AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players ›  Official OPPO BDP-105 Owner's Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official OPPO BDP-105 Owner's Thread - Page 108

post #3211 of 5983
What Oppo BDP-105 are these guys reviewing? It must not be the one I have.

Some quotes:
  • "For sheer utility and sound quality, its hard to beat the Oppo BDP-105"
  • "you won’t find a better Blu-ray player for reference-quality video playback"
  • "Allowing you to tap into the reference-quality DAC and video processing so the rest of your system can benefit is a feature that truly sets the Oppo apart"

Yes, indeed I wish it were all true.

But wait a minute:
  • Where's the "sheer utility" when the audio is so delayed the show is not watchable? Plus the delay isn't even consistent. I started out with a tolerable delay last evening that became totally intolerable just by plugging in the headphones.
  • Are the reviewers changing the default on the QDEO sharpness to get reference quality? Or is their box working properly with the factory default?
    I'm personally not sure whether or not the +1 as suggested by Bob is not too sharp, or that at 0 the picture is "fuzzed" - but it is softer. But which setting really provides "reference quality" I can't answer.
  • Once again, "tapping in" would be great if audio/video sync were maintained and no audio delay occurred.

There are a lot of things I love about this box. It does sound great, it does look great. But, as it is at the time of this writing, it fails to properly do the "sheer utility" of items it is supposed to.
post #3212 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkphader View Post

What Oppo BDP-105 are these guys reviewing? It must not be the one I have.

Some quotes:
  • "For sheer utility and sound quality, its hard to beat the Oppo BDP-105"
  • "you won’t find a better Blu-ray player for reference-quality video playback"
  • "Allowing you to tap into the reference-quality DAC and video processing so the rest of your system can benefit is a feature that truly sets the Oppo apart"

Yes, indeed I wish it were all true.

But wait a minute:
  • Where's the "sheer utility" when the audio is so delayed the show is not watchable? Plus the delay isn't even consistent. I started out with a tolerable delay last evening that became totally intolerable just by plugging in the headphones.
  • Are the reviewers changing the default on the QDEO sharpness to get reference quality? Or is their box working properly with the factory default?
    I'm personally not sure whether or not the +1 as suggested by Bob is not too sharp, or that at 0 the picture is "fuzzed" - but it is softer. But which setting really provides "reference quality" I can't answer.
  • Once again, "tapping in" would be great if audio/video sync were maintained and no audio delay occurred.

There are a lot of things I love about this box. It does sound great, it does look great. But, as it is at the time of this writing, it fails to properly do the "sheer utility" of items it is supposed to.
And that is one man's opinion:D
post #3213 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiofan1 View Post

And that is one man's opinion:D

The audio delay and sync problems are not an opinion, they are fact.
post #3214 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkphader View Post

The audio delay and sync problems are not an opinion, they are fact.

I am watching australian open right now. It does have audio synch issue.
Have to skip channels back and fourth to get corrected.
It is a good player and i recognize the value and thats why i purchased it, But please have the guts to admit if something is wrong with it. Thats the only way it will get fixed... And i have no doubt that people are not working on this fix.
post #3215 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlatRocky View Post


I am watching australian open right now. It does have audio synch issue.
Have to skip channels back and fourth to get corrected.
It is a good player and i recognize the value and thats why i purchased it, But please have the guts to admit if something is wrong with it. Thats the only way it will get fixed... And i have no doubt that people are not working on this fix.

 

Did you email Oppo?

 

After reading many reviews

 

 

"From there, my focus turned to comparing the sound of this player to the spectacular BDP-95. I didn’t expect much difference given that they both use the same reference DAC, but considering the small differences in design, I wanted to make sure. Two-channel playback was nearly identical, and any difference I did perceive was so slight, I might as well not even report it. The BDP-105 was every bit as detailed and dynamic as the BDP-95, and this was proven time and again with a large assortment of SACDs and CDs."

 

I am not sure it's worth to upgrade especially plugging down $1290..

 

The fan on the BD-P95 almost never goes on and I sit 12 feet away so not an issue.

