AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players ›  Official OPPO BDP-105 Owner's Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official OPPO BDP-105 Owner's Thread - Page 133

post #3961 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimshowalter View PostOppo said:

""Based on our own testing of Apple products, we are assuming at this time that the audio drops are not from the Cambridge Audio iD100 or BDP-105, but from the huge jitter on the SBCLK signal generated by the Apple devices. We have measured up to 377 ns jitter on Apple products. A good value should be less than 10 ns jitter.

High-end DAC chips, like the ESS9018 used in OPPO BDP-105, are very sensitive to these jitter levels, which could result in the DAC failing to lock the input data and lose the audio output.

The audio drops stopping after about 5-10 minutes could be either the Cambridge Audio iD100 or OPPO BDP-105 beeing able to eliminate the jitter and correctly lock the input signal."

So does that mean that mean using a mac with HDMi plugged into an Oppo BDP-95 to use the Oppo DAC is not recommended

post #3962 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Valenti View Post

I called Oppo and got a link to the unsigned driver for windows 8 32 / 64 x86 x64. Here is the link [URL=http://]http://download.oppodigital.com/BDP0103/USB_DAC_Driver_Win8/OPPO-USB-AUDIO-2.0-DRIVER(WINDOWS)_v1.61.zip[/URL] ....
Follow these instructions : [URL=http://]http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f11-software/preinstallation-failed-please-run-setup-again-if-you-are-asked-confirm-installation-software-please-confirm-13783[/URL]

I did this and it worked on windows 8 64 bit. I am using cplay and it sounds great!

How do you get this link to work? I keep going back to page one of this thread when I click it.

Thanks for your help. I really want to get the asynchrous USB working for windows 8.
post #3963 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deanhorn View Post

How do you get this link to work? I keep going back to page one of this thread when I click it.

Thanks for your help. I really want to get the asynchrous USB working for windows 8.


Here you go ... Just have to clean out the link... This is what I did. It should work now.

http://download.oppodigital.com/BDP0103/USB_DAC_Driver_Win8/OPPO-USB-AUDIO-2.0-DRIVER(WINDOWS)_v1.61.zip

http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f11-software/preinstallation-failed-please-run-setup-again-if-you-are-asked-confirm-installation-software-please-confirm-13783
post #3964 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by wse View Post

So does that mean that mean using a mac with HDMi plugged into an Oppo BDP-95 to use the Oppo DAC is not recommended

You probably meant 105.

I think it means Oppo has more work to do on its firmware.
post #3965 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by eusoro View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by angelo View Post

thanks


what kind of information the OPPO display let you know during reproduction using the OPPO as external DAC?

You know, the MDAC let us know frequency, levels etc..[/quote


I'm not sure it does . If it renders the fq info, I havent located it . the only way I can tell is via the oppo's hdmi out connection to my avr. I run both xlr analog and hdmi digital from the oppo. So while its playing analog I can seek the fq info either on the avr display or the TV hooked to it.
In my case I have Oppo hooked up directly to a TV via HDMI (no sound) and I don't see fq information. I am streaming from PC or playing via SMB - no fq info.
Maybe I am missing something - could be a great feature for Oppo to add
post #3966 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by RouslanB View Post

In my case I have Oppo hooked up directly to a TV via HDMI (no sound) and I don't see fq information. I am streaming from PC or playing via SMB - no fq info.
Maybe I am missing something - could be a great feature for Oppo to add



