AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Sony HW50 / BenQ W7000 / Epson 5020 / JVC RS55 / JVC RS 46 / JVC RS4810 / JVC RS56 Mini-shootout 2012-2013
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sony HW50 / BenQ W7000 / Epson 5020 / JVC RS55 / JVC RS 46 / JVC RS4810 / JVC RS56 Mini-shootout... - Page 130

post #3871 of 4154
Quote:
Originally Posted by plasmaowner View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by n8dgr84 View Post

I thought the Sony was supposed to be great with motion, especially how it runs HDTV at 240hz?
Did you try changing some of the motion settings around?

In the Sony HW50 owners thread I've seen very few complain about motion with the Sony, but there have been a couple. Personally my unit does motion flawlessly with all my sources. I dare to say even better then my Infocus X10.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by dlimatime View Post

Previously I had purchased the Sony HW50 & Epson 5020 but returned both of them due to significant motion judder with 2D HDTV sports content via Charter Cable TV.

 

The only issues I've seen with motion judder on the HW50 have been using film mode.  I think someone in the HW50 thread mentioned something about an incorrect 3:2 pulldown?!  In any case, I watch a ton of sports on my HW50 and motion judder is something that I'm particularly sensitive to (think zombie and black levels)!  I can say the Sony handles motion very well if setup correctly.

post #3872 of 4154
RS-55 is my vote, though if you can go see them in PERSON first (are these floor models), if yes then check the convergence (fuzzy color around menu text or on JVC test pattern), and pick the RS4810 over the RS55 if the RS-55 has questionable convergence or inferior.
post #3873 of 4154
Quote:
Originally Posted by coderguy View Post

RS-55 is my vote, though if you can go see them in PERSON first (are these floor models), if yes then check the convergence (fuzzy color around menu text or on JVC test pattern), and pick the RS4810 over the RS55 if the RS-55 has questionable convergence or inferior.

These are not floor models. Brand new.
post #3874 of 4154
Then take the RS-55.
post #3875 of 4154
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by becker800 View Post

I've been reading through this 100+ page thread but unable to find a solid answer and thought it would be easier to post.

Im decided on a projector for my HT room.

its about 13' Wide, 17' Long. 8 1/2 foot ceilings. Fully enclosed HT room with no windows so its dark. Projecting onto 108" Screen Innovations Zero Edge screen. Projector will be ceiling mounted.

My options to pick from
JVC DLA-RS46 - Lowest price
JVC DLA-RS55 - middle price +$700 over RS46
JVC DLA-RS4810 - Highest price +$1300 over RS46

Originally had planned for the RS46 due to low cost and solid performance but just wanted to ask the experts before I made my decision.

Thank you!

is the room light treated as well? (dark ceiling / floor?) How far are you sitting from the screen?
post #3876 of 4154
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

is the room light treated as well? (dark ceiling / floor?) How far are you sitting from the screen?

Yes it will be, room is not quite done yet but i have a pretty dark blue carpet (almost black)

The ceiling I have yet to decide on so my options are completely open. (ill take suggestions)

As of now, ill be about 13 feet from screen, if I decide to do an additional row, the closest seats would be fairly close, maybe 7-8 feet.
post #3877 of 4154
Thread Starter 
A dark ceiling is critical for reducing the reflections that will kill the excellent native contrast of these models. Ideally you would have the ceiling black at least 1 screen height outward from the top of the screen.

If you're going to consider a close seating distance, you'll likely see a nice benefit to the e-shift.

I've seen all 3 models in my HT setup, I have a slight preference for the RS55 (dual iris, contrast looks great when clamped down) and the e-shift 1 vs. e-shift 2 (the original looks a bit more natural to me)

these are all nice projectors, the 4810 does have better 3D than the RS55 as an FYI.
post #3878 of 4154
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post

A dark ceiling is critical for reducing the reflections that will kill the excellent native contrast of these models.

White ceiling does not affect that excellent native (on/off) contrast.

But it does affect ANSI... Which is not so excellent, but yes, it is important too.
post #3879 of 4154
Do we color the whole ceiling black ( Flat Latex) ?, would it better to also hand velvet from the ceiling and the side of the walls in the front as well? I read somewhere on this forum, the color is calles "mouse ears" black , what brand is this paint?
post #3880 of 4154
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ilya Volk View Post

White ceiling does not affect that excellent native (on/off) contrast.

But it does affect ANSI... Which is not so excellent, but yes, it is important too.