 

I really wanted to see Audio improvement if at all possible :(

post #3216 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiofan1 View Post

Speaking in terms of the 95 vs 105 analog performance being similar as I used the 95 exclusively via the rca&balanced outs (same brand cables Audioquest columbia's) which should help with so called placebos:rolleyes: I'm very familiar with the sound of of the analog outs and thought I'd be the last hold out for sure as I did pronounce against some objection early on that the 95 was indeed a "Giant killer" well later the pro reviews came around and many audiophiles backed this claim up. My reputation means something to me and this time around I don't have to go out on a limb. speaking to the hold outs who own the 95 , the 105 has more resolution and a purer sound than the 95 deeper decay and does this while providing a more stable image and what I thought impossible better bass tight extended with more audible octaves being represented, Now the real point is at what percent is it better than the 95? is it enough to justify an upgrade? percents 15-20 as an upgrade its a no brainier for what it brings to the table. If you need further convincing ,I'D suggest using the 30 days run it through your pre and for the icing on the cake run it direct to the amp (staggering and jumps to a 30% though I still use a pre for those special days guess what i'll be doing!) you'll find that last little thing that could have been just a little better in the 95 is in the 105:)

I agree about the 105 sounding better than the 95. I've now had mine for 30 days and am strictly 2-channel rca outs to an integrated amp and speakers. The 105 is without question, in my system to my ears, much better than the 95. There is a solidity to the image and a "grip" on the music that was not so evident in the 95.The high freq's on the 105 seem "silkier" too. I thought the 95 was a great player, it is, but the 105 IS a step up in the audio chain.
post #3217 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiofan1 View Post

Speaking in terms of the 95 vs 105 analog performance being similar as I used the 95 exclusively via the rca&balanced outs (same brand cables Audioquest columbia's) which should help with so called placebos:rolleyes: I'm very familiar with the sound of of the analog outs and thought I'd be the last hold out for sure as I did pronounce against some objection early on that the 95 was indeed a "Giant killer" well later the pro reviews came around and many audiophiles backed this claim up. My reputation means something to me and this time around I don't have to go out on a limb. speaking to the hold outs who own the 95 , the 105 has more resolution and a purer sound than the 95 deeper decay and does this while providing a more stable image and what I thought impossible better bass tight extended with more audible octaves being represented, Now the real point is at what percent is it better than the 95? is it enough to justify an upgrade? percents 15-20 as an upgrade its a no brainier for what it brings to the table. If you need further convincing ,I'D suggest using the 30 days run it through your pre and for the icing on the cake run it direct to the amp (staggering and jumps to a 30% though I still use a pre for those special days guess what i'll be doing!) you'll find that last little thing that could have been just a little better in the 95 is in the 105:)

 

My pre/pro allows me to do a direct comparison as I can do "Direct" which means the pre/pro just become a volume control.

 

So you are saying the 105 sounds 20% better than the 95! 

 

 

Here is Oppo 's quote "the BDP-105 will sound better than the BDP-95, but it should not be substantially so." so maybe 10%

post #3218 of 5983
Guys

Been trying out my Oppo for about 2 weeks, haven't even got around to putting a blu-ray disc in the machine yet. I've been enjoying the audio so much.

I was connected today to the USB DAC, streaming spotify but I couldn't get any audio output on the coax or optical port. HDMI was fine.

Could someone give me clarification on whether this is normal behavior or do I need to toggle a setting somewhere.
post #3219 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by lesliew View Post

...I was connected today to the USB DAC, streaming spotify but I couldn't get any audio output on the coax or optical port. HDMI was fine.

There are no SPDIF, Optical or Coax, outputs on the BDP-105 - only Optical and Coax inputs. You can use those inputs, for example, to run a Sonos player into the Oppo to utilize the Oppo DACs rather than the Sonos DACs.

When you use the USB DAC, output is only from the Stereo RCA or XLR outputs as far as I know - I didn't think the USB DAC would also output over HDMI, but maybe it does?

Was that the question - I must have missed something?

----

ehh - ignore all of this - too many drugs... frown.gif
Edited by stevepow - 1/25/13 at 9:43pm
post #3220 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkphader View Post

What Oppo BDP-105 are these guys reviewing? It must not be the one I have.

