AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Why are JTR speakers more popular than Seaton Sound speakers?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Why are JTR speakers more popular than Seaton Sound speakers? - Page 3

post #61 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post

Humm, good point on the brand loyalty thing ...
Again, it's all about intent and I intended to be rude so ... in the immortal words of 43, Mission Accomplished ... smile.gif

As to the rest blah blah blah Salk, blah blah blah biased. smile.gif

Yes, clearly you intended to be rude, because put simply you're a rude individual who intentionally goes on attack when challenged, even when you're wrong. You should be ashamed of yourself.

As to the rest blah blah blah, blinded by JTR bias, blah blah blah, can't argue the facts so resorts to: blah blah blah. smile.gif
post #62 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post

The reality is I will probably have these speakers for the rest of my life.
Thats the statement I have been looking for. You truly do have the best speakers out with the HE design. It does not get any better. It someone says something else is better be skepitical. At this level there is no better just different. once you have all your equipment together with sometime you will no longer wonder if you have the best b/c the sound will be obvious.wink.gif
I look forward to hearing your impressions about 6 months from now.smile.gif
Chris
post #63 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by countryWV View Post


Thats the statement I have been looking for. You truly do have the best speakers out with the HE design. It does not get any better. It someone says something else is better be skepitical. At this level there is no better just different. once you have all your equipment together with sometime you will no longer wonder if you have the best b/c the sound will be obvious.wink.gif
I look forward to hearing your impressions about 6 months from now.smile.gif
Chris

Well, I keep liking them more and not less so I can only guess what I'll be saying in 6th months. You guys are going to be sick to death of me going on about these....
post #64 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post

Well, I keep liking them more and not less so I can only guess what I'll be saying in 6th months. You guys are going to be sick to death of me going on about these....
Nah, we won't. I (we) love hearing about individuals finding their dream speaker. I expect your honeymoon period to last a long long time, especially with all the new music you'll (we'll) be discovering and sharing (which has already started). smile.gif
post #65 of 114
As a designer (and not having listed to JTR or Seaton) I would tend to favor Mark's approach. With these drivers DSP is certainly the best way to go with much greater flexibility than a passive system. Being able to tune the room with adjusting the DSP is a big plus as well.
post #66 of 114
Carp,
you will eventually hear some speakers that will be better but the problem will be price and then you will say not worth it!
post #67 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by MKtheater View Post

Carp,
you will eventually hear some speakers that will be better but the problem will be price and then you will say not worth it!

Ha!! I would have said that about the Noesis too! I knew their price before hearing them so I figured there was NO way I would consider buying them. Once I heard them I was desperately trying to talk myself out of buying them - it didn't work.

You're right though, this really is my price bracket limit for speakers. There is no way I could go to the next tier, whatever that is - 10 grand? Whatever it is I could never do it.
post #68 of 114
I will go out on a limb and say anywhere from $10k to $20k per pair. RMK! had expensive well respected speakers and likes the Noesis better, I assume. He mentioned before he liked certain things better on his revels but that was comparing the 12's.
post #69 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Craig View Post

As a designer (and not having listed to JTR or Seaton) I would tend to favor Mark's approach. With these drivers DSP is certainly the best way to go with much greater flexibility than a passive system. Being able to tune the room with adjusting the DSP is a big plus as well.


Sounds like the April GTG will be a worth the trip just to get some perspective.

Looking forward to hearing your Line Arrays and meeting you in April my good sir!
post #70 of 114
I've heard the Cat 12's and a few submersives, they are extremely great, theres no doubt about it. When I was thinking about upgrading my T12's I had only 3 company's in mind, JTR, Seaton Sound and Danley. I couldn't bring myself to buy anything Danley because of how narrow my room is (would likely be a nightmare) and the fact I've never head anything from them. The Seaton Cat 12's would have been right up my ally if not for the fact they are powered. I don't want self powered speakers in my HT ( I like buying amps and changing gear). If Mark made a passive version? I'd be all over it. I'd be willing to bet he's loosing a ton of customers just for that one reason, plus It's a huge pain in the but to put up wall plugs for surrounds etc. (if you had to wire them in in an already finished room) If Mark had a rack mountable DSP to go along with his speakers for the xover, and give the user the amp choise instead of built in to each speaker, I think he could reach a entire segment he's not currently targeting (or at least, not reaching). I'm sure he's got his reasons for not doing so and of course thats great, I'm simply looking at it from my eyes as a customer of HT gear and it's of course it's only my opinion. He's always been very helpful on the forums and of course makes amazing gear. Who knows, maybe in the future.

