AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Sony HW50 / BenQ W7000 / Epson 5020 / JVC RS55 / JVC RS 46 / JVC RS4810 / JVC RS56 Mini-shootout 2012-2013
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sony HW50 / BenQ W7000 / Epson 5020 / JVC RS55 / JVC RS 46 / JVC RS4810 / JVC RS56 Mini-shootout... - Page 126

post #3751 of 4160
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elix View Post

This 'test' is one of the most deceptive (and useless) things in Art's reviews.

even though he does post a disclaimer to take the photos with a grain of salt, readers are inevitiably drawn to the screenshots for the comparisons.

members have asked me to do the same but there is no way I am going down that road. Not until everyone has one of these on their desktop and I get a camera capable of at least 14 stops.

studiomonitor.jpg
post #3752 of 4160
Thread Starter 
Jim, the JVC projectors have a 3 pin 3D VESA port that you can plug a number of transmitters into, including the original JVC IR emitter, the new RF emitter and also the Monster Vision 3D emitter.

Any combination will work with the splitter cable I made. I posted a link in my signature how to make it.

The MV3D's are very comfortable, they are unique in shape / size compared to all of the other glasses.

3d-splitter3.jpg
post #3753 of 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

members have asked me to do the same but there is no way I am going down that road. Not until everyone has one of these on their desktop and I get a camera capable of at least 14 stops.

studiomonitor.jpg
There is still a way to make comparison of black levels using camera. Only this has to be done in a scientific way:
- same environment (no lighting, same objects in the room on the same places);
- all PJ's must be set to the same ftL @ 100% brightness, gamma @ 2.2;
- dynamic contrast must be off;
- camera position must be the same;
- image frame must be the same;
- camera settings must be the same - manual settings with long shutter speed (obviously, the image must be overexposed to show difference in black levels);
- no processing or the same processing after the image has been taken.

Obviously Art don't abide by these rules so his comparisons can't be used to judge projectors' relative black levels.

I remember Coderguy once did a great comparison which showed perceptual black levels of different projectors. I think it was in your thread, Zombie.
post #3754 of 4160
Thread Starter 
I've done those tests before and the results are 1/2 decent, but most will take it out of context which is why I choose not to post those photos. Plus people will see bright corners and freak out.

Also I believe he was using a DLP and the JVC, the results aren't going to be as drastic when comparing the 5020 / HW50 and the JVC's.

The highest contrast DLP i've seen this year was the HC8000 and the black floor was still less than the HW30 from last year and around the Panasonic 8000 (which is several notches behind the 5020 and HW50 and a good distance behind the JVC's).

I watched a calibrated RS4810 last night on the HP screen with my new pitch black ceiling/floor. Dark scenes look amazing when the gamma is adjusted right. There is a certain depth to the image that is hard to reproduce on the other models. The 5020 and HW50 do hold their own though. The Panasonic 8000 & Mitsubishi HC8000 looked muddy to me in these scenes.

The nirvana projector for me would have the best quality of the DLP and LCOS panels in 1 projector. Add in Sony's color system which provides some of the best 'out of the box' colors.
post #3755 of 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

I've done those tests before and the results are 1/2 decent, but most will take it out of context which is why I choose not to post those photos. Plus people will see bright corners and freak out.

Also I believe he was using a DLP and the JVC, the results aren't going to be as drastic when comparing the 5020 / HW50 and the JVC's.

The highest contrast DLP i've seen this year was the HC8000 and the black floor was still less than the HW30 from last year and around the Panasonic 8000 (which is several notches behind the 5020 and HW50 and a good distance behind the JVC's).

I watched a calibrated RS4810 last night on the HP screen with my new pitch black ceiling/floor. Dark scenes look amazing when the gamma is adjusted right. There is a certain depth to the image that is hard to reproduce on the other models. The 5020 and HW50 do hold their own though. The Panasonic 8000 & Mitsubishi HC8000 looked muddy to me in these scenes.

The nirvana projector for me would have the best quality of the DLP and LCOS panels in 1 projector. Add in Sony's color system which provides some of the best 'out of the box' colors.

All we need is a single chip LCOS machine with JVCs iteration for great contrast. They just need to update their chips like Sony did and you'll have good enough Motion. Then use an LED/laser hybrid light engine to eliminate the possibility of RBE. The single chip route eliminates convergence issues and cuts down on costs.

I.don't know why but they stopped development on a single chip LCOS solution years ago. Ideally, if the chip is fast enough, It can do sequential color and be fine with motion. Maybe that was why they didn't have any real production units.
post #3756 of 4160
Thread Starter 
I'd like to know more about this JVC:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXRoiz913nk

Published on Jan 9, 2013

JVC DLA-SH7NLG 4K Projector Demo with RGB Laser Light source shown at I/ITSEC 2012 in Orlando.