...

There are a lot of things I love about this box. It does sound great, it does look great. But, as it is at the time of this writing, it fails to properly do the "sheer utility" of items it is supposed to.

I tend to agree with your sentiment, but when have you ever read a review that honestly pointed out technical glitches that ostensibly will be fixed in the near term. The reviews almost always seem to focus on the "concept".

My Oppo locks up quite often - even a few times I have had to pull power from it to snap out of the coma. Normally this happens after I have been playing 5.1 FLAC for several hours from a USB drive. Today I was listening to some for a while, then tried to play a Blu-ray disc - the disc started, I got all way to the FBI screen - then black screen and no response from the remote - it took 15 seconds or so to respond to power off. Happens quite often.

Network playback - just as flakey. And I tried a trial of JRiver and Twonky both to control it. rolleyes.gif As a spoiled Sonos user, I can't imagine enduring either of those and all the futzing around. While all other "players" show up always and available, I have to coax the Oppo to appear with inconsistent rituals. It makes a fine Sonos DAC - better to let it shine where it does so naturally than swimming upstream.

The things it screws up for me, no other player can even do. So I take it with a grain of salt and enjoy the sound. But this is a piece of hardware that I would not put in front of my wife for household use - not until it learns to behave a little better. We have never experienced any kind of video/dialog sync with any cable box, Blu-ray, DVD, nada with our current setup. If I introduced something like that into our main home theater system, she'd have my head. wink.gif
post #3221 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevepow View Post

There are no SPDIF, Optical or Coax, outputs on the BDP-105 - only Optical and Coax inputs.

When you use the USB DAC, output is only from the Stereo RCA or XLR outputs as far as I know - I didn't think the USB DAC would also output over HDMI, but maybe it does?

I don't think any of that is correct.

-Bill
post #3222 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevepow View Post

There are no SPDIF, Optical or Coax, outputs on the BDP-105 - only Optical and Coax inputs.
You might want to take another look at the rear panel of your BDP-105 - it does have coax and optical digital outputs (located between the HDMI input and HDMI outputs) as well as inputs.
post #3223 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkphader View Post


The sound and video is generally great. But the things it screws up are the things that I need it to do right. It's those things that enticed me to sell my BDP-93 and get the BDP-105.

I expect some bugs and know that most will get fixed in a reasonable amount of time via firmware updates. But in some areas this box is severely broken and it's going on close to three months now with no resolution. So either some earlier manufactured units have real hardware issues and are not the ones being reviewed, or, as you suggest, that the reviewers are focusing on the "concept" (as well as the standard basics which the unit revels at) but not really putting it through the paces testing all of the promised "sheer utility".

It's just very, very frustrating because I really, really just want it to work like it should. In concept it is ideal. In practice it leaves one wanting.

 

Ok now I am curious what doesn't work? List please

post #3224 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiofan1 View Post

Speaking in terms of the 95 vs 105 analog performance being similar as I used the 95 exclusively via the rca&balanced outs (same brand cables Audioquest columbia's) which should help with so called placebos:rolleyes: I'm very familiar with the sound of of the analog outs and thought I'd be the last hold out for sure as I did pronounce against some objection early on that the 95 was indeed a "Giant killer" well later the pro reviews came around and many audiophiles backed this claim up. My reputation means something to me and this time around I don't have to go out on a limb. speaking to the hold outs who own the 95 , the 105 has more resolution and a purer sound than the 95 deeper decay and does this while providing a more stable image and what I thought impossible better bass tight extended with more audible octaves being represented, Now the real point is at what percent is it better than the 95? is it enough to justify an upgrade? percents 15-20 as an upgrade its a no brainier for what it brings to the table. If you need further convincing ,I'D suggest using the 30 days run it through your pre and for the icing on the cake run it direct to the amp (staggering and jumps to a 30% though I still use a pre for those special days guess what i'll be doing!) you'll find that last little thing that could have been just a little better in the 95 is in the 105:)

Couldn't agree more. Same thing we're hearing here. The direct to amp delivery of music is really special.

