AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Audio theory, Setup and Chat › Simplified REW Setup and Use (USB Mic & HDMI Connection) Including Measurement Techniques and How To Interpret Graphs
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Simplified REW Setup and Use (USB Mic & HDMI Connection) Including Measurement Techniques and How... - Page 8

post #211 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

 

I agree. This ought to be in one of the first posts in the thread if we are going to remember to do it and what it stipulates. HST, I always do 1/24th anyway, but I also often make a 1/6th as I understand that it can give us a better idea of what our ears actually hear. 1/24th tells us better what is going on, 1/6th tells us better what it might sound like. Please correct me if I am wrong.

 

EDIT: looking at your two graphs Jerry - the 10db peak to peak difference between 970Hz and just over 1kHz all but disappears on the 1/3 smoothed graph - as it is quite deep but also very narrow, does this not correspond more to what we hear?  IOW, we could obsess over that small frequency band as shown in the 1/24th graph and spend a lot of time trying to smooth it, but a quick glance at the 1/3 (or pref 1/6th) smoothed graph would show us that is probably inaudible anyway? Have I got this right or am I way off?

 

I think we will have a lot of discussion around this topic.  My current understanding is that the further you go up the frequency, the less important these narrow peaks and valleys are.  A graph of 10K-20K with no smoothing is useless because of the "whiskers".  Smoothing must be applied in this range, and I don't think we hear any of those narrow variations.

 

In the lower frequencies, I believe we are more sensitive, therefore the recommendation to always present frequencies below ~300Hz with no smoothing.

post #212 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuzed2 View Post

+2

Moreover, the .mdat files can be shared. Look here: Feri REW.zip 15k .zip file

Just unzip it, click on it and it will open up in your REW. Then you can do whatever you want with it, change smoothing, frequency range, dB range, etc.

It's fun. smile.gif

P.s.: I had to zip the file coz AVS didn't accept .mdat as an attachement, but zip yes.
post #213 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post

That doesn't look right.....   There shouldn't be a 30 dB increase in your lower bass.  Either REW is improperly measuring, or you have a serious issue in the low end.

Hi Jerry, thanks for looking, how about this


Just notice my graph limits has changed eek.gif
post #214 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioguy View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by djbluemax1 View Post


All the little settings in Windows (and the various different versions of Windows that different users may be on) that need to be correctly set for everything to work together. No sound from HDMI? Did you set your soundcard's outputs correctly? My laptop doesn't automatically output sound through the HDMI connection, only video. I have to go into the configuration to change that manually. Once I know how and where to do that, it's quick and simple, but until and unless I know that, it can be a PITA. Did I configure the input channel settings in Windows correctly for REW? (this was my first PITA when trying to hook up my external soundcard. Took a while for me to figure that one out).

Max

And where does one go to learn EXACTLY where to look, what to change, what to not change? That is one of the many frustrations I am having
Therein is the major problem with REW, AFAIK, there really isn't one place where you can go to find ALL the correct settings and parameters to set before beginning. The REW Help file will help set the basics for REW, but there are too many possible equipment configurations for Windows computers. Different systems may (and do) need slightly different settings.

HTS can be a LOT of help as those folks have lots of experience with using and configuring REW setups, but even there, with my particular setup (Windows 7 PC to Roland Quad Capture external soundcard to calibrated EMM-6 mic), I eventually had to figure it out myself by going into every menu (Windows and REW) before I could figure out what had to be set in what manner for everything to work properly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post

I think we should agree in this thread on certain standards for the graphs we publish.  My recommendations:

- Use 1/24 smooting for full-range graphs, and no smooting for graphs that focus on bass frequencies, say below 300Hz.
- Adjust vertical axis resolution so that the scale shows in 5 dB increments (I believe Jason made the same recommendation).
- Always include a full-range graph (20-20,000 Hz), as well as a graph that focuses on a problem range (e.g. bass frequencies 20-300 Hz).

Having said that, would you care to re-publish your averaged graph with 1/24 smoothing, rather than 1/3 smoothing?

Thanks.

I agree. This ought to be in one of the first posts in the thread if we are going to remember to do it and what it stipulates. HST, I always do 1/24th anyway, but I also often make a 1/6th as I understand that it can give us a better idea of what our ears actually hear. 1/24th tells us better what is going on, 1/6th tells us better what it might sound like. Please correct me if I am wrong.

EDIT: looking at your two graphs Jerry - the 10db peak to peak difference between 970Hz and just over 1kHz all but disappears on the 1/3 smoothed graph - as it is quite deep but also very narrow, does this not correspond more to what we hear?  IOW, we could obsess over that small frequency band as shown in the 1/24th graph and spend a lot of time trying to smooth it, but a quick glance at the 1/3 (or pref 1/6th) smoothed graph would show us that is probably inaudible anyway? Have I got this right or am I way off?
The higher up the FR range we go, the less audible any dips etc. over narrow frequencies are, but a huge dip around the 970-1kHz region will be audible. Our ears are extremely sensitive to that region.

