Quote:
Originally Posted by Ph8te 
^^ This......The Kuro will always be brought up due to its performance and rave reviews, I think what people are looking for is a measured black level set that will match or go lower than the Kuro......Every year we see pots and speculation on if a TV will come close or beat it, every year we find for some reason the black level is not met......Some people have moved on and are happy, others have decided to wait so that when measured by tools they ahve a TV they can say beats out the Kuro as well as offer them something visualy that will be superior to thier current set.......
Of course the above post will probably be looked as a trolling post becasue I agree with rogo on certain things.....

^^ This......The Kuro will always be brought up due to its performance and rave reviews, I think what people are looking for is a measured black level set that will match or go lower than the Kuro......Every year we see pots and speculation on if a TV will come close or beat it, every year we find for some reason the black level is not met......Some people have moved on and are happy, others have decided to wait so that when measured by tools they ahve a TV they can say beats out the Kuro as well as offer them something visualy that will be superior to thier current set.......
Of course the above post will probably be looked as a trolling post becasue I agree with rogo on certain things.....
I think people are absolutely convinced here that absent a "black level" that doesn't match/exceed some 5-year-old TV, the newer TV is inferior. That's definitely the case. What's less clear to me for a long time is how that one element of performance -- which really only applies in a dark room -- has become the only thing on which a display is judged. It'd be like judging a car solely on skidpad performance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubbleboyjones 
But the relevant part is every year there has been improvements in TV PQ for the remaining plasma manufactures. The goal is to keep a balance on keeping the cost low enough to move the sets while offering quality something that Pioneer seemed to have failed at.
Seriously could anyone dream of getting the PQ of an 2012 Panny 55” ST set back in 2008 for under $1,500?

But the relevant part is every year there has been improvements in TV PQ for the remaining plasma manufactures. The goal is to keep a balance on keeping the cost low enough to move the sets while offering quality something that Pioneer seemed to have failed at.
Seriously could anyone dream of getting the PQ of an 2012 Panny 55” ST set back in 2008 for under $1,500?
I believe my 2006 50" Panasonic was top end, $2200, a total steal at the time (Costco special when they still got top-of-the-line models). So no, not really is your answer.

Quote:
See and this kind of "whatever-speak" is exactly what I'm talking about. "I have concluded this product is bad because I do not like the choices made by the product manufacturer. So even though your McLaren outperforms my Ferrari on the skidpad, I have deemed it unworthy because it uses too much carbon fiber."
Quote:
Don't enter kuro threads.
This could easily be flipped around so I've deleted all the loaded language from the quote posted. Don't enter non-Kuro threads to talk about your obsolete display. Now, obviously this thread is a Kuro thread so the admonition doesn't apply here.



















Also, certain PQ components have a more significant weight when it comes to perception (which is obviously lessened by certain viewing environments) of overall PQ, with black level being near the top of the list thanks to its direct responsibility in contributing to the contrast ratio, which itself is more important than resolution and color reproduction.



