AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Plasma Flat Panel Displays › Samsung F8500 - new industry standard? [please use links to newer thread]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Samsung F8500 - new industry standard? [please use links to newer thread] - Page 11  

post #301 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarddTimezz View Post

I agree with streamlining the offerings but my point was more along the lines of size offerings. For those of us wanting a highend plasma in a nice 50" size this Samsung is now the only player left standing! Panasonic has the S and ST midline but no VT or ZT. When I asked the question to a Panny insider they responded with the smaller sizes in flagship models were not profitable for them in the US and will only be available in Europe. Strange because I own a 46" pz850u and it wasn't that long ago that 50" was considered huge. I guess everyone lives in a 3000sqft home?

I think the point is there isn't much demand for high-end, smallish anythings. For what it's worth, the average American home is 2500-ish square feet. The average high-end TV buyer probably has a typically larger living space (although places like Silicon Valley and New York City will depress the square footage even while being expensive as hell).

High-end TVs are a small market to begin with. Small high-end TVs are a smaller market....

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarddTimezz View Post

This is exactly my point. For Panasonic to say there is no market for small sized flagships I feel is a terrible decision and shows they are out of touch with their customer. They couldnt sell any 65" vt50s until the price was cut in half! I was hoping for at least the VT60 in a 50" but no cigar! Samsung will get my money this time around as there are no other options except to brave the used market for a pioneer.

I think you misinterpret how well the VT50 sold and how it was priced. I got one very early in the cycle for <$3000. A lot of people bought them on pre-order for much more here (and paid full retail at Best Buy much later).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speakerphile View Post

Panasonic sold quite a few 65VT50's well before the price was "cut in half"(BTW, not really in half). In addition to this, the 50GT50 wasn't flying off the shelf. I understand your frustration, but it wasn't some deliberate snub by Panasonic to screw you out of a smaller high-end set. The fact is, you are in the minority. High-end 50" sets just aren't in high demand. The Samsung might do somewhat well this year, but it's because it is the only one. There just wasn't enough demand for 3 of them.

And this is exactly the point. The "high end + small" market is... small. It might well be large enough to satisfy one model from one mfr. in plasma and perhaps one or two LCDs as well... Beyond that, it probably doesn't exist.
post #302 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by barth2k View Post

And what's with the 64"? They cheated me an inch! If you're going to deviate from the norm, give me an extra inch!

Did you forget about 63in plasmas? This is an extra inch from their old 63in models, hence the +1 moniker that the 51in also has.
post #303 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Plasma View Post

Yes, yes, it is almost review time !

Hey Chris what have you heard? F8500 being released soon?
post #304 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogo View Post

I think the point is there isn't much demand for high-end, smallish anythings. For what it's worth, the average American home is 2500-ish square feet. The average high-end TV buyer probably has a typically larger living space (although places like Silicon Valley and New York City will depress the square footage even while being expensive as hell).

High-end TVs are a small market to begin with. Small high-end TVs are a smaller market....
I think you misinterpret how well the VT50 sold and how it was priced. I got one very early in the cycle for <$3000. A lot of people bought them on pre-order for much more here (and paid full retail at Best Buy much later).
And this is exactly the point. The "high end + small" market is... small. It might well be large enough to satisfy one model from one mfr. in plasma and perhaps one or two LCDs as well... Beyond that, it probably doesn't exist.

I'm with you rogo but disagree the market is small. Imagine what choices you would have if Pioneer reintroduced the Kuro in 50" and an Oled was also available but only in 50" and both retailed at $2500 with the F8500 at 2k. I'm of the belief all three of these smaller sized highend units would outsell all those overpriced unreasonably large plasmas. My point is tvs need to decrease in size and return to high quality of build but I guess those days of quality electronics are long gone. Throw away tvs are here to stay.
post #305 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarddTimezz View Post

I'm with you rogo but disagree the market is small. Imagine what choices you would have if Pioneer reintroduced the Kuro in 50" and an Oled was also available but only in 50" and both retailed at $2500 with the F8500 at 2k. I'm of the belief all three of these smaller sized highend units would outsell all those overpriced unreasonably large plasmas. My point is tvs need to decrease in size and return to high quality of build but I guess those days of quality electronics are long gone. Throw away tvs are here to stay.


I would have guessed and hoped you were right about this, but I think the undeniable fact is that the market for a high quality 50 inch display is not large. The trump card here is that Panasonic has decided not to make them any more (not to disparage the st series...I have one). So, obviously a given tv manufacturer would be in the best position to decide if the market wants the, to make one based on previous years.