I know that figuring REW out is already going to be time consuming, but if anyone is interested in how the results of measuring and correcting FR anomalies affects the audible outcome, I highly recommend downloading and trying the Harman How-To-Listen program.

*** edited to add *** I went back to look at the specific graph you were referring to and you're actually right, the 10db difference over that small range would be very difficult to hear for most listeners (who aren't Tom Holman).


Max
Edited by djbluemax1 - 1/11/13 at 1:50am
post #215 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

I am amazed that I am so excited at the prospect of this smile.gif  

I am hoping Jason (or anyone) might create a step by step guide as to what we need to do, once REW is set up and working, so that we can get started right away on the most important measurements, how to interpret them and what changes we might make as result of seeing them. 

Jeff and I already did. Here you go: Acoustical Measurement Standards.

Note this is focused on two channel, but extending to home theater is straightforward. For HT use the main change would be to tighten down the LF frequency response targets significantly since you have subs which can be physically placed separate to main speakers.

Any questions I'd be glad to answer them. Note Jeff & my thinking on ETC is a bit different. For more on that see this article: Listening Room Reflections and the ETC.
post #216 of 2940
With respect to frequency resolution, I'd suggest 1/3rd octave above 250Hz, and both 1/3rd AND a higher resolution (e.g. 1/12th or 1/24th octave) below 250Hz.

It all depends what you are trying to understand.

Generically speaking now....our ear's loudness summing is closer to a 1/3rd octave filter, individual resonance discrimination is closer to a 1/6th. 1/12th and higher are useful to understand center frequencies of dips and peaks for addressing room issues such as room modes and speaker boundary interference. But with too high a resolution you can't see the wood for the trees...
post #217 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by JChin View Post

Hi Jerry, thanks for looking, how about this


Just notice my graph limits has changed eek.gif

Measuring LFE + Main? LFE is too hot then... Remember, if you pass signal to LFE directly (not separated by means of the receiver crossover) it is hot by 10dB. May be this is the reason of such difference under 50 Hz?
post #218 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioguy View Post

And where does one go to learn EXACTLY where to look, what to change, what to not change? That is one of the many frustrations I am having

I have drafted a step-by-step configuration guide to get the beginner up and running on REW, including the configuration of the Windows audio interface. I will be forwarding my draft to Feri and Keith this evening for their feedback, and hopefully will be able to post it in this thread within a day or two. Like Max says, developing a generic "how to" guide is not that easy, but I hope this document will be useful

I reported yesterday that I had reached an impasse with regards to configuring ASIO4ALL with HDMI. Not wanting to accept defeat, I put in a fresh hard drive into the laptop and did a completely fresh install of everything. It now seems to be working properly, even though I still have access only to two channels. This is evidently a limitation of my laptop hardware (a two year old Acer). At least I can proceed with getting the USB mic to simplify my kit.
post #219 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by JChin View Post

Hi Jerry, thanks for looking, how about this


Just notice my graph limits has changed eek.gif

The 20-40Hz peak does not look healthy. Ar you using the Audyssey mic as a temporary measurement tool? If yes, then we shouldn't worry too much about the measurements. Otherwise, we should try and understand why the bass looks so peculiar.
post #220 of 2940
HTS has some good tutorials and notes on what they like to see in graphs that get posted to them. I think it would be good to adopt their convention so there is some consistency for people that look at both forums. Thoughts?
post #221 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post

The 20-40Hz peak does not look healthy. Ar you using the Audyssey mic as a temporary measurement tool? If yes, then we shouldn't worry too much about the measurements. Otherwise, we should try and understand why the bass looks so peculiar.

Yes using DM-A409 mic to play around for now tongue.gif.
Here is my last testing for this evening biggrin.gif.

LF, C, RF, SL and SR at MLP w/Audyssey turned off.
Once again thanks for looking.
post #222 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by JChin View Post


Yes using DM-A409 mic to play around for now tongue.gif.
Here is my last testing for this evening biggrin.gif.

LF, C, RF, SL and SR at MLP w/Audyssey turned off.
Once again thanks for looking.

 

I would say you have a pretty good handle on how to generate the frequency response graphs.  Now we need to get you a "real" mic so the measurements are more accurate.

post #223 of 2940
Earlier this evening, I tried using the Omnimic on REW.

Seems that it would work but loading the calibration file was problematic.

It doesn't use the file extention that REW is looking for. It has something like .omm

Would like to know if changing the file extention to .TXT would be enough for it to work correctly.

