Okay, so I'm actually coming at this from a weird angle. I'm an experienced DSLR video shooter (Pana GH2, Sony A65, Oly EM5) and I'm very comfortable with manual everything. Canon was practically giving away camcorders this Black Friday, so for a mere $250 I got an M400. I've been planning to pick up a camcorder for a while and this seemed like the perfect opportunity.
So my question is, what should I actually be expecting from this thing? I'm hoping for more usable AF, especially with the more forgiving depth of field. It's not a high end unit, so I'm not sure how much manual control I'll get or will even want to exercise. What about color profiles? DSLR land is all about flattening the heck out of the curve and patching it up in post. Will the cine modes here do the same thing?
More generally speaking, I've seen a lot of people talking about how camcorders are designed for video while the large sensor still cameras have it shoehorned in and there are all kinds of quirks. But I'm not really sure what that means in practice -- yes the A65 has a moire problem and a record limit, the EM5's codec will occasionally melt into macroblocking for no reason, and the GH2 tends to hunt in AF mode and clip highlights harshly. But what is the real strength of the camcorder? Or is it just the carefree experience that makes it?
(Bit of a brain dump there, I know. Please bear with me.)
So my question is, what should I actually be expecting from this thing? I'm hoping for more usable AF, especially with the more forgiving depth of field. It's not a high end unit, so I'm not sure how much manual control I'll get or will even want to exercise. What about color profiles? DSLR land is all about flattening the heck out of the curve and patching it up in post. Will the cine modes here do the same thing?
More generally speaking, I've seen a lot of people talking about how camcorders are designed for video while the large sensor still cameras have it shoehorned in and there are all kinds of quirks. But I'm not really sure what that means in practice -- yes the A65 has a moire problem and a record limit, the EM5's codec will occasionally melt into macroblocking for no reason, and the GH2 tends to hunt in AF mode and clip highlights harshly. But what is the real strength of the camcorder? Or is it just the carefree experience that makes it?
(Bit of a brain dump there, I know. Please bear with me.)









