or Connect
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › sealed sub or ported sub?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

sealed sub or ported sub? - Page 2

post #31 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ak Gara View Post

But is that at the expense of frequencies NOT at the targeted port frequencies?

It is. As mentioned each has their trade offs.
post #32 of 35
Beeman

No doubt about that. My thought was to get all the info out there, then we could explain things as questions pop up. There are more than a couple people chiming in on this thread that have a lot more epxerience than I do, may as well put it to good use!

Short answer, like Bill said - if the sub is well designed, it will sound good!
post #33 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kamikaze13 View Post

The general consensus would be that for typical setups, for movie watching ported is the way to go and tends to be more boomy/have more output/more punch and for music sealed is preferred.

Spewing technical data just confuses the matter.

Nuts rolleyes.gif
post #34 of 35
Whether or not their are scientific studies to back up one or the other, i don't know. But to my ears, for movies I prefer a good ported setup over a good sealed setup and for music I prefer a good sealed setup over a good ported setup. Hence why in my car I have a sealed sub setup and in my Living room I have a ported sub. Both subs are great at both movies and music, but the ported just brings out more magic with movies to me. As doing the sealed sub for music.
post #35 of 35
Quote:
But is that at the expense of frequencies NOT at the targeted port frequencies?
Quote:
It is. As mentioned each has their trade offs.
It is if you're running the sub well below the box tuning frequency. But if you're not there is no trade off.
The quibbling over which is better for what is just that, quibbling, and is usually the case the more vociferous the quibblers the less likely they are to actually understand what they're quibbling about.
Quote:
Hence why in my car I have a sealed sub setup and in my Living room I have a ported sub.
There is a reason why you might have that preference, it's called Cabin Gain. The smaller the listening space the higher the low frequency cabin gain, which would make a sub with flat response in a large room too bottom heavy in a car. To compensate for that you can use a small sealed sub, one that would be very shy in the lows in a large room, but with the cabin gain of a car it's just right. This JBL data sheet shows response of the GTO 1014 driver in a small sealed box both in and out of a car:
http://www.jbl.com/resources/Brands/jbl/Products/ProductRelatedDocuments/en-US/BoxesandParameters/GTO1014TD.pdf

It also shows vented and bandpass boxes in and out of the car; the sealed is best, despite being the smallest of the three. But one can't draw any finite conclusion from this one case, other than how a sub will work is a product of the driver specs, the box and the room you're using it in. Use another driver with different specs and the results will also be different.
Designing a sub is like juggling three balls, as you have to consider the driver specs, the cabinet, and the listening room it's intended to be used in. You may end up vented or sealed, or with something else entirely. But what you don't consider is the program material, only how low and how loud you need it to go, and how to get that with the driver being used.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › sealed sub or ported sub?