the future arrives. cool.gif
post #2539 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

If the post firmware RS46/X35 patch makes the 3D [/b]the same as the RS4810, then the HW50 is going to exceed it by nearly 2x the 3D output with the CT controls set to factory (0) for minimal crosstalk.
Pre-firmware, the RS46 3D output is ~900 lumens, but with identical performance to the current RS45/55.

Are you planning to update your RS46 and give a report? So far, nobody has reported anything on lumen output with updated RS46/X35 switcher #s.

(which makes me wonder if it's worth the "update" if ghosting is improved at the expense of significant lumens ...)

confused.gifconfused.gifconfused.gif
post #2540 of 4168
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cl7gr View Post

I know there isn't objective! That's why I am waiting for your final review... The reason is that I love jvc's 2d and I hope that if with the new firmware fixed the 3d issue then this would be my next projector... 4810 is less brighter in the specs as well... 1300 ANSI for 46 1200 ANSI for 4810... That's the reason I am still hoping... By the end I believe that is better to have a projector with the best 2d possible and an acceptable 3d than the opposite. I prefer jvc to be as close as possible to sony's 3d than sony to be close to jvc's 2d! All this with the hope that after the new firmware rs46 will be like sony in terms of ghosting and a little bit less bright... I own 4000 original DVD and blueray.... Only 43 of them are 3d...
If you translate these reviews from France, they also mention that rs46 is brighter than 4810 ! 939 lumens vs 539!!!

Hi, you have a look a little closer at those reviews. The X55 was a pre-release model. In a direct A/B with a production RS46 vs. RS4810 (and swapping lamps) the RS4810 was slightly brighter in 2D mode vs. the RS46, despite what the marketing copy says.. so the 939 vs. 539 is invalid.

Here's what we know so far. The RS46 (pre-firmware) is ~900 lumens in 3D. Veteran JVC owners would immediately mistake it for the RS45 on RS55 in 3D, it looks identical. The RS4810 with the current firmware is ~ 559 lumens in 3D mode with CT @ 0 and ~860 lumens with the CT controls @ 8 which has more visible crosstalk.

The HW50 is ~1000 lumens in 3D with no other changes to the controls. I don't know if the RS46 post firmware is going to look identical to the RS4810, we have to wait for a solid report from someone who has seen both. The RS46 I have won't be updated until January some time, so it's going to be a while before I have any more information on this topic.

from your comment above, it sounds like you're leaning towards the JVC since 2D is a primary concern. Folks seeing the HW50 and the JVC in a direct A/B could have a tough time picking a favorite since Sony has increased their PQ from the HW30 to the HW50 by a fair bit. it's definitely not an easy decision picking between the 2.
post #2541 of 4168
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragon Reborn View Post

Are you planning to update your RS46 and give a report? So far, nobody has reported anything on lumen output with updated RS46/X35 switcher #s.

(which makes me wonder if it's worth the "update" if ghosting is improved at the expense of significant lumens ...)
confused.gifconfused.gifconfused.gif

It could be a while, i'm not sure if this one will get updated. So it's not taken out of context, I'm not saying the RS46 pre-firmware has un-watchable 3D. It's fine for quite a number of 3D movies. the biggest complaint is dark on light ghosting. This stands out mainly in 3D animations. I watched Spiderman 3D on my RS55 a few weeks ago and thought it looked great since crosstalk is minimal with this particular movie.

The panels are the same or similar from the 1st gen JVC in 2010, so there had to be a compromise between reducing crosstalk artifacts vs total 3D brightness. This is obviously being done in software considering how different the pre-firmware 46 looks vs the 4810. The change also slightly reduces the contrast and overall depth appearance as well. Personally, i'd probably keep the pre-firmware since I prefer bright 3D and can deal with some of the crosstalk once in a while vs. dimmer 3D.
post #2542 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