As for JTR. I knew the sound, Jeff although slow at responding to emails etc, is always great to talk to and has always been willing to make me custom speakers he doesn't offer. Thats the kicker for me. The willingness to help someone out and get exactly what they want/need to make things work for them. I love my Noesis but I will never keep them forever. I like changing stuff to much to keep anything too long. I like to think I'm a companys dream guy. I will buy anything new to try out and will usually go though a certain line of speakers before moving on to something else. (I've done the entire paradigm line from monitor's to Sigs. Entire PSB line from alpha to platinum, etc. I just like to monkey around. No wonder, as of yesterday I've just finished my 59th DIY sub smile.gif Though I've kept my Mal-x 21's and FTW 21's the longest of any speaker I've ever owned. If Jeff comes out with line better than the Noesis, I'd also be all over it smile.gif

of course the price also has a lot to do with it, Seaton vs JTR as most people already have amps.
post #71 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by N8DOGG View Post

*** I couldn't bring myself to buy anything Danley because of how narrow my room is (would likely be a nightmare) ***.

Actually, a speaker with a narrow horizontal pattern is exactly what one wants in a narrow room.
post #72 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by N8DOGG View Post

I've heard the Cat 12's and a few submersives, they are extremely great, theres no doubt about it. When I was thinking about upgrading my T12's I had only 3 company's in mind, JTR, Seaton Sound and Danley. I couldn't bring myself to buy anything Danley because of how narrow my room is (would likely be a nightmare) and the fact I've never head anything from them. The Seaton Cat 12's would have been right up my ally if not for the fact they are powered. I don't want self powered speakers in my HT ( I like buying amps and changing gear). If Mark made a passive version? I'd be all over it. I'd be willing to bet he's loosing a ton of customers just for that one reason, plus It's a huge pain in the but to put up wall plugs for surrounds etc. (if you had to wire them in in an already finished room) If Mark had a rack mountable DSP to go along with his speakers for the xover, and give the user the amp choise instead of built in to each speaker, I think he could reach a entire segment he's not currently targeting (or at least, not reaching). I'm sure he's got his reasons for not doing so and of course thats great, I'm simply looking at it from my eyes as a customer of HT gear and it's of course it's only my opinion. He's always been very helpful on the forums and of course makes amazing gear. Who knows, maybe in the future.

As for JTR. I knew the sound, Jeff although slow at responding to emails etc, is always great to talk to and has always been willing to make me custom speakers he doesn't offer. Thats the kicker for me. The willingness to help someone out and get exactly what they want/need to make things work for them. I love my Noesis but I will never keep them forever. I like changing stuff to much to keep anything too long. I like to think I'm a companys dream guy. I will buy anything new to try out and will usually go though a certain line of speakers before moving on to something else. (I've done the entire paradigm line from monitor's to Sigs. Entire PSB line from alpha to platinum, etc. I just like to monkey around. No wonder, as of yesterday I've just finished my 59th DIY sub smile.gif Though I've kept my Mal-x 21's and FTW 21's the longest of any speaker I've ever owned. If Jeff comes out with line better than the Noesis, I'd also be all over it smile.gif

of course the price also has a lot to do with it, Seaton vs JTR as most people already have amps.

Mark wouldn't care less that he is "loosing a ton of customers", he can barely keep up with demand as it is. It's not his goal anyway as he has already said. If his objective was to make passive speakers he would.
As for turning over equipment well I've turned my fair share over also and as I said previously, now I have Cat 12c's I never have to bother with that again. From the sounds of things your equipment turnover seems more like a necessary thing you need to do to satisfy your consumerism (the actual spending money, getting new goods, get the buzz from new goods, buzz wears off, repeat process) rather than the ultimate goal of arriving at audio nirvana and being satisfied.
Anyway your last paragraph sums it up.
post #73 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by DS-21 View Post

Actually, a speaker with a narrow horizontal pattern is exactly what one wants in a narrow room.