Under "rain in sight" Seattle skies, Gill
post #3225 of 5983

From the latest review ... Is this true??? (http://everythingaudionetwork.blogspot.com/2013/01/audiophile-review-oppo-bdp-105.html)

 

...... if you use the Dual Display mode to play hi-res audio from either HDMI and then connect an LCD TV to the other HDMI output to see the menus. Since most LCD TVs only operate at 48 kHz sample rate, the Oppo, in the Dual Display mode, downsamples HDMI audio in both HDMI outputs to 48 kHz — regardless of the high-res audio's native source sample rate. I confirmed this with the Benchmark DAC2-HGC’s sample rate indicator ...


Edited by dmusoke - 1/25/13 at 8:54pm
post #3226 of 5983

"

.

In careful A/B tests with the BDP-95 and BDP-105’s unbalanced inputs into the Bryston headphone amp using the Coda preamp as the source switcher and audio relay, I could not reliably tell the difference between the two players when listening through my reference Shure SRH1840 or the AKG-K701 headphones. Oppo’s tweaked-out power supply and upgraded parts may have improved measured performance a bit, but it is not enough of a change to make a significant audible difference under most listening conditions.

Suffice it say that the BDP-105 retains the sonic pluses of the ’95 with some potential audible refinement, but its main advantage over the previous player is its greatly expanded feature set.
.
.
On PCM or DSD, the BDP-105 delivered its high-end audio detail without a hint of harshness. The DSD playback via analog jacks, as with the BDP-95, is quite good. Only when I moved to the $7,999 Esoteric did I hear significant differences in upper-end detail when playing SACDs, such as Anthony Wilson - Our Gang (Groovenote) and Steve DavisQuality of Your Silence (DMP). But the Esoteric is $7,000. The Oppo is $1,200.
"

Edited by dmusoke - 1/25/13 at 8:52pm
post #3227 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmusoke View Post

"In careful A/B tests with the BDP-95 and BDP-105’s unbalanced inputs into the Bryston headphone amp using the Coda preamp as the source switcher and audio relay, I could not reliably tell the difference between the two players when listening through my reference Shure SRH1840 or the AKG-K701 headphones. Oppo’s tweaked-out power supply and upgraded parts may have improved measured performance a bit, but it is not enough of a change to make a significant audible difference under most listening conditions.

Suffice it say that the BDP-105 retains the sonic pluses of the ’95 with some potential audible refinement, but its main advantage over the previous player is its greatly expanded feature set."

 

Thank you, it seems the big advantage of the 105 is new features, being able to be used as a DAC but sound wise not worth the upgrade!

 

Plus with all these issues not worth it for me, I am waiting for the next generation

Oppo BDP-115 :)

post #3228 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkphader View Post

  • Audio from outside sources (ARC, SPDIF) is delayed (sometimes severely) causing lip sync issues.
  • Direct in via HDMI audio/video sync issues - for me this applies to the Roku stick in which viewing one item the a/v sync might be close and the next so out of sync (delayed audio again) that it's almost impossible to believe. Can't watch two Vevo videos in a row without the sync issue destroying the experience.
  • Many times once the audio becomes horribly delayed it requires a cold boot of the system (removal of power cord after shutdown) to get reasonably close again.
  • The audio delay is quite variable and little things, like changing from speakers to headphones, can cause a tolerable delay to become intolerable.
  • Freezes under various conditions requiring a reboot. I really don't think such an "appliance" should ever lock-up in this manner (even Microsoft has almost eradicated the BSOD).
  • SMB has minor but workable issues.
  • Sometimes on a power-up no video is displayed and it needs a reboot.
  • Connecting both HDMI outs to my TV (in case I want some sources to be QDEO processed and others not) breaks ARC, so this can't be done since I lose audio when the player is not the source.

The audio delays, and a/v sync issues are the most damning. I find myself virtually holding my breath when I select ARC as the source, hoping that the audio delay is minor and that I wont need some magic and a special dance or two before starting over.
And I don't bother to plug the Roku stick in anymore, it's virtually useless.

That said, playing discs and network streaming do work quite well for me.