But, this is the F8500 thread and it will be interesting if there is enough support for the smaller version of this set. I'd imagine so, since options are limited. I'm interested in the larger size myself. smile.gif

I imagine we will be in a relatively similar situation once OLED has matured. OLED for $2500 at 50" isn't reasonable now, and they are only going to be available at 55" right now as far as i know, so I guess I didn't fully get your point.
Edited by skro - 2/24/13 at 7:37pm
post #306 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarddTimezz View Post

I'm with you rogo but disagree the market is small. Imagine what choices you would have if Pioneer reintroduced the Kuro in 50" and an Oled was also available but only in 50" and both retailed at $2500 with the F8500 at 2k. I'm of the belief all three of these smaller sized highend units would outsell all those overpriced unreasonably large plasmas. My point is tvs need to decrease in size and return to high quality of build but I guess those days of quality electronics are long gone. Throw away tvs are here to stay.

The market is vanishingly small. You're entitled to think whatever you wish, but the way it works is kind of like this.

Only 10% of TVs sold are 50" and up to begin with, perhaps that's up to say 20% in the U.S. Within that sub-category only about 10% of TVs sold are "high end" models. So basically, even in the U.S. only 2% of TVs sold are "high end TVs that are 50" and up."

Now, given varied living spaces, those will be distributed across 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 80, an 90" screen sizes. While the largest sizes have small volumes, we are talking a market that is very approximately 2% of something under 40 million sales annually. In other words, about 800,000 total TVs. The people buying "high end" models, however, will generally skew more expensive, so we might find that the total willing to buy an expensive 50" is perhaps just 10% of that 800,000 or 80,000 annually. With 5-6 models, no one finds the market very attractive. But the last guy making a plasma and the last 1-2 LCDs do find it attractive.

In general, the problem with high-end TVs is that. Each small slice is lucrative only if you find little competition. Making $1000 per set is great if you sell 100,000 sets. If you sell 10,000 however, it's a lot of effort for relatively little gain.
Quote:
Originally Posted by skro View Post


I would have guessed and hoped you were right about this, but I think the undeniable fact is that the market for a high quality 50 inch display is not large. The trump card here is that Panasonic has decided not to make them any more (not to disparage the st series...I have one). So, obviously a given tv manufacturer would be in the best position to decide if the market wants the, to make one based on previous years.

But, this is the F8500 thread and it will be interesting if there is enough support for the smaller version of this set. I'd imagine so, since options are limited. I'm interested in the larger size myself. smile.gif

I imagine we will be in a relatively similar situation once OLED has matured. OLED for $2500 at 50" isn't reasonable now, and they are only going to be available at 55" right now as far as i know, so I guess I didn't fully get your point.

I suspect eventually we'll see a smaller OLED to complement the 55" and a larger one too. And in the short one, the F8500 at multiple sizes ought to be nice for a lot of people. Just keep in mind that doesn't mean millions.
post #307 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinger View Post

Hey Chris what have you heard? F8500 being released soon?
Ya know Samsung usually releases early. PN64F8500 should be out in April.........
post #308 of 1868
Hmm...I just looked at the product images on OneCall's webpage and I'm left wondering- how does someone wall mount this panel? Based on the image of the rear of the set, it appears to lack any mounting holes. I'm guessing this is just a prototype image (& not the production model), but it seems odd.
post #309 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghettogreg View Post

Hmm...I just looked at the product images on OneCall's webpage and I'm left wondering- how does someone wall mount this panel? Based on the image of the rear of the set, it appears to lack any mounting holes. I'm guessing this is just a prototype image (& not the production model), but it seems odd.

It has standard mounting holes. I wouldn't worry about what you're seeing on OneCall. And I don't even see a "rear image" of the set, so I'm confused by your comments. I see a side image, which of course obscures the guts of the back, which is where the holes are located.

Perhaps they had some other image that they pulled since your post of what was allegedly the back?!?
post #310 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogo View Post

It has standard mounting holes. I wouldn't worry about what you're seeing on OneCall. And I don't even see a "rear image" of the set, so I'm confused by your comments. I see a side image, which of course obscures the guts of the back, which is where the holes are located.

Perhaps they had some other image that they pulled since your post of what was allegedly the back?!?

I still see the image on their product page (image 2 of 6)

post #311 of 1868
That cant be right, it doesn't apear to have air vents either
post #312 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by remush View Post

That cant be right, it doesn't apear to have air vents either

Nor any power or video connectors. It looks like an early mock up.
post #313 of 1868
The forum police got me with a warning for supposed non MSRP talk...REALLY.... I guess what they will be charging is less than MSRP off the bat, what company comes out with a bangin product and expect to sell it at a discounted price... oh yeah Samsung unilaterally prices their products now so there is really no deals until they say so...

So as I stated before in my post before they got deleted There is now info and specs and "MSRP" on Samsung.com on the F5300 and F4500. Also there is info and specs on the F8500 and their so called deal pricing off MSRP smile.gif and F5500 on (1 call .com) being one. Sorry for informing people on this forum so do not delete my posts.
post #314 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghettogreg View Post

Hmm...I just looked at the product images on OneCall's webpage and I'm left wondering- how does someone wall mount this panel? Based on the image of the rear of the set, it appears to lack any mounting holes. I'm guessing this is just a prototype image (& not the production model), but it seems odd.
Lets face it, if these where real pics of production units, they would be for sale wink.gif
post #315 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Plasma View Post

Ya know Samsung usually releases early. PN64F8500 should be out in April.........

