Quote:
Originally Posted by HarddTimezz 
I agree with streamlining the offerings but my point was more along the lines of size offerings. For those of us wanting a highend plasma in a nice 50" size this Samsung is now the only player left standing! Panasonic has the S and ST midline but no VT or ZT. When I asked the question to a Panny insider they responded with the smaller sizes in flagship models were not profitable for them in the US and will only be available in Europe. Strange because I own a 46" pz850u and it wasn't that long ago that 50" was considered huge. I guess everyone lives in a 3000sqft home?

I agree with streamlining the offerings but my point was more along the lines of size offerings. For those of us wanting a highend plasma in a nice 50" size this Samsung is now the only player left standing! Panasonic has the S and ST midline but no VT or ZT. When I asked the question to a Panny insider they responded with the smaller sizes in flagship models were not profitable for them in the US and will only be available in Europe. Strange because I own a 46" pz850u and it wasn't that long ago that 50" was considered huge. I guess everyone lives in a 3000sqft home?
I think the point is there isn't much demand for high-end, smallish anythings. For what it's worth, the average American home is 2500-ish square feet. The average high-end TV buyer probably has a typically larger living space (although places like Silicon Valley and New York City will depress the square footage even while being expensive as hell).
High-end TVs are a small market to begin with. Small high-end TVs are a smaller market....
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarddTimezz 
This is exactly my point. For Panasonic to say there is no market for small sized flagships I feel is a terrible decision and shows they are out of touch with their customer. They couldnt sell any 65" vt50s until the price was cut in half! I was hoping for at least the VT60 in a 50" but no cigar! Samsung will get my money this time around as there are no other options except to brave the used market for a pioneer.

This is exactly my point. For Panasonic to say there is no market for small sized flagships I feel is a terrible decision and shows they are out of touch with their customer. They couldnt sell any 65" vt50s until the price was cut in half! I was hoping for at least the VT60 in a 50" but no cigar! Samsung will get my money this time around as there are no other options except to brave the used market for a pioneer.
I think you misinterpret how well the VT50 sold and how it was priced. I got one very early in the cycle for <$3000. A lot of people bought them on pre-order for much more here (and paid full retail at Best Buy much later).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speakerphile 
Panasonic sold quite a few 65VT50's well before the price was "cut in half"(BTW, not really in half). In addition to this, the 50GT50 wasn't flying off the shelf. I understand your frustration, but it wasn't some deliberate snub by Panasonic to screw you out of a smaller high-end set. The fact is, you are in the minority. High-end 50" sets just aren't in high demand. The Samsung might do somewhat well this year, but it's because it is the only one. There just wasn't enough demand for 3 of them.

Panasonic sold quite a few 65VT50's well before the price was "cut in half"(BTW, not really in half). In addition to this, the 50GT50 wasn't flying off the shelf. I understand your frustration, but it wasn't some deliberate snub by Panasonic to screw you out of a smaller high-end set. The fact is, you are in the minority. High-end 50" sets just aren't in high demand. The Samsung might do somewhat well this year, but it's because it is the only one. There just wasn't enough demand for 3 of them.
And this is exactly the point. The "high end + small" market is... small. It might well be large enough to satisfy one model from one mfr. in plasma and perhaps one or two LCDs as well... Beyond that, it probably doesn't exist.