I meant the actual size of the speakers. Getting the surrounds setup properly in my room would not be fun lol.
post #74 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy4daisy View Post

Mark wouldn't care less that he is "loosing a ton of customers", he can barely keep up with demand as it is. It's not his goal anyway as he has already said. If his objective was to make passive speakers he would.
As for turning over equipment well I've turned my fair share over also and as I said previously, now I have Cat 12c's I never have to bother with that again. From the sounds of things your equipment turnover seems more like a necessary thing you need to do to satisfy your consumerism (the actual spending money, getting new goods, get the buzz from new goods, buzz wears off, repeat process) rather than the ultimate goal of arriving at audio nirvana and being satisfied.
Anyway your last paragraph sums it up.

Geez man, get your panties in a bunch did you?
post #75 of 114
Haha so I wasn't the only one to think the same thing. That response seemed a litte harsh, but with almost all text, emails and typed replies they can always just come across that way.
post #76 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Seaton View Post


It was a choice I knew would limit sales, but delivered a superior product.

They are also key parts of what provide the resulting performance. I would never suggest that I wouldn't design and offer a passive speaker, but that's not what I wanted to found and anchor my company with.

Quote:
Originally Posted by N8DOGG View Post


If Mark made a passive version? I'd be all over it. I'd be willing to bet he's loosing a ton of customers just for that one reason,

of course the price also has a lot to do with.

Quote:
Originally Posted by N8DOGG View Post

Geez man, get your panties in a bunch did you?

Maybe you should take over the running of Seaton Sound, show them the "right" way to do things lol? smile.gifsmile.gif
post #77 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy4daisy View Post



Maybe you should take over the running of Seaton Sound, show them the "right" way to do things lol? smile.gifsmile.gif

Or better yet he could get you to be his PR man for Seaton and really drive up sales rolleyes.gif
post #78 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy4daisy View Post

As for turning over equipment well I've turned my fair share over also and as I said previously, now I have Cat 12c's I never have to bother with that again. .
Best to leave predicting the future to the fortune tellers. tongue.gif If you live long enough then even you will kiss your Cat 12s good bye in favor of something else. smile.gif
Never could be a long time. wink.gif
Chris
Edited by countryWV - 1/16/13 at 5:37am
post #79 of 114
We all enjoy life, HT, etc... in different ways. As long as you enjoy this hobby, it doesn't matter how you do it. Some like to find bargains and hang on to them...some like to try new equipment...there is no right answer except if the end result is your enjoyment, then you have succeeded.
post #80 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by countryWV View Post


Best to leave predicting the future to the fortune tellers. tongue.gif If you live long enough then even you will kiss your Cat 12s good bye in favor of something else. smile.gif
Never could be a long time. wink.gif
Chris

Lol, best to leave the predicting to the fortune tellers you say, and then you predict I will get rid of my Cats one day, I take it you are a fortune teller then? Lmao smile.gif
post #81 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy4daisy View Post

Lol, best to leave the predicting to the fortune tellers you say, and then you predict I will get rid of my Cats one day, I take it you are a fortune teller then? Lmao smile.gif
It was purposely worded that way. I am glad to see you understand. wink.gif See if you can pull any meaning out of it. (It's in the contradiction) If not at least you got to Lyao.tongue.gif
Chris
Edited by countryWV - 1/16/13 at 7:04am
post #82 of 114
I can't believe I missed this thread lol. I own Seaton Cat 12Cs for LCR and have 2 Submersive HPs so I'll give my "un-biased" opinion rolleyes.gif They da best. The end.

lol just kidding. In all honesty, I enjoy them a lot, I think they are fantastic speakers with all the headroom I could ever want. I knew they were going to sound good based on everything I've read, but didn't think they would sound THIS good. The imaging is fantastic TO ME. In the crappy room they are in right now, I can pinpoint vocalists and do get that 3 dimensional sound field. I can localize some sounds to the speakers, but the room they are in is horrible with highly reflective surfaces everywhere, and the speakers have to be placed close to the wall in the particular set up. They will soon (within the next month, hopefully) be moved to a dedicated theater room in the basement which will have modest acoustic treatments done. Still, I wouldn't call the room "ideal" but it's head and shoulders above the acoustic nightmare they are in now. When I move them to the dedicated room, I plan on writing a thorough review. I didn't want to right a review right when I bought them, one reason being because of the room, and I also wanted to own them for some time before I wrote a review. But I am very impressed with them so far. The subs are particularly impressive. I'll give more details when I write my review
post #83 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdevil77 View Post

I can't believe I missed this thread lol. I own Seaton Cat 12Cs for LCR and have 2 Submersive HPs so I'll give my "un-biased" opinion rolleyes.gifThey da best. The end.

