I spent some time reading the manual, the German thread, and Fritz's shootout review.
It seems like a lot of people on the thread were waiting for this guy, Fritz, to do his "in-depth" review/comparison. However, it's a rather basic review. He didn't even calibrate the projectors. FYI, they say he is a big fan of the BenQ W1070.
Essentially, Fritz comes to the conclusion that the Acer & BenQ are about the same noise level with comparable modes, therefore, the Acer is quieter. Why? The Acer's low mode produces 2400 lumens which is better than the BenQ's highest mode thus, for a noise to lumen ratio the Acer wins.
The Acer is significantly brighter however, because it has an RGBCYW wheel it has a blue hue out of the box — some claim that the white segment may also decrease contrast. He didn't bother to correct for this issue before doing screen shots. . .
He also seems to get SBS 3D incorrect. He states it can do full SBS in 1080p but the manual states otherwise — it's just like the BenQ according to the manual. However, it does have 2D to 3D conversion. The BenQ 3D glasses need to be 144Hz while the Acer are 120Hz, thus 144Hz glasses are backward compatible.
The throw ratio and zoom for each are identical.
Fritz, in his comparison, states that the Acer had some "flicker" in bright fast scenes (at least that's what I gathered). However, others on the thread state they have not seen this issue at all, nor any judder. They are both using TI Dark Chip 3.
Acer claims that their new "colorboost II" technology increases saturation and gives better colors all around. Well, if you look at Fritz's screen shots it's clear that out of the box there is a blue hue to the Acer. However, the Acer does seem to have better color saturation out of the box — look at the screen shot of the bird. However, this may be due totally to the lack of calibration! HOWEVER, now that I think about it. He does own the W1070, so he may have it somewhat calibrated????
The fact that Fritz did NOT calibrate or make any adjustments to the projectors pretty much makes his review-comparison mute. About all we can gather from his comparison is that the Acer is brighter, similar fan noise level, and just as sharp as the BenQ W1070.
Thus. . .
They are pretty much the same with the following exceptions:
Really can't make any other conclusions because no calibration was done, and not data testing.
However, the people who have purchased it on the German thread are generally happy with it.
Fritz's conclusion that the BenQ is the better projector for home theater use and the Acer is the better one for living room/all-around seems a bit off to me. The W1070 if a living room projector, thus if it is beat at it's own game then pushing it to a new category doesn't really work IMO. It's like saying, 'the Acer bests the BenQ but I need a way to say the BenQ is better than the Acer.'
However, since he didn't correct for the color issues we really have no way of knowing which one is truly better for living room or home theater situations.
I'm considering the Acer because the BenQ doesn't seem to be as bright as I expected. I don't see any increase in brightness when I change the lamp modes. In fact ecosmart is generally the brightest mode, and if I toss in anything near projectorreviews.com calibrated settings it is way to dark even in a completely dark room. And that's on a 84' screen. I don't think I'm getting anywhere near 1700 lumens "calibrated" like projectorreviews got. However, I'm hesitant about the RGBCYW wheel — don't know if they are more likely to produce rainbow effect or not, and if it really will remain brighter after calibration because the white is artificially bumping the lumen rating. . .
It seems like a lot of people on the thread were waiting for this guy, Fritz, to do his "in-depth" review/comparison. However, it's a rather basic review. He didn't even calibrate the projectors. FYI, they say he is a big fan of the BenQ W1070.
Essentially, Fritz comes to the conclusion that the Acer & BenQ are about the same noise level with comparable modes, therefore, the Acer is quieter. Why? The Acer's low mode produces 2400 lumens which is better than the BenQ's highest mode thus, for a noise to lumen ratio the Acer wins.
The Acer is significantly brighter however, because it has an RGBCYW wheel it has a blue hue out of the box — some claim that the white segment may also decrease contrast. He didn't bother to correct for this issue before doing screen shots. . .
He also seems to get SBS 3D incorrect. He states it can do full SBS in 1080p but the manual states otherwise — it's just like the BenQ according to the manual. However, it does have 2D to 3D conversion. The BenQ 3D glasses need to be 144Hz while the Acer are 120Hz, thus 144Hz glasses are backward compatible.
The throw ratio and zoom for each are identical.
Fritz, in his comparison, states that the Acer had some "flicker" in bright fast scenes (at least that's what I gathered). However, others on the thread state they have not seen this issue at all, nor any judder. They are both using TI Dark Chip 3.
Acer claims that their new "colorboost II" technology increases saturation and gives better colors all around. Well, if you look at Fritz's screen shots it's clear that out of the box there is a blue hue to the Acer. However, the Acer does seem to have better color saturation out of the box — look at the screen shot of the bird. However, this may be due totally to the lack of calibration! HOWEVER, now that I think about it. He does own the W1070, so he may have it somewhat calibrated????
The fact that Fritz did NOT calibrate or make any adjustments to the projectors pretty much makes his review-comparison mute. About all we can gather from his comparison is that the Acer is brighter, similar fan noise level, and just as sharp as the BenQ W1070.
Thus. . .
They are pretty much the same with the following exceptions:
- Acer has 2D to 3D conversion
- Acer is brighter (~30%), thus noise level is technically quieter — same level with more lumens. Acer low is brighter than BenQ highest.
- Acer claims a slightly longer lamp life.
- BenQ has 12v trigger.
- BenQ ISF color settings
- BenQ has small amount of vertical lens shift — mine causes the upper part of the image to slightly blur when used.
- BenQ 3D uses 144Hz which might produce a smoother/less flicker image.
- Acer uses a RGBCYW wheel and Benq uses RGBRGB — lots of arguments about this all over the web.
Really can't make any other conclusions because no calibration was done, and not data testing.
However, the people who have purchased it on the German thread are generally happy with it.
Fritz's conclusion that the BenQ is the better projector for home theater use and the Acer is the better one for living room/all-around seems a bit off to me. The W1070 if a living room projector, thus if it is beat at it's own game then pushing it to a new category doesn't really work IMO. It's like saying, 'the Acer bests the BenQ but I need a way to say the BenQ is better than the Acer.'
However, since he didn't correct for the color issues we really have no way of knowing which one is truly better for living room or home theater situations.
I'm considering the Acer because the BenQ doesn't seem to be as bright as I expected. I don't see any increase in brightness when I change the lamp modes. In fact ecosmart is generally the brightest mode, and if I toss in anything near projectorreviews.com calibrated settings it is way to dark even in a completely dark room. And that's on a 84' screen. I don't think I'm getting anywhere near 1700 lumens "calibrated" like projectorreviews got. However, I'm hesitant about the RGBCYW wheel — don't know if they are more likely to produce rainbow effect or not, and if it really will remain brighter after calibration because the white is artificially bumping the lumen rating. . .



























.....