Hi, you have a look a little closer at those reviews. The X55 was a pre-release model. In a direct A/B with a production RS46 vs. RS4810 (and swapping lamps) the RS4810 was slightly brighter in 2D mode vs. the RS46, despite what the marketing copy says.. so the 939 vs. 539 is invalid.
Here's what we know so far. The RS46 (pre-firmware) is ~900 lumens in 3D. Veteran JVC owners would immediately mistake it for the RS45 on RS55 in 3D, it looks identical. The RS4810 with the current firmware is ~ 559 lumens in 3D mode with CT @ 0 and ~860 lumens with the CT controls @ 8 which has more visible crosstalk.
The HW50 is ~1000 lumens in 3D with no other changes to the controls. I don't know if the RS46 post firmware is going to look identical to the RS4810, we have to wait for a solid report from someone who has seen both. The RS46 I have won't be updated until January some time, so it's going to be a while before I have any more information on this topic.
from your comment above, it sounds like you're leaning towards the JVC since 2D is a primary concern. Folks seeing the HW50 and the JVC in a direct A/B could have a tough time picking a favorite since Sony has increased their PQ from the HW30 to the HW50 by a fair bit. it's definitely not an easy decision picking between the 2.

I think I keep leaning towards the Sony with all things considered. I think it should work in my room alright. Now I just have to finish said room. Something tells me I'll be projecting onto a bed sheet for the first month or so until I get sheet-rock up.... just a sad (but probably true) prediction.
post #2543 of 4168
I’ve read every page here, and I just want to thank you Zombie for your efforts!
The research you’ve done and especially the ghosting screen shots are so much help to those of us looking for a good 3D projector experience.

I’m an older long-time film collector (16mm!!!) who mostly watches classic content and has a set-up that would make most of you here cringe. Super-long throw (23.4 feet!) and a 12-foot wide painted 1.1 gain screen for full scope (please don’t hate me!), but in a dedicated basement theater room with optimal light conditions, pretty much a “bat-cave” as those around here say, albeit an art-deco one.

I don’t really want the “giant plasma” effect, I’m just trying for a decent old-school film-like theatrical experience, and to me that means SIZE first. I want to be in my neighborhood cinema(s) from the 1960’s and early 70’s. I want to buy a good projector and have it run trouble free for at least 4 years (my last one I kept 7, can you imagine the amount of quality increase I saw on upgrading?) So I very much appreciate the obsessive dedication some of you guys here bring to all of this.

I have a JVC RS40 that I absolutely love, it’s actually bright enough for me in my set-up although I know it wouldn’t be for most here. I am a huge fan of the blacks and the super-smooth picture of D-ILA (I sit crazy close too, I break all the rules), but it recently stopped sending the 3D IR signal. Not the emitter, I tried a new one. Also starting to display an occasional glitch when I switch sources or modes where the image will go all green or sometimes all red/yellow for a second or two. So there’s trouble inside, but I’m still under warranty for another month so I’m sending her in.

BUT even I haven’t been happy with the brightness and ghosting for 3D on this, so here’s my excuse to look into the two-projector dedicated 3D route, because I’m also a serious 3D fan, and again, a big picture is essential to really experience 3D imho. I would go for the BenQ but I’m one who sees rainbows like crazy, and since the Epson 5020 seems to be the brightness champ, and from the screen shots the ghosting seems to be pretty damn minimal, I’m trying one out. Should have it Sunday and can return it for 30 days no questions asked, and best of all can have it while the JVC’s in the shop. My plan is to keep both if they can save the 40 and if I like it just use the Epson for the depthies.

So again, thanks to all here, I really needed your work to make a decision.
One question –
Is there a phone number where I can actually talk to a human being at JVC service? I can’t seem to find one.

And as to the ButtKicker that’s suddenly appeared in the conversation, if someone’s looking for one, contact me.

S A M 33
post #2544 of 4168
I received my HW50 last night and spent a very short time with it.

With the 2 Sony glasses I received I found the glasses to be constantly losing sync. My projector is mounted lower than normal and the emitter is on bottom which is also slightly angled to the side. I'll have to see if mounting the projector slightly higher helps or if I'll have to get the external emitter. I still have to try out my Xpand X104s.

Before I set up the HW50 I viewed a few clips on my RS45 and cycled through different manual iris settings (0, -5, -10, -15). For 2D I have always watched movies with the iris at -15. In this setting I will say that the HW50 (in low lamp mode with either the Auto Iris or Manual Iris) will not do blacks quite like the RS45 (whether we are talking dark or the darkest of dark scenes). For those who must have the blackest of blacks the JVC is going to have the edge if you are willing to clamp down the iris.