Does anyone know?

Does anyone know how to test it?
post #224 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimP View Post

Earlier this evening, I tried using the Omnimic on REW.

Seems that it would work but loading the calibration file was problematic.

It doesn't use the file extention that REW is looking for. It has something like .omm

Would like to know if changing the file extention to .TXT would be enough for it to work correctly.

Does anyone know?

Does anyone know how to test it?

I would be surprised if changing the file extension would work. Is it even a text file?

I'm not that familiar with the OM microphone. Does it work without a calibration file? If yes, you could always send the mic to Cross-Spectrum Labs and they can create a calibration file. That might cost as much as buying a REW-compatible mic, though.
post #225 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post


I think we should agree in this thread on certain standards for the graphs we publish.  My recommendations:

- Use 1/24 smooting for full-range graphs, and no smooting for graphs that focus on bass frequencies, say below 300Hz.
- Adjust vertical axis resolution so that the scale shows in 5 dB increments (I believe Jason made the same recommendation).
- Always include a full-range graph (20-20,000 Hz), as well as a graph that focuses on a problem range (e.g. bass frequencies 20-300 Hz).

Having said that, would you care to re-publish your averaged graph with 1/24 smoothing, rather than 1/3 smoothing?

Thanks.

Hi Jerry,

Well noted you recommendations, so here goes again with 1/24 smoothing for full-range.



Thanks.
Hey Feri, how's it going? BTW, just wanted to mention that the graph you ;posted above is still not 1/24 octave smoothing. It's still 1/3 octave smoothing. Not sure how you measured the graph or captured it, but the post below shows what a 1/24 octave smoothing graph looks like.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JChin View Post

testing eek.gif

BTW, here are two graphs of my own taken from the exact same measurement. Graph a) is the 1/3 smoothing graph
a.jpg 71k .jpg file

and graph b) is the 1/24 octave smoothing graph.
b.jpg 81k .jpg file





Max

P.S. personally, I prefer to use 1/6 octave smoothing for graphs to 20kHz and No smoothing for graphs focusing on the 5-250Hz range.

The same graph above with 1/6 smoothing


And a bass region only graph with No smoothing

Edited by djbluemax1 - 1/11/13 at 2:05am
post #226 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by JChin View Post

testing eek.gif

I think you may be driving the LFE channel (channel 4 on HDMI) as well as a full range channel? Only run channel 4 in isolation, the other channels include the sub due to AVR bass management.
Regards, Mike.

Edit, sorry didn't see the earlier relies.
Edited by AV_mike - 1/11/13 at 2:11am
post #227 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by AV_mike View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by JChin View Post

testing eek.gif

I think you may be driving the LFE channel (channel 4 on HDMI) as well as a full range channel? Only run channel 4 in isolation, the other channels include the sub due to AVR bass management.
Regards, Mike.

Edit, sorry didn't see the earlier relies.

 

I often find that when someone replies to a question that has already been answered, that the additional replies, being worded slightly differently or explained from a different perspective, can actually illuminate.

post #228 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyal Mellor View Post

With respect to frequency resolution, I'd suggest 1/3rd octave above 250Hz, and both 1/3rd AND a higher resolution (e.g. 1/12th or 1/24th octave) below 250Hz.

It all depends what you are trying to understand.

Generically speaking now....our ear's loudness summing is closer to a 1/3rd octave filter, individual resonance discrimination is closer to a 1/6th. 1/12th and higher are useful to understand center frequencies of dips and peaks for addressing room issues such as room modes and speaker boundary interference. But with too high a resolution you can't see the wood for the trees...

With all respect to AustinJerry, what Nyal says is pretty much the industry standard. My suggestion is follow that std so you can compare apples to apples outside of this thread.


Sent from my 32GB iPhone4 using Tapatalk
post #229 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post

I would be surprised if changing the file extension would work. Is it even a text file?

I'm not that familiar with the OM microphone. Does it work without a calibration file? If yes, you could always send the mic to Cross-Spectrum Labs and they can create a calibration file. That might cost as much as buying a REW-compatible mic, though.

I just renamed the .omm file and was able to open it in a text reader.

It looks fairly similar to a mic correction file with some added information.

I've asked John over at HTS to take a look at it.
post #230 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnbum88 View Post

HTS has some good tutorials and notes on what they like to see in graphs that get posted to them. I think it would be good to adopt their convention so there is some consistency for people that look at both forums. Thoughts?

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtbdudex View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyal Mellor View Post

With respect to frequency resolution, I'd suggest 1/3rd octave above 250Hz, and both 1/3rd AND a higher resolution (e.g. 1/12th or 1/24th octave) below 250Hz.

It all depends what you are trying to understand.