A white ceiling, side walls, floor, etc....affects general image impact and pop as well. The more you can make your room invisible, the better the image will be in general since there is less distractions to catch your eye.
post #3881 of 4154
I got a sample of black velvet and put it up on the ceiling and the difference in the light coming off my ceiling (painted flat black) in comparison was drastic. Not sure how much this will be seen on screen but the ceiling will nearly disappear. I'll have to now find the best pricing on black velvet fabric and how to attach it to the ceiling.
post #3882 of 4154
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ilya Volk View Post

White ceiling does not affect that excellent native (on/off) contrast.

But it does affect ANSI... Which is not so excellent, but yes, it is important too.

I've heard this many times, and its "implication" seems to be something different than my "perception." I don't argue the numbers. They're easy to measure. However, my perception is that native contrast is much more important than ANSI to overall perceived image quality. Since the objective numbers tell us that native on/off contrast doesn't change because of white walls, ceiling and floor, the implication (to me anyway) is that the "experience" of watching a high native contrast projector in a dark room might not be dramatically better than it is in a light colored room. This is the polar opposite of my viewing experience. For me, darkening the entire room provided the single greatest improvement in my theater. Again, I'm not arguing numbers.
post #3883 of 4154
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Clark View Post

I've heard this many times, and its "implication" seems to be something different than my "perception." I don't argue the numbers. They're easy to measure. However, my perception is that native contrast is much more important than ANSI to overall perceived image quality. Since the objective numbers tell us that native on/off contrast doesn't change because of white walls, ceiling and floor, the implication (to me anyway) is that the "experience" of watching a high native contrast projector in a dark room might not be dramatically better than it is in a light colored room. This is the polar opposite of my viewing experience. For me, darkening the entire room provided the single greatest improvement in my theater. Again, I'm not arguing numbers.

This is the point I was making. The perceived differences are substantial, especially with the JVC.

The only negative effect is that is makes projectors with less capable black floor than the JVC stand out. The 5020 and HW50 both look very good with dark scenes, but it changes with projectors like the Sharp 30K, HC8000 & BQ W7000 where I'd prefer a lower black floor.

It might take a Sim2 to provide the blacks i'm looking for with a DLP.
post #3884 of 4154
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrZaus View Post

Do we color the whole ceiling black ( Flat Latex) ?, would it better to also hand velvet from the ceiling and the side of the walls in the front as well? I read somewhere on this forum, the color is calles "mouse ears" black , what brand is this paint?

it depends on how crazy you want to get. Black paint will still reflect some light but will be a major improvement over a white ceiling. This is the material I use:

http://www.protostar.biz/flock.htm

flock03.jpg

it has a very sticky adhesive backing... be warned it's staying attached to whatever you put it on (wall, ceiling, etc).
post #3885 of 4154
Painting the ceiling and front wall FLAT Black makes a HUGE difference!!!
post #3886 of 4154
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Butny View Post

Painting the ceiling and front wall FLAT Black makes a HUGE difference!!!

Come on guys let's stay on topic here, this is a projector shootout thread, maybe we should move this over to the home remodel section for home theater builds....
LOL...just like busting your guys balls......oops can is say balls on here....eek.gifbiggrin.gif:)
post #3887 of 4154
The big reason the black ceiling helps is two fold:

1) Unless you are watching your projector somewhat dark (sub 10-12 fL), the white walls will make the entire room brighter and still boost the black level above the perceived sweet-point in brightness, even though it does boost the white the same.

2) The ANSI contrast is raised, but the quality of dark scenes are not derived much from ANSI (though they still need some), but the main reason we see it better is because our eyes pickup the screen without distracting light entering our pupils. So although the screen itself doesn't change in contrast, the reception / perception to our eyes does due to distracting light reflections on the walls.
post #3888 of 4154
I just ordered some of the protostar light trap material to cover the front of the ceiling a filmscreen back in length. How to you recommend applying it? Should I cut it into smaller pieces or try and apply it as one piece across the whole ceiling (obviously twice as it needs two rolls to go back far enough)?
post #3889 of 4154
Thread Starter 
Is your ceiling drywall? This material is permanent, there is no taking it off once it goes on without destroying the drywall. I just wanted to get that warning out there... biggrin.gif