April? Damn I thought we were looking at March and April for the Pannys? personally I'm interested in the 51"version..

As for the photos showing no mounting holes,I can't see any large flat panel tv not having the ability to be wall mounted, that's a pretty big market to ignore, I for one would go ST60 if that was the case but honestly I just can't see it..
post #316 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Plasma View Post

Ya know Samsung usually releases early. PN64F8500 should be out in April.........

April? Damn I thought we were looking at March and April for the Pannys? personally I'm interested in the 51"version..

As for the photos showing no mounting holes,I can't see any large flat panel tv not having the ability to be wall mounted, that's a pretty big market to ignore, I for one would go ST60 if that was the case but honestly I just can't see it..
post #317 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghettogreg View Post

I still see the image on their product page (image 2 of 6)

I'm guessing you see that in your cache or something. I don't see that image.
post #318 of 1868
I'd like to get a calibtrated 60" version to upgrade from my non calibrated LG 55LHX. Should be a pretty good upgrade I would think.
post #319 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinger View Post

April? Damn I thought we were looking at March and April for the Pannys? personally I'm interested in the 51"version..

As for the photos showing no mounting holes,I can't see any large flat panel tv not having the ability to be wall mounted, that's a pretty big market to ignore, I for one would go ST60 if that was the case but honestly I just can't see it..

Samsung is probably in march, only if something happened and they needed to delay the launch for another month.
post #320 of 1868
Confirmed, the TV will have h.265 (aka HEVC) embedded!

Link:
http://www.samsung.com/uk/f8500plasmatv/
post #321 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slickman View Post

I'd like to get a calibtrated 60" version to upgrade from my non calibrated LG 55LHX. Should be a pretty good upgrade I would think.
You have a nice set there, but you are right, nice upgrade indeed wink.gif
post #322 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gradius2 View Post

Confirmed, the TV will have h.265 (aka HEVC) embedded!

Link:
http://www.samsung.com/uk/f8500plasmatv/

Actually it was confirmed when it was announced. Though pretty cool feature, not sure how much use it will get though as it will take a while for it catch on. It will be interesting to see when streaming services start to move to this, hopefully we will be able to stream Blu-Ray quality video in the next few years.

http://global.samsungtomorrow.com/?p=21335
post #323 of 1868
How many HDMI inputs in the 8500? The upper end Panasonic's have only three.
post #324 of 1868
per early specs the 8500 will have 4 HDMI inputs...
post #325 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Plasma View Post

You have a nice set there, but you are right, nice upgrade indeed wink.gif

I know who to call when I want to get it too. wink.gif
post #326 of 1868
Onecall is clearly using the B2B materials provided by Samsung and this is a shot of a cosmetic mock-up. Mount is VESA 400x400. As stated, there will be 4 HDMI inputs.
These will be in the hands of legit authorized dealers the third or fourth week of March.
post #327 of 1868
Just read on another site that the F8500 will start shipping on March 18.
post #328 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by TWD View Post

Just read on another site that the F8500 will start shipping on March 18.

Nice, eagerly waiting some real hands on reviews..
Samsung"s claims about this TV are truly setting the bar quite high and boy do I hope they reach them... Luckily for me I've already narrowed down my 2 choices for my next TV down to the 51F8500 or 50" ST60, seeing Panny already said to expect very little PQ difference between the ST50 & ST60 comparisons between the F8500 and ST50 should be available soon after March 18th smile.gif
post #329 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinger View Post

Nice, eagerly waiting some real hands on reviews..
Samsung"s claims about this TV are truly setting the bar quite high and boy do I hope they reach them... Luckily for me I've already narrowed down my 2 choices for my next TV down to the 51F8500 or 50" ST60, seeing Panny already said to expect very little PQ difference between the ST50 & ST60 comparisons between the F8500 and ST50 should be available soon after March 18th smile.gif

My guess is the F8500 will clearly beat the ST60, edge out the VT60 and be very, very close to the ZT60. I still think the ZT60 will edge the F8500 out in MLL, but other areas might be different.
post #330 of 1868
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHir View Post

My guess is the F8500 will clearly beat the ST60, edge out the VT60 and be very, very close to the ZT60. I still think the ZT60 will edge the F8500 out in MLL, but other areas might be different.

Did you get a chance to see the ZT60 and F8500 at CES? If so, please share your other observations and comparisons. Thx.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Plasma Flat Panel Displays
This thread is locked  
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Plasma Flat Panel Displays › Samsung F8500 - new industry standard? [please use links to newer thread]