Had you said "they da best EVAR!!!!" it would have been much more believable wink.gif
post #84 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by MKtheater View Post

I will go out on a limb and say anywhere from $10k to $20k per pair. RMK! had expensive well respected speakers and likes the Noesis better, I assume. He mentioned before he liked certain things better on his revels but that was comparing the 12's.
Your assumption is correct ... smile.gif

My goals for the sound I wanted evolved and getting my room to a certain point acoustically was job one. It was only through a process of elimination (brief demos but more often, ownership) that my desire for the high efficiency designs emerged. Despite spending crazy amounts of money on them, the limitations imposed by many of the speakers and subs I owned (Revels included) left me unsatisfied. I found the JTR's to have less of these limitations.

For me, the Noesis sound better than the Triple 12's. The Catalysts are a different design but again in terms of dynamics and sound quality I think they are excellent. Prior to Noesis, the Cats were tops in SQ but lacking a certain visceral quality of the Triple 12's. IMHO, the Noesis equal or eclipse the Cats in SQ and, are better dynamically than the Triple 12's.

Honestly, I could happily live with either the Cats or Noesis but the Noesis is the devil I know. Trust me if something significantly better comes along and the price is right ... I am all over it ...
Edited by RMK! - 1/16/13 at 1:35pm
post #85 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frohlich View Post

Had you said "they da best EVAR!!!!" it would have been much more believable wink.gif

They are mo betta then da best EVA!!!! lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post

Your assumption is correct ... smile.gif

My goals for the sound I wanted evolved and getting my room to a certain point acoustically was job one. It was only through a process of elimination (brief demos but more often, ownership) that my desire for the high efficiency designs emerged. Despite spending crazy amounts of money on them, the limitations imposed by many of the speakers and subs I owned (Revels included) left me unsatisfied. I found the JTR's to have less of these limitations.

For me, the Noesis sound better than the Triple 12's. The Catalysts are a different design but again in terms of dynamics and sound quality I think they are excellent. Prior to Noesis, the Cats were tops in SQ but lacking a certain visceral quality of the Triple 12's. IMHO, the Noesis equal or eclipse the Cats in SQ and, are better dynamically than the Triple 12's.

Honestly, I could happily live with either the Cats or Noesis but the Noesis is the devil I know. Trust me if something significantly better comes along and the price is right ... I am all over it ...

I'd love to hear the Noesis or even the triple 12s for that matter. Not because I'm looking to replace my beloved cats of course, I'd just love to hear them.
post #86 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdevil77 View Post

They are mo betta then da best EVA!!!! lol
I'd love to hear the Noesis or even the triple 12s for that matter. Not because I'm looking to replace my beloved cats of course, I'd just love to hear them.

You should try and catch that GTG in Pennsylvania in April. As I recall, the Catalyst's and Noesis will be there plus some other interesting speakers. Also, I think Mark is going and if you haven't me him, he is a great guy and very smart. smile.gif
post #87 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post

You should try and catch that GTG in Pennsylvania in April. As I recall, the Catalyst's and Noesis will be there plus some other interesting speakers. Also, I think Mark is going and if you haven't me him, he is a great guy and very smart. smile.gif

Jeff is coming as well (IIRC).
post #88 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy4daisy View Post



Maybe you should take over the running of Seaton Sound, show them the "right" way to do things lol? smile.gifsmile.gif

post #89 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post

You should try and catch that GTG in Pennsylvania in April. As I recall, the Catalyst's and Noesis will be there plus some other interesting speakers. Also, I think Mark is going and if you haven't me him, he is a great guy and very smart. smile.gif

When is this and where in PA??? If I'm free and able to go and it's not TOO far, I'll definitely try to go! I'd love to meet Mark and Jeff also, as well as many others on here that are as "crazy" as me about this stuff
post #90 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdevil77 View Post

When is this and where in PA??? If I'm free and able to go and it's not TOO far, I'll definitely try to go! I'd love to meet Mark and Jeff also, as well as many others on here that are as "crazy" as me about this stuff

Details can be found here:
http://www.avsforum.com/t/1446450/ne-spring-speaker-shootout-gtg-date-poll-and-discussion

Hope you can go. I would love to but it's 2000 miles and a bad week for me ...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Why are JTR speakers more popular than Seaton Sound speakers?