I'm ready to migrate my 6TB of media storage to a dedicated server. It's mostly movies, music and pictures which will be accessed by two XBMC clients in the house. I will also store some documents on there which I'd like to be able to access from any computer on the network or even remotely.
I've already built the server which is based on a mini-ITX Intel board with G540 Celeron. Yesterday I installed Windows 7 Pro (had a spare copy) and was able to access the files on the server from my other Window's PC's and XBMC boxes using Workgroups sharing function.
With regards to Data Protection I'll be buying Flexraid to protect from a disk failure and then backing up any important docs to the cloud (eg. crashplan).
Still - I'm wondering if I ought to ditch Win 7 and go with WHS 2011 which so many of you seem to be using.
Part of me feels I'm using Win 7 in a way in which it was not designed and WHS would be "better" but I'm not sure why.
Can anyone explain what benefits I'd get from WHS over Win 7?
Thanks
I've already built the server which is based on a mini-ITX Intel board with G540 Celeron. Yesterday I installed Windows 7 Pro (had a spare copy) and was able to access the files on the server from my other Window's PC's and XBMC boxes using Workgroups sharing function.
With regards to Data Protection I'll be buying Flexraid to protect from a disk failure and then backing up any important docs to the cloud (eg. crashplan).
Still - I'm wondering if I ought to ditch Win 7 and go with WHS 2011 which so many of you seem to be using.
Part of me feels I'm using Win 7 in a way in which it was not designed and WHS would be "better" but I'm not sure why.
Can anyone explain what benefits I'd get from WHS over Win 7?
Thanks