This video shows the Approach to SeaTac Airport with stunning imagery created by the Visualization Projector and Rockwell's EP8000 Image Generator.
The SH7 uses a 10 MP (4096 x 2400) 1.27-inch DiLA (LCOS) imager from JVC and this model replaces the dual UHP lamp illumination with a Laser based RGB light stream to give 4000 lumen brightness and 10K:1 contrast. See the video showing the JVC technology in action at I/ITSEC.
post #3757 of 4160
Haha idk. That 10k:1 may upset some people. Unless that is just a commercial number to keep the lumens high.
post #3758 of 4160
Thread Starter 
watch the video, they are claiming the blacks looked excellent. I'm not sure what this projector is or the target audience, but the technology is promising to hear about 4K + e-shift + laser light source.

Is there anything new brewing in the mid-range DLP camp? (3K-10K). It seems the DLP market is currently under 3K models, budget models and PICO units. I have the QUMI 720P DLP and like this little projector. I use it for a monitor sometimes or watching TV at night when I don't care about leaving it on.

It's a shame there isn't something in the 4-7K DLP range. I would pay in that range for a DC4 3D DLP with a decent lens that could put out ~1000 lumens in 3D mode.
post #3759 of 4160
I think vivitek has a 3d DLP LED model coming out this year. Probably an updated H9080FD. Hopefully its in that $7-$8000 msrp range. Its basically Runco LS-5 with an LED light engine.
post #3760 of 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elix View Post


- dynamic contrast must be off;
.

If you are talking about dynamic iris, i can't agree..
post #3761 of 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sona Kakoo View Post

If you are talking about dynamic iris, i can't agree..

I kind of half agree. The issue is that people are usually fine when claiming numbers from JVC machines (or others that use manual irises) when the iris is closed down but then have an issue saying dynamic irises shouldn't count. In the end both fixed and dynamic don't show native black level performance. So it would have to be fully open iris on both or iris in use (whether it be manual or dynamic) on both.

He may be talking about software that gives the impression of heightened contrast but in actuality most of those processors clip whites and crushes blacks. There are a ton of DLP models that have such features. Those should be turned off for sure.
post #3762 of 4160
10k:1 native contrast with 4000 lumens should yeild very decent black levels! And keep in mind this is JVCs 1st effort with a laser projector, and true 4k. I expect some amazing machines in the next few years. If the bulbs will last as long as advertised, I intend to stick with my RS46 until such time as something like that is at or under the 5k mark.
post #3763 of 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

Jim, the JVC projectors have a 3 pin 3D VESA port that you can plug a number of transmitters into, including the original JVC IR emitter, the new RF emitter and also the Monster Vision 3D emitter.

Any combination will work with the splitter cable I made. I posted a link in my signature how to make it.

The MV3D's are very comfortable, they are unique in shape / size compared to all of the other glasses.

3d-splitter3.jpg

SO I think I get what you are doing. The home made splitter allows both RF transmitters to be hooked up & working at the same time. This will allow me to use both types of 3D glasses. Now if I only want to buy the MV3D glasses & emitter then I can just plug it directly into the JVC & buy as many pairs of MV3D glasses that I need. smile.gif Am I correct?
post #3764 of 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post

He may be talking about software that gives the impression of heightened contrast but in actuality most of those processors clip whites and crushes blacks. There are a ton of DLP models that have such features. Those should be turned off for sure.
Fixed iris and dynamic iris are two different beasts. Sure, they both close irises. But with fixed iris you get constant brightness on all IRE levels. I wrote that both projectors to be tested must be calibrated to equal brightness on 100% white field and equal gamma (2.2, for example). Dynamic iris would prevent that most of the time and won't show projector's real native contrast anyway.
post #3765 of 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post

All we need is a single chip LCOS machine with JVCs iteration for great contrast. They just need to update their chips like Sony did and you'll have good enough Motion. Then use an LED/laser hybrid light engine to eliminate the possibility of RBE. The single chip route eliminates convergence issues and cuts down on costs.

I.don't know why but they stopped development on a single chip LCOS solution years ago. Ideally, if the chip is fast enough, It can do sequential color and be fine with motion. Maybe that was why they didn't have any real production units.

I don't think it's so easy to develop faster chips. To make them switch faster you would probably have to make them thinner (I read this somewhere but can't recall where), which in turn would make them less good at blocking light. i.e. they would take a hit in contrast. Sure, they could take Sonys route, but then probably have to start from scratch with a new chip and might not be able to get more contrast than Sony anyway?