Generically speaking now....our ear's loudness summing is closer to a 1/3rd octave filter, individual resonance discrimination is closer to a 1/6th. 1/12th and higher are useful to understand center frequencies of dips and peaks for addressing room issues such as room modes and speaker boundary interference. But with too high a resolution you can't see the wood for the trees...

With all respect to AustinJerry, what Nyal says is pretty much the industry standard. My suggestion is follow that std so you can compare apples to apples outside of this thread.


Sent from my 32GB iPhone4 using Tapatalk

 

How about following the HTS guide, for compatibility?

post #231 of 2940
1st, thanks for all involved for putting this together. Now my issue, I have REW configured, and I can see all my channels, but for some reason I only can get to do one test tone, then I always get the below dialog box.

Capture.PNG 8k .PNG file


Sorry for the attachement, couldn't figure how to just get the message to show.


If I exit REW, go back in, I can do one test tone, then when I try another, I get the same message, any ideas?

Thanks
post #232 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post


How about following the HTS guide, for compatibility?

I am all for it, Keith. This is a good suggestion from Mike. The important thing is that we have consistency when sharing measurements.
post #233 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtbdevs View Post

1st, thanks for all involved for putting this together. Now my issue, I have REW configured, and I can see all my channels, but for some reason I only can get to do one test tone, then I always get the below dialog box.

Capture.PNG 8k .PNG file


Sorry for the attachement, couldn't figure how to just get the message to show.


If I exit REW, go back in, I can do one test tone, then when I try another, I get the same message, any ideas?

Thanks




I think I found the issue, not sure if this is the way its suppose to work, but after I do a test tone, my reciever(Onkyo TX-NR818), drops back to All Ch Stereo(which is why I recieved the sound card message). I have to wait till it goes back to Multich, then it works. It is suppose to drop out from the Multich mode?
post #234 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtbdevs View Post

I think I found the issue, not sure if this is the way its suppose to work, but after I do a test tone, my reciever(Onkyo TX-NR818), drops back to All Ch Stereo(which is why I recieved the sound card message). I have to wait till it goes back to Multich, then it works. It is suppose to drop out from the Multich mode?

It could easily be a HDMI handshake issue between your laptop and the Onkyo. Try to disconnect the HDMI cable and plug it in again. Check for a consistent Multi CH IN on the Onkyo display before measuring.

Also please make sure no other app in your laptop is active (media player, etc.) that can suck away resources from REW. Look into TaskManager to verify no such app is running in the background.

Hope this helps.
Edited by mogorf - 1/11/13 at 7:26am
post #235 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post

It could easily be a HDMI handshake issue between your laptop and the Onkyo. Try to disconnect the HDMI cable and plug it in again. Check for a consistent Multi CH IN on the Onkyo display before measuring.

Also please make sure no other app in your laptop is active (media player, etc.) that can suck away resources from REW. Look into TaskManager to verify.

Hope this helps.



Yes, it does. Thanks..
post #236 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtbdevs View Post

Yes, it does. Thanks..

When solved please come back with the solution. It will help others with same or similar issues for doing a quick troubleshooting.

Thank you. smile.gif
post #237 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post


How about following the HTS guide, for compatibility?

I am all for it, Keith. This is a good suggestion from Mike. The important thing is that we have consistency when sharing measurements.

Agreed. Very important.

post #238 of 2940

Well, I can't tell you how close I came today to jacking the whole REW thing in. I spent 5 hours getting it to work (I think it works) using my OmniMic for testing purposes. Even following the brilliant step-by-step guide Jerry is preparing it took me the best part of the day to get it working. There are just so many things to configure and fiddle with. Eventually I think I have it running - but there are still a few things that bother me and give me reason to wonder if I am actually configured properly. I won't go into them now as I intend to spend a little more time over the next few days on it. But Plug and Play.... well, it ain't.  By contrast, with OmniMic, I ran the s/w, plugged in the mic and started measuring.... now THAT is PnP.

post #239 of 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post

When solved please come back with the solution. It will help others with same or similar issues for doing a quick troubleshooting.

Thank you. smile.gif



I ended up re-installing all of my audio drivers, and that seems to have fixed it, I no longer get that dialog box, between taking test tones.

Next step is to try using my Audyssey Mic, and see what I can do with that.

Thanks.
post #240 of 2940
Can one use the mic that comes with the Omni-mic system with REW? I mean the OMM cal file is nothing more then a text file at its heart, at least right clicking it and editing it with Notepad++ shows it just like the Radioshack generic cal file that you can download for use the REW.

Am I off base here?

Bill
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Audio theory, Setup and Chat
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Audio theory, Setup and Chat › Simplified REW Setup and Use (USB Mic & HDMI Connection) Including Measurement Techniques and How To Interpret Graphs