Quote:
Originally Posted by falconman515 
Contrast ratio means nothing if the uniformity and picture look terrible! Now don't get me wrong on 1080p movies and 3D the Sharp was Stunning!!! But on regular HD channels it was so so and sports it was HORRIBLE !!! I am a big tv show and sports guy so the Sharp was not the right TV for me At All! I returned the thing within a few days (would have taken it back the next day after watching TV and sports but had to wait to find time to return it).
A company can tout these massive contrast ratios, all this smart tv jibber jabber, 480hz junk when we all know it's only 120hz, etc, etc, etc, ..... if the picture is bad and doesn't render all things good or great then it's not a good TV ... and the Sharp was NOT a good TV (for basic TV HD and sports for sure).
I could care less about what they "Claim" a TV to have ... I am looking for real world results and this TV by far exceeded the Sharp in those categories.

Contrast ratio means nothing if the uniformity and picture look terrible! Now don't get me wrong on 1080p movies and 3D the Sharp was Stunning!!! But on regular HD channels it was so so and sports it was HORRIBLE !!! I am a big tv show and sports guy so the Sharp was not the right TV for me At All! I returned the thing within a few days (would have taken it back the next day after watching TV and sports but had to wait to find time to return it).
A company can tout these massive contrast ratios, all this smart tv jibber jabber, 480hz junk when we all know it's only 120hz, etc, etc, etc, ..... if the picture is bad and doesn't render all things good or great then it's not a good TV ... and the Sharp was NOT a good TV (for basic TV HD and sports for sure).
I could care less about what they "Claim" a TV to have ... I am looking for real world results and this TV by far exceeded the Sharp in those categories.
Since our main 50 inch just died, we've been watching our 42 in Philips that's rarely been used. I had recenty dialed it in and think it has a fantastic picture for both dvd and hd content over Fios.
My point is that I just looked up the spects and it shows a contrast ratio of 1100:1, so I'm thinking 1,000,000:1 sounds pretty good to me. For that matter, at what point is the point of diminshing returns?
Do you really notice the difference between 1,000,000 and 10,000,000, and like someone said, is there really an acurate way to determine what the correct ration really is?






