Regarding single chip LCOS, the switching speed requirement is very high. Now they can't even switch fast enough to do 3D without ghosting at 120 hz. A DLP with a 5x color wheel is working at 3x (RGB) 5x (wheel speed) x 24 Hz = 360 Hz.

DLPs are inherently about a 1000 fold faster compared to LCOS, which also explains why they do not suffer from any ghosting.

If they could make a laser LCOS I would be very happy with that. If I understand it correctly the very low etendue of the laser would make it possible to close down the iris fully without light loss. 1000-1500 calibrated lumens that doesn't degrade over time coupled with 150K:1 native contrast seems like a very powerful combination to me. In addition low etendue makes it possible to use much simpler and cheaper optics without degrading image quality - i.e. much smaller lenses could be used without affecting sharpness.

I have an X35 at the moment and a 119'' high contrast high power screen. I wouldn't mind even higher contrast even though it's quite good already, and a bit more lumens in 3D would be nice (it's very nice and bright in the sweetspot and in high lamp, but that's noisy and with a new lamp and it's less good outside the sweet spot.). Otherwise I'm very happy with it. Sure, there are some ghosting in the most difficult scenes and it would be nice to get rid of that, but it's rarely visable and I love watching 3D on the machine. I have a Panasonic 55VT50 as well and the JVC kills it in 3D IMO. The image size is of course very important, but in addition to that, the panasonic has very poor black levels in 3D mode and more noticeble ghosting compared to the JVC. The high contrast of the JVC really kills the tv and makes the experience so much better.
Edited by Drexler - 3/10/13 at 3:39am
post #3766 of 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

I've done those tests before and the results are 1/2 decent, but most will take it out of context which is why I choose not to post those photos. Plus people will see bright corners and freak out.

Also I believe he was using a DLP and the JVC, the results aren't going to be as drastic when comparing the 5020 / HW50 and the JVC's.

The highest contrast DLP i've seen this year was the HC8000 and the black floor was still less than the HW30 from last year and around the Panasonic 8000 (which is several notches behind the 5020 and HW50 and a good distance behind the JVC's).

I watched a calibrated RS4810 last night on the HP screen with my new pitch black ceiling/floor. Dark scenes look amazing when the gamma is adjusted right. There is a certain depth to the image that is hard to reproduce on the other models. The 5020 and HW50 do hold their own though. The Panasonic 8000 & Mitsubishi HC8000 looked muddy to me in these scenes.

The nirvana projector for me would have the best quality of the DLP and LCOS panels in 1 projector. Add in Sony's color system which provides some of the best 'out of the box' colors.
How much ceiling and floor in front of the screen do you pitch black?
post #3767 of 4160
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Cutter View Post

SO I think I get what you are doing. The home made splitter allows both RF transmitters to be hooked up & working at the same time. This will allow me to use both types of 3D glasses. Now if I only want to buy the MV3D glasses & emitter then I can just plug it directly into the JVC & buy as many pairs of MV3D glasses that I need. smile.gif Am I correct?

correct, you can use just the MV3D transmitter and run as many MV3D glasses as you want.

These Optoma glasses will also work with the MV3D RF transmitter.

http://www.amazon.com/Optoma-BG-ZF2100GLS-Active-Shutter-Glasses/dp/B008PQJXFO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1362930697&sr=8-1&keywords=optoma+3D+glasses


Quote:
Originally Posted by lgreis View Post

How much ceiling and floor in front of the screen do you pitch black?

At least 1 screen height is a good starting point.
post #3768 of 4160
Ceiling is easy to figure out, how do you get black on the floor without it looking really bad from an asthetic point of view?
post #3769 of 4160
Black rug that you roll up when not using the projector, otherwise it's the usual non dedicated room compromise: If it's a dedicated room, then who cares about aesthetics: fit a black carpet (at least on the stage if it has one) and enjoy the better picture. wink.gif
post #3770 of 4160
I bought a 10x13 black area rug from Lowes last year. It fits between the screen and the front row of seats and works fine.
post #3771 of 4160
Well a fully black carpet is no good, I have a white dog lol. Charcoal is the darkest I'd go, course I'm thinking black walls, black ceiling and and really dark carpet, it'll be impossible to light lol. My 1st room I did a black ceiling and dark red walls, with 2 200w lights on full blast we could barely see.
post #3772 of 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by plissken99 View Post

Well a fully black carpet is no good, I have a white dog lol. Charcoal is the darkest I'd go, course I'm thinking black walls, black ceiling and and really dark carpet, it'll be impossible to light lol. My 1st room I did a black ceiling and dark red walls, with 2 200w lights on full blast we could barely see.

