My thought on hard drives having owned 50 of them is they are all basically the same.
I have currently: Samsung, Hitachi, WD, and Seagate.
When I bought each, there was a current reason.
But in hind sight they are all the same.
I can't hear a difference between a green and a Seagate.
People who say "heat" are just idiots. These things don't get any hotter.
The "heat and noise " issue gets beat to death around here with green drive propagandizers but in a server environment it's a non issue. And good case with good cooling and acoustic properties will take a normal drive without issue.
Perhaps if I had a mini ITX build I'd consider that. But in my case it's not a big deal.
Capacity to price is main concern. Reliability and performance also matter. I'd say the few dollars in electricity a year is last on my list.
It's quite trendy around here to say the buzz words "heat and noise" but owning 30 hard drives from various mfg's it's more just "heat and noise" spewing from people's mouths than it is from actual hard drives. I've never had a problem with "heat and noise". I think only in a very small build or perhaps a dedicated HTPC in say a bedroom is that going to be a factor.
In a tower desktop or server it's just a non issue.
It's great this is a HTPC forum but I think too often people assume every build is an ITX build in the worlds smallest case and going to be on display. The recommendations around here seem to assume that's the only HTPC that exists. That's a pet peeve of mine around here.
Green drives are good only in a mini dedicated HTPC IMO. It makes sense. But only if its same or cheaper priced as a RED or normal drive or that the Green actually does save significant energy/heat/noise.
But I think there's a general perception that's wrong: People assume green is cheaper and saves significant heat and noise and energy. That's not really true. Green drives are old now. A modern model that's not designated as green offers better performance, warranty, reliability, and price while being on par or better on energy too.
RED now sells for basically same as Green right now. Longer warranty, better speeds and lower energy.
Seagate offers huge benefit in price, also a boost in speed. But is only on par with energy and warranty/reliability.
There's nothing wrong with a green drive but I think they are a bit overrated. 12 months ago it was clear best choice but today that choice is much tougher.
Most if the people recommending them today are still living in 2011.
I have currently: Samsung, Hitachi, WD, and Seagate.
When I bought each, there was a current reason.
But in hind sight they are all the same.
I can't hear a difference between a green and a Seagate.
People who say "heat" are just idiots. These things don't get any hotter.
The "heat and noise " issue gets beat to death around here with green drive propagandizers but in a server environment it's a non issue. And good case with good cooling and acoustic properties will take a normal drive without issue.
Perhaps if I had a mini ITX build I'd consider that. But in my case it's not a big deal.
Capacity to price is main concern. Reliability and performance also matter. I'd say the few dollars in electricity a year is last on my list.
It's quite trendy around here to say the buzz words "heat and noise" but owning 30 hard drives from various mfg's it's more just "heat and noise" spewing from people's mouths than it is from actual hard drives. I've never had a problem with "heat and noise". I think only in a very small build or perhaps a dedicated HTPC in say a bedroom is that going to be a factor.
In a tower desktop or server it's just a non issue.
It's great this is a HTPC forum but I think too often people assume every build is an ITX build in the worlds smallest case and going to be on display. The recommendations around here seem to assume that's the only HTPC that exists. That's a pet peeve of mine around here.
Green drives are good only in a mini dedicated HTPC IMO. It makes sense. But only if its same or cheaper priced as a RED or normal drive or that the Green actually does save significant energy/heat/noise.
But I think there's a general perception that's wrong: People assume green is cheaper and saves significant heat and noise and energy. That's not really true. Green drives are old now. A modern model that's not designated as green offers better performance, warranty, reliability, and price while being on par or better on energy too.
RED now sells for basically same as Green right now. Longer warranty, better speeds and lower energy.
Seagate offers huge benefit in price, also a boost in speed. But is only on par with energy and warranty/reliability.
There's nothing wrong with a green drive but I think they are a bit overrated. 12 months ago it was clear best choice but today that choice is much tougher.
Most if the people recommending them today are still living in 2011.
















).