 

You should send an email to OPPO they are great with follow-up hopefully they can fix all these problems :(

post #3229 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by wse View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmusoke View Post

"In careful A/B tests with the BDP-95 and BDP-105’s unbalanced inputs into the Bryston headphone amp using the Coda preamp as the source switcher and audio relay, I could not reliably tell the difference between the two players when listening through my reference Shure SRH1840 or the AKG-K701 headphones. Oppo’s tweaked-out power supply and upgraded parts may have improved measured performance a bit, but it is not enough of a change to make a significant audible difference under most listening conditions.

Suffice it say that the BDP-105 retains the sonic pluses of the ’95 with some potential audible refinement, but its main advantage over the previous player is its greatly expanded feature set."

 

Thank you, it seems the big advantage of the 105 is new features, being able to be used as a DAC but sound wise not worth the upgrade!

 

Plus with all these issues not worth it for me, I am waiting for the next generation

Oppo BDP-115 :)

 

The BDP-115 will still have the same ESS dacs, since they are the best ESS Technology makes so the sound signature will not change much. Probably, it will come with new features such as room correction software, even better and more powerful headphone amp and more streaming features and options. Re-read my statement above as i added to it to indicate that the reviewer said he had to go to an $8000 SACD player to find a better the BDP-105!

 

I think this the best review of the player where you feel the reviewer spent lost of time to listen and execise all of its analog and digital features. Some reviews focused on its measurements(which is great btw) and others were the standard 3 page review where you feel the reviewer was on a dealine to deliver the review and seemed rushed.


Edited by dmusoke - 1/25/13 at 10:20pm
post #3230 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevepow View Post

There are no SPDIF, Optical or Coax, outputs on the BDP-105 - only Optical and Coax inputs. You can use those inputs, for example, to run a Sonos player into the Oppo to utilize the Oppo DACs rather than the Sonos DACs.

When you use the USB DAC, output is only from the Stereo RCA or XLR outputs as far as I know - I didn't think the USB DAC would also output over HDMI, but maybe it does?

Was that the question - I must have missed something?

Oops - I did miss something - the Coax and Optical Outputs.

I don't stand behind any of this - too much flu and anti-flu medicine. When it says on the label do not operate heavy equipment - probably should be wary of operating any equipment.

Sorry rolleyes.gif
post #3231 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by wse View Post

My pre/pro allows me to do a direct comparison as I can do "Direct" which means the pre/pro just become a volume control.

So you are saying the 105 sounds 20% better than the 95! 


Here is Oppo 's quote "the BDP-105 will sound better than the BDP-95, but it should not be substantially so." so maybe 10%

Nope! its a good solid 20% and a player you don't want to miss in your setup waiting for the 115 this one will be my keeper as I didn't really want to sell my 95, I 'm keeping the 105 for its audio upgrade alone the extra's are indeed a plus but the pure sonic's it has is a must have.
post #3232 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmusoke View Post

From the latest review ... Is this true??? (http://everythingaudionetwork.blogspot.com/2013/01/audiophile-review-oppo-bdp-105.html)

...... if you use the Dual Display mode to play hi-res audio from either HDMI and then connect an LCD TV to the other HDMI output to see the menus. Since most LCD TVs only operate at 48 kHz sample rate, the Oppo, in the Dual Display mode, downsamples HDMI audio in both HDMI outputs to 48 kHz — regardless of the high-res audio's native source sample rate. I confirmed this with the Benchmark DAC2-HGC’s sample rate indicator ...

When you use Dual Display, the audio and video output on both HDMI outputs are configured to formats that are acceptable to BOTH the devices you have attached.

There is a simple fix for this: Either turn off the small display or switch it to a different input so that it's HDMI input jack is no longer "live". Once you do that, there will now only be one HDMI output "live" from the OPPO and thus the Split A/V vs. Dual Display choice is ignored and "best" audio and video goes out the remaining HDMI connection.
--Bob
post #3233 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevepow View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevepow View Post

There are no SPDIF, Optical or Coax, outputs on the BDP-105 - only Optical and Coax inputs. You can use those inputs, for example, to run a Sonos player into the Oppo to utilize the Oppo DACs rather than the Sonos DACs.

When you use the USB DAC, output is only from the Stereo RCA or XLR outputs as far as I know - I didn't think the USB DAC would also output over HDMI, but maybe it does?

