What a difference a week makes. After countless hours of tweaking, I've got a 9.2-capable AVR running a system running that - at it's best - sounds almost exactly the same with a real center and a phantom center in the surround mode I prefer for music listening - DTS Neo X Music + THX
What made the difference? Power. I grossly underestimated the power requirements of the center channel. Before, I had the XTi-1000 powering the L/R mains, figuring that left extra power for the AVR to drive the center. Flipping that equation brought overall balance to the system. I gave over my entire Crown XTi-1000 to the center channel and now it sings. To make up for the loss of power in the L/R mains, I am running 7.2 instead of 9.2 and bi-amping. The end result is 280 watts each for L/R and 550 watts for the center.
My impressions of what a center channel can do have been totally rehabilitated. The ideal is that at the point of measurement for a good AVR, the listener should not be able to discern the difference between phantom and real center channels. That requires the two-channel front stage to have exceptional imaging, and for the 3-channel stage it requires a center that is truly matched, properly integrated... and given access to a surplus of power relative to the rest of the system.
So, am I still a member of the no center channel club? I have one installed now, and it's a $1,000 center channel. It works and it allows me to have guests over and 'wow' everyone with what I could experience by myself with a phantom center channel. Switching to phantom remains an option, but it's no longer my default. Still a fan - I like 'knowing' that center channel is off - psychologically it's somehow more gratifying to hear 'holographic' sound - even if modern surround processing is now just as good at recreating subtle depth cues.
Of course everything I am discussing is for listening to MUSIC.
For movies, the new system in "Neo: X Cinema THX" mode blows away everything else I have experienced. There's no way I will watch a movie with a phantom center anymore... but again I'm a bit surprised how much power was needed to make it work.
What made the difference? Power. I grossly underestimated the power requirements of the center channel. Before, I had the XTi-1000 powering the L/R mains, figuring that left extra power for the AVR to drive the center. Flipping that equation brought overall balance to the system. I gave over my entire Crown XTi-1000 to the center channel and now it sings. To make up for the loss of power in the L/R mains, I am running 7.2 instead of 9.2 and bi-amping. The end result is 280 watts each for L/R and 550 watts for the center.
My impressions of what a center channel can do have been totally rehabilitated. The ideal is that at the point of measurement for a good AVR, the listener should not be able to discern the difference between phantom and real center channels. That requires the two-channel front stage to have exceptional imaging, and for the 3-channel stage it requires a center that is truly matched, properly integrated... and given access to a surplus of power relative to the rest of the system.
So, am I still a member of the no center channel club? I have one installed now, and it's a $1,000 center channel. It works and it allows me to have guests over and 'wow' everyone with what I could experience by myself with a phantom center channel. Switching to phantom remains an option, but it's no longer my default. Still a fan - I like 'knowing' that center channel is off - psychologically it's somehow more gratifying to hear 'holographic' sound - even if modern surround processing is now just as good at recreating subtle depth cues.
Of course everything I am discussing is for listening to MUSIC.
For movies, the new system in "Neo: X Cinema THX" mode blows away everything else I have experienced. There's no way I will watch a movie with a phantom center anymore... but again I'm a bit surprised how much power was needed to make it work.





























