Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Lammer 
Any content we have ever had on a spinning silver disc has always been compressed.
DVD and standard-def TV on our larger screens sucked, and then HD-DVD & Blu-Ray & HDTV became a god-send.
Then we soon got spoiled and starting complaining about the compression artifacts, macroblocking, etc, in our HDTV broadcasts and Blu-Ray transfers.
And we want more colour too.
Are there any virtues in having uncompressed "2K" 1080P content along with a fuller colour spectrum, vs whatever means they choose to encode 4K ?
- Andy

Any content we have ever had on a spinning silver disc has always been compressed.
DVD and standard-def TV on our larger screens sucked, and then HD-DVD & Blu-Ray & HDTV became a god-send.
Then we soon got spoiled and starting complaining about the compression artifacts, macroblocking, etc, in our HDTV broadcasts and Blu-Ray transfers.
And we want more colour too.
Are there any virtues in having uncompressed "2K" 1080P content along with a fuller colour spectrum, vs whatever means they choose to encode 4K ?
- Andy
Uncompressed video is *much* too large to make sense. Uncompressed 1080p video with simple 8bit per channel RGB would already consume exactly 1TB for a 2 hour movie (hope my math is correct). If you use a larger colorspace, you probably want to use more than 8bit, then the movie file size increases accordingly. That just doesn't make any sense today. Ok, you could use lossless compression (similar to TrueHD for audio), that would help quite a bit, but it would still be too large to make sense. Video compression is still necessary today, but bitrate could be increased, or better codecs used. RED claims to have a codec which works much better than h264. Basically RED is saying that they can use Blu-Ray like video bitrates (file sizes), but they can compress 4K into that with a bigger color gamut, higher bitdepth, no color subsampling and less compression artifacts. Whether what they claim is really true is still up in the air. We'll have to wait and see on that...
I think the key problems with Blu-Ray today are studios/encoding houses screwing up, by using stone age 2K masters and/or by using DNR/edge enhancement and/or by using lower bitrates than necessary and/or by not applying proper dithering.