Was that the question - I must have missed something?

Oops - I did miss something - the Coax and Optical Outputs.

I don't stand behind any of this - too much flu and anti-flu medicine. When it says on the label do not operate heavy equipment - probably should be wary of operating any equipment.

Sorry rolleyes.gif

You'd have been OK operating a 103. It's much lighter.

Get some rest, drink plenty of fluids, and wash your hands / cover your mouth before posting here again. OK? biggrin.gif
--Bob
post #3234 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmusoke View Post

. . . .

I think this the best review of the player where you feel the reviewer spent lost of time to listen and execise all of its analog and digital features. Some reviews focused on its measurements(which is great btw) and others were the standard 3 page review where you feel the reviewer was on a dealine to deliver the review and seemed rushed.

At this point I think we can safely put to rest any lingering concerns over OPPO's switch away from stacked DACs in the new design for the 105.
--Bob
post #3235 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by lesliew View Post

Guys

Been trying out my Oppo for about 2 weeks, haven't even got around to putting a blu-ray disc in the machine yet. I've been enjoying the audio so much.

I was connected today to the USB DAC, streaming spotify but I couldn't get any audio output on the coax or optical port. HDMI was fine.

Could someone give me clarification on whether this is normal behavior or do I need to toggle a setting somewhere.

Are you using the latest firmware? Check Setup > Device Setup > Firmware Information. The "Main" firmware version number should end 1220.

While playing that Spotify input stream from your PC using the Asynchronous USB DAC, press the Info button on the OPPO remote and report what the on-screen display says is coming in as the input data format. It will be 2.0 LPCM, but the question is at what rate? If greater than 48KHz, is the thing you have connected at the other end of the Optical/Coax OUTPUT cable able to handle that higher rate of input from the OPPO?

What do you have the Optical/Coax Output of the OPPO set to? If LPCM, is it set to a high enough rate to handle the input rate coming in?

Check to confirm you have DTS Neo:6 processing OFF, as the Neo:6 processing limits the rate of digital audio.
--Bob
post #3236 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by wse View Post

Did you email Oppo?

After reading many reviews

"From there, my focus turned to comparing the sound of this player to the spectacular BDP-95. I didn’t expect much difference given that they both use the same reference DAC, but considering the small differences in design, I wanted to make sure. Two-channel playback was nearly identical, and any difference I did perceive was so slight, I might as well not even report it. The BDP-105 was every bit as detailed and dynamic as the BDP-95, and this was proven time and again with a large assortment of SACDs and CDs."



I am not sure it's worth to upgrade especially plugging down $1290..



The fan on the BD-P95 almost never goes on and I sit 12 feet away so not an issue.



I really wanted to see Audio improvement if at all possible frown.gif


Holy Psychedelic Colors, Batman!

Yes, Robin. The 70's were good to this one.....

biggrin.gif
--Bob
post #3237 of 5983
I've used the Roku stick a few times and have not noticed any lipsync issues. Only lockups I've had were trying to play huge (~30GB) M2TS files over the network - otherwise the player's operation has been reliable though many, many CDs, SACDs, DVD-As, DVDs, Blu-Rays and streamed flac, SD and HD camcorder video files. Have not attempted any operation with external HDMI sources or the USB audio input. My setup is wired gigabit ethernet, HDMI 1 to projector, HDMI 2 to receiver, and dedicated stereo outs to receiver. Control is via RS-232. Network is Windows 7 and Vista PCs. Have tried Windows "Play to" and Kinsky, both worked but the file format limitations and app interface quirks have me using the OPPO's interface rather than an external controller. Overall the functionality has been satisfactory.

Mike
post #3238 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by wse View Post

Did you email Oppo?

After reading many reviews


"From there, my focus turned to comparing the sound of this player to the spectacular BDP-95. I didn’t expect much difference given that they both use the same reference DAC, but considering the small differences in design, I wanted to make sure. Two-channel playback was nearly identical, and any difference I did perceive was so slight, I might as well not even report it. The BDP-105 was every bit as detailed and dynamic as the BDP-95, and this was proven time and again with a large assortment of SACDs and CDs."