Never thought about that really, the great CAVE for movies and nothing else I guess
post #3773 of 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

correct, you can use just the MV3D transmitter and run as many MV3D glasses as you want.

These Optoma glasses will also work with the MV3D RF transmitter.

http://www.amazon.com/Optoma-BG-ZF2100GLS-Active-Shutter-Glasses/dp/B008PQJXFO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1362930697&sr=8-1&keywords=optoma+3D+glasses
At least 1 screen height is a good starting point.

How do you like these compared to the Monster 3D glasses?
post #3774 of 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by wse View Post

Never thought about that really, the great CAVE for movies and nothing else I guess

That's what I'm doing in my new theater room. Nothing but movies and maybe some game time for the kids.
post #3775 of 4160
I happened across another review for the X35 and thought I would share. There are quite a few mentions about comparison to the Sony VPL-HW50ES in the review as well.

http://reviews.cnet.com/home-theater-projectors/jvc-dla-x35b/4505-7858_7-35616134.html
post #3776 of 4160
Zombie

I have a JVC 4810 along with the JVC RFemitter. Will any of the aftermarket RF 3D glasses work with the JVC emitter, or does each aftermarket brand like Monster and Xpand require their own dedicated emitter? Thanks.
post #3777 of 4160
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by phisch View Post

Zombie

I have a JVC 4810 along with the JVC RFemitter. Will any of the aftermarket RF 3D glasses work with the JVC emitter, or does each aftermarket brand like Monster and Xpand require their own dedicated emitter? Thanks.

There are reports that these 2 glasses work with the JVC RF Transmitter:

* Samsung SSG-4100GB (these are very cheap @ $20 a pair)

* Panasonic TY-ER3D4MU

There may be others that folks can report on. I don't believe the MV3D glasses will work from what I've seen, different protocols on the transmitters.
post #3778 of 4160
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by walterappleby View Post

I happened across another review for the X35 and thought I would share. There are quite a few mentions about comparison to the Sony VPL-HW50ES in the review as well.

http://reviews.cnet.com/home-theater-projectors/jvc-dla-x35b/4505-7858_7-35616134.html

Thanks for posting, this is a decent review. There's some things I think they skipped such as discussing reality creation vs. native lens sharpness, etc. On my HP screen, we can see the JVC has a lower black floor. Sony 3D get's an edge for better handling of the crosstalk + FI in 3D mode. +1 for the Sony putting out 1000+ calibrated lumens to help with ambient light viewing.

regarding motion comparison - it's interesting that he didn't see any differences between the JVC and Sony with the FPD motion tests.

Out of the box color - "Prior to calibration the Sony's default picture settings are clearly better than anything JVC offers. If the X35 has one big weakness, it's the relatively inaccurate state of its image prior to any adjustment. The best setting, Film, couldn't begin to climb the heights of accuracy achievable by a professional calibration."

I have to agree here based on a recent 4810 calibration. The Sony is a dream to calibrate in comparison. R709 setting = pretty darn close. Same thing with Gamma. 2.2 = very close to 2.2 which is good since you need image director to make adjustments. The JVC gamma is easy to adjust though with calibration equipment. Wandering green saturation, not as easy to fix.
post #3779 of 4160
Off topic:

Jason,

I replaced my home brew Unraid server over the weekend with a business class 24-bay Supermicro server. As usual, it was easy to move the Unraid drives from the old server to the new one. The SM server booted from my Unraid flash drive and recognized the old (and new) drives. After a parity check, I was up and running. Interestingly, almost all my problems with dodgy playback (especially Disney titles like Tangled) via the network to the MED600X went away. No need to use NFS. Playback of iso files is as smooth as from a locally attached USB hard drive. This Supermicro server is faster by far in every way than my other server. I have about 39TB of storage today, and could go up to 92 if I switched out all the drives for 4TB ones. Next step, replace the Banshee-loud power supplies with a quiet Seasonic that I won't be able to hear from a block away. biggrin.gif That mod is for later this week.
post #3780 of 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

There are reports that these 2 glasses work with the JVC RF Transmitter:

* Samsung SSG-4100GB (these are very cheap @ $20 a pair)

* Panasonic TY-ER3D4MU

There may be others that folks can report on. I don't believe the MV3D glasses will work from what I've seen, different protocols on the transmitters.

Thank you. I heard the Panasonics are pretty good, so I'll order a couple of pairs to try out the 3D on the JVC.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Sony HW50 / BenQ W7000 / Epson 5020 / JVC RS55 / JVC RS 46 / JVC RS4810 / JVC RS56 Mini-shootout 2012-2013