What if you sent the HDMI feed (with audio) to TV and press the remotes info button...it should render the info on TVs display. Not very ideal but might work.....
post #3967 of 5641
Wow guys, great thread! I plan to run stereo subs (towers with dual 10'' woofers) as stands for my monitors. Rather than connecting both subs to the SW out on the 105's multichannel outputs using a y splitter, I plan to run interconnects from the dedicated L and R stereo outs of the 105 to the line inputs of the subs and run interconnects from the line out of the subs to the L and R inputs of my Meridian 558 5x200 multichannel amp, and use the center and left and right surround multichannel outs from the 105 to the respective inputs on the Meridian. I assume that I would set L and R speakers as large, center and surrounds to small, and subwoofer to off in the 105, set the crossover, level, and phase on the subs themselves, and use the test tones and distance settings of the105 and possibly an SPL meter to optimize the sound, though I've never actually used one before (if all else fails, read the instructions). Does this sound like a reasonable way to configure the 105 for multichannel audio (SACD and DVD-A) and movies? I currently use a Denon 5910ci universal player as a transport run through the Berkeley Alpha II DAC for redbook and hi rez 2 channel audio. smile.gif
post #3968 of 5641
As good as the Oppo 105 is - if I am outputting video directly to my tv and projector - I wonder if using analog out for stereo if I would be better off getting a used Modwright BDP 95. Some are selling them for the 105 the big question is 2 channel playback. I have a BDP 93 at the moment and will be keeping it. I imagine as well the difference in multi channel between the two would not be that great. It would cost about 900 - 1000.00 more for the Modwright version and it seems to be a great cd player for the money from what I have read. Amy thoughts?
post #3969 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcheek View Post

Wow guys, great thread! I plan to run stereo subs (towers with dual 10'' woofers) as stands for my monitors. Rather than connecting both subs to the SW out on the 105's multichannel outputs using a y splitter, I plan to run interconnects from the dedicated L and R stereo outs of the 105 to the line inputs of the subs and run interconnects from the line out of the subs to the L and R inputs of my Meridian 558 5x200 multichannel amp, and use the center and left and right surround multichannel outs from the 105 to the respective inputs on the Meridian. I assume that I would set L and R speakers as large, center and surrounds to small, and subwoofer to off in the 105, set the crossover, level, and phase on the subs themselves, and use the test tones and distance settings of the105 and possibly an SPL meter to optimize the sound, though I've never actually used one before (if all else fails, read the instructions). Does this sound like a reasonable way to configure the 105 for multichannel audio (SACD and DVD-A) and movies? I currently use a Denon 5910ci universal player as a transport run through the Berkeley Alpha II DAC for redbook and hi rez 2 channel audio. smile.gif

Why would you do it that way instead of running the dedicated LFE from the Oppo to both subs, and Y'ing the L and R full-range from the Oppo to both subs?
post #3970 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by filmbuff2 View Post

As good as the Oppo 105 is - if I am outputting video directly to my tv and projector - I wonder if using analog out for stereo if I would be better off getting a used Modwright BDP 95. Some are selling them for the 105 the big question is 2 channel playback. I have a BDP 93 at the moment and will be keeping it. I imagine as well the difference in multi channel between the two would not be that great. It would cost about 900 - 1000.00 more for the Modwright version and it seems to be a great cd player for the money from what I have read. Amy thoughts?

I would much rather have the 105 than a used Modwright 95. There are a lot of new features on the 105, and to my thinking anyway the insertion of tubes into the reproduction chain degrades sound quality by adding distortion. Plus of course you end up paying more for the Modwright 95.

The only way it can be justified is if you have some sort of strong preference to the sound qualities of the added distortion. Even then I think the use of a tube based amp would be a better approach.
post #3971 of 5641
Just chiming in here as a recent 105 owner to say that, once Oppo figures out the streaming sync problem via firmware, this will be the finest piece of electronics I've ever owned. I was able to sell the BDP-83, an excellent standalone CD player/DAC which I shall not name, and an audiophile quality HT pre/pro which I likewise will not name, and the 105 equals my previous setup in some ways, and bests it in many others. I use the 105 direct to a Parasound Halo A21 and an EAD Powermaster 1000 in a 7.1 configuration with an SVS sub. Speakers are Monitor Audio GS60's with matching speakers all around.

I love Oppo. Bought the DV-971 way back when and haven't looked back.
post #3972 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by ehlarson View Post

I would much rather have the 105 than a used Modwright 95. There are a lot of new features on the 105, and to my thinking anyway the insertion of tubes into the reproduction chain degrades sound quality by adding distortion. Plus of course you end up paying more for the Modwright 95.