The FI and brightness of the HW50 in 3D makes it a much nicer 3D projector over the RS45 however I do find dark scenes looking grayish in 3D on the Sony. frown.gif

Maybe I should try out an ND filter. Yes, I am picky when it comes to black levels. I'll post more late tonight or sometime tomorrow when I can do some more comparisons.
post #2545 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

It could be a while, i'm not sure if this one will get updated. So it's not taken out of context, I'm not saying the RS46 pre-firmware has un-watchable 3D. It's fine for quite a number of 3D movies. the biggest complaint is dark on light ghosting. This stands out mainly in 3D animations. I watched Spiderman 3D on my RS55 a few weeks ago and thought it looked great since crosstalk is minimal with this particular movie.
The panels are the same or similar from the 1st gen JVC in 2010, so there had to be a compromise between reducing crosstalk artifacts vs total 3D brightness. This is obviously being done in software considering how different the pre-firmware 46 looks vs the 4810. The change also slightly reduces the contrast and overall depth appearance as well. Personally, i'd probably keep the pre-firmware since I prefer bright 3D and can deal with some of the crosstalk once in a while vs. dimmer 3D.

Thanks so much for this info, Z!

As a result, until we get more post-update measurements, I will be in no rush to update mine. JVC North America seems to be on "holidays" right now since nobody (dealers, jvc.ca, jvc.com) has a clue about this problem still even though Europe has reported it for several weeks.
post #2546 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by xb1032 View Post

I received my HW50 last night and spent a very short time with it.
With the 2 Sony glasses I received I found the glasses to be constantly losing sync. My projector is mounted lower than normal and the emitter is on bottom which is also slightly angled to the side. I'll have to see if mounting the projector slightly higher helps or if I'll have to get the external emitter. I still have to try out my Xpand X104s.
Before I set up the HW50 I viewed a few clips on my RS45 and cycled through different manual iris settings (0, -5, -10, -15). For 2D I have always watched movies with the iris at -15. In this setting I will say that the HW50 (in low lamp mode with either the Auto Iris or Manual Iris) will not do blacks quite like the RS45 (whether we are talking dark or the darkest of dark scenes). For those who must have the blackest of blacks the JVC is going to have the edge if you are willing to clamp down the iris.
The FI and brightness of the HW50 in 3D makes it a much nicer 3D projector over the RS45 however I do find dark scenes looking grayish in 3D on the Sony. frown.gif
Maybe I should try out an ND filter. Yes, I am picky when it comes to black levels. I'll post more late tonight or sometime tomorrow when I can do some more comparisons.

we will wait a full review from you my friend, i am between epson5020 and sonyhw50es thanks, have nice days with your new proj
post #2547 of 4168
Thank you very much Jason! You are very helpful :-)
post #2548 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

The RS4810 with the current firmware is ~ 559 lumens in 3D mode with CT @ 0 and ~860 lumens with the CT controls @ 8 which has more visible crosstalk.

Hi Z,

I'm not sure if you already answered this or not ...

Is the 3D crosstalk performance on the RS4810 with CT @ 8 noticeably better than the pre-firmware RS46?
post #2549 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

you're going to hate this projector, I can't believe you bought it. we're never going to hear the end of this if you don't like it....
this is all toe's fault. btw, the buttkicker is one of the coolest things ever... this is never going to get old.. it's a perfect extension of my subs.

Glad you like you butt being kicked.smile.gif enjoy
post #2550 of 4168
Quote:
Originally Posted by coderguy View Post

The old saying is true, this forum is the most expensive place I ever visited. Geeze, now still have to buy a Lumagen, some b-kicker thing, replace HT speakers, get some super blacker than black materials, more 3D glasses.
When does it stop...

It never stops. The only thing that stops is you and we all hope that doesn't happen for a very long time. Happy new year.
Edited by mark haflich - 12/28/12 at 9:19am
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Sony HW50 / BenQ W7000 / Epson 5020 / JVC RS55 / JVC RS 46 / JVC RS4810 / JVC RS56 Mini-shootout 2012-2013