Originally Posted by zombie10k
If they can replicate the 3 things that made the HW50 better than the HW30, then it should be a popular model next year.
- brightness increase in 2D and 3D
- Reality Creation
- Better overall 3D performance (mainly due to the brightness and sharpness with RC)
Jason, i agree on all three above points .
If anything is a little "weak" on the 95, it is that it is not a light canon and that extra light can be good used to a lot off things:
Bigger picture posiblility
brighter picture and less sensible, with lights in the room etc.
lower gain screen posibility ( like typical AT screens and 3D at same time )
3D never gets to bright IMO and with active glasses, more light = better posibility to lower the duty cykle on the glasses and therby lower the ghosting even more
More posibility to run the projector in low lamp mode - for longer lamp time, lower noise , lower heats generated/ longer life time in general, but not sacrifice light/punch/ "dynamic" output
BTW. I seen the RC in both the HW50 and the 1000ES and even that I think the RC in HW50 make a very good benfit
( when used correct ) it can NOT
compare and is not generating as big a benefit in picture quality as the RC ( with 2K to 4K upscaling/ database whatever ) in the 1000ES do - its outstanding !
but I do expect the RC in a new 95+ (even if it still is a 2K projector ) would be a big benefit too
And if I dont get the 1000ES ( still consider
) , this new model going to be my replacement of the almost flawless 95ES I have now.