The only way it can be justified is if you have some sort of strong preference to the sound qualities of the added distortion. Even then I think the use of a tube based amp would be a better approach.
Modwright makes both a tube AND solid state conversion for the 95 as witnessed HERE

Judging solely from the $1000.00 price tag he listed in his post, my guess is that he's looking at the solid state conversion. I've heard nothing but glowing testimonials from those who have gone with the modwright conversion though again I also take into consideration the fact that after laying out $1000.00 bucks, it's pretty much inconceivable that someone would come out and say that they didn't hear much difference at all. Could it be that pesky old monetarily induced placebo thingy, only your hairdresser knows for sure. wink.gif
Edited by Torqdog - 3/2/13 at 7:25pm
post #3973 of 5641
Considering my setup and what I am using ( older Sony ES player into a V Dac ) and after the advice given so far I should just stick with a stock 105. I have a Vincent SV 236 hybrid integrated amplifier on order so given some of the tube qualities in the design it might be a good idea to pair them up and see what happens, I most likely will be satisfied with what I hear.
post #3974 of 5641
Oppo app miss a lot of feature - Can it be like the Onkyo app - so I do not have to switch the television on?
post #3975 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by filmbuff2 View Post

Considering my setup and what I am using ( older Sony ES player into a V Dac ) and after the advice given so far I should just stick with a stock 105. I have a Vincent SV 236 hybrid integrated amplifier on order so given some of the tube qualities in the design it might be a good idea to pair them up and see what happens, I most likely will be satisfied with what I hear.

I'm running a BDP-105 through the Vincent SV236MKII and LOVE the sound! I enjoy some tubes in my system and this combo rocks for me. Long time ago I had a tube based cd player into a ss NAD integrated and really enjoyed that too. I think the very detailed sound of the 105 works very well with the tube integrated.
Good luck!
post #3976 of 5641
I've been searching the thread for information about accessing music files via a media server. I know nothing about this and am hoping for a comprehensive explanation. Here's my situation.

I have the terrific BDP-105
I have a Macbook Pro and an iPad

Here are my questions:

1. Does the media server software unwrap the files and output the files as over the wireless connection to the Oppo?

2. Is there a bandwidth limitation doing this? For instance, can one play a 192/24 FLAC with no degradation?

3. Can you do this for multi-channel, hi res files?

4. I'm looking for a solution that will allow me to view files and control file play from my iPad.

5. Is my assumption correct that this solution (media server access) eliminates the issue with MAC OS extended (journaled) drives' not being readable by the Oppo? (because the media server is accessing the files (point #1, above.)

Who is doing this with Mac/iPad< or iPhone> and what software are you using?
post #3977 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by woof07 View Post

I've been searching the thread for information about accessing music files via a media server. I know nothing about this and am hoping for a comprehensive explanation. Here's my situation.

I have the terrific BDP-105
I have a Macbook Pro and an iPad

Here are my questions:

1. Does the media server software unwrap the files and output the files as over the wireless connection to the Oppo?

2. Is there a bandwidth limitation doing this? For instance, can one play a 192/24 FLAC with no degradation?

3. Can you do this for multi-channel, hi res files?

4. I'm looking for a solution that will allow me to view files and control file play from my iPad.

5. Is my assumption correct that this solution (media server access) eliminates the issue with MAC OS extended (journaled) drives' not being readable by the Oppo? (because the media server is accessing the files (point #1, above.)

Who is doing this with Mac/iPad< or iPhone> and what software are you using?

1. If compatible file format, no unwrapping required as 105 does that. Avoid wireless if possible to maximize Ethernet quality without signal interruption..

2. No bandwidth limitations other than oppo max of 192khz.

3. Yes to multichannel hi res.

4. Mac server software not my gig as I use jriver for windows, which has an iPhone and iPad app to do exactly what you describe. Just saw that jriver just released a Mac beta.

5. Correct.
post #3978 of 5641

Thanks eusoro - the links now work for me.

But, after going through all of this, I got some file error at the end and it did not install. I am going to wait for Oppo to put it on their support website. Hopefully at that time, you will not need a PHD in PC's to install it.

Seems like trying to use PC's for music is getting more complicated instead of user friendly. Thank goodness I still have my Logitech Squeezebox Touch to get my music off the computer. This device is a model for all manufacturers to follow. It is so user friendly and I have not had a problem with it. Sorry for the rant, but I am a little frustrated at this point.
post #3979 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torqdog View Post

Modwright makes both a tube AND solid state conversion for the 95 as witnessed HERE

Judging solely from the $1000.00 price tag he listed in his post, my guess is that he's looking at the solid state conversion. I've heard nothing but glowing testimonials from those who have gone with the modwright conversion though again I also take into consideration the fact that after laying out $1000.00 bucks, it's pretty much inconceivable that someone would come out and say that they didn't hear much difference at all. Could it be that pesky old monetarily induced placebo thingy, only your hairdresser knows for sure. wink.gif

There is a decided lack of specs on modwright's site. Given the specs of the stock 105 are close to theoretical limits, it would be difficult to impossible for modwright to do anything except degrade the signal.
post #3980 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimshowalter View Post

There is a decided lack of specs on modwright's site. Given the specs of the stock 105 are close to theoretical limits, it would be difficult to impossible for modwright to do anything except degrade the signal.
Good point. However, it is interesting to note that Oppo used Modwright engineers(IIRC) in designing the new 105 which indicates to me that Oppo has the deepest respect for what Modwright has done in the past.
post #3981 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torqdog View Post

Good point. However, it is interesting to note that Oppo used Modwright engineers(IIRC) in designing the new 105 which indicates to me that Oppo has the deepest respect for what Modwright has done in the past.

Up to a point. You'll note that Oppo didn't see the need to replace the opamps with discrete versions, replace solid state with tubes, turn the unit into two-channel only (tube version), etc. In other words, much (most?) of the mods from modwright were rejected.
post #3982 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimshowalter View Post

Up to a point. You'll note that Oppo didn't see the need to replace the opamps with discrete versions, replace solid state with tubes, turn the unit into two-channel only (tube version), etc. In other words, much (most?) of the mods from modwright were rejected.


Most likely the price point could not be met with additional upgrades. Note that the addtion of the linear power supply for the audio section is a significant upgrade that was probably suggested by MW engineers. The clearly audible weekness of the 95 was its power supply and the addition of the LPS in the 105 was necessary. While other component upgrades would also be desireable, they were probably not worth that added expense for the target audience.
post #3983 of 5641
Was it Modwright or Nuforce that provided the input to the 105 design? I don't think Oppo ever said who it was and my guess is it is more likely Nuforce since Oppo has worked with them before.
post #3984 of 5641
I also thought it made a lot more sense that it was nuforce
post #3985 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deanhorn View Post

Thank goodness I still have my Logitech Squeezebox Touch to get my music off the computer. This device is a model for all manufacturers to follow. It is so user friendly and I have not had a problem with it. Sorry for the rant, but I am a little frustrated at this point.

One of the interesting things about the server end of the Squeezebox ecosystem (Logitech Media Server) is that it also supports DLNA. So with a controller like Asset UPnP you can pay directly to the Oppo.