 



I am not sure it's worth to upgrade especially plugging down $1290..



 



The fan on the BD-P95 almost never goes on and I sit 12 feet away so not an issue.



 



I really wanted to see Audio improvement if at all possible frown.gif



This is what i wrote to oppo today, i will keep the thread posted. I really like this player and want it to be perfect so that every one in the family can enjoy it, not avoid using it accept me. I want this player to just get int the av system and blend. switched through 3 av receivers in 2 months because i didnt like em and seller of those products have given me the options to return if they dont work to MY satisfaction. Returned tx-nr818 from onkyo and sc-68 from pioneer but ended up loving 4520ci from Denon despite not seeing any big time reviews online, because it just worked after automatic calibrations to a passable grade. The onkyo and pioneer products might be great to some big time reviews and i believe that. av tastes are subjective. Or any tastes for that matter.
I originally ordered bdp-103 and loved it. It had hdcp issues with motorola box few times but operated just fine. No lip synch issue what so ever. Picture quality on 150" screen great and it made my cheap dlp projector look like top dog with picture setting tweaking for cable signal picture cleanup in oppo. Having faith in oppo after seeing bdp-103 i returned it and purchased bdp-105 instead. I am willing to work with the issues. Otherwise i will go back to BDP-103 because my Denon doesnt sound not too for off of oppo with some careful tweaking. All in all i found it great hobby when it is minus 35c out side.
Sorry for any spellings or grammar fumbles. LoL.

Hello, i have few issues with my BDP-105 and need help. I have your latest firmware installed.
1. Player gets sluggish to remote control commands. Hardware and software remote commands, have to recycle the power, but have to leave it off for at-least 10 minutes before it starts working again. Seems like heating up? I have put the player away from the rest of the av equipments and it seems like it does better but i am not sure.
2. Very bad lip synch issue for cable signal. I have tried connecting directly to the projector and through the denon 4520ci. Video files from hard disks not often but it does it once or few times in a movie but is able to self correct. In cable signal i have to skip the channel back and forth to correct it. Also cable lip-synch issue is variable timing. So i cant correct it.
3, when browsing network video or audio files, player browses fine up to 4-5 screen lengths of files just fine but when try to reach over 60-70 files, it rests the browsing process and goes back to the root folders. I am using plex server because thats the only one successfully can be used. I tried other methods of browsing files through oppo to my network unsuccessfully. I am using windows 8 on an i7 machine with 10gb rams. Wndr3700 netgear router and i have tried using oppo wirelessly and wired, same results.. I have grace note option shut off In oppo.

I would also like to know if the following features are on your table for the near future firmware updates?
1. Having the custom option to select input port? When player is powered on/off?
2. Hdmi pass through when player is off? Seems like player does have the ability to pass through when powered.
3. To show media info in the tablet app without using the tv screen?

And at the end, i do wanna congratulate you for creating such a great product. That is the reason that i wanna go trough this to fix up the quirks and i believe that you guys are fully capable of doing this. Any new product on the market is very seldom perfect.
Sound alone is worth keeping this player. Most of the issues are video and network related.
Regards.
Kris
Edited by FlatRocky - 1/26/13 at 8:16am
post #3239 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkphader View Post

Of course I've been in contact with Oppo since virtually day one. Both via phone and email. It would be foolish to think otherwise.
No resolution yet.

Does anyone have a Roku stick in a 105 where the A/V stays perfectly in sync?
Does anyone have a 105 that doesn't delay the audio (via ARC or SPDIF) from external sources?
Does anyone have a 105 that doesn't freeze up?

Sync is horrible on my Roku stick. I can use Netflix directly on the 105 and it is fine. Netflix on the Roku because of the sync issues is unwatchable. My 105 has never locked up. SJ
post #3240 of 5983
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkphader View Post

I expect some bugs and know that most will get fixed in a reasonable amount of time via firmware updates.

Hard to imagine how they are going to fix the HDCP handshake problems with a firmware update, since that stuff is normally implemented in ASICs.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Blu-ray Players
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players ›  Official OPPO BDP-105 Owner's Thread