I wouldn't say a "touch enabled device makes Windows 8 shine"
I would say a touch enabled device is essential if you want it to be tolerably usable.
It's only to be expected: Win8 is designed with touch in mind, and without that it's horrid.
It's like saying most people can get along with Win7 but you should really be using a mouse. Well, duh.
The difference is that PC's had a mouse for so many years before Win7 it was virtually guaranteed no-one would be struggling with just a keyboard. And in any case, mice are dirt cheap.
By contrast, the vast legacy PC base doesn't have a touchscreen, lots of the upcoming PC's won't either, because touchscreens are anything but cheap - espescially as the world has become accustomed to larger screen sizes.
This whole fiasco could so easily have been avoided, if Win8 had included the option: operate in classic Windows or Metro modes. But Microsoft wanted to push their unified front end...
I would say a touch enabled device is essential if you want it to be tolerably usable.
It's only to be expected: Win8 is designed with touch in mind, and without that it's horrid.
It's like saying most people can get along with Win7 but you should really be using a mouse. Well, duh.
The difference is that PC's had a mouse for so many years before Win7 it was virtually guaranteed no-one would be struggling with just a keyboard. And in any case, mice are dirt cheap.
By contrast, the vast legacy PC base doesn't have a touchscreen, lots of the upcoming PC's won't either, because touchscreens are anything but cheap - espescially as the world has become accustomed to larger screen sizes.
This whole fiasco could so easily have been avoided, if Win8 had included the option: operate in classic Windows or Metro modes. But Microsoft wanted to push their unified front end...

