Still not as user friendly as the Squeezebox though. I was disappointed when the Squeezebox products were discontinued. The Touch especially is very nice.
post #3986 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzGuyy View Post

Was it Modwright or Nuforce that provided the input to the 105 design? I don't think Oppo ever said who it was and my guess is it is more likely Nuforce since Oppo has worked with them before.
I couldn't remember exactly which of the two it was either which is why I inserted the(IIRC) acronym. I do remember reading somewhere that whichever company it was, was involved in developing the 105 which I personally found quite interesting and a revelation of sorts.
post #3987 of 5641
purplerocks: Thank you for the heads up on the Vincent amplifier - it makes more sense to just use the above average sound quality of the Oppo into the Vincent. Granted as most of us are aware tubes do modify the sound like just about everything in audio to one degree or another, but at least it tends to be a pleasing sort of distortion and I have usually liked the combination of tube pre amps with solid state. I just did not want to have another component in my system although I was tempted to get Modwright LS 100 pre amp. As far as getting hi rez files on a external hard drive I have been thinking about using my laptop with Jplay combined with jRiver and the Jack Kenny JKDAC32 - new to the idea of computer based music servers etc. so I am not sure if this is something I could use in conjunction with the Oppo.
post #3988 of 5641
Well, mainly because of a post I read awhile back in Audioholics by a poster with the user name Soundhound:

''I have used my subwoofers in 'stereo' for years. Read the following and see if you think you might get some benefit from this setup. To do it, all you need is two powered subwoofers with internal line level crossovers, and two extra interconnects.

While it is true that low bass is in theory non directional, the way that bass mixes in the room is not. An example - suppose that you have a group of performers on a stage and they are being recorded by two or three omni directional microphones in front about 15 feet away, which is a common technique. Now say you have someone playing a bass drum or string bass on the extreme left of the stage. The sound of that instrument will reach the left microphone earlier than the right microphone. Considering the frequency of the instruments will be be around 30 Hz in the case of the bass drum and 40 Hz in the case of the bass, the delay in the sound reaching the left and right microphones will be as much as half a wavelength. If you were to play this with a single subwoofer, or two subs with the bass between the channels summed by the crossover as it is when you use the "sub/LFE" output on your pre/pro, this acoustic delay would simply cause peaks and dips in the response of the bass from that instrument. However, if you use stereo subs and are hearing ture stereo bass, this delay between the sound reaching the left and right microphones is heard as natural acoustic mixing of the bass frequencies from those instruments in the listening room, just as it did in the original recording venue. The way the bass mixes in the room is natural, acoustic, and dynamic over time.

As an example of another real-world benefit of stereo subs located next to the main left and right speakers, consider the following example. You have your single subwoofer connected to the "subwoofer/LFE output of your pre/pro, and the sub is located next to your couch, and you have it crossed over at 80Hz (in other words, a pretty conventional arrangement). The distance from your listening position to the mains is 10 feet (the sub is 10 feet from your mains). You play a studio recording that has a bass player coming from the right speaker. He plays an open "E" string. Guess what? The fundamental frequency of that string (about 40Hz) will come from the subwoofer next to you. The second harmonic at around 80Hz will come from both your sub and your main speakers. The 3rd harmonic (and above) of the bass will come exclusively from your mains. As you can imagine, this plays absolute havoc with the harmonic presentation and structure and of the instrument! The effect is of the same type, if not to the same degree, of taking the tweeter out of your speaker cabinets and relocating them a couple feet away. Fundamental frequencies coming from one place, and the harmonics coming from another. The closer the notes being played are to the bass crossover frequency, the worse this disembodiment of the fundamental from it's harmonics will be, as the phase difference between the two will be greater due to the higher frequency. Adjusting the "phase" control of your subwoofer will not correct this: it only corrects for one specific frequency, that of the crossover, and musicians hate being restricted to playing only one note (at least good ones!).

Electronics designers take great pains to ensure that all the frequencies in an amplifer (especially at the low end) are amplified with a minimum of phase shift (this is the reason for DC coupling) - Why mess this up if you don't have to?
I notice an increase in sense of "air" and "realism" on almost all recordings that have live performers, even studio recordings. While low bass cannot be heard as "directional" in the traditional sense, the way the bass interacts as it mixes acoustically in the listening room certainly can be sensed and felt as added realism, and the filling in of that dimension that you are in the space where the recording was made. In addition, sound effects that were recorded in stereo for movies will have their bass reproduced in stereo. This is especially apparent in city street scenes when a bus or train passes. It just sounds more "real" as a result of the way the bass mixes in the room, just like it would if you were there. This benefit wil also be apparent when playing multi-channel discs like SACD and DVD-A, as the main left and right channels will give this added realism from the natural acoustic mixing of the low bass.