It can be applied like wallpaper. It's a 2 person job to keep it taught and make sure it's being evenly applied when pressing down on the material to engage the adhesive. If you're careful with the application, it can be overlapped and made to look seamless.
post #3890 of 4154
Yes, it is textured drywall. Guess when I eventually sell the house it will be a pain in the ass but that's for future me to deal with.
post #3891 of 4154
So would black velvet work just as well but be easier to remove & cost a lot less? Anyone tried this? Is it better then just flat black painted walls? I love the idea of this product but if it sticks like crazy I'm worried about trying to apply it to my ceiling that is textured. eek.gif
post #3892 of 4154
deleted, didn't know about thread below
Edited by Manni01 - 3/25/13 at 5:17pm
post #3893 of 4154
Please try to keep the "black"ing out of your home theater to this thread:

http://www.avsforum.com/t/1465053/black-theater-improvment-thread-once-you-go-black-you-never-go-back
post #3894 of 4154
Zombie, when will we see the 2nd season of Z30000? smile.gif Come to think of it, this thread hasn't seen a 1st one yet .smile.gif
Edited by Elix - 3/25/13 at 5:29am
post #3895 of 4154
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elix View Post

Zombie, when will we see the 2nd season of Z30000? smile.gif Come to think of it, this thread hasn't seen a 1st one yet .smile.gif

I started round 1 in the Sharp 30K thread, but it quickly got lost in a discussion on ebay deals. I'll re-post it here to stay on topic.

I spent time last night calibrating an HW50 and the Sharp 30K in 3D mode. Both need fair amounts of gain changes (green and blue) to offset the loss of red due to the color tint.

The Sony HW50 ended up with ~800 lumens in 3D mode, the Sharp 30K was ~600 lumens in 3D mode. Since both are near eye level, the differences are magnified by the 2.8 gain of the screen/ Neither of these models light up the HP like the Epson 5020 in 3D, I have to go back and check my notes on the post-calibrated lumens.

of course there is no chance of crosstalk possible on the 3D DLP's. 3D performance is flawless as expected.

sharp3.jpg

sharp4.jpg

sharp5.jpg

I'm working on taming the colors in 2D this week. stay tuned.
post #3896 of 4154
Jason and others,

Thanks to all for making this thread. I have been reading for several days and am close to a decision. I wanted to solicite the group for a final round. I am shooting 18 feet to a Da-Lite HP (2.8) screen, same a Jason's. I am sitting directly in front of the projector, roughly at 17'. There is no room treatment at all, but the ceiling goes up to 16' above the screen, so there are no reflections from there. I am considering a HW50, or a new in box RS-55. I will be using very little 3D, at least until there is more content, and really want a fabulous 2D image.

Any replies would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Mark

I am worried about the dimming bulb as reported by others on the RS55

Edited by AceMT - 3/25/13 at 12:30pm
post #3897 of 4154
Thread Starter 
Hi, what size is the HP screen?

On my 142" the RS55 has a more refined PQ than the HW50. I have to turn down the reality creation to minimum for most bluray content. The e-shift creates a perception of increased detail and contrast in the overall image without obvious artifacts. I never turn e-shift off, regardless of the content. I think it makes all decent sources look better.

I wouldn't worry too much about the lamp since the rev 3 with the metal flap hasn't generated any forum buzz on early failures. I am still using my rev 2 and it's been behaving quite well. I'm running @ -11 on the iris and it's easily lighting up the HP screen.

If you are getting a good deal on the RS55, I wouldn't hesitate to get it. I still think it's one of the best under 10K for 2D PQ.
post #3898 of 4154
Oops, sorry! Size is 119". I don't know how good the deal really is. About $850 more than the Sony.....but it is new in box.
post #3899 of 4154
Quick query.

I've seen a few people say they prefer glasses with removable CR2032 batteries to glasses that have rechargeable ones. I'm just curious why? According to specs, glasses with a removable CR2032 battery will last for 70hrs of use. Many rechargeable glasses say that they will last 40-60hrs on a single charge. Assuming you can recharge them 20, 30, 50, 100 times, why would those that prefer the non-rechargeable variety... prefer the non-rechargeable variety lol.

Obviously there could be a bit of marketing speak and maybe the spec for how long a single charge lasts is inflated, but even if it's have what's claimed, 20-30hrs on a single charge, after 2 or 3 charges, you've eclipsed the CR2032. Unless the battery doesn't hold a charge after more than one or two charges... I don't get it lol.

Not trying to flame or troll lol. I'm honestly asking cause I want to see if there is something I'm missing.
post #3900 of 4154
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post


The Sony HW50 ended up with ~800 lumens in 3D mode, the Sharp 30K was ~600 lumens in 3D mode. .

Some additional info - The Epson 5020 calibrated through the glasses is still cranking out over 1200 lumens. When the lamp was new, it was closer to 1400.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Sony HW50 / BenQ W7000 / Epson 5020 / JVC RS55 / JVC RS 46 / JVC RS4810 / JVC RS56 Mini-shootout 2012-2013