I'd hasten to point out that Dolby must feel that height is the most important after basic 5.1/7.1, since that's all their PLIIz system offers. I'd guess the first movies with a genuine 9.1 mix will have the extra channels be height. Width seems like more of an enhancement than a channel effect anyhow. Audyssey is selling their technology as a superior experience and since Dolby doesn't do wide, of course they say that's the big deal. Maybe they are right. I preferred height having been forced to choose. I'm sure it's seamless and sublime for those who can have it all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by subyguy 
And just for a different pov, imo wides are the most important after the basic 5.1 if your room can handle them. Makes a super wide soundstage that just sucks you into the action. I don't disagree that in your room highs are better than wides but to just say that wides aren't important will mislead many people. In fact audessey states that wides are more important than heights as well. I'm currently running 7.2 surround with wides off my 4311 which is capable of 11.2 with my separate amps but my ceiling isn't high enough in my current theater for highs. The new house we're building has 9' basement ceilings so I will likely go 9.2 or 11.2 there.

And just for a different pov, imo wides are the most important after the basic 5.1 if your room can handle them. Makes a super wide soundstage that just sucks you into the action. I don't disagree that in your room highs are better than wides but to just say that wides aren't important will mislead many people. In fact audessey states that wides are more important than heights as well. I'm currently running 7.2 surround with wides off my 4311 which is capable of 11.2 with my separate amps but my ceiling isn't high enough in my current theater for highs. The new house we're building has 9' basement ceilings so I will likely go 9.2 or 11.2 there.






















The Presence Speakers can only be run in lieu of the rear surrounds it seems.