This setup is completely transparent to HT, multi-channel, and stereo playback, as anything you throw at it will have the bass reproduced correctly, regardless of format. No more fooling around with the logisitics of what to do with the subwoofer when playing SACD/DVD-A - the bass just reproduces seamlessly.
And best of all, if you have the two subs and extra interconnects, doing this costs nothing.

The ".1" channel is a convention that came from the movie industry, and had no precedent in the music recording industry. It works for movies since in a large theater, very few people are in the "sweet spot", so a mono LFE track is a reasonable compromise.

The ".1" track is a bad fit for music however. Forcing the "movie" model for speaker configuration on a system playing music where a significant number of people are in the "sweet spot" does not work well - it's a kludge in my opinion.

You're basically thinking of your main speakers/subs as _very_ extended full range speakers that can take the demands of film/HT, while at the same time being optimal for music. The LFE track in movies is simply being routed as a mono signal to both of your mains, where it ends up in both of your subs, just the same way it would be if your subs were connected conventionally to your pre/pro with a "Y" adapter. When playing music (either stereo or multi-channel SACD/DVD-A), the entire music spectrum, including the bass, is in stereo, and coming from where it should be: next to (or part of) your mains. One of the results is a cleaner, more coherent and focused soundstage. I've also noticed a heightened sense of realism, and of feeling I'm in the recording venue. Even hearing the low frequency content of the air conditioning rumble and "room tone" that exists in all large spaces in stereo rather than mono enhances the sense of realism. A side benefit is that in movies, you will hear the extremely low frequency content of stereo sound effects (like street scenes with busses and trains etc) that reside in the main left and right speakers in stereo - something that you won't hear in a movie theater, or even on a movie dubbing stage since the mains in these venues only respond down to around 40Hz.


If you have to use a single subwoofer for whatever reasons, at least take into consideration the above and place the sub as close to the mains as possible, preferrably equal-distant from both. This is still a compromise however, since a single sub is still a significant distance from the mains.

While it is true that as the frequency of sound goes down, the ability to locate the source diminishes, but there are a lot of other things to take into consideration. It's just not as simple as "bass is omni-directional so it doesn't matter where you put the sub"!


To configure your system to take advantage of stereo bass, do the following:

First of all, move one subwoofer as close as possible to your main front left speaker. Move the other subwoofer as close as possible to your main front right speaker.

In the preamp's speaker setup menu, set your main left and right front speakers to "Large". Set the subwoofer to "Off". Set your center and surrounds to "small" or "large" depending on their size. Most setups use the "small" speaker setting.

Disconnect the subwoofers from the LFE/Subwoofer output of the preamp. Run an interconnect from the main left and right outputs of the preamp to the "line input" of each subwoofer - the left output to the left subwoofer, and the right output to the right subwoofer. Run an interconnect from the "line output" of your left subwoofer to the input of your left channel power amplifier. Run the right subwoofer's "line output" to the input of your right channel power amplifier.

Set the crossover frequency of both of your subwoofers to the crossover frequency you used previously in your preamp. You will probably need to re-adjust the level controls of your subwoofers.

Sounds like a plan.
post #3989 of 5641
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimshowalter View Post

Why would you do it that way instead of running the dedicated LFE from the Oppo to both subs, and Y'ing the L and R full-range from the Oppo to both subs?

Sorry for the dupe post!!! I forgot to include the quoted post that I'm replying to.

Well, mainly because of a post i read awhile back in Audioholics by a poster with the user name Soundhound:

I have used my subwoofers in "stereo" for years. Read the following and see if you think you might get some benefit from this setup. To do it, all you need is two powered subwoofers with internal line level crossovers, and two extra interconnects.

While it is true that low bass is in theory non directional, the way that bass mixes in the room is not. An example - suppose that you have a group of performers on a stage and they are being recorded by two or three omni directional microphones in front about 15 feet away, which is a common technique. Now say you have someone playing a bass drum or string bass on the extreme left of the stage. The sound of that instrument will reach the left microphone earlier than the right microphone. Considering the frequency of the instruments will be be around 30 Hz in the case of the bass drum and 40 Hz in the case of the bass, the delay in the sound reaching the left and right microphones will be as much as half a wavelength. If you were to play this with a single subwoofer, or two subs with the bass between the channels summed by the crossover as it is when you use the "sub/LFE" output on your pre/pro, this acoustic delay would simply cause peaks and dips in the response of the bass from that instrument. However, if you use stereo subs and are hearing ture stereo bass, this delay between the sound reaching the left and right microphones is heard as natural acoustic mixing of the bass frequencies from those instruments in the listening room, just as it did in the original recording venue. The way the bass mixes in the room is natural, acoustic, and dynamic over time.

As an example of another real-world benefit of stereo subs located next to the main left and right speakers, consider the following example. You have your single subwoofer connected to the "subwoofer/LFE output of your pre/pro, and the sub is located next to your couch, and you have it crossed over at 80Hz (in other words, a pretty conventional arrangement). The distance from your listening position to the mains is 10 feet (the sub is 10 feet from your mains). You play a studio recording that has a bass player coming from the right speaker. He plays an open "E" string. Guess what? The fundamental frequency of that string (about 40Hz) will come from the subwoofer next to you. The second harmonic at around 80Hz will come from both your sub and your main speakers. The 3rd harmonic (and above) of the bass will come exclusively from your mains. As you can imagine, this plays absolute havoc with the harmonic presentation and structure and of the instrument! The effect is of the same type, if not to the same degree, of taking the tweeter out of your speaker cabinets and relocating them a couple feet away. Fundamental frequencies coming from one place, and the harmonics coming from another. The closer the notes being played are to the bass crossover frequency, the worse this disembodiment of the fundamental from it's harmonics will be, as the phase difference between the two will be greater due to the higher frequency. Adjusting the "phase" control of your subwoofer will not correct this: it only corrects for one specific frequency, that of the crossover, and musicians hate being restricted to playing only one note (at least good ones!).

Electronics designers take great pains to ensure that all the frequencies in an amplifer (especially at the low end) are amplified with a minimum of phase shift (this is the reason for DC coupling) - Why mess this up if you don't have to?

I notice an increase in sense of "air" and "realism" on almost all recordings that have live performers, even studio recordings. While low bass cannot be heard as "directional" in the traditional sense, the way the bass interacts as it mixes acoustically in the listening room certainly can be sensed and felt as added realism, and the filling in of that dimension that you are in the space where the recording was made. In addition, sound effects that were recorded in stereo for movies will have their bass reproduced in stereo. This is especially apparent in city street scenes when a bus or train passes. It just sounds more "real" as a result of the way the bass mixes in the room, just like it would if you were there. This benefit wil also be apparent when playing multi-channel discs like SACD and DVD-A, as the main left and right channels will give this added realism from the natural acoustic mixing of the low bass.

This setup is completely transparent to HT, multi-channel, and stereo playback, as anything you throw at it will have the bass reproduced correctly, regardless of format. No more fooling around with the logisitics of what to do with the subwoofer when playing SACD/DVD-A - the bass just reproduces seamlessly.
And best of all, if you have the two subs and extra interconnects, doing this costs nothing.

The ".1" channel is a convention that came from the movie industry, and had no precedent in the music recording industry. It works for movies since in a large theater, very few people are in the "sweet spot", so a mono LFE track is a reasonable compromise.

The ".1" track is a bad fit for music however. Forcing the "movie" model for speaker configuration on a system playing music where a significant number of people are in the "sweet spot" does not work well - it's a kludge in my opinion.

You're basically thinking of your main speakers/subs as _very_ extended full range speakers that can take the demands of film/HT, while at the same time being optimal for music. The LFE track in movies is simply being routed as a mono signal to both of your mains, where it ends up in both of your subs, just the same way it would be if your subs were connected conventionally to your pre/pro with a "Y" adapter. When playing music (either stereo or multi-channel SACD/DVD-A), the entire music spectrum, including the bass, is in stereo, and coming from where it should be: next to (or part of) your mains. One of the results is a cleaner, more coherent and focused soundstage. I've also noticed a heightened sense of realism, and of feeling I'm in the recording venue. Even hearing the low frequency content of the air conditioning rumble and "room tone" that exists in all large spaces in stereo rather than mono enhances the sense of realism. A side benefit is that in movies, you will hear the extremely low frequency content of stereo sound effects (like street scenes with busses and trains etc) that reside in the main left and right speakers in stereo - something that you won't hear in a movie theater, or even on a movie dubbing stage since the mains in these venues only respond down to around 40Hz.


If you have to use a single subwoofer for whatever reason, at least take into consideration the above and place the sub as close to the mains as possible, preferrably equal-distant from both. This is still a compromise however, since a single sub is still a significant distance from one of the mains.

While it is true that as the frequency of sound goes down, the ability to locate the source diminishes, but there are a lot of other things to take into consideration. It's just not as simple as "bass is omni-directional so it doesn't matter where you put the sub"!


To configure your system to take advantage of stereo bass, do the following:

First of all, move one subwoofer as close as possible to your main front left speaker. Move the other subwoofer as close as possible to your main front right speaker.

In the preamp's speaker setup menu, set your main left and right front speakers to "Large". Set the subwoofer to "Off". Set your center and surrounds to "small" or "large" depending on their size. Most setups use the "small" speaker setting.

Disconnect the subwoofers from the LFE/Subwoofer output of the preamp. Run an interconnect from the main left and right outputs of the preamp to the "line input" of each subwoofer - the left output to the left subwoofer, and the right output to the right subwoofer. Run an interconnect from the "line output" of your left subwoofer to the input of your left channel power amplifier. Run the right subwoofer's "line output" to the input of your right channel power amplifier.

Set the crossover frequency of both of your subwoofers to the crossover frequency you used previously in your preamp. You will probably need to re-adjust the level controls of your subwoofers.
post #3990 of 5641
Thanks for the advice, regarding xAct, for batch converting an Apple lossless (ALAC) iTunes library to FLAC, for transfer to a hard drive, along with album art - on a MAC / APPLE system):

I've tried this, hoping that "Artist Folders" and the inner sub-folders of (Albums), then in turn sub-sub folders (Songs) could be batch-converted from Apple lossless (ALAC) to FLAC and stored on a directly connected USB hard drive, with at least this rudimentary navigation / search feature, if the Oppo 105 TV (via HDMI) was on, although the audio would go to analog out / headphones:

1. ARTIST (alphabetical, by name)
2. Sub-folder: ALBUMS: (alphabetical, by name)
3. Sub-sub folder: SONG: from that particular album, (alphabetical, by name)

Unless I'm missing something, neither xAct, nor DBPowerAmp, Nor Jriver Media Center are able to do this - at least with a MAC rather than a WINDOWS / MSFT- based system. Granted, jRiver has a beta version for Mac - but it seems very buggy for the time being.

Am I the only one who wants a lossless version of their entire iTunes library, converted to a Codec that the Oppo 105 can read, that the Oppo will access via a directly connected USB hard drive, with some decent and simple navigation / search features on the TV?


I don't want to have an active computer in the signal path, and I don't want to stream the songs wirelessly, nor can I have an ethernet hard-wire connection - just USB hard drive directly in to Oppo 105.

Any clarification / help is appreciated!

Thanks
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Blu-ray Players
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players ›  Official OPPO BDP-105 Owner's